Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
MASTER OF ENGINEERING
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
(ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING)
SUBMITTED BY
Kumar Chauhan, University Roll No. 13991 in the requirement for the
dissertation has not been submitted in part or full in any other university
(Dr. S. K. Singh)
Professor and Head
Department of Civil &
Environmental Engineering
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
1.1 General 1
1.2 The objective & need of present study6
2.1 Introduction 9
2.2 The issues regarding water quality of river Yamuna 11
2.3 Standards 16
6.1 Conclusions 74
6.2 Recommendations 75
References 78
Introduction
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
1
Introduction
North West of Yamunotri, hot springs at the latitude 310 2’12’’ N and
longitude 780 26’10’’. Arising from the source, the river flows through
series of curves and rapids for about 120 km to emerge into Indo-
Gangetic plains at Dak Patthar in Uttranchal. At Dak Patthar the river
water discharge is regulated through a weir & diverted into a famous Sikh
religious centre Paonta Sahib (Himachal Pradesh) and reaches
Hathnikund in Haryana where the major part of river water is diverted, no
water is allowed to flow in the river, downstream to Hathnikund barrage.
The river is almost dry in some stretches between Hathnikund and Delhi.
Downstream of Hathnikund the river regain water from ground water
accrual and contributions of feeding canals and small tributaries etc.
From Hathnikund the river sluggishly meanders and reaches Delhi at
Palla after traveling a distance of about 224 km.
2
Introduction
3
Introduction
4
Introduction
5
Introduction
6
Introduction
river in Delhi reach, Religious activity like Purnima Snan, Chhath Pooja,
Murty viserjan, disposal of domestic of Residual mortal remains of dead
bodies and disposal of domestic pooja/yagyan remains are having large
impact on the pollution of river due to heavy population density in Delhi.
Besides this jhuggi dwellers residing in the bed & on the bank discharge
their all kinds of waste for daily uses they also become the carrier of
infectious diseases.
7
Introduction
8
Chapter 2: Literature Review
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
9
Chapter 2: Literature Review
quantity of treated and untreated sewage (about 3300 MLD) was being
discharged into the river. The self-purification capacity of the River
Yamuna is due to lack of minimum flow in the river and heavy discharge
of 22 drains (treated and untreated) waste in river Yamuna. Even though
Delhi constitutes only 2% of the catchments of the Yamuna basin, yet it
contributes 80% of the pollution load.
10
Chapter 2: Literature Review
The present concern for surface water quality has made it necessary
for engineers and planners to predict the distribution of pollutants
discharged into the river. There is a need to study, analyse and predict the
important water quality and quantity vector so that it does not fall below
acceptable level. The natural direction and current human actions
unfortunately have not been conductive to enhance the environmental
state of river basin.
The issues related with water quality of Yamuna River are described as
follows:
11
Chapter 2: Literature Review
12
Chapter 2: Literature Review
13
Chapter 2: Literature Review
14
Chapter 2: Literature Review
losses, the Delhi’s share of Yamuna water transported through WYC and
added back into the river through Drain No.2. All this leads to stagnation
of water and formation of dry zones in the drainage area of the river. Non
availability of fresh water hampers the purification capacity of the river
and causes increase in concentration of pollutants in the river water.
Yamuna is the largest tributary of river Ganga and the main source
of fresh water is Northern India. Originating from Himalayas, its total
length is 1.376 km covering a catchments area of 366.220 km2 besides
15
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2.3 STANDARDS
16
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Though numerous attempts have been made to clean it, the efforts have
proven to be futile. The main reasons for this is due to high density of
population living in Delhi, the dumping of untreated water and solid waste in
to it (mostly illegally), the lax attitude of the government and mismanagement
of projects focused at cleaning it. Also the water in this river remains stagnant
for almost 9 months in year aggravating the situation.
17
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Water of the Yamuna River in the capital is not fit for drinking
even after treatment of disinfection, as reported by the Central Population
Control Board (CPCB). As per the CPCB’s best use classification, the
quality of water in the river in the stretch between Wazirabad and Okhla
was class E, which meant the water was only suitable for irrigation,
industrial cooling and controlled waste disposal. However, the quality of
water as it entered the city at Palla till Wazirabad, from where industrial
activity and dense settlements began, was classified C, indicating it was
suitable for drinking after conventional treatment and disinfection.
18
Chapter 2: Literature Review
TABLE 2.2: Primary Water quality criteria for designated best use classes
Designated-Best
use Class of
Criteria
water
19
Chapter 3: Methodology
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 METHODOLOGY
a) PH Meter
b) DO Meter
DO:- DO was found with the help of DO meter. DO meter gives direct
values by dipping DO electrode in the sample. In the raw water, the level
20
Chapter 3: Methodology
COD:- COD was found by taking sample (1ml) and distilled water
(1ml) in two different vials and acid reagent (1ml) and potassium
dichromate (1.5ml) and then properly mixed. Then the vials were put
in the incubation unit for 2 hours at 150 Degree Celsius. Then after
cooling COD was found with the help of spectrometer. This test is used
for finding out the amount of oxygen required for the chemical
oxidation of organic matter existing in the water, and it involves the
use of strong oxidant like Pottassium Dichromate under the acidified
condition of solution, this test gives an idea about the magnitude of
pollution existing in the domestic and industrial waste waters.
Therefore the purpose of this test is more or less same as the BOD test.
But this test fails to specifically differentiate between the biological
degradable organic matter and biological inert organic matter and
therefore BOD & COD test cannot be correlated directly. However the
21
Chapter 3: Methodology
principal merits associated with COD test in that it takes much short
time as compared to BOD test.
TDS:- TDS was found with the help of electronic balance, oven etc.
Total Dissolved solids, as the name suggests, gives the quantity of
dissolved solids and in the lab, it is measured quickly & automatically
22
Chapter 3: Methodology
23
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
CHAPTER 4
QUALITY OF WATER OF RIVER YAMUNA AT DELHI
During the past few decades the water quality of the river Yamuna
has been degraded. It has been found that 22 km Delhi stretch of River
Yamuna from downstream Wazirabad barrage to Okhla barrage is most
polluted stretch of River followed by Agra stretch. There is drastic
change in Yamuna River water quality from Palla (upstream) to
Niazamuddin old bridge and upstream Okhla barrage at Agra Canal as
revealed by the water quality data. At Agra, the BOD ranged between 4
to 43 mg/I with annual average of 20 mg/I whereas Total coliform ranged
between 2.1x106 to 17.1x107 Nos./100ml. This indicate that the river
water quality is not confirming the Total Coliform standard i.e. 5000
Nos/100 ml at most of the locations. The main reasons of pollution in the
river is the significant discharge of domestic and industrial waste water
from urban centers and over-extraction of river water for drinking and
irrigation purposes.
24
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
TABLE 4.1: Water Quality in River Yamuna During 1990-1998 and 2002
Year
Parameter Location
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 2002
PH PALLA 8.1 8.21 8.00 8.1 8.4 8.0 8.31 8.2 8.22 8.38
OKHLA 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.8 7.5 7.4 8.15 7.64
DO PALLA 8.46 8.1 7.1 7.3 6.9 9.0 9.3 7.5 10.50 9.9
OKHLA .3 2.3 0.0 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.2 1.3 5.80 4.7
BOD PALLA 3.00 3.10 3.30 3.60 2.30 2.70 3.10 2.30 2.00 4.00
OKHLA 22.6 25.6 19.0 37.5 49.7 15.0 18.2 16.0 12.0 21.0
COD PALLA 11.50 12.60 10.20 10.90 8.30 18.20 49.20 9.50 20.00
OKHLA 69.5 58.2 57.0 108.5 87.0 49.2 72.1 61.5 70.00
25
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
Year
Parameter Location
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 2002
FC PALLA 1505 3435 1580 795 193 3944 2901 743 750 6400
OKHLA 165710 188900 190210 40450 204250 184967 76136 273875 174000 260000
NZB - * - - - 9.19 - - -
WT PALLA 24.3 23.6 24.2 23.6 23.0 23.6 26.2 25.8 26.8
OKHLA 24.8 24.2 24.0 23.2 23.6 24.6 26.5 26.3 26.5
AMM PALLA 0.21 0.2 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.20
OKHLA 6.8 7.2 3.8 7.4 8.1 7.7 13.3 8.3 8.2
SOURCE: CPCB,2000
NOTE
NZB : Nizamuddin Bridge
Do : Dissolved Oxygen, mg/1
FC : Faceal Coliform, No./100ml.
BOD : Biochemical Oxygen Demand, mg/1
TKN : Total Kjeldahal Nitrogen, mg/1,
COD : Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/1
WT : Water Temperature, Degree Celsius
TC : Total Coliform, No./100 ml
AMM : Ammonia, mg/1
26
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
Monitored location
Water Quality
Agra canel/
S. No Parameters Standard Nizamuddin /
Palla Okhla Barrage
for ‘C’ Class Bridge
u/s)
Bio-chemical Min 1 4 5
Total Coliform
4. 5000 Min 400 500000 101000
Nos./100 ml
27
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
sewer while only 523 of the 567 unauthorized but regularized colonies
have sewers. Almost all i.e. 1639 unauthorized colonies have no sewers,
so this is the reason behind environmental degradation of river Yamuna.
28
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
Location
COD BOD DO Total coliform Faecal
Water quality pH
S. No. (mg/I) (mg/I) (mg/I) (MPN/100 ml) Coliform
criteria 6.0-9.0
- 3(max) 4(min) 5000 (MPN/100 ml)-
(‘C’ Class)
Surghat
2. (Down stream of 7.4 36 5 7.5 90000 26000
Wazirabad Barrage)
River Yamuna at
Khajori Paltoon Phool
3. 7.7 328 70 Nil 19000000 7200000
(Downstream
Najafgarh Drain).
River Yamuna at
4. 7.6 128 25 Nil 21000000 260000
Kudesia Ghat
River Yamuna at
6. 7.5 60 19 Nil 9000000 2100000
Nizamuddin Bridge
29
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
River Yamuna at
Khajori Paltoon Phool
3. 7.4 136 25 Nil 2400000 9500
(Downstream
Najafgarh Drain).
River Yamuna at
4. 7.5 80 20 3.2 910000 30000
Kudesia Ghat
River Yamuna at
6. 8.0 44 13 1.8 6500000 11000000
Nizamuddin Bridge
30
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
Total
Location COD BOD DO
pH coliform Faecal Coliform
S. No. Water quality criteria (mg/I) (mg/I) (mg/I)
6.0-9.0 (MPN/100 (MPN/100 ml)-
(‘C’ Class) - 3(max) 4(min)
ml) 5000
River Yamuna at
Khajori Paltoon Phool
3. 7.5 128 40 Nil 9300 2300
(Downstream Najafgarh
Drain).
River Yamuna at
4. 7.8 44 16 1.8 110000 4300
Kudesia Ghat
River Yamuna at
6. 7.6 48 14 3.4 91000 3600
Nizamuddin Bridge
31
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
River Yamuna at
4. 7.4 60 14 Nil 110000 44000
Kudesia Ghat
River Yamuna at
6. 7.1 40 16 Nil 27000 20000
Nizamuddin Bridge
32
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
Surghat
2. (Down stream of 8.0 40 8 8.3 15000 4300
Wazirabad Barrage)
River Yamuna at
Khajori Paltoon Phool
3. 7.6 356 95 Nil 110000 46000
(Downstream
Najafgarh Drain).
River Yamuna at
4. 7.9 120 26 Nil 21000 44
Kudesia Ghat
River Yamuna at
6. 7.7 104 20 Nil 35000 27000
Nizamuddin Bridge
33
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
Surghat
2. (Down stream of Wazirabad 7.8 28 4.4 5.1 9100 2800
Barrage)
River Yamuna at
6. 8.2 140 30 Nil 110000 46000
Nizamuddin Bridge
34
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
River Yamuna at
4. 7.1 120 22 Nil 36000 11000
Kudesia Ghat
River Yamuna at
6. 7.3 84 22 Nil 91000 23000
Nizamuddin Bridge
35
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
36
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
37
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
38
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
39
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
40
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
41
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
42
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
8.2
7.8
pH
7.6
7.4
7.2
6.8
6.6
Sep -11 Jan - 12 Mar - 12 Jul - 12
Figure 1.74.8:
Figure - Variation of pH atofdifferent
Variation pH at Seasons
different Seasons
43
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
160
BOD (mg/l)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Sep -11 Jan - 12 Mar - 12 Jul - 12
Location : River
Location: Yamuna
River at Khajori
Yamuna Paltoon
at Khajoori
Phool(Downstream Najafgarh Drain).
Pontoon Bridge (D/S Najafgarh Drain)
Figure 1.84.8:
Figure - Variation of BODofatBOD
Variation different
atSeasons
different Seasons
44
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
1
0.9
DO (mg/l)
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Sep -11 Jan - 12 Mar - 12 Jul - 12
Location
Location:: River Yamuna
River at KhajoriPaltoon
Yamuna at Khajoori
Phool(Downstream NajafgarhDrain).
Pontoon Bridge (D/S Najafgarh Drain)
45
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
46
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
47
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
48
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
49
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
50
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
51
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
52
Chapter 4: Quality of Water of River Yamuna at Delhi
53
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
CHAPTER 5
CONTROL MEASURES FOR
POLLUTION OF RIVER YAMUNA
54
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
55
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
56
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
57
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
5.3.1 The Yamuna River bed in Delhi is right now only being used as
a canal to transport Delhi’s sewage to Agra Canal.
58
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
High powered committee put forward various short term & Long term
measures. Among them were the follows:
The canal meant to divert sewage of Delhi to Agra Canal (and not
use Yamuna Bed for it as it is doing now) is simply missing. As a result
the near pondage of sewage waters between the Wazirabad and the Okhla
Barrage for almost 9 months of the year results on one hand in creation of
59
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
a delusion of the river still being in place in the city but on the other
results in avoidable pollution of ground water with toxic elements.
60
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
FIGURE 5.2: Najafgarh drain Swirl under a bridge on the way to River Yamuna
61
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
62
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
63
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
64
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
65
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
(c) The High Powered Committee (HPC) has had four meetings and
suggested a number of measures to be taken up on short-term and
long term basis in order to maintain a minimum flow of 10 cumecs
in river Yamuna for maintenance of river ecology.
(d) The spirit of the Supreme Court High Powered committee measure
of maintaining 10 cumecs on its river bed throughout is not visibly
fruitful yet. Most of Yamuna’s river bed remains dry for months.
The provisions made for 10 Cumecs of natural fresh water to be
maintained throughout simply are not yielding result.
66
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
(e) In a recent order the Allahabad High Court (dated January 12, 2011 in
PIL no.4003 of 2006 in the matter of Ganga Pollution Vs. State of UP
and Others) has said that from any river, not more than 50% of
available water should be diverted and rest should be allowed to remain
in the river. This principal needs to be applied in case of Yamuna at
every location, but particularly at the Hathnikund barrage.
67
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
a) It shall allow the River bed of River yamuna to remain free to all
pollution, all year round. When a Basic Ecological Flow is allowed
to flow on its bed, it shall flow free of most contaminations that are
now poured into it. Additionally, the canal shall also drastically
lower the amount of Natural Fresh Water Flow required to
maintain the Ecological balance of the River as there will be little
need for dilution.
68
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
The Prime Minister of India, in his address to the First Core Group
of Central Ministers and State Chief Ministers on prices of Essential
Commodities on April 8, 2010 emphasized that Punjab and Haryana
farmers needs to take up rice under SRI cultivation in right earnest when
he said, “Punjab and Haryana farmers showed the way in adopting
intensive, HYV based agriculture some forty year ago. They have to do it
again through reduced water use, through better agronomic practice like
the System of Rice Intensification method of rice cultivation”.
69
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
5.4.4. Stop Shahdara Drain, Hindon Cut and other drains to flow
into Yamuna and redirect them for irrigation or other uses.
70
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
All the above measures among others shall surely help bring Back
River yamuna to the people of India. Yamuna is as old as India is old. It
has already existed forever. No development can last longer than forever.
As part of a timeless civilization, the river Yamuna, other than being
traditional water resources, is also a cultural icon and is worshipped as a
goddess in Indian Culture. A little inquiry into ancient Indian scriptures,
rituals, art forms, traditional vocation, festivities or even the National
Anthem shall vividly bring forward the esteem and glory that this Grand
River holds, even in present times.
71
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
Najafgarh (25 km), Supplementary (15 km) and Shahdara (10 km)}
to intercept sewage flowing in their subsidiary small drains and
conveying to the nearest Sewage Treatment Plants for treatment to
ensure that only treated sewage is discharged into drains. Cost of
this project is Rs.1800 cr.
(iii) Intercepting 13 small drains into Bela Road and Ring Road Trunk
sewer after rehabilitation.
a) Both the river as well as the major drains would be protected and
would not carry any untreated effluent.
c) The sewage from more than 1500 unauthorized colonies and other
unsewered areas, including rural village and JJ Clusters would be
trapped before it is permitted to reach all the major drains. This
72
Chapter 5: Control Measures for Pollution of River Yamuna
d) Since new STPs would only be put up after the capacity of the
existing underutilized STPs is fully utilized, it would have a
positive impact on the cost factor also.
73
Chapter 6: Conclusions and Recommendations
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 CONCLUSIONS
74
Chapter 6: Conclusions and Recommendations
6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
75
Chapter 6: Conclusions and Recommendations
76
Chapter 6: Conclusions and Recommendations
77
References
REFERENCES
9. Sholz, g., Vanlarhoven, j., et.al, 2002, Managing for river health
integrating water and community participation. Jr. water science
technology, 45 (11), 209-213.
10. Sharan, Nidhi Kumar, Bipul and Sen, P.K. 1997, An attempt to
correlate BOD and COD of a Municipal Swage treatment plant –A
case study. Indian j. Environmental Protection, 17 (80), 610-612.
78