Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Introduction
In the Gospel of we come across the command of Jesus: "Go and make all nations my
disciples (Mt. 18:19-20) The church from its very origins has been missionary in nature
because it founder our Lord Jesus Christ came into the world to fulfill God plan/mission of
salvation of all humanity. The sole aim of Jesus was to proclaim this Good News and to
establish the 'reign of God' on earth. Jesus called for a 'renewal of ones self' or 'conversion of
heart' for one to become a part of the kingdom of God. After the Pentecost event the mission of
Christ was continued by his disciples. We can see in the early church the disciples proclaiming
the good news with great zeal. Paul, Thomas and Bartholomew traveled to far ends of the earth
to spread the good news. Later on the European colonizers brought in the missionaries along
with them to spread Christianity to their colonies. But the focus of these missionaries now quite
different from what Christ preached 'conversion of heart and coming back to God' had taken a
backseat and was now replaced by 'conversion to Christianity.' History shows us the
missionaries showed scant respect to the new religions and cultures that they encountered.
People were uprooted from their tradition and culture and the western culture was imposed upon
them. In a way they shared the colonial mentality of the imperialist rulers.
If we read the gospels carefully we notice that all the four evangelist had different
interpretation of the mission command of Jesus. They understood and proclaimed the good news
to address the problems that arose in the context and situation in which they lived. Today it
would be a great mistake to apply the text or understand the message in the same manner as two
thousand years ago. There is a vast difference between the two thousand-year-old primitive
Jewish society, which consisted of simple tribal people with little advancement in religion,
philosophy or science and the world today and especially India. The evangelist did not
encounter religions of the east when the proclaimed the universality and supremacy of
Christianity in Asia Minor and Europe. And therefore our whole approach of evangelization has
to be different in the context of the Far East and India in particular. Before we determine our
different approach toward India we need know the Indian context and how it differs from the
west.
2. The Indian Context
The church's missionary activity and its missionary goal were determined up to a large
extent by its theology. Prior to the Vatican Council II the church was ecclesio centric and hence
it was believed that anyone staying outside the church could not partake in eternal life and
'saving souls' became the only missionary goal of the church. After the Vatican Council II our
theology was mainly Christo-centirc the church acknowledged that salvation was possible even
to those outside the church, yet even for these salvation came only through Christ who is
considered to the one and only source of eternal life.
"The Saviour wills all men to be saved. Those who, through no fault of their own do not know the
Gospel of Christ or his church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, moved by grace try to do his
will through the dictates of their conscience" (LG16)
"The church …. Is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is mediator and the way of salvation." (LG14)
The church or even Christ as the only means of salvation is not well received by many
people today. Jacob Kavunkal says: It is a claim of uniqueness for Jesus Christ and the Church,
denying the salvific value of other religions, which makes church's mission objectionable to
other religions in Asia (Kavunkal: 292). Even though it is clear according to the N.T. that a
Christian must believe that Jesus Christ is the only mediator, we must refrain from making such
claims of uniqueness in a religiously pluralistic context. We should learn to respect salvific
values of other religions and at the same time preserve the true missionary vocation. In E.A.
mission is still anchored on salvation. It fails to realize the ground realities in Asia. (Kavunkal:
299)
The council of Florence (1438-45) says All those outside the church will go to hell. This
teaching of the council has simply been discarded. Pope Nicholas I claimed that such a teaching
was against the Divine and Natural Law. (Saldhana 1997: 410 )
Jesus Christ is the Son of God is a faith statement made by Christians and hence it is normative
for Christians all over the world. But to make it an absolute statement in matter of revelation is
to ignore the reality of the other and his religious traditions. Claims for the uniqueness of Jesus
by quoting the scriptures, which have relevance only for the Christians, means nothing for the
people of other faith. In the early Church the Fathers of the Church had to deal only with the
pagans and tribals; they were never challenged with great religions like Hinduism and Buddhism
which professed their own and unique ways of attaining salvation (Moksha/Nirvana). The
dogmas of yesteryears have served their purpose. As Cardinal Dopfner says, we certainly
cannot apply them to this age in their original formulation. They surely need to be reinterpreted;
especially exclusivist dogmas and doctrines which show no respect to the reality of other rich
religious faiths. Otherwise in this age of dialogue and inter-faith communion we could be
termed as a bunch of fundamentalist who are adamant to assert and force their revelation on
others. (Schoonenberg, 1971: 33)
J. Ratzinger makes the following remark in one of his books:
"For modern consciousness, the certainty that God's mercy transcends the bounds of the lawfully
established church is an evidence of such elementary force that there really is no longer any problem with it at all.
This renders all the more questionable a church that for a millennium and a half, not only tolerated its own claim to
be the unique way to salvation, but has elevated it to an essential element of its self-understanding, and seems to
have made it part of its very faith."
1. Today communication technology, media and fast means of transportation has made
the world a small place or a 'global village' as many call it. What is said and done in one corner
of the world at a moment becomes news throughout the world the very next moment. We
interact with hundreds of people every day who belong to different culture, caste, religion and
even nationalities.In such a world we cannot afford to live as we did before - engaged in a world
of our own thinking nothing is better than my religion or culture. Healthy relationships with
others and a respect for their beliefs and traditions are imperative.
2. Today we seriously need to rethink our theology and our doctrinal statements that our
ancestors have promulgated. People today are apprehensive of accepting books as infallible and
submit unconditionally to men who claim to speak in the name of God. Many disagree that
revelation is limited only to the Bible. The theology of revelation, which has already produced
such a great variety of models in the course of the centuries, must undertake yet another radical
adaptation in our own day. (Dulles: 'Revelation Theology' pg. 175-177 as cited in
Bulhmann:202) Today there is a need for us to seriously rethink our Christo-Centric theology
and be open minded to a Theo-Centric theology
3. Today being religious mean being Inter-Religious, hence our attitude has to be of
mutual respect and enrichment. We need to geniuenly respect the positive elements in other
religions. As the great thinker J. Neuner says: No one is ever saved by any religion, we are
saved by God alone who touched our human hearts in many ways ( Neuner: pg. 27) One fails to
understand how serious the church is about Inter- Religious Dialogue when it promulgates
documents like Dominus Iesus.. Hence it is essential to be careful also about the kind of
language we use in the formulation of doctrines and encyclicals. Today we are caught with old
ideals of missiology. Saving the whole world from damnation is still our approach. We need to
accept that even people of other faith can be saved by God even if they do not profess their faith
in Christ.
4. Carrying out the mission requires "a truly local church which is truly indigenous and
inculturated. It shares in the life of the people their aspirations, and traditions of the people."
The First Plenary Assembly of the FABC stated " The primary focus of our task of
evangelization then, at this time in our history, is the building up of a truly local church." ( Class
Notes ). For this we need to get rid of our western image. But things seem to be going in the
opposite direction today, the Roman Curia is trying its best to stamp its authority on the local
churches by curtailing their autonomy.
5.In Asia the challenge before the church is to rethink its old missiological approach. In
the past the church grew very strongly in the west America and Europe because the church
entered fully into the culture of the people. Unfortunately the church has become too much
western. Today when the Pope talks of repeating the success story of evangelization of the west
in the East (E.A. 11) There are many things he overlooks. The church like the west could
neither destroy nor penetrate the great cultures of east. Therefore in the east the church has to
understand its mission anew. Past formulas won't work now. Modern world does not accept
conceptual dogmas like Christ being one and only saviour of the world. Our mission has to deal
with the concrete life situation of the people. Also our multi-religious and secular society does
not admit monopolies. (Neuner 2000:540)
Evangelization is the mediation, or transmittal, of the gospel, of Shalom ( and so evangelization could be called
"shalomization".) of the good news, of salvation, of a hope and meaning for life. And therefore it needs no further
justification. Such an offer speaks for itself. Every sincere man and woman will welcome it, for God himself has
created the human being as a being who, unlike the brute beast, is a 'salvation seeker' Evangelization is not the
outgrowth of the free initiative of some dynamic group of human beings whom God has chosen. The initiative is
Be one with the struggles of the people. A starving and an oppressed man should not be
promised pie in the sky after he dies while his earthly life is miserable.
6. Conclusion
The purpose of our evangelization always needs to be aimed at building a new human society.
based on the values of the gospel. We should always look to the future with a new outlook
Bishop Patrick D'souza : - There is no return to the past neither to past mission theories, nor to
the past mission methods, nor to the past mission goals.
According to In de Groot: "Israel is the opening word in God's proclaiming salvation, not the
Amen." In choosing Israel as segment of all humanity, God never took his eye off the other
nations; Israel was a minority called to serve the majority. ( "Contemporary Missiology An
Introduction" J Verkuyl, Eerdmans Publishing Michigan 1978. Pg 91
According to M. Mueller 'the worst heresy is to hold that God had revealed himself to one
people alone, to the Jews."
BIBILIOGRAPHY
Bulhmann W. (1982) "The Chosen People", St. Paul's Publication, Middlegreen - England
Saldanha J. (1984) "Missiological Studies in India" Indian Missiological Review, pg. 176
Saldanha J. (2006) "Mission Today Themes and Issues" Cleratian Publication - Bangalore