MISSING 13TH AMENDMENT TO CONSTITUTION

In my humble opinion; the neglect of the “Original Organic Constitution dated

1787”, is evidence of our demise and corruption in the courts, to wit, I see little we
can do about it, especially due to the modification and omissions of the “missing
Thirteenth Amendment”. We can attempt legal remedy in the courts, but what do
you expect a corrupt court to do except protect it's own position. We the People may
very well need to resort to brute force to take back what is ours or give it up
completely, if the courts should disregard our attempt to restore the “Republic for
which it stands”. . .

what is next and who will lead the charge? Rod Class? To date I have not heard of
him winning in court with his excellent works. He is truly making a valiant effort,
and I commend him on his brilliant fight on “THEIR” turf, where judges referee
and attorney (lawyers, counselors at law) preside over the “common man” . . .

The only place where a man can set himself apart is on the battlefield, where the
true strength of mind and body conspire to preserve ones own beliefs and survival;
anything else is a fiction created by legislators, attorneys, congressmen, and those
who would benefit from titles of nobility at the expense of your rights and freedoms.

The Original Thirteenth Amendment

Ratified March 12, 1819
The Founders held an intense disdain and distrust of "Nobility" as a result of a long
history, during Colonial times, of abuses and excesses against the Rights of Man and the
established Common Law and Constitutions by the "Nobility", and therefore placed in
the new Constitution two injunctions against acceptance of Titles of Nobility or Honor or
emoluments from external sources. The Revolutionary War for Independence was
primarily waged to eliminate these abuses and excesses of the "Nobility" and the
"Monied Classes" from the life of the Nation, recognizing the Equality of all men.

As there was no penalty attached to a title of nobility or honor in the Constitution

as originally ratified, the Original Thirteenth Amendment was proposed in December of
1809 to institute penalty for accepting or using a "Title of Nobility or Honor" to set
oneself apart from, or superior to, or possessing of any special privileges or immunities
not available to any other citizen of the United States, and to eliminate the widespread
use of "emoluments" as bribery and graft of the legislatures and judiciary used to
further the causes and positions of "Special Interests". It was an attempt to keep
politicians and civil servants "Honest" in their service to the citizens.

As noted in the discussion in Article 1 of the Constitution, the original

Thirteenth Amendment, was ratified in 1819, adding a heavy penalty upon any
person holding or accepting a Title of Nobility or Honor, or emoluments from
external powers by making that person "cease to be a citizen of the United

1
States" and "incapable of holding any Office of Trust or Profit under the United
States". This Amendment was proposed, properly ratified, and was a matter of
record in the several States archives until 1876, by which time it was quietly, and
fraudulently deleted, never repealed, during the period of Reconstruction after the
Civil War and the presently acknowledged Thirteenth Amendment was
substituted. The original records of the
original 13th amendment were thought to be destroyed at the time of the
burning of the capitol during the War of 1812, but have since been found in the
archives of the British Museum, the national archives and in the archives of
several of the States and territories. The fact of its existence had been lost to
memory until, by chance, researchers discovered in the public library at Belfast,
Maine an 1825 copy of the U. S. Constitution. Subsequent research shows that it
was in the records of the ratifying states and territories until 1876, the last to drop
it from record was the Territory of Wyoming after 1876. The most intriguing
discovery was the 1867
Colorado Territory edition which includes both the "missing" Thirteenth
Amendment and the current 13th Amendment, on the same page. The current
13th Amendment is listed as the 14th Amendment in the 1867 Colorado edition. –
See Images CO1868-1, CO1868-2, CO1868-3, CO1868-4, and CO1868-5.
Located on this site; http://www.barefootsworld.net/consti12.html

Amendment on the same page. The current 13th Amendment is listed as

the 14th, the current 14th amendment is omitted, and the current 15th
Amendment is in proper place. See Images WY1876-1, WY1876-2, WY1876-3
- See Ref. "Thirteenth Amendment Publication Table"

For further discussion and the history of the Original Thirteenth

Amendment see "Demon of Discord, Ratification and Suppression of the Original
Thirteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States."

On December 3, 1860, the month after Lincoln was elected, President

Buchanan asked Congress to propose an "explanatory amendment". It was to be
another 13th Amendment, to eradicate and cover-up the deletion of the Original
Thirteenth Title of Nobility and Honour Amendment. This proposed amendment,
which would have forever legalized slavery, was signed by President Buchanan
the day before Lincoln took office.

Under the Constitution of 1787 all sworn judges and officers are properly
seated and are de jure Officers properly functioning in proper Offices.

Under the Constitution of 1871 all sworn judges and officers are
not properly seated and are de facto officers improperly functioning in
"Mob Rule" fictional offices, under vi et armis, under the corporate state of
Washington, District of Columbia, a ten mile square (actually, a 68 square
mile) Foreign Country, whose states are Guam, Puerto Rico, American

2
Samoa, the Virgin Islands, etc., etc.

THE MOST SIGNIFICANT difference between (1) the Original,

Organic, Constitution for the united States of America adopted in 1787,
and (2) the Constitution adopted for the “Act of 1871”, being the
Constitution of the United States of America, is the obvious changes in
the Amendments, such changes being, not subtle, but extreme and
contrary. Secondarily, the Preface to the Original Organic Constitution for
the united states was, exactly that, a Constitution (contract) for the newly
formed states of the Republic. The latter (1871) Constitution of (belonging
to) the United States is a corporate charter for the now defunct federal
government.

These changes, on the surface, may seem insignificant, however,

once the definition of the “changed” word (term) in question is examined,
you’ll find a MAJOR, yes, even catastrophic to society, difference. Please
pay close attention to the next two (2) brief statements.

From Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition, 1891 (active in the time
frame of the “Act of 1871”), the definition of the word “for” is; “For. In
French Law. A tribunal. Le for interieur, the interior forum; the tribunal of
conscience.” (Emphasis added.)

From Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition, 1891, the definition of the
word “tribunal” is; “tribunal. The seat of a judge; the place where he
administers justice; a judicial court; the bench of judges.”

Logic concludes that if a judge (or, any/all other officer(s)) has not
taken an Oath to uphold the Original, Organic, Constitution for the united
States of America, he is UN-SEATED!! Remember, the latter (1871
edition) Constitution is not “for” the Union of States, but rather “of”
(belonging to – a possession of). Also, keep in mind, that the latter
Constitution was initiated as a Charter for a Commercial Corporation, an
enterprise for gain and profit!

We know (from history) that the latter Amendments to the

Constitution are different than the earlier Amendments. The original
document, at Amendment 13, specifically denies any holder of Title of
Nobility (T.O.N.A., Titles Of Nobility Act) to any access of the Public Trust,
Citizenship, etc., while the “superimposed” document prevents private
ownership of slaves and the actions of involuntary servitude at
Amendment number 13.

Thus, we are observing some vast differences, originating well after

the established fundamentals of law had been in place for over one
hundred years. Other differences of a similar nature have effectively

3
 placed the unknowing, living man into a position of bondage, involuntary
servitude, and slavery.

This constitutional study could easily fill volumes by itself . . . –

The Constitution (1st or 2nd) requires who's justice to be served? One is of

the people, the other of corporate greed.

Consider the TWO (2) constitutions, the “Original Organic Constitution for the United States of
America, dated 1789, AND the corporate charter constitution titled “Constitution of the United
States”, dated 1871, a.k.a. Act of 1871 – you should be specific as to which one an oath has been
sworn to. – by: Phil Daniels