Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

CHAPTER 1 “assidere” – “to sit beside”

Education from the term “educare” or “educere” Goal of assessment is to improve student learning
which means “to draw out”. and provide students, parents, and teachers with
reliable information regarding the students’
Education is a “pouring in” process wherein the
progress.
teacher was the giver of knowledge.

OUT – COME BASED EDUCATION Evaluation – process designed to provide


information that will help us to make judgment
3 CHARACTERISTICS OF OBE: about a particular situation.
1. It is student based
2 CATEGORIES OF EVALUATION
2. It is faculty driven
1. Formative Evaluation – judging the worth of the
3. It is meaningful
program while their activity is in progress.
2. Summative Evaluation – judging the worth of
To implement OBE, the following procedure is
the program at the end of activities.
recommended:

1. Identification of the educational objectives of the We measure weight of knowledge of subject


subject/course. matter, we assess learning outcomes and we
2. Listing of learning outcomes specified for each evaluate results in term of some criteria or
subject/course objective. objectives.
3. Drafting outcomes assessment procedure

OUTCOMES OF EDUCATION ASSESSMENT FOR, OF, AS LEARNING

2 Types: Assessment FOR learning – teachers uses result


to inform or adjust their teaching.
1. Immediate outcomes – are skills acquired upon
completion of an instruction. ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING – given at the end
2. Deferred outcomes – ability to apply the of a unit, grading period or a semester. It is meant
cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills many to assess learning for grading purposes.
years after completion of a degree.
ASSESSMENT AS LEARNING – students assess
their own work.
Outcomes in OBE come from different levels:
CHAPTER 3
1. Institutional – graduates of an educational
institution are supposed to be able to do after CMO No. 20 s. 2014, program outcomes for all
graduation higher education:
2. Program – graduates of an particular program
are able to do after the program. a. Articulate and discuss the developments in the
3. Course – student should able to demonstrate specific field of practice.
after the subject b. effectively communicate orally and in writing
4. Learning/Instructional/Lesson outcomes – using both English and Filipino
what students able to do after a lesson c. work effectively and independently in multi-
disciplinary and multi – cultural teams
CHAPTER 2 d. act in recognition of professional, social and
Measurement – the process of determining or ethical responsibility
describing the attributes or characteristic of e. preserve and promote Filipino historical and
physical objects generally in terms of quantity. cultural heritage

TYPES OF MEASUREMENT
1. Objective (testing) – do not depend on the Program Outcomes for Teachers
person taking the measurement a. Articulate the rootedness of education in
2. Subjective – (perception) – differ from one philosophical, socio-cultural, historical, and
assessor to the next even if the same quantity or psychological and political context.
quality being measures. b. Demonstrate mastery of subject mater
c. Facilitate learning using wide range of teaching
Assessment – process of gathering evidence of methodologies.
students performance over a period of time to
determine learning mastery or skills.
d. Develop innovative curricula, instructional plans, CONSTRUCTED ALLIGNMENT
teaching approaches and resources for diverse
learning Constructed alignment means teaching learning
e. Apply skills in the development and utilization of activities and assessment task are aligned with the
ICT learning outcome.
f. Demonstrate a variety of thinking skills LEARNING TEACHING – ASSESSMENT
g. Practice professional and ethical teaching OUTCOME LEARNING TASK
standards TASK
h. Pursue lifelong learning for personal and “To drive a car” Teach/show Let student
professional growth how to drive a drive a car
car
THREE TYPES OF LEARNING
VARIETY OF ASSESSMENT METHOD, TOOLS
Three Domains (Benjamin Bloom 1956) AND TASK
1. Cognitive
2. Affective Assessment methods:
3. Psychomotor
1. Traditional assessment – paper and pencil test
2. Authentic assessment (Alternative) – non –
Bloom’s Taxonomy Anderson’s and
1956 Krathwohl’s Taxonomy paper and pencil
2001
Evaluation Creating PORTFOLIO – it is a purposely collection of
Synthesis Evaluating student work and documented performance.
Analysis Analyzing
Application Applying Types of Portfolio
Comprehension Understanding
Knowledge Remembering 1. Working or Development Portfolio –
containing work in progress as well as finished
4 Categories of Knowledge work
2. Display or Best work Portfolio – students best
1. Factual Knowledge – refers to facts. Basic work and interpret their meaning.
information (ex. terminologies) 3. Assessment or Evaluation Portfolio –
2. Conceptual Knowledge – refers to document what student have learned
interrelationship of facts. (ex. Theories, models)
3. Procedural Knowledge – knowing how to do SCORING RUBRICS – coherent set of criteria for
something. (ex. Problem solving) student’s work that includes description of levels of
4. Metacognitive Knowledge – knowing that you performances quality on the criteria.
know. (ex. Self-knowledge, memorizing)
2 types:

DOMAIN I: DOMAIN II: DOMAIN III: 1. Analytic – each criterion is evaluated separately.
Cognitive Psychomotor Affective 2. Holistic – all criteria are evaluated
(Dave 1975) (Krathwool and simultaneously.
David 1956)
Creating Imitation Receiving
Evaluating Manipulation Responding Learners have multiple intelligences and varied
Analyzing Precision Valuing learning styles. It is good for the teachers to
Applying Articulation Organizing consider the multiple intelligences of learners in
Understanding Naturalization Internalizing able to demonstrate learning in manner which
Remembering makes the feel comfortable.

Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the K to


Kendall’s and Manzano’s New Taxonomy 12 Program
LEVEL 6: Self - system
LEVEL 5: Metacognitive process DepEd Order 8, s. 2015 for the guidance of all
LEVEL 4: Knowledge Utilization teachers:
LEVEL 3: Analysis
LEVEL 2: Comprehesion 1. Teacher should employ assessment methods
LEVEL 1: Retrieval that are consistent with standards.
2. Teacher must employ both formative and
summative assessment both individually and
collaboratively.
3. Grades are function of written work, 8. The length of alternatives should not be the
performances task and quarterly test. determinants of the correctness of the answer.
4. The cognitive process dimension given by 9. Avoid stem that reveals the answer to another.
Krathwohl and Anderson 2001 governs formulation 10. Avoid alternatives that are synonymous to each
of assessment task. other.
11. Avoid presenting sequenced items.
CHAPTER 5 12. Avoid use of assumed qualifiers that examines
are not aware of.
PLANNING A TEST AND CONTRUCTION OF 13. Avoid use of non – relevant source of difficulty.
TOS 14. Avoid use of unnecessary words.

Important Steps in planning a test are: 3. Matching Type


1. Identifying test objectives – must cover various Choices were progressively reduced as one
levels of Bloom’s taxonomy successful matches the items on the left with the
2. Deciding on the type of objective test to be items on the right.
prepared – align the test on objective outcomes Guidelines in constructing:
3. Preparing a Table of Specification – guides 1. Match homogenous to heterogenous items.
the teacher in constructing a test. It ensures that 2. The stem must be in the first column and the
there is a balance between easy and difficult items) options on the second.
4. Constructing the draft test items – the actual 3. Arrange options chronologically.
number of items to be constructed in the draft 4. Direction must be given.
should be double the desired number of items.
5. Try – out validation – tries out to a group of Constructing Supply Type of Test
students. 1. Fill in the blank
Guidelines in constructing:
TYPES OF PAPER – AND – PENCIL TEST 1. Avoid over mutilated sentences.
2. Avoid open ended sentences.
Constructing Selected – Response Type 3. The blank should be at the end or near the end
1. True – False Test of the sentences.
Binomial choice or alternate response choice test 4. Ask question on more significant answer.
only have two options such as true or false, right or 5. The length of the blank should not suggest
wrong, yes or no, good or better, check or cross answer.
out.
Guidelines in constructing: 2. Essays
1. Do not give a hint in the body of the question. Compairing, justifying, summarizing, generalizing,
2. Avoid using always, never, often inferring, classifying etc.
3. Avoid using long sentences as these tend to be
true. Types of Essays
4. Avoid trick statements with some minor 1. Restricted essay – short focus
misleading or misspelled words. 2. Non – restricted essay – longer and complex
5. Avoid quoting verbatim from book.
6. Avoid specific determiners. Guidelines in constructing:
7. Avoid grossly disproportionate number of true or 1. Phrase the direction
false. 2. Inform them about the criteria
8. Avoid double negatives. 3. Put a time limit
4. Evaluate the answers without knowing the writer.
2. Multiple Choice Test Do not provide optional questions.
Offers with more than two options per item to 5. Emphasize higher level thinking skills.
choose from.
Two parts: a stem and options General Considerations
“Distracters” 1. Prepare test items ahead of time
Guidelines in constructing: 2. TOS Base
1. Do not use unfamiliar words 3. More test items
2. Do not use vague modifiers 4. HOTS Qs
3. Avoid complex word arrangement. 5. No trivial questions
4. Do not use negative or double negative 6. Examines language levels
5. Each item should be short as possible 7. No negatives/double negatives
6. Distracters should be plausible. 8. Simple or clear sentence structure
7. All options should be consistent with the stem 9. One correct answer
10. Observe words in good language
11. Provide necessary information to the correct
answer
12. No verbatim lifting statements from the books
13. Answer keys
14. Independent test items
15. Varied test type
Types:
1. Selected – answers are provided by the students
2. Alternate Response – two choices

Unintended Clues
1. Answer/blanks of diff. length
2. Answer found in test items
3. Answer found in the other part of the test
4. Recognizable pattern of answers

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen