Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Whistle blowing can occur in any organisation whether it is large or small, public
or private, government or non-governmental. Whistleblowers often face an uphill
battle to be heard in large organisations (especially where the misconduct they
are attempting to expose is wide-spread or systemic) and without the protection
of robust whistle blowing policy, can often face significant reprisal from within the
organisations that they seek to serve. Whistleblowers come into the picture
wherein they bring to the notice of the relevant stakeholder’s issues related to
violations of corporate governance and misconduct. Indeed, the term
whistleblowers literally mean people who “blow the whistle” on ethical and
normative violations.
“In a recent study, it was reported that over 38% of employees witnessed
wrongdoing in the workplace and decided not to report due to a lack of belief
‘anything would be done about it’.”
Although it’s too early to state this definitively, you could say that the 2010 – 2020
decade is shaping to be the decade of the whistleblower. New websites such as
wiki leaks have risen to prominence by providing whistleblowers a vehicle to
distribute information. In addition to this, social networking sites like face book,
have been partially credited with enabling whistle blowing and organisation of
protests on such a scale that it has led to the displacement of multiple
governments in North Africa. Prime examples of how important whistle blowing
can be for an organization are the past scandals of Enron, WorldCom, and
the Bernie Madoff scandal of 2008. Reflecting on the WorldCom accounting
scandal and whistle blowing’s role in the matter, one Fortune magazine article
stated, “If [Cynthia] Cooper had been a good soldier, the whole incredible mess
might have been concealed forever.” In simple words, had Cynthia not spoken up,
the inappropriate behavior would have continued and, as a result, cause even
more damage than the scandal did when it surfaced to the public.
NOTE:
When Time magazine editors named WorldCom's Cynthia Cooper and Enron's Sherron
Watkins two of their People of the Year for 2002, they were acknowledging the importance of
internal whistleblowers—employees who bring wrongdoing at their own organizations to the
attention of superiors.
At WorldCom, Cooper pushed forward with an internal audit, alerting the Board of Directors
Auditing Committee to problems, despite being asked by the company's CFO to postpone her
investigation. According to Fortune magazine, "If Cooper had been a good soldier, the whole
incredible mess might have been concealed forever." At Enron, accountant Sherron Watkins
outlined the company's problems in a memo to then-CEO Kenneth Lay.
But by the time Watkins and Cooper blew the whistle, much damage had already been done,
and the shareholders and employees were the ultimate losers. So the question is, How does an
organization create a culture that encourages employees to ask questions early—to point out
issues and show courage in confronting unethical or illegal practices? And then how can a
company ensure that timely action is taken? In other words, how does an organization
encourage internal whistleblowing?
1. Provide protection to the people in your own organisation who have the
courage to speak up about matters that concern them
2. Avoid unwanted publicity in the event that some of your staff are engaged
in unscrupulous behaviour
3. Generate positive publicity from a social responsibility perspective
4. Reinforce a culture of values-based leadership and senior management
accountability
5. Increase confidence in the quality of leadership being demonstrated across
all locations in the company (especially in companies that operate across a
geographically diverse area).
As with most matters, there are positives and negatives. Whistle blowing, too, has
some negative aspects.
Although these two negative aspects of whistle blowing can be quiet unsettling,
both can be curbed. By promoting a whistle blowing culture within the
organization, employees will feel comfortable speaking up when necessary.
Any complaint by the whistleblowers must not be dismissed, and at the same
time, they must also be not hyped up. Indeed, how well corporatess deal with
whistleblowers is often a reflection of how well they manage corporate
governance and discrimination issues.
Conclusion
It is also the case that when the whistleblowers allege wrongdoing at the highest
levels, then it creates a stink that is difficult for everyone to handle.
This is what happened in the case of Infosys where wrongdoing at the highest
level was alleged, and the way in which the whole issue was handled reflects
poorly on a venerable organization such as Infosys.
To conclude, it is better for all corporate norms to be followed, and in case, there
are any complaints, they must be treated with the respect they deserve.