Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Submitted to:
Dr. Priya Dwivedi
Submitted by:
Anushi Mishra
PGDM (Marketing & HR)
(Examination Id: 20062)
Title: Motivation as a tool for Increasing the Productivity of Employees in an
Organization.
2. Annu Tomar and Sanjeev Sharma (2013) (Article: Motivation as a tool for effective
staff productivity in the Public & Private Organization)
This paper aims to find out the relationship between motivation and productivity in an
organization. The paper studies the theory presented by the researchers in the field of
motivation and productivity. Our finding suggests that positive relationship occurs
between motivation and higher productivity. However, the data and research is usually
based on secondary source of data. The paper recommends that for creating good job
opportunities, job redesign and congenial atmosphere along with financial rewards
enhance productivity. Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is accepted and alternative
hypothesis (Ha) is rejected.
The study concluded that few current studies related to motivation and productivity is
mentioned here. Uwe and Hartwig (2000) have examined the effects of a psychologically
based management system on work motivation and productivity. It is concluded that PPM
(Participative Productivity Management) helps to increase productivity mainly by increasing
task and goal clarity, and that increases in productivity can only be reached reliably when no
competing system of performance appraisal exists besides PPM. Wright (2002) has examined
the role of work context in work motivation. Miao and Evans (2007) studied the impact of
sales person motivation on role perceptions and job performance. Empirical results from a
survey of sales people indicate that, compared to the global motivation constructs, the
cognitive and affective representation of I/E (intrinsic and extrinsic) motivation provides a
more robust description of the salesperson motivation. From this study, it is obvious that most
workers in the industry are not satisfied and motivated in their jobs, especially those in the
junior cadre. Significant relationship was found between motivation and job commitment on
one hand, and satisfaction with job and job commitment on the other hand. It is found that
individuals are motivated to perform well when the work is meaningful and individuals
believe they have responsibility for the outcomes of their assigned tasks. Finally, through this
study we find there is a positive relationship between motivation and productivity of
employees.
Certain recommendations under the study include: Pay-for-performance incentives are often
utilized in the private sector to encourage competition among and within team, but such a
model may not be directly applicable to the public sector, as resources are often tighter, and
money may not be the primary source of motivation for those with an ethos of public service.
Research suggests that individuals are motivated to perform well when the work is
meaningful and individuals believe they have responsibility for the outcomes of their
assigned tasks.
Promote Challenges and Accomplishments: Specific and challenging goals can lead to
higher levels of performance, productivity, and creativity which in turn is linked with an
overall stronger commitment to the organization (Perry, Mesch, & Paarlberg, 2006). We
propose developing challenging goals and timelines together with employees. By setting
goals, employees obtain a clear strategy for their own professional development, which
creates greater satisfaction and motivation (Ambrose & Kulik, 1999). Accomplishing
goals that challenge employee creativity and problem-solving skills can improve
performance, enhance employee self- confidence, and improve job satisfaction which can
outweigh a one-time monetary award (Perry, Mesch, & Paarlberg, 2006). Goal setting
should be followed by regular and thorough feedback given by supervisors on employee’s
goal achievements.
Create Organizational Learning Opportunities: Goal setting should be challenging
and achievable, goals can also promote learning opportunities. Organizations can
integrate learning opportunities through setting goals that allow employees to engage in
problem- solving and knowledge acquisition.
Utilize Group Incentives as Well as Individual Incentives: Organizational learning and
employee’s personal growth are impacted by the incentives offered in the work
environment. It is recommended to implement a variety of awards such as team awards,
individual recognition based on extraordinary performance, and rewards for all
employees for achieving their goals. In order to strengthen teamwork, appreciating
employees for performance that benefits the team is required. Awarding only a few
people with rewards might be counterproductive. According to Bob Behn, some hard
working employees might feel treated unfairly and lose their work spirit or develop
resentments to other employees and the team (Behn, 2000).
Rethink Job Design: Incentives are just one method used to promote motivation in the
work environment, another method is job design. It is advised to implement a job design
in an organization in which employees rotate job positions, gain more responsibility over
their work and resources, and engage in trainings and organizational learning
opportunities. Jobs designed with a sense of challenge and task significance can facilitate
a sense of meaningfulness, leading to better work performance and personal growth in the
work setting (Perry, Mesch, & Paarlberg, 2006).
Promote a Healthy Work Environment: Organizational practices that motivate
employees and improve performance may be ineffective if little attention is paid to the
working environment. It is recommended to eliminate dissatisfactory work conditions.
There should be proper setting up of an environment in which employees feel fair
treatment and safe future. The employer can also install motivators such as
acknowledgment, responsibility, and learning opportunity to improve the employees’
performance. There are two elements crucial for motivated workers: the absence of
dissatisfaction about the work environment and salary, which creates a neutral attitude
towards work, followed by motivators to generate extrinsic and intrinsic motivation.
Contingent upon above suggestions, success requires a comprehensive strategy
implemented thoughtfully. The synergy is to be established to build a highly motivated
and empowered team of talented, top- performing professionals.
3. Aguinis et al. (2013) (Article: What monetary rewards can and cannot do: How to
show employees the money)
The study stated that monetary rewards can be a very powerful determinant of employee
motivation and achievement which, in turn, can advance to important returns in terms of
firm-level performance. Monetary rewards can be a very powerful determinant of
employee motivation and performance which, in turn, can lead to important returns in
terms of firm-level performance. However, monetary rewards do not always lead to these
desirable outcomes. We discuss in this installation of Human Performance what monetary
rewards can and cannot do, and reasons why, in terms of improving employee
performance.
Also, we offer research-based recommendations including the following five general
principles to guide the design of successful monetary reward systems:
define and measure performance accurately,
make rewards contingent on performance,
reward employees in a timely manner,
maintain justice in the reward system, and
use monetary and nonmonetary rewards.
In addition, we offer specific research-based guidelines for implementing each of the five
principles. In short, our article summarizes research-based findings and offers
recommendations that will allow managers and other organizational decision makers to
understand when and why monetary reward systems are likely to be successful in terms of
enhancing employee motivation and performance.
5. Onyishi Jude Chidi (2010) (Article: The effect of motivation as a tool for increasing
employee efficiency and productivity (a study of selected banks in Nigeria) The study
states that the majority of organizations are competing to survive in this volatile and
fierce market environment. Motivation and performance of the employees are essential
tools for the success of any organization in the long run. On the one hand, measuring
performance is critical to organization’s management, as it highlights the evolution and
achievement of the organization. On the other hand, there is a positive relationship
between employee motivation and organizational effectiveness, reflected in numerous
studies. This paper aims to analyze the drivers of employee motivation to high levels of
organizational performance. The literature shows that factors such as empowerment and
recognition increase employee motivation. If the empowerment and recognition of
employees is increased, their motivation to work will also improve, as well as their
accomplishments and the organizational performance. Nevertheless, employee
dissatisfactions caused by monotonous jobs and pressure from clients, might weaken the
organizational performance. Therefore, jobs absenteeism rates may increase and
employees might leave the organization to joint competitors that offer better work
conditions and higher incentives. Not all individuals are the same, so each one should be
motivated using different strategies. For example, one employee may be motivated by
higher commission, while another might be motivated by job satisfaction or a better work
environment. The study took reference of McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y to study
the behavior of employees and to understand the relationship between productivity and
motivation.
The research paper concludes, people seek security and the underlying needs are
fundamental to people’s existence. After these needs are satisfied, people will focus more
on job performance. People also see social systems, so the sociability aspect of effective
organizations cannot be neglected. Last but not least, personal growth is also important to
people, as self-actualization and the need for achievement and growth are vet powerful
needs that influence the development of effective organizations. Management should
evaluate employee suggestion scheme and use the feedback from the workforce to
improve the organizational environment and fulfill their needs and skills. People are
different and they are motivated by diverse needs, such as physiological needs, safety
requirements and self-actualization needs. Thus, focusing on employees at every level of
the workforce and analyzing each department of the organization will provide detailed
accurate information regarding the needs of employees. A motivated and qualified
workforce is essential for any company that wants to increase productivity and customer
satisfaction. In this context, motivation means the willingness of an individual to do
efforts and take action towards organizational goals. The challenge for any manager is to
find the means to create and sustain employee motivation. On one hand, managers should
focus on reducing job dissatisfaction (working conditions, salary, supervision,
relationship with colleagues), while on the other hand should use motivating factors such
as achievement, recognition, responsibility and the work itself. Employee participation
and empowerment do not only enhance efficiency, growth and innovation but they also
increase employee motivation and trust in the organization. If employees feel appreciated
for their work and are involved in decision-making, their enhanced enthusiasm and
motivation will lead to better productivity and loyalty.
7. Shah and Pathan (2009), explores the changes in productivity with major supposition of
quantifying the relationships in terms of changes in the production caused by motivation
among workers in maintaining secrecy and security of confidential data. The study
concludes that changes in productivity as gains in profitability are significantly related to
motivation levels at all three tiers of organization structures.
8. Anka L. M. (2006), examines the essential skills needed by managers to work efficiently
and effectively in an organization. At lower level, the major need is for technical and
human skills and at higher level manager’s effectiveness depends largely on human and
conceptual skills. At top level, conceptual skill becomes important for successful
administration. These three skills play an important role in enhancing efficiency of
employees.
9. Decoene and Bruggeman (2006) in their study developed and illustrated a model of the
relationship between strategic alignment, motivation and organizational performance in a
BSC context and find that effective strategic alignment empowers and motivates working
executives. Leaders motivate people to follow a participative design of work in which
they are responsible and get it together, which make them responsible for their
performance.
10. Garg and Rastogi (2006) (Article: New model of Job Design: Motivating Employees’
performance)
The study identifies the key issues of job design research and practice to motivate
employees’ performance and concluded that a dynamic managerial learning framework is
required to enhance employees’ performance to meet global challenges. The paper aims
to identify the key issues of job design research and practice to motivate employees'
performance. Design/methodology/approach – The conceptual model of Hackman and
Oldham's job characteristics has been adopted to motivate employees' performance.
Findings – The paper finds that a dynamic managerial learning framework is required in
order to enhance employees' performance to meet global challenges. Practical
implications – Traditional outcomes will certainly remain central to the agenda. But some
wider developments are to be incorporated within organizational systems so as to
motivate employees for better performance. Originality/value – The paper may be of
value to researchers and practitioners in the management development field for offering
enhanced jobs to employees leading to improved performance.
12. Den and Verburg (2004) (Article: High Performance work syste, organizational
culture and firm effectiveness)
They found the impact of high performing work systems, also called human resource
practices, on perceptual measures of firm performance. The HRM literature emphasises
the importance of people in enhancing firm performance or even creating competitive
advantage. This study provides further evidence on the link between so‐called high
performance work systems and firm performance and relates these to organisational
culture. In total 175 organisations from different sectors in the Netherlands participated.
Senior HR managers were questioned on HRM practices and chief executives on
organisational culture. Three different groups of personnel are distinguished in the
measures: core employees, managers and specialist professional staff. One high
performance work system could be distinguished, consisting of a combination of practices
with an emphasis on employee development, strict selection and providing an overarching
goal or direction. Results of regression analyses controlling for sector, firm size and age
show a significant impact of this system on several performance outcomes (perceived
economic outcomes, beyond contract and absenteeism), as well as positive relationships
with three organisational culture orientations. Practices that are not part of this
combination also show some positive (but limited) links with culture and outcomes.
13. Kunz and Pfaff (2002) (Article: Agency Theory, performance evaluation and the
hypothetical construct of intrinsic motivation)
The study stated no substantive reason to fear an undermining effect of extrinsic rewards
on intrinsic motivation. This study explores the ways in which information about other
individual's action affects one's own behaviour in a dictator game. The experimental
design discriminates behaviourally between three possible effects of recipient's within-
game reputation on the dictator's decision: Reputation causing indirect reciprocity, social
influence, and identification. The separation of motives is an important step in trying to
understand how impulses towards selfish or generous behavior arise. The statistical
analysis of experimental data reveals that the reputation effects have a stronger impact on
dictators' actions than the social influence and identification.