Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER - 5
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.1.1 Objective
Traffic assessment and forecast has been carried out as part of Detailed Project Report for road section.
An accurate estimate of the traffic that is likely to use the project road, when it is upgraded, is very important as
it forms the basic input in its design and operation. Analysis of the travel characteristics of vehicles using the
project road is important in traffic forecast. Hence, detailed traffic surveys have been carried out to assess the
current traffic characteristics on the project road.
The project alignment starts at Km 0/000 at Ramanathan Circle, traverse through Membalam junction at
km 0/850, intersecting ODR 113 at Km 3/350, Outer Ring Road (ORR) at Km 7/300 and NH-83 at Km 10/050 and
finally ends at km 93/700 of SHU-89, being Km 10/600 end chainage of project road, to a total length of 10.6km.
The project road busy corridor attracts heavy traffic as it links Thanjai Periya Kovil, Railway station
As per the TOR, Clause: 7.2, following traffic surveys has been carried out at the following locations;
The location, type and date of surveys are mentioned in Table 5.1 The traffic survey location shown in
Figure 5.1 respectively.
Duration of
S.No Type of Survey Chainage (Km) Location Date of survey
survey
Classified Traffic 22.07.2019 –
1 5+400 BVM Nagar 7 Days
Volume Counts 28.07.2019
0+000 Ramanathan Circle 24 hours 23.07.2019
Intersection
0+800 Membalam 24 hours 26.07.2019
Volume Count
2 Eswari Nagar (ODR 113
/Turning 3+430 24 hours 23.07.2019
intersecting)
Movement
7+275 Outer Ring Road 24 hours 26.07.2019
Pedestrian/Animal 22.07.2019 –
3 20 Locations 24 hours
count 28.07.2019
Training of Enumerators:
Enumerators proposed to be deployed for traffic survey were trained in identification of various
categories of vehicles and filling up of Performa / formats before the work is commenced on surveys.
Survey Teams:
Each team was consisting of one supervisor and adequate enumerator, depending on location and scope
of the survey.
All results are presented in tabular and graphical form. The survey data is analyzed to bring out the
hourly and daily variations. The traffic volume count per day is averaged to show a weekly Average Daily Traffic
(ADT) by vehicle type. The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) was worked out by applying seasonal factors.
The relevant traffic volume data from secondary sources is also compiled. The salient features of traffic
volume characteristics were brought out and variations if any, from the traffic census carried out by the NHAI are
suitably explained.
The type of traffic surveys and the survey stations are mentioned in Table 5.2
The PCU factors used in the analysis, as referred from IRC:106, which is presented below in table 5.5.
SH 99A
Vehicles
Vehicles /day PCUs /day
Two Wheeler 27035 20276
Three Wheeler 1613 1936
Car/Jeep/Van/taxi 3954 3954
Bus 426 937
LCV(Mini bus, Tempo) 1002 1403
2-Axle 233 513
3 Axle 55 121
Multi Axle 52 209
Tractor With Trailer 18 73
Tractor Without Trailer 11 15
Cycle 379 151
Thanjavur - Vallam Road (SH-99A) DETAILED FEASIBILITY REPORT
Km 0.000 to 10.600 Page 6 of 30
Consultancy Services for preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) for
the work of Preparation of detailed project report for improvements of
various category of roads belonging to highways department in
Thanjavur Corporation area.
SH 99A
Vehicles
Vehicles /day PCUs /day
Others 8 48
Animal Drawn 0 0
Hand Cart 8 15
TOTAL 34794 29651
Source: Traffic Survey July 2019
35000
Hand Cart
Animal Drawn
30000
Others
Cycle
25000
No of Vehicles
0
CH. 5+400
Traffic Survey Location
Cycle
Tractor With out Trailer
20000 Tractor With Trailer
Multi Axle
3 Axle
15000
2-Axle
LCV (Mini Bus,Tempo)
10000 Bus
Car/Jeep/Van/taxi
5000 Three Wheeler
Two Wheeler
0
CH. 5+400
Traffic Survey Location
Table 5.7 gives the daily traffic volume in numbers and table 5.8 depicts in PCU) as summarized below. It
is observed that maximum traffic flow plying on Tuesday as compared to other working days.
30000 Cycle
2-Axle Truck
10000
LCV (Mini Bus,Tempo)
5000
Bus
0 Car/Jeep/Van/taxi
WED
FRI
TUE
SAT
SUN
MON
THUR
Three Wheeler
Cycle
25000
Tractor With out Trailer
15000
3 Axle Truck
Car/Jeep/Van/taxi
0
WED
FRI
SAT
TUE
MON
SUN
THUR
Three Wheeler
Two Wheeler
Days
Figure 5 .6 presents the hourly variation of traffic, which is maximum on working day. As can be seen
from graph, there is no tidal variation in traffic during peak hours.
The Peak Hour Factor (PHF) (defined as the ratio between the numbers of vehicles counted during the
peak hour to the total vehicles counted in a day) calculated at various count locations is presented in Table 5.9.
Peak Hour
SI. No. Survey Locations PHF (%) Peak Hours
Volume (PCU)
Time Interval
2500.00
2000.00
1500.00
1000.00
PCU Value
500.00
0.00
00.00AM - 01.00 AM
01.00AM - 02.00 AM
03.00AM - 04.00AM
04.00AM - 05.00AM
07.00AM - 08.00AM
08.00AM - 09.00AM
02.00PM - 03.00PM
03.00PM - 04.00PM
06.00PM - 07.00PM
07.00PM - 08.00PM
10.00PM - 11.00PM
11.00PM - 12.00AM
02.00AM - 03.00AM
05.00AM - 06.00AM
06.00AM - 07.00AM
09.00AM - 10.00AM
10.00AM - 11.00AM
12.00PM - 01.00PM
01.00PM - 02.00PM
04.00PM - 05.00PM
05.00PM - 06.00PM
08.00PM - 09.00PM
09.00PM - 10.00PM
11.00AM - 12.00NOON
Directional distribution of traffic during morning, mid-day, evening and night was also analyzed. The
analysis reveals that there is a tidal flow on the road during the peak hours and the directional distribution
for the whole day. The directional distribution is shown in Table 5.10.
Directional Distribution
Chainage (Km)
Towards Membalam (%) Towards Vallam (%)
Composition of average daily traffic at Km 5/400 is shown in table 5.11. It can be seen from f ol lo w i n g
table that two wheelers constituted the major % of traffic followed by Cars and Three wheelers. The traffic of
trucks (2 Axle, 3 Axle, and Multi Axle) is also in the range of 0.15% to 1%.
There is no significant Agricultural activity in this area and hence seasonal correction is not considered,
but to derive the AADT from ADT observed the seasonality in traffic and adopted the factor as 1, so we can
consider AADT equal to ADT. The traffic volume at the location is shown in Table 5.12.
Table 5.12 Traffic Volume at of the Road Project, AADT in Vehicle & PCU per day
SH 99A, 5+400 km
Vehicles
Vehicles/day PCUs/day
Two Wheeler 27035 20276
Three Wheeler 1613 1936
Car/Jeep/Van/taxi 3954 3954
Bus 426 937
LC (Mini Bus, Tempo) 1002 1403
2-Axle 233 513
3 Axle 55 121
Multi Axle 52 209
SH 99A, 5+400 km
Vehicles
Vehicles/day PCUs/day
Tractor With Trailer 18 73
Tractor Without Trailer 11 15
Cycle 379 151
Others 8 48
Animal Drawn 0 0
Hand Cart 8 15
TOTAL 34794 29651
For the optimum utilization of resources, phased out road up-gradation Programme is essential so that
improved facilities are created as per the traffic requirement. As shown in Table 5.9, the maximum hourly traffic
2263 PCU/hour, observed at Km. 5+400. Design service volume (PCU/hr) as per IRC: 106-1990 given in below in
table 5.12
The Peak Hour Factor (PHF) (defined as the ratio between the numbers of vehicles counted during the
peak hour to the total vehicles counted in a day) observed at Km 5+400 from Table 5. 8 and found to be 7%
and 2293PCU.
Considering the project road as Sub-arterial category, from the above table it can be clearly noted that
the proposed project highway will be able to cater 2900 PCU in peak hour. As the prevailing peak hour traffic is
being 2263PCU, the project road on augmentation will sustain for a considerable period. Further the traffic
bound in this urban stretch will be operating only at a speed of 40Kmph, at this condition the project road will
cater the traffic seamlessly at level of service 'C'. For the enhancement of traffic flow the following measures are
Thanjavur - Vallam Road (SH-99A) DETAILED FEASIBILITY REPORT
Km 0.000 to 10.600 Page 14 of 30
Consultancy Services for preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) for
the work of Preparation of detailed project report for improvements of
various category of roads belonging to highways department in
Thanjavur Corporation area.
5.6.1 Objective
The objective of the turning movement survey is to determine the directional movement of traffic In
order to access the measure required to improve the junction capacity and regulate safe traffic movement.
The turning movement survey is to understand the traffic characteristics of each arm of the
intersection and to access the need of signal control, grade separation etc. at the intersection.
As per IRC: SP: 41 -1994 (“Guidelines for the Design of At grade intersection in rural and urban area”)
the traffic at intersection will require time separation, i.e. signal control, when the major road flow is more
than 800 vehicle per hour (both direction) and the mirror road flow is more than 250 vehicles per hours (one
direction) for each of any 8 hours of an average day.
A total of 4 intersections were identified for conducting turning movement survey which is a major
intersection. The directional traffic counts were carried out for 24 hrs. The location of Intersections taken up for
study is indicated in Table 5.13.
Type of
S.No Location Chainage (Km) Survey Date
Junction
1 X Ramanathan Circle 0+000 23.07.2019
2 Y Membalam 0+800 26.07.2019
3 Y Easwari Nagar 3+430 23.07.2019
4 + Outer Ring Road 7+275 26.07.2019
Thanjavur - Vallam Road (SH-99A) DETAILED FEASIBILITY REPORT
Km 0.000 to 10.600 Page 15 of 30
Consultancy Services for preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) for
the work of Preparation of detailed project report for improvements of
various category of roads belonging to highways department in
Thanjavur Corporation area.
The traffic flow at junction Ramanathan circle has been analysed and summary of total peak hour flow
is shown below in table 5.14 following to the detailed volume direction wise in table 5.15 as follows.
ARM-2 (Railway
ARM-1 (SH-99A) ARM-3 (SH-27) ARM-4 (SHU-89)
Station Road)
Types of Towards
Towards Towards Towards Towards Towards
Vehicles Ramanat Towards Towards
Ramanat Railway Ramanat Pudukott Ramanat
han Vallam Trichy
han Circle Station han Circle ai han Circle
Circle
Passenger
1090 1287 1521 1346 1462 1109 727 1058
Vehicle
Commercial
33 42 27 28 33 34 29 18
Vehicle
Slow
Moving 4 9 8 4 5 7 10 7
Vehicles
Total No. of
Vehicles on 1127 1338 1556 1378 1500 1150 766 1083
Peak Hour
Total Peak
998 1182 1346 1224 1295 1030 724 927
Hour PCU
From the above figure it can be observed that the maximum traffic of 678 PCUs/hr. (15.54 %) is in the
direction from SH-27 to SH-99A. The minimum traffic of 46 PCUs/hr. (1.04%) observed at the junction is in the
direction from SHU-89 to SH-27.
From the analysis of peak hour data in the below table, it can be seen that, this junction warrants for
Thanjavur - Vallam Road (SH-99A) DETAILED FEASIBILITY REPORT
Km 0.000 to 10.600 Page 17 of 30
Consultancy Services for preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) for
the work of Preparation of detailed project report for improvements of
various category of roads belonging to highways department in
Thanjavur Corporation area.
grade separation at the year of 2037. Presently this junction is facilitated with twin at grade rotary, adjoining to
the existing 2 lane ROB at the nearby Membalam junction, it is envisaged that the additional provision of ROB will
share a considerable quantum of traffic bound towards Thanjavur Big Temple and old bus stand, therefore the
Ramanathan Circle junction traffic will be reduced and the junction at present condition will sustain for another
few years catering the future traffic. Hence this junction may be maintained at present status for time being.
Table 5.16: Peak Hour Traffic Projection at Ramanathan Circle Junction, Km 0+000
The data collected from survey has been compiled and checked for further analysis in order to
understand the traffic characteristics and travel pattern in the study area. This junction is obviously warrants
for a flyover as it attains the requisite volume of traffic at the end of the year 2033 .The traffic forecast has been
done in accordance with IRC: SP: 90-2010, clause 5.7.1.2, considering a growth of 5% per year the peak
hourly volume traffic is projected from the base year of 2021 to 2040, the design life of the facility ie. 20 years
after the construction of flyover, this is illustrated in the table below.
Therefore a grade separator is recommended at this junction to cater the growing traffic. In order to
mitigate the severity this junction is proposed to facilitate with an additional provision of 2 lane ROB, adjoining to
the existing 2 lane ROB which will act as a divided 4 lane ROB, so as to handle the majority of traffic bound
towards Thanjavur Big Temple. It is envisaged that this arrangement will de-congest this junction and avoid
queuing of vehicles on the ROB towards Big Temple.
From the above figure it can be observed that the maximum traffic of 1034 PCUs/hr. (35.50 %) is in the
direction from Thanjavur to Vallam. The minimum traffic of 173 PCUs/hr. (5.94%) observed at the junction is in
the direction from Vallam to ODR 113.
The peak hour traffic projection indicates there is no need of grade separator and the intersection will
handle the future traffic for another few decades. Therefore this junction is proposed to facilitate with traffic
islands and traffic signs.
Table 5.22 Peak Hour Traffic Projection at Easwari Nagar junction, Km 3+430
1 2019 2913
2 2020 3059
3 2021 3212
4 2022 3373
5 2023 3542
6 2024 3719
7 2025 3905
8 2026 4100
9 2027 4305
10 2028 4520
11 2029 4746
12 2030 4983
13 2031 5232
14 2032 5494
15 2033 5769
16 2034 6057
17 2035 6360
18 2036 6678
19 2037 7012
20 2038 7363
21 2039 7731
22 2040 8118
From the above figure it can be observed that the maximum traffic of 458 PCUs/hr. (23.56 %) is in the
direction from Thanjavur to Vallam. The minimum traffic of 18 PCUs/hr. (0.93%) observed at the junction is in
The peak hour traffic projection indicates there is no need of grade separator and the intersection will
handle the future traffic for another few decades. Therefore this junction is proposed to facilitate with traffic
islands and traffic signs.
5.7.1 Methodology
With the above objectives the survey was carried out by running a passenger car with a speed of 60 Kmph along
the entire length of project road from Km 0/000 to Km 10/400.
Three runs were made during morning peak hours off-peak hours and evening peak hours in both directions for
the entire section of the project road. The following details were collected during the field survey and the details
are furnished.
Time taken to traverse the section from one end to other end in both directions.
Time delay due to traffic congestion.
Number of overtaking/ overtaken/ opposite vehicles
The above details are tabulated and analyzed as per IRC: 102-1988. Table 4.15 gives the journey speed achieved
during each run of the car.
Table 5.27 Summary of Speed and Delay Analysis
Section Average Journey Speed (Kmph)
S. Morning
From To Off Peak Evening Peak
No Peak
(km) (km)
Up Down Up Down Up Down
Membalam Vallam
1 38.92 37.89 42.84 43.43 38.05 37.74
0+000 10+400
the project road at the mid-block section within the urban limit were collected for 12 hours. The data has been
tabulated and analyzed in order to decide the highest intensity of pedestrian movement at these locations.
Uncontrolled crossings:
It is proposed to provide Mid-block Zebra crossings intermittently along the project highway, as number
of intersections abut from km 0+000 to km 9+000 and inevitable to facilitate crossings to approach the
Commercial and Residential built-ups along the road.
Warrant for Crossings:
According to Clause: 6.7.4.1.2 of IRC: 103: 2012 the following condition for the warrant of Mid-block crossing is
considered.
I. Peak hour volumes of pedestrian (P) and vehicles (V) are such that PV 2 > 108 for undivided carriageways
and PV2 > 2x108 for divided carriageways.
II. Approach speeds of vehicles exceed 65kph.
III. Waiting time for pedestrian / vehicles become too long.
IV. Accident records indicate 5 or more injuries to pedestrian in a year due to collision with vehicles.
The Control measure usually adopted in such cases is a traffic signal with exclusive pedestrian phase. In
certain cases, where the warrants are met only during peak hours, police control could also be introduced.
Pedestrian operated pelican signals could also be introduced at such locations where the vehicular volume is too
large even through the volume of pedestrian may be low. Unless judiciously used. Pelican crossings are known to
cause undesirable impediments to the flow of vehicular traffic.
The Design of street crossings should aim for simplicity. The recommended minimum width of a street
crossing is 1800mm. The Safety of crossing can be significantly improved by extending the footpath out across
any parking lanes. This has the triple purpose of reducing the width of roadway to be crossed, slowing vehicular
traffic and improving the ability of pedestrian and drives to see each other. Crossings should be laid out with
ample space, especially at the top of the kerb ramp to allow easy passage for pedestrian who are not crossing the
road.
The locations of Zebra Crossing to facilitate Pedestrian movement to cross the road and to approach
footpath/platform is provided with respect to the Pedestrian movement in the Peak hour is accessed and
tabulated below.
Table 5.28 Zebra Crossing for Pedestrian movement
Warrant for
Chainage Pedestrian Peak hour
S. No. Location Zebra Crossing
(Km) s (P) PCU (V)
PV2> 2 x 108
1 0+032 Near Manimandapam junction 81 4363 15
2 0+900 Near membalam bus stop 107 4935 26
3 1+365 At junction near apex heart 126 4912 30
Warrant for
Chainage Pedestrian Peak hour
S. No. Location Zebra Crossing
(Km) s (P) PCU (V)
PV2> 2 x 108
hospital
4 1+820 Near Balaji nagar bus stop 142 4327 27
5 2+275 Near Laxmi Seeval bus stop 84 3861 13
6 2+820 Mangalapuram bus stop 92 3483 11
7 3+200 Municipal colony bus stop 118 3107 11
Easwari nagar bus stop at junction
8 3+450 128 2913 11
with ODR - 113
Near Murugan Kovil bus stop, at
9 4+010 59 2728 4
junction with medical college road
10 4+290 Medical college 2nd gate 36 2684 3
11 4+540 Medical college 3rd gate 43 2514 3
At junction with Rahuman nagar
12 5+050 104 2455 6
road
13 5+290 National Pharma Hospital 52 2304 3
14 5+565 Muligai Pannai Bus stop 48 2263 2
15 6+320 Tamil University bus stop 82 2178 4
16 6+780 Housing board bus stop 41 2036 2
17 7+670 Pillayarpatti bus stop 55 1944 2
18 7+885 Pillayarpatti Village 73 1989 3
Periyar Maniammai University bus
19 9+390 1*
stop 62 1422
20 10+370 At junction with SHU - 89 57 1178 1*
*Although these locations are not warranted for Zebra Cross provision, it is proposed considering
the significance of the place.