Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This manuscript has been published online, prior to printing for RNA Biology,
Volume 3, Issue 2. Definitive page numbers have not been assigned. The current cita-
tion is:
INTRODUCTION
RNA Biology 2005; 3(2):
http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/rnabiology/abstract.php?id=3110
The Src substrate associated in mitosis of 68 kDa (Sam68) is a known substrate of
Once the issue is complete and page numbers have been assigned, the citation will several tyrosine kinases including Src family kinases and the BRK breast tumor kinase.1
change accordingly. The association of Sam68 with Src and BRK tyrosine kinases is mediated by SH3 and SH2
KEY WORDS
domain-dependent interactions. Moreover, the phosphorylation of Sam68 by BRK was
shown to occur downstream of the epidermal growth factor in breast tumor cell lines.2
Sam68 has been shown to serve several cellular roles including mRNA splicing3 and viral
Src associated substrate in mitosis of 68kDa,
Sam68, KH domain, RNA metabolism, mRNA RNA export.4 The physiological role of Sam68 has remained elusive until recently. Sam68
targets was shown to play a role in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell differentiation, as mice
null for Sam68 have an increased osteogenic differentiation.5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Sam68 is a known RNA binding protein that was initially shown to bind DNA and
cellular RNA in vitro.6 It was then shown that Sam68 bound poly U7 and poly A ribonu-
This work was funded by grant MT-13377 from cleotide homopolymer.8 It was later demonstrated by using SELEX (systematic evolution
the Canadian Institutes of Health Research of ligands by exponential enrichment) with bacterial recombinant protein that Sam68
(CIHR). S.R. is an investigator of the CIHR.
bound RNAs containing UAAA and UUUA motifs with high affinity.9 By using bacterially
expressed glutathione-S-transferase Sam68 fusion proteins immobilized on glutathione
beads bound cellular mRNAs were identified by differential display and cDNA-RDA. Ten
mRNAs were validated in HeLa cells over-expressing HA-Sam68.10 Abundant mRNAs
were identified including hnRNP A2/B1 and β-actin, whose binding sites were mapped to
UAAA and UUUUUU consistent with the previous homopolymeric RNA and SELEX
data. The difficulty with the interpretation of these previous experiments is that bacterially
purified Sam68 was utilized and since Sam68 is extensively modified post-transcription-
ally,1,11-13 the recombinant protein may not properly reflect the specific RNA binding
activity of the post-translationally modified protein. Therefore the physiological mRNA
targets will best be identified using the purified endogenous Sam68 complex from
mammalian cells. The identification of RNA targets of Sam68 in vivo will help unravel
the cellular function of Sam68 and find its binding sites on RNAs. Bearing this in mind,
we decided to identify the mRNAs bound to Sam68 in vivo. Herein, we identify mRNAs
bound to the endogenous Sam68 complex using NIH 3T3 cells that were cross-linked
with UV light. Subsequently, the bound mRNAs were amplified by using an oligo dT
based approach and the cDNAs cloned. We identified 23 mRNA targets bound to the
Sam68 complex that were absent in the mock immunoprecipitations. We validated five
mRNA targets by immunoprecipitation reverse transcription PCR demonstrating that
these mRNAs are associated with the Sam68 RNA binding protein complex. The challenge
will be to identify the mRNAs that specifically associate with Sam68.
DISCUSSION
We have identified 23 mRNAs bound to the endogenous Sam68
protein complex in NIH3T3 cells and all these contain UAAA,
UUUA or poly(U) motifs. We believe that a subset of mRNAs were
identified as positive controls such as β-actin were not identified in
our assay. Furthermore, a correlation could not be made between the
position where reverse transcription reaction stopped, and a putative
Sam68 binding site. There was one exception: the 5' end of the
sequence for thrap2 mRNA, where the reverse transcription reaction
stopped, is a poly(U) stretch and 2 UUUA motifs. It remains to be
determined whether Sam68 binds a rather undefined site on
mRNAs, and thereby a very large set of mRNA, or whether it
requires a specific cellular context in order to bind to its RNA targets,
or any other reason thereof; one appealing theory involves mRNA
Figure 2. Association of mRNAs with the endogenous Sam68 complex in
NIH 3T3 cells. NIH3T3 cells were immunoprecipitated (IP) with either nor-
targets bound to other RNA binding proteins in the large Sam68
mal rabbit serum (NRS) or rabbit polyclonal anti-Sam68 AD-1 antibody (±- complex. This latter possibility explains why a specific Sam68
Sam68). The co-immunoprecipitating mRNAs were subjected to reverse tran- binding site cannot be identified with our approach.
scription PCR. Various sets of primers were used based on the mRNA targets The mRNAs identified in Table 1 can be functionally classified
from Table I. GAPDH served as a negative control and ≤-actin served as a into cell motility and migration (Prof1, Myl6, Evl, Fnbp3 and Bgn),
positive control. The 'markers' indicates 1kb DNA ladder (Invitrogen). transcription-related genes (Thrap2, Copeb, Hmgn1, Hmgb1 and
Bclaf1), cell cycling/cell division (Apc5, Smc6 and Nap1l1) and cell
Half the eluted cDNAs were amplified by suppression PCR to favor death (Sesn2, Anx11, Bri3bp and Bclaf1). As phosphorylation of
longer DNA fragments (Fig. 1, lanes 1–3) and the other half was Sam68 by Src is known to negatively regulate RNA binding activity,18
amplified by regular 2 primer PCR (Fig. 1, lanes 4–6). The DNA and that Src will function to increase the motility and migration of
fragments were purified, subcloned and sequenced (Table 1). The cancer cells, it follows that Sam68 should have a regulator effect on
Genbank accession number, the portion of the mRNA amplified, its mRNA targets, or at least those related to cell motility and migra-
the redundancy of each clone is shown, and whether the polyA tail tion. Therefore we could speculate that tyrosine phosphorylation of
was primed are shown. Surprisingly, no intronic sequences were Sam68 could liberate the mRNA sequestered by Sam68, rendering
found, suggesting that the captured molecules corresponded indeed them available for translation, for example. Recent observations by
to mature mRNAs, as predicted for oligo dT primed reactions. Paronetto et al., suggest that shuttling of Sam68 from the nucleus to
However, the high level of internal priming of the oligo dT primers the cytoplasm in spermatocytes correlates with phosphorylation, that
(Table 1) should have identified some pre-mRNA species associated it associates with polysomes and may facilitate translation.19
with Sam68. Most likely the method was not sensitive enough or too In conclusion, we have shown that specific mRNAs can be captured
few clones were sequenced. The non-specific mRNAs associated to the Sam68 RNA binding protein complex. We have defined a
with the mock immunoprecipitations were also cloned and were subset of the mRNAs that the Sam68 complex associates with
typically tRNA, ribosomal protein genes and mitochondrial gene mRNAs regulating cell mobility and migration, cell cycle and tran-
products (data not shown). In the clones identified with anti-Sam68 scriptional regulation. Further studies are required to identify the
immunoprecipitations ~20% represented non-specific RNAs and complete list of Sam68 RNA targets and to define the specific binding
the remaining were deemed mRNAs associated with the Sam68 sites in the presence or absence of certain cellular signals.
complex. A total of 23 mRNAs was captured with our analysis
(Table 1).
Validation of mRNA targets bound to the Sam68 complex. We
proceeded with the validation of the Sam68 captured mRNA targets.
NIH 3T3 cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with either
control normal rabbit serum (Mock) or the anti-Sam68 antibodies.
The co-precipitating mRNAs were isolated and amplified with
primer sets corresponding to a chosen set of mRNAs from Table 1.
We used β-actin as a positive control, since it a known target of
Sam68,10,17 however we did not identify this mRNA in our assay
demonstrating that we have only identified a subset of Sam68
associated mRNAs. As a negative control gene we used the glycer-
aldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA (GAPDH). It was
negative, but we increased the number of PCR cycles until we could
detect an equal amount of intrinsic noise between the mock and the
anti-Sam68 antibody immunoprecipitations. Myl6, Copeb, Fnbp3,
prof1 and Tctp were true positives and Ena/vasp and thrap2 may be
false positives as we could detect them in the corresponding mock IP
lanes (Fig. 2). These data demonstrate that ~70% of the identified
mRNAs are indeed true positives.
TABLE 1 mRNA identified associated with the endogenous Sam68 protein complex in NIH3T3 cells
mRNA captured Accession number Position cloned Redundancy in CART polyA primed
thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 2 (Thrap2) BC040283 3776–4265 4 yes
bri3 binding protein (bri3bp) XM_132386 931–1180 3 no
non-muscle myosin light chain 3 (Myl6) U04443 114–606 3 yes
core promoter element binding protein (Copeb/KLF6/Zf9) NM_011803 998–1386 2 no
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 1 (Hmgn1) NM_008251 499–962 2 no
structural maintenance of chromosome 6 (Smc6) AJ310552 1368–1870 2 no
biglycan (Bgn) BC052857 1908–2375 1 yes
Ena-VASP like protein (Evl) U72519 1702–1788 1 yes
formin binding protein 3 (Fnbp3) NM_018785 1970–2348 1 no
profilin 1 (Prof1) BC002080 317–756 1 no
high mobility group box 1 BC008565 410–654 1 no
lipoprotein receptor-related protein (Lrp1) AF367720 14443–14783 1 yes
nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 1 (Nap1l1) NM_015781 1564–1795 1 no
anaphase promoting complex subunit 5 (APC5) BC046804 1917–2386 1 yes
cDNA coding for a hypothetical protein BC033455 857–1290 1 no
cDNA coding for a hypothetical protein AY061989 1781–2312 1 no
cDNA coding for a hypothetical protein NM_133718 3396–3011 1 no
sestrin 2 (Sesn2) NM_144907 2251–2533 1 no
annexin A11 (Anx11) BC012875 2040–2186 1 no
BCL2-associated transcription factor 1 (BCLAF1) BC034300 2387–2838 1 no
tumor protein, translationally-controlled 1 (Tctp) NM_009429 395–722 1 no
poly A binding protein 1 (pabc1) BC011207 2034–2214 1 yes
Chr 10, ERATO Doi 214, expressed BC021952 200–408 1 no
References
1. Lukong KE, Richard S. Sam68, the KH domain-containing superSTAR. Biochim. 14. Chen T, Boisvert FM, Bazett-Jones DP, Richard, S. A role for the GSG domain in localiz-
Biophys. Acta 2003; 1653: 73-86. ing Sam68 to novel nuclear structures in cancer cell lines. Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10:3015-33.
2. Lukong KE, Larocque D, Tyner AL, Richard S. Tyrosine phosphorylation of sam68 by 15. Gubler U, Hoffman BJ. A simple and very efficient method for generating cDNA libraries.
breast tumor kinase regulates intranuclear localization and cell cycle progression. J Biol Gene 1983; 25: 263-9.
Chem 2005; 280:38639-47. 16. Galarneau A, Richard S. Target RNA motif and target mRNAs of the Quaking STAR pro-
3. Matter N, Herrlich P, Konig H. Signal-dependent regulation of splicing via phosphoryla- tein. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12:691-8.
tion of Sam68. Nature 2002; 420: 691-5. 17. Hill MA, Schedlich L, Gunning P. Serum-induced signal transduction determines the
4. Reddy TR, Xu W, Mau JKL, Goodwin CD, Suhasini M, Tang H, Frimpong K, Rose DW, peripheral location of ≤-actin mRNA within the cell. J. Cell Biol 1994; 126: 1221-30.
Wong-Staal F. Inhibition of HIV replication by dominant negative mutants of Sam68, a 18. Wang LL, Richard S, Shaw AS. p62 association with RNA is regulated by tyrosine phos-
functional homolog of HIV-1 Rev. Nature Medicine 1999; 5:635-642. phorylation. J. Biol. Chem 1995; 270:2010-3.
5. Richard S, Torabi N, Franco GV, Tremblay GA, Chen T, Vogel G, Morel M, Cléroux P, 19. Paronetto MP, Zalfa F, Botti F, Geremia R, Bagni C, and Sette C. The nuclear RNA-bind-
Forget-Richard A, Komarova S, Tremblay ML, Li W, Li A., Gao YT, Henderson JE. ing protein Sam68 translocates to the cytoplasm and associates with the polysomes in
Ablation of the Sam68 RNA Binding Protein Protects Mice from Age-Related Bone Loss. mouse spermatocytes. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:14-24.
PLoS Genet 2005; 1; e74.
6. Wong, G. et al. Molecular cloning and nucleic acid binding properties of the GAP-associ-
ated tyrosine phosphoprotein p62. Cell 1992; 69; 551-558.
7. Taylor SJ, Shalloway D. An RNA-binding protein associated with src through its SH2 and
SH3 domains in mitosis. Nature 1994; 368: 867-871.
8. Chen T, Damaj BB, Herrera C, Lasko P, Richard S. Self-association of the single-KH-
domain family members Sam68, GRP33, GLD-1, and Qk1: role of the KH domain. Mol
Cell Biol 1997; 17:5707-18.
9. Lin Q, Taylor SJ, Shalloway D. Specificity and determinants of Sam68 RNA binding. J.
Biol. Chem 1997; 272: 27274-80.
10. Itoh M, Haga I, Li Q-H, Fujisawa J-I. Identification of cellular mRNA targets for RNA-
binding protein Sam68. Nucl Acids Res 2002; 30: 5452-64.
11. Côté J, Boisvert FM, Boulanger MC, Bedford MT, Richard S. Sam68 RNA binding pro-
tein is an in vivo substrate for protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1. Mol Biol Cell 2003;
14: 274-87.
12. Babic I, Cherry E, Fujita DJ. SUMO modification of Sam68 enhances its ability to repress
cyclin D1 expression and inhibits its ability to induce apoptosis. Oncogene 2002; [Epub
ahead of print].
13. Babic I, Jakymiw A, Fujita DJ. The RNA binding protein Sam68 is acetylated in tumor cell
lines, and its acetylation correlates with enhanced RNA binding activity. Oncogene 2004;
23:3781-9.