Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
Limited research has been conducted to explore the impact of LQBTQIA programming in
public libraries. The objective of this study is twofold: (1) to identify the needs and
and (2) to collect information from library systems with an established commitment to
self-administered surveys will collect patron and library staff responses, respectively,
from the San Francisco Public Library system and the New York Public Library system.
Staff and patron participants will be asked if they are willing to follow up their survey
with a telephone interview with a researcher to share detailed accounts of their personal
experiences. The data collected will allow the research team to gauge the effectiveness of
past programming efforts and will use the insights of patrons and staff to draw
libraries towards inclusivity and the perceptions of LGBTQIA and allied patrons.
Needs Assessment
Public libraries help weave together different threads of their communities into a rich and
vibrant fabric by supporting and strengthening the bonds among groups and factions. As
demographics change and shift the paradigm of community inclusivity and representation in the
United States, it is imperative that these institutions offer programs and services that reflect all
segments of the population. Limited research has been published on the relationship between
diversity programs supported by community libraries and their effect on social inclusion and
Queer, Intersex, and Asexual (LGBTQIA) (Condred 2018, Naidoo 2013, Gustina & Guinnee
steadily growing, “library materials, programs, and displays related to sexual orientation and
gender identity still cause controversy” (GLBTRT, 2016). To assuage this lack of information, a
mixed methods research study is proposed to evaluate the correlative implications of diversity
activities, events, and programs offered by libraries and their influence on social inclusivity,
increased awareness, and general acceptance of LGBTQIA members among library patrons. In
particular, the study will explore the effects of integrating Drag Queen Story Time (DQST)
programming on communal and organizational scale, wherein drag queens are enlisted to read
stories to children in libraries and other information centers with the goal to “give kids
glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models,” whilst promoting diversity awareness
Literature Review
Visibility of, and thus inclusivity and the need for acceptance for, the LGBTQIA
community has increased since the late 20th century (Lupien, 2007). However, research on the
relationship between LGBTQIA population and public libraries has identified a disconcerting
gap between library theory and practice. Naidoo (2013) remarks that “if the public library is
meant to be the heart of the community and provide inclusive library services and collections
representative of the local population,” it is imperative that they “serve the informational and
recreational needs of children and caregivers in the LGBTQ families” (p. 34). Gustina &
Guinnee (2017) further note that while the American Library Association (ALA) Code of Ethics
“positions libraries to elevate purposefully the voices and aspirations of all people in their service
area, whatever the individual’s social, economic, legal, or citizenship status,” but “many libraries
have found that work to be impractical” and historically “shown a low tolerance of risk” in
pieces such as the above, which remark on generalities about theory and practice but do not have
a research component. The existing research, albeit minimal at best, has made some positive
correlations in the broadening of diversity programs and services and their impact on social
awareness and feelings of inclusion, but the studies thus far remain limited in scope. For
example, one study focused solely on the patrons that identify as transgender, citing the
difference in informational needs from those of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer patrons, and
accordingly limited their sample pool to transgender participants (Drake & Bielefield, 2017,
p.162). Another focused solely on academic libraries serving students in queer studies programs
across Canada (Lupien, 2007). Studies conducted by Lupien as well as Gregg (2018)
demonstrated the interactions among librarians and patrons searching for LGBTQIA materials,
but neither explored the effects of LGBTQIA programming within the community.
The research conducted as part of this study is foundational, as it will lay the groundwork
to encourage and guide others in developing effective and impactful diversity-minded library
libraries should consider the dimensions of both the organization and patrons independently, and
in so doing, the researchers are hoping to demonstrate a positive correlation in the findings
between diversification of programming and social inclusion within their community, and
consequently suggest further practices public libraries can adopt to improve upon their efforts
towards diverse representation. The results of the study will impact the course of action this
library system follows when developing training and programing to benefit LGBTQIA persons.
The goal of this research study is to identify best practices to foster inclusivity and
productivity among the public library sector and LGBTQIA communities. The two research
objectives will be (1.) to gain a better understanding of the needs and interests of the LGBTQIA
population and their allies as they relate to public library programming, and (2.) how to better
prepare the public library system logistically to partner with individuals and local organizations
to implement LGBTQIA-diverse programming. The data collected in this study will help this
library system develop trainings to ensure library staff comply with ALA guidelines on
inclusivity and representation in order to develop programming that will serve the LGBTQIA
community through representing queer identities and issues, as well as to encourage members of
The survey design as proposed will identify instances where the library system can
develop increased LGBTQIA programming and help determine the appropriate measures for
implementation in order to best serve the local queer community. Together, these surveys will
provide a comprehensive view into the possibility of growth and outreach on an organizational
and communal scope through diversity programming. In particular, this study will focus on Drag
Queen Story Hour, a library event gaining popularity across the country.
A. Survey Section
The methodology proposed for this study is an explanatory sequential mixed methods
approach that will utilize two different self-administered surveys followed by a second round of
interviews with interested participants. Creswell (2018) identified explanatory sequential mixed
methods approach as the best approach to gather empirical data for studies such as this one
rapid turnaround of results for review prior to follow-up interviews (p. 15). The first survey,
referred to as the Library Survey going forward, will focus on operational methods and will be
administered to library staff. The second survey, referred to as the Patron Survey from here on,
will collect data from patrons concerning their experiences with queer programming at their local
library. Participants of both surveys will be able to indicate if they are willing to take part in a
short, recorded telephone conversation with a researcher to share their personal experiences with
queer library programming. While the initial survey pool will encompass a large number of
library patrons and professionals, the follow-up interviews will solely examine a percentage of
those initially surveyed and be randomly selected depending on the rate of return of interest from
the Library Survey. As a way to encourage participation in both surveys, all those that complete
The research population chosen for this survey is comprised of employees and patrons of
two library systems offering DQSH: the San Francisco Public Library and the New York Public
Library. The San Francisco Public Library was the first library system to introduce the DQSH
program to patrons, pioneered by founder Michelle Tea and RADAR Productions in 2015. While
the event began at San Francisco’s Eureka Valley branch, it has since traveled throughout their
27 branches within their system. The concept gained popularity and eventually made its way to
the East Coast in 2016, when the New York Public Library began to hold DQSH events
(Condren, 2018). This survey collects data from anonymous sources which do not represent a
true sample of the population in that they are not randomly selected but are instead chosen
through their association with the three library systems. Therefore, the survey population is not
stratified because individuals being surveyed are neither outed necessarily as part of the queer
community nor do they proportionally represent the populations served by the libraries.
The first survey will be distributed to employees of these library systems. The
questionnaire will include questions addressing the particular library’s path towards offering
programs for marginalized communities; the current diversity programs they offer geared
specifically towards their LGBTQIA patrons; community response to these efforts; the budgetary
restrictions they face in providing these programs or services; the benchmarks in place to
measure their success in these endeavors; and what concerns or issues might dictate the future of
these programs, events, and services. The second survey will be administered to patrons of the
identified libraries and will address the response and effects of the library’s efforts towards
broadening representation and social inclusion of the LGBTQIA community through programs,
events, and services. While the questions for the library employees will be different from that of
the survey for patrons, both questionnaires will be structured similarly. This survey study will be
Neither the staff nor the patron surveys are compulsory. Library staff will receive
information about the survey through direct correspondence. Meanwhile, the patron survey will
be delivered in various ways. Advertisements for the survey will be placed physically around the
library branch as well as through the library’s website and social media outlets. There will also
be promotion of the survey through LGBTQIA clubs and organizations in order to obtain data
directly from within the community. All participants of queer-focused library programming at
In order to collect the data from the library staff and patrons as effectively and efficiently
as possible, the surveys will be administered electronically. The survey will be accessible
through Google Docs, chosen because this hosting site allows researchers to conduct data
analysis easily and succinctly. In addition to efficiency, solely using a digital formatted survey
will result in more clearly defined answers and will limit data misinterpretations. Library staff
should already be equipped with computers in order to complete their survey, however, some
patrons who wish to complete their survey may not have access to computers at home. In this
case, librarians will assist patrons on the library computers in order to access the survey online.
Librarians may answer general queries or offer clarifications, however they will refrain from
Each survey will be comprised of three sets of ten questions. The first set will consist of
multiple choice questions, the second set a series of open-ended responses, and lastly there will
be ten questions in which the surveyor must rate their responses using a 1-5 Likert scale.
Additionally, both surveys will begin with an introductory section in which respondents will
supply demographic information such as age, gender, location, ethnicity, and education and
income-level. Understanding the demographic similarities among SFPL, NYPL, and HCPL will
allow the researchers to understand the unique circumstances within each library system which
would help or hinder the implementation of LGBTQIA programming, as well as the type of
programs implemented. This section will also include the option for participants to select if they
wish to be contacted for a second, in-depth telephone interview wherein they can speak directly
B. Interview Section
These interviews will provide qualitative data from which the researchers will be able to
draw conclusions about the impact of diversity training and diverse programming for library staff
and patrons. They will be conducted using a series of open-ended guiding questions which will
designed to serve the LGBTQIA community. The researchers recognize the opportunity to hear
firsthand from patrons who have specific comments and concerns about library programming as
Qualitative analysis of the responses from participant interviews will enable the research team to
expand upon theories suggested by the quantitative data from the preliminary surveys.
1. Personnel
The principal investigators of this research project consist of the following individuals: Kristen
Bott, Tricia Johnson, Erica Richardi, Crystal Stephenson and Silvia Vetrovsky. The five
principal investigators will administer the two surveys and will be in charge of following
through with the interviews. The researchers will use the assistance of two student assistants to
sort and analyze survey responses as well as schedule interviews with the selected respondents.
2. Timeline
The proposed time frame for this study is one year. The first month will be focused on
preliminary functions, including the assembly of team members, review of library policies prior
to distribution of surveys, and the creation of promotional materials to raise awareness of the
survey study approaching distribution. Materials will be distributed in the second month, which
is the optimal time for researchers to visit the identified library systems for this study in person.
Team members will also take this time to initiate an account and correspondence with Google
Docs. Once established, the Library and Patron Surveys will be published online for
participation. The surveys will be available for two weeks, providing satisfactory opportunity for
survey submissions and retrieval. Following the surveys, participants will be identified for
interviews. One month will be sufficient time to collect surveys, identify those indicating
willingness for interviews, and begin the process of contacting those identified. The fourth
month will be entirely focused on participant interviews. Data analysis will require the
predominant amount of time to complete, so three months have been budgeted for this portion of
the study. Once analysis of results is complete, members will begin to assemble the
determinations gleaned from the data and conduct an official report of the findings throughout
the eighth month. The remaining four months will be designated to publication of report,
addressing advisory boards, participating in conferences, and relaying results to the two library
actions, from modifying services to reevaluating their current programs and events. The
researchers for this proposal believe that one year is adequate time to complete the research,
analysis, and develop determinations, pursue publication of results, and identify the
3. Budget
Total $177,730.00
The Graduate Assistants will be paid hourly in accordance with the guidelines of the USF School
of Information GA compensation policy. Cost sharing through the School of Information will
support 15% of the salary of the primary researchers, all of whom are PhD candidates.
4. Others
Promotional materials such as signs and posters will be designed in-house and printed using a
commercial service. Vital supplies include functional and updated computers with a reliable
Internet connection. We will use Google Docs to collect responses from our surveys and
Microsoft Excel to track expenses. All collaborators will use email as the primary means of
communication throughout the project and updates to the project will be done through Google
Drive. Other miscellaneous supplies include a viable printer/scanner with ink, paper, thumb
References
Condren, C. (2018). Far from a drag: How one library embraced drag queen story hour. Children
& Libraries: The Journal of The Association for Library Service to Children, 16(1),
21-22.
Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J.W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed
Drake, A. A., & Bielefield, A. (2017). Equitable access: Information seeking behavior,
GLBTRT. (2016, April 9). Open to all: Serving the GLBT community in your library. American
http://www.ala.org/rt/sites/ala.org.rt/files/content/professionaltools/160309-glbtrt-open-to
-all-toolkit-online.pdf
Gregg A, S. (2018). Curry’s study on the quality of public library reference service to
LGBTQ youth. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, (13)1 , 57-63.
Gustina, M., & Guinnee, E. (2017). Why social justice in the library? The case for
shifting library policy, practice, and culture toward radical inclusivity. Library
study of user perceptions and satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Information & Library
and user services. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(4), 226-227.
Naidoo, J. C. (2013). Over the rainbow and under the radar: Library services and
New York Public Library. (2018). Home. New York Public Library. Retrieved October 12, 2018,
from https://www.nypl.org
San Francisco Public Library. (2018). Home. San Francisco Public Library. Retrieved October
Staino, R. (2017, June 5). Drag Queen Story Hours Flourishing on Both Coasts. School Library
https://www.slj.com/?detailStory=drag-queen-story-hours-flourishing-on-both-coasts
Member Contribution:
Name
Final Draft
Crystal Stephenson Wrote Sections II and III as a Foundation for Editing and Revisions
Appendix
Patron Survey
Introduction:
Help Hillsborough County Library System expand our library programming! We're
working on building events and programs that better support all HCLS patrons, but we need your
help! Please fill out this brief questionnaire about your library habits and how you can see our
library growing as we continue to build programming that serves the entire community.
Because we are trying to gain a better understanding of the opinions and viewpoints our
patrons have with regards to the LGBTQIA community represented in the public library, you
will be presented with a series of multiple choice and scaled (1-5) questions. We will collect data
from patrons concerning their experiences with queer programming at their local library. You
will note that section one of this survey will be used to gather general demographic information
regarding patrons' backgrounds, including their age, gender, location, education, and more in
order to paint an accurate representation of the people utilizing the library. Section two of this
survey will ask questions specific to the level of exposure to LGBTQIA programs and materials
in the library.
Thank you for participating in our survey. We are truly appreciative of your time in
helping us better serve our community and as a thank you from us, we will be sending you a $10
gift card from Amazon! Simply provide us with your email address so we can contact you with
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Questionnaire:
Section 1
a. Urban
b. Rural
c. Suburban
d. Other
a. I live alone
g. I am currently homeless
j. Other
b. Trans (Your gender identity does not correspond with your birth sex)
c. Non-binary/Genderqueer (Your gender does not correspond with the gender binary)
d. Questioning
a. Straight
b. Gay
c. Lesbian
d. Bisexual
e. Asexual
f. Queer
a. Under 25
b. 25-35
c. 35-45
d. 45-55
e. Over 55
Section 2
b. Once a week
d. Once a month
2. How important is it to you that your local public library actively represent all member of your
d. Not sure
3. Do you feel represented in the collections and programs at your public library and welcome in
that space?
a. Yes, I feel represented in the collections and programs and welcome in the library
b. I feel represented in the collections and programs but not welcome in the space of the
library
c. I feel welcome in the space of the library but not represented in the collections and
programs
e. Unsure
4. Which obstacle most prevents you from attending programs at the library?
a. The timing of the programs (day of the week or time of the day is inconvenient)
d. Transportation barriers (ex: a lack of parking at the library, inadequate public transport)
g. Other
5. Do you believe that your public library can improve upon current efforts to represent the
6. Select the response that most closely matches yours. "I would be willing to attend LGBTQIA
a. Yes
d. Maybe
e. Other
f. None
8. Select the response that most closely matches your scenario. "When I visit the library and am
a. I find the information I need easily because there are plenty of resources available
b. I find most of the information I need although there are limited resources available
d. I can never find what I am looking for due to lack of resources available
9. Which of the following LGBTQIA movies would you be interested in seeing at the next movie
night?
a. Birdcage
b. Paris is Burning
c. Love, Simon
f. Other
g. None
10. Which of the following LGBTQIA books would you be interested in for story time?
b. When You Look Out the Window: How Phyllis Lyon and Del Martin Built a Community
e. Other
f. None
11. Have you attended a diversity program or event, such as the Drag Queen Story Time, at your
12. And if you have attended a diversity program or event, such as the Drag Queen Story Time,
at your local public library, please choose one of the following responses:
c. I felt uncomfortable
** Note: The above survey can also be accessed using the following link:
Patron Questionnaire