You are on page 1of 8

Using the Internet for

Multiparty Dispute Resolution


Colin Rule

Director of Online Dispute Resolution


eBay / PayPal

December 9, 2010
ADR Technology / Internet Tools
Meeting Support
– Dynamic projection systems
– Real-time feedback
– Brainstorming
– Voting and rating tools
– Real-time editing
– Audio / Video conferencing

Online Data and Communications Management


– Full-text searching
– Document management systems
– Online scheduling / Project Management
– Email broadcasts / email newsletters
ADR Technology / Internet Tools (2)
Online Interactivity
– Synchronous meetings (chat, IM, shared desktops) eDeliberation.com

– Threaded discussion environments


– Polling / Surveys
– Joint document editing systems
– Social Networks

Mapping / Decision Support


– Visualization
– Modeling
– Scenario Development
– Governance
– Trade off analysis
Utility of Technology Tool Types at Each Stage of Engagement and Consensus Building Processes
Explore/Inform Consult Advise Decide Implement

Surveys / polling / comment


collection and analysis

Social Networking

Web forums / email lists

Trade off Analysis / Decision


Aiding / Online Deliberative
tools
Modeling / simulation

Project Management /
Scheduling

Visioning / Scenario
development

Mapping / Visualization

Governance support
Advantages
• Lightens administrative load on neutrals eDeliberation.com
– Easy information dissemination
– Document and information repository
• Allows for both targeted and asynchronous
communication
• Supports in-meeting tasks
• Enables participants to make progress between meetings
• Can engage people across wide geographic areas where
face-to-face meetings are impractical
• Dynamic reframing
• Concurrent caucusing
Disadvantages
• Some are threatened by technology eDeliberation.com

• Things can go wrong


• Facilitators can lose control
– Parties are more able to communicate among themselves
– Mediators can overreact and misuse online power
• Discussions can end up focusing on the technology and
not the issues that need to be addressed
• Technology may advantage some parties over others
– Those with fast internet connections
– Those who are comfortable with technology
– Those who type fast (especially in synchronous
communications)
Users
Who can benefit from technology
in multiparty processes? eDeliberation.com

Federal/state/local governments and agencies, for:


- rulemaking
- policy dialogues
- dispute handling systems
- expert panels

ADR Service Providers, for:


- partnering on ODR-enabled processes
- technology planning and design
- facilitation/mediation
- pre-meeting preparation
- post-meeting follow-up
Conclusion
• Public Dispute Resolution sponsors, eDeliberation.com
providers, and participants will come to use
technology more extensively
• The tools will become more sophisticated
– More user friendly
– Better integrated and tested for stability
– Improved support materials (help files, user manuals)
• Users will become more comfortable with technology
– Parties will come to expect that online interaction
options will be available to them
– Funders will ask for online components in proposals
• Technology decisions need to be well considered and
thought out thoroughly in advance of implementation