Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Connie A. McLaren
University of Phoenix
Miami School District Negotiation Paper
The Miami school district has had an unexpected increase in enrollment. This
unexpected increase has forced them to re-evaluate the upcoming year’s school boundaries. The
Miami school district has hired experts to redraw the school boundaries. The new plan means
that many students will not be able to remain in their present schools. Parents are upset by this
and have voiced their concerns and objections to the proposed plan. The Miami school board will
have to educate the parents about the need for the new boundaries and the consequences if the
new boundaries are not established. The forthcoming paragraphs will evaluate the parents
concerns and ways the board plans to address the various concerns and issues.
Quality of Education
Parents are concerned that the quality of their children’s education will be compromised
by the new plan. Parents argue that their children are established in their current schools, with
their current classmates, and moving them will be disruptive to their learning. Many parents have
chosen the schools their children are currently attending, and purposely purchased homes in the
area because they wanted their children to attend the schools in the area. Parents are concerned
that the faculty in the other schools may not be as good or as qualified as the current schools.
Parents of high school aged children entering their senior years are upset that the students will
have to change schools during their senior year possibly affecting scholarships and the academic
grade point averages of the students. Additionally, the students will not be able to graduate with
many of their friends they have gone through high school with.
Parents are concerned about the added travel time their children will endure due to
attending the new schools. Parents whose children normally walked to and from school will ride
buses to and from school each day. Parents are upset and believe the new boundaries
compromise their children’s safety. High school students will be driving further, adding to their
chances of being involved in car accidents, and increasing car insurance rates.
Parents are concerned about their children attending schools with less fortunate children,
in a neighboring area. Parents selected the area they are residing in for many reasons, of which
included the economic and cultural diversity of the area. Parents do not believe the board has the
right to force their children to attend the schools in the neighborhood less fortunate than the one
they reside in. Parent’s fear inferior or prejudiced treatment towards their children, and that the
students will not receive the quality of education they currently obtain. The parent’s believe the
schools will not have the same resources as the schools in the current neighborhood. Parents are
also concerned that the influence of gang and drug activity will be higher in the new schools and
their children will be peer pressured into becoming involved in these inappropriate behaviors.
The new school boundaries could also have an adverse effect on property value in the
neighborhood. The homes are upper-middle-class, with part of their value based on the quality of
schools in the area. Potential buyers will be less likely to purchase a home in the area, because,
of the risk of their children not being able to attend the schools in the neighborhood. A drop in
people interested in buying in the area will lower property values since the general population in
the area are young families raising children. Purchasing a home for young families includes
purchasing that home in a quality school district. Potential buyers may begin to look for homes
elsewhere.
school boundaries. The neighboring schools are located in areas that are not as affluent as those
in the current neighborhood are. Neighboring schools have higher instances of truancy,
behavioral issues, lower average grades, and more gang type behaviors. Parents are fearful, if
their children must move into these schools of what the negative influences will be and what
The Miami district school board has received numerous letters and phone calls
concerning the new school boundaries. The complaints have been so many, that the board knows
they cannot move forward until the board addresses the issues with the stakeholders. The board
must be prepared and do their research on the issues, prior to meeting with the stakeholders.
Stakeholders
The Miami school board needs to understand who the stakeholders are in the issue
concerning new school boundaries. Stakeholders are “a person or group that has an investment,
share, or interest in something” (“Stakeholder“, n.d., p. 1). The stakeholders involved in the new
school boundaries are the faculty of the schools, members of the board, students, parents, and
bus drivers. Stakeholders could also include employees or owners of after-school programs,
daycares, local businesses, and anyone else affected by the new school boundaries, and the effect
they could have on the community. Stakeholders could include local realtors, as the homes in the
area might not sale as quickly or for as much as they potentially could have, before the new
The Miami district school board should attempt to use the collaborative strategy as much
as is feasible. The stakeholders all have valid concerns and complaints that the board must hear,
examine, and are prepared to re-evaluate the boundaries, if necessary. The community
stakeholders in return much listen to the board explain their needs to establish new boundaries.
Parents are concerned the quality of education and learning their students will receive in the new
schools will decline. The board might consider moving some of the teachers to the new schools
to help alleviate some of the concerns the parents have. Parents are concerned their children are
going to have to travel too far to their new schools, putting them at higher risks for accidents.
The Miami school board will need to explain to the parents that the new boundaries will be set in
A large concern for parents is the fact that many of the schools that their children will be
attending are in a neighborhood, which is lower class than the one they live in. Parent’s are
fearful their children will be in danger of gang activity, be ridiculed because of their stature, and
be subject to peer pressure from the rougher students toward inappropriate behaviors. The Miami
school board might combat these concerns with added security at the schools, more stringent
procedures, and punishments for students involved in wrongful doings. In addition, the board
should come prepared to defend the schools in question, with statistics that prove the parents
fears invalid.
Ultimately, the board must make choices and decisions based on what the federal
guidelines outline for schools. The current schools have become overcrowded. Overcrowded
classrooms make for disruptive learning and in turn falling grades. Overcrowded schools tend to
have higher rates of gang type behaviors, such as fighting and drug use. If the school board does
not redefine school boundaries, the quality of education in these schools will decline resulting in
schools undesirable to parents and in turn will drive down property values and such even more so
than the new school boundaries will. The board must explain these types of issues to the parents
understanding, and problem solving in nature, the stakeholders will be more receptive to the
boards arguments and need for the new school boundaries. The stakeholders are not going to
come to the table with negotiations in mind, they will approach with demands, and reasons why
they feel the boundaries are a bad idea. It will be up to the board to win the stakeholders over in a
Ethics or Culture
The decisions for the negotiation strategy had nothing to do with culture. The strategy is
based on ethics, and what is right for the community, students, and school district. Not changing
the boundaries would ultimately be more disruptive for the schools, students, and neighborhood
than redefining the boundaries will be. The initial shock and implementation of the new
boundaries will have some rough issues that will have to be ironed out and dealt with as they
Conclusion
Change is never easy to implement or participate in. People do not like change and will
fight it any chance they get. Understanding why the stakeholders do not like the changes
(Roberts & Hofstetter, n.d.) will be valuable to the board members. Communicating to the
stakeholders in an effective and clear manner will help the stakeholders more effectively
Roberts, D., & Hofstetter, W. (n.d.). Why People Don’t Change. Retrieved Apriil 17, 2010, from
http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/Hofstatter2.html&adt=0
http://dictionary.factmonster.com/stakeholder