Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 29 (2013) 1–8

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Flow Measurement and Instrumentation

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/flowmeasinst

Determination of capacity of labyrinth side weir by CFD

M. Cihan Aydin a,n, M. Emin Emiroglu b
a
Civil Engineering Department, Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis, Turkey
b
Civil Engineering Department, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey

a r t i c l e i n f o abstract

Article history: Side weirs are widely used in irrigation, land drainage, urban sewage systems, flood protection, and
Received 11 April 2012 forebay pool of hydropower systems by flow diversion or intake devices. The hydraulic behavior of side
Received in revised form weirs received considerable interest by many researchers. A large number of these studies are physical
17 August 2012
model tests of rectangular side weirs. However, in the study, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
Accepted 19 September 2012
models together with laboratory models of labyrinth side weirs were used for determining the discharge
Available online 23 October 2012
capacity of the labyrinth side weir located on the straight channel. The discharges performances obtained
Keywords: from CFD analyses were compared with the observed results for various Froude number, dimensionless
Side weir nappe height, dimensionless weir width, and weir included angle. The results obtained from both
Water discharge
methods are in a good agreement.
Labyrinth weir
& 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
CFD analysis
Free surface flow

1. Introduction
A side weir is an overflow weir framed in the side of a channel,
which allows lateral overflow when the surface of the liquid in
the channel rises above the weir crest [1]. Side weirs are hydraulic
structures often in irrigation techniques, sewer networks, land
drainage, and flood protection. The crest length of a weir has the
greatest influence on the discharge capacity. A labyrinth weir is
defined as a weir crest that is not straight in planform. The
increased sill length provided by labyrinth weirs effectively
reduces upstream head to the particular discharge. A labyrinth
weir can therefore be used to particular advantage where the
width of a channel is restricted and a weir is required to pass a
range of discharges with a limited variation in upstream water
level. Hay and Taylor [2] and Tullis et al. [3] carried out experi-
ments on the advantage of labyrinth weirs in case of limited
channel widths. There are a lot of prototype labyrinth spillways
(for example the Avon Dam (Australia), the Ritschard Dam (USA),
the Ute Dam (USA), the Hyrum Dam (USA), the Sarioglan Dam
(Turkey), the Kizilcapinar Dam (Turkey)). However the idea of
labyrinth side weir was first presented by Emiroglu et al. [4], and
there is not any prototype labyrinth side weir in our knowledge.
They reported that discharge coefficient of the labyrinth side weir is
1.5–4.5 times higher than normal rectangular side weir in a rectan-
gular channel. However it is noted that one of the disadvantages of
n
Corresponding author. Tel.: þ90 4342285170; fax: þ 90 4342285171.
E-mail addresses: mcaydin@gmail.com (M.C. Aydin),
memin.emiroglu@gmail.com (M.E. Emiroglu).
the labyrinth side weirs is the decrease of discharge capacity with
increasing the nappe height when the weir included angle is chosen
too small.
A review of previous studies indicated that rectangular sharp-
crested side weirs have been investigated extensively, including
work by Ackers [5], Collinge [6], Frazer [7], Subramanya and
Awasthy [8], El-Khashab and Smith [9], Uyumaz and Muslu [10],
Helweg [11], Swamee et al. [12], Agaccioglu and Yuksel [13]. The
hydraulic behavior and discharge coefficient of side weirs for the
different type of weirs, main channel and flow conditions have
been studied by many researchers such as: Nadesamoorthy and
Thomson [14], Singh et al. [15], Yu-Tek [16], Cheong [17], and
others. Ranga Raju et al. [1] investigated on the discharge
coefficient of a broad-crested rectangular side weir depending
on the main channel, Froude number and head/weir width ratio.
Recently, Aydin [18] modeled the free surface flow over the
triangular labyrinth side weir by using Volume of Fluids (VOF)
method to describe the surface characteristics in subcritical flow
conditions. Borghei and Parvaneh [19] studied a new type of
oblique side weir with asymmetric geometry on an experimental
set-up. The researchers stated that this kind of weir is more
efficient than the ordinary oblique weir. Emiroglu et al. [20]
carried out a comprehensive study to determine the discharge
coefficient of a sharp crested rectangular side weir in a straight
channel, and developed an equation for discharge coefficient
including all dimensional parameters. Agaccioglu et al. [21]
presented a reliable equation based on 1504 experimental runs
for discharge coefficient of the rectangular side weir in a curved
channel depending on the all dimensionless parameters. Haddadi
and Rahimpour [22] investigated an experimental setup to obtain

0955-5986/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2012.09.008
2 M.C. Aydin, M.E. Emiroglu / Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 29 (2013) 1–8

the relationships of discharge coefficient with the other dimen-

sionless parameters for trapezoidal broad-crested side weir.
Bagheri S., Heidarpour [23] investigated the water flow over
sharp-crested side weirs obtaining the distribution of the three-
dimensional velocity.
Assuming that the specific energy across the weir is constant
in the dynamic equation of spatially varied flow for outflow over a
weir [24], the general equation of weirs can be described as
dQ pffiffiffiffiffiffi
q¼ ¼ C d 2g ½hp3=2 ð1Þ
dx
where q is the discharge per unit length over the weir, Q is
the out-flow discharge, x is the longitudinal direction, g is the
gravitational acceleration, p is the height of the weir, h is
the depth of flow measured from the channel bottom along the
channel centerline, and Cd is the discharge coefficient of the weir.
Emiroglu et al. [25] used Eq. (1) to estimate the discharge
coefficient of sharp-crested triangular labyrinth side weirs on a
straight channel, and they proposed the following equation for
subcritical flow:
  0:4
 0:254  0:122
C d ¼ 0:4 þ 2:62 þ0:634 bL þ 3:214 ‘L 0:684 hp1
  1:982 #3:857
y
þ 0:122 sin þ 0:22F 2:458
1 ð2Þ
4

In the present study, the discharge capacity of triangular

labyrinth side weir with one cycle was determined by using
VOF method with Fluent code, and the discharge coefficients
obtained from the CFD were compared with the experimental
Fig. 1. Sketch view of labyrinth side weirs. (a) Hydraulic profile of the triangular
data of Emiroglu et al. [4]. Recently, some of the researchers such
side weir, (b) Plan view if triangular side weir and (c) Front view of the triangular
as Bridgeman et al. [26], Aydin and Ozturk [27], Schaffrath et al. [28] side weir.
used Fluent in their studies at various field as nuclear, mechanical
and civil engineering. In the other study, Hargreaves et al. [29]
studied the validation of CFD for modeling free surface flows over Table 1
common hydraulic structures using Fluent with VOF (Volume of Model geomeries and meshing specifications.
Fluid) method. They gained the confidence that more complex
L (m) y (1) p (m) Grid size (mm) Number of cells Meshing type
hydraulic structures should be modeled by using similar techniques.
0.25 45 0.12 10 291800 3D Hexahedral
0.16 10 292325 3D Hexahedral
2. Physical model 0.20 10 292325 3D Hexahedral
60 0.12 10 347610 3D Hexahedral
0.16 10 347610 3D Hexahedral
The data used in this study were taken from the experimental
0.20 10 463480 3D Hexahedral
studies conducted by Emiroglu et al. [4] on a large model. The authors
conducted 2830 laboratory tests for determining discharge coefficient 0.50 45 0.12 10 561320 3D Hexahedral
0.16 10 561320 3D Hexahedral
of triangular labyrinth side weirs. The typical hydraulic characteristics 0.20 10 561320 3D Hexahedral
and the views of the triangular labyrinth side weir are also illustrated 60 0.12 10 340675 3D Hexahedral
in Fig. 1. Their set-up consisted of a rectangular main channel 0.5 m 0.16 10 408810 3D Hexahedral
wide, 0.50 deep and 12 m long, with a discharge collection channel 0.20 10 646440 3D Hexahedral
0.5 m wide and 0.70 m deep parallel to the main channel. A sluice
gate was fitted at the end of the main channel to control flow depth.
A rectangular weir was placed at the end of collection channel to (h1–p)/p and different weir included angles in order to obtain the
measure the discharge of the side weir. In order to measure the water variation of the discharge coefficient.
level in the collection channel, a digital point gauge was fixed further
0.40 m from the weir. Labyrinth side weirs were fabricated from
sharp edged steel plates. The discharges were measured to an 3. CFD model
accuracy of 70.1 L/s, by means of an electromagnetic flow-meter
installed in the supply line. A High Performance Computer (HPC) was used to simulate the
The experiments were conducted for subcritical flow, stable CFD models with VOF method in ANSYS-FLUENT1. The VOF model
flow and free overflow conditions. Novak and Cabelka [30] stated can model two or more immiscible fluids by solving a single set of
that minimum nape height should not be less than 30 mm momentum equations, Eq. (3), and tracking the volume fraction of
because of the surface tension over the weir crest. Therefore, each of the fluids throughout the domain, Eq. (4) [31].

minimum nape height is taken into account as 30 mm. The data of @ @ @P s @ @ui @uj
the experiments were considered for the weir lengths (L) of 0.25 ðruj Þ þ ðrui uj Þ ¼  þ m þ þ rg j þF j ð3Þ
@t @xi @xj @xi @xj @xi
and 0.50 m, the weir heights (p) of 0.12 m, 0.16 m and, 0.20 m,
and weir included angles with y ¼451and 601. Labyrinth side
weirs were tested for different Froude numbers, different ratios of 1
License owner: Bitlis Eren University, Customer Number: 618883.
 M.C. Aydin, M.E. Emiroglu / Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 29 (2013) 1–8 3

" #
1 @ ! Xn
ðaq rq Þ þ r:ðaq rq v q Þ ¼ Saq þ _ pq m
ðm _ qp Þ ð4Þ
rq @t p¼1
where r is the density of fluid, m is the dynamic viscosity of fluid, u is
the velocity vectors, Ps is the pressure and F is a body force; m _ qp is the
mass transfer from phase q to phase p, m _ pq is the mass transfer from
phase p to phase q, aq is the qth fluid’s volume fraction in a cell. The
source term Saq of Eq. (4) is zero by default. If aq ¼0, the cell is empty,
if aq ¼1, the cell is full (of the qth fluid), and if 0o aq o1, the cell
contains the interface between two fluid phases. The VOF model with
time-dependent solution in Fluent was used to calculate free surface
flow in the labyrinth side weir models.
3.1. Geometry and boundary conditions
The geometries and meshes were generated by using Gambit.
The parameters of the created models and its meshing specifica-
tions were given in Table 1. The typical view of model geometry
and boundary conditions are given in Fig. 2. The open channel
boundary conditions were applied to the CFD model as the
pressure inlet at the main channel inlet, the pressure outlets at
aspects known as iterative convergence and grid convergence, in
terms of time-dependent problems, iterative convergence at
every time step should be checked. It must be ensured that
iterative convergence is achieved with at least three orders-of-
magnitude decrease in the normalized residuals for each equation
solved. Each time steps are maximum 40 iterations and all
residuals drop under three orders every time steps. As shown in
Fig. 3, iterative convergences were achieved for each Froude
number of the each CFD model of labyrinth side weirs (for
L¼0.25 m, y ¼601, and p ¼0.20 m). It is pointed out that this is
quite time-consuming process despite of using the HPC system.
A method for discretization error estimation is the Richardson
extrapolation (RE) method which was first used by Richardson [33].
The Grid Convergence Index (GCI) method which is based on Richard-
son Extrapolation was used to estimate the discretization errors. The
procedure of this method was outlined by Celik et al. [34] as
following.
For three dimensional calculations the representative cell,
mesh or grid size l was estimated by
" #1=3
1XN

the boundaries which open to atmosphere and labyrinth side weir l¼ ðDV i Þ ð5Þ
Ni¼1
outlet (Fig. 2). The pressure inlet boundary condition presents an
option which ensures to easily describe the bottom and the
surface levels of the main channel and also the velocity of the
main channel flow. A water level of downstream weir is imposed
initially by the pressure inlet boundary at the main channel
outlet. It is assumed that the free surface levels of the inlet and
outlet boundaries in the main channel are approximately equal
initially. After the solution is converged, the water levels reach
own natural level in the subcritical conditions. For subcritical
outlet flows (F1 o1), if there are only two phases, then the
pressure is taken from the pressure profile specified over the
boundary, otherwise the pressure is taken from the neighboring
cell. Based on the Froude number when F1 o1 the flow is known
to be subcritical where disturbances can travel upstream as well
as downstream. In this case, downstream conditions might affect
the flow upstream [31].

3.2. Solution convergence

The numerical verification in this paper is partially based

on the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Fig. 3. Iterative convergence for various Froude numbers. (a) Hydraulic profile of
editorial policy statement, which provides a framework for CFD the triangular side weir, (b) Plane view of triangular side weir and (c) Front view of
uncertainty analysis [32]. Convergence investigation involves two the triangular side weir.

Fig. 2. Model geometry and boundary conditions [18].

4 M.C. Aydin, M.E. Emiroglu / Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 29 (2013) 1–8

where DVi is the volume of ith cell and N is the number of cell.
Three different sets of grid are selected and the apparent order is
calculated using the equation below.
1
4. Results and discussion
The discharge coefficients Cd of CFD models were calculated by
Eq. (1) using the data obtained from CFD analyses as calculated by

Emiroglu et al. [25] for their physical model.
P¼ ln j32 =j21
þ qðPÞ
ð6Þ
lnðr 21 Þ Emiroglu et al. [4] found that the discharge coefficient Cd for
labyrinth side weir included angles of 451 and 601 is greater than
where j21 ¼ f2  f1, j32 ¼f3 f2, r is the grid refinement factor, the Cd coefficient for the other included angles (y ¼901, 1201 and
defined as r21 ¼ l2/l1 for l1 o l 2, f1, f2, f3 are the key variables 1501). They stated that the effect of L/b ratio, which plays an
which play an important role for the considered study. If the grid important role in the discharges capacity of labyrinth side weir,
refinement (r) is constant, q(P) ¼0. Then, it is calculated following on Cd for labyrinth side weir included angles of 451 and 601 is very
approximate relative errors: important due to the increase in the intensity of secondary flow


created by lateral flow. Therefore, in the CFD analyses, it is only

f f
considered that the triangular labyrinth side weir included angles
e21 ¼

1 2

ð7Þ
f1
Finally, the fine grid convergence index was calculated as [35]
1:25e21
GCI21
f ine ¼
r P21 1
Three various grid sizes which are fine-grid, base grid (10 mm)
and coarse-grid were used to control grid convergence. The
refinement factors between the coarse and fine grids (r ¼ l coarse/
l fine 41) is 1.11 according to Roache [36] who recommended a
minimum 10% change in the grid refinement factor. The values of
key variable (f1, f2, f3) were considered as the overflow discharges
of side weir for three grid sizes. The numerical errors for
L¼0.25 m, y ¼601, p¼0.12 m were estimated in Table 2. Accord-
ing to this table, the fine-grid evaluation of GCI can be given as
between 0.77% and 7.88% which corresponds to the weir dis-
charges of 0.12 and 0.52 L/s approximately. The maximum dis-
cretization error with the averaged apparent order was also
obtained as 2.13% in terms of velocity magnitude in the middle
of side-weir by Aydin [18].
of 451 and 601.
To show the effects of parameter (h1  p)/p on discharge
coefficients, Cd values obtained from both the CFD and physical
models are plotted against the dimensionless nappe height
(h1  p)/p for L/b ¼0.5 and 1.0 in Fig. 5(a–d). These figures show
ð8Þ
that Cd decreases with the increase in (h1  p)/p. The effect of
(h1  p)/p on Cd can be explained with the discontinuity region.
This discontinuity region has a strong secondary motion next to
the boundary of the weir side. Tullis et al. [3] also stated that the
values of discharge coefficient decrease with the increasing nappe
height. The decreasing trend of Cd with the increase of (h1  p)/p
increases with reducing labyrinth side weir included angle. For
this reason, higher nappe heights on labyrinth side weir are not
selected by hydraulic designers. The discharge capacity of the
labyrinth side weir increases with the reducing included angle (y).
Thus, the effect of nappe height on discharge of labyrinth side
weir is more significant in the small angles. Therefore, the
designer must carefully be choosing the nappe height.

3.3. Turbulence model

In order to determine the sensitivity of results to turbulence,

the six various turbulence models (RSM, standard k–e, RNG k–e,
Realizible k–e, k–o, Spalart–Allmaras, where k is the turbulence
kinetic energy, e is the turbulence dissipation rate, and o is the
specific dissipation rate of turbulence) were compared in Fig. 4 for
L¼0.25 m, y ¼601, p ¼0.12 m and F1 ¼0.43. Fig. 4 shows that the
variations of dimensionless velocity ratios (V/Vm) at the middle of
the weir entrance with the turbulence models are quite slight
especially for RSM, Standard k–e, Realizable k–e and Spalart–
Allmaras turbulence models besides other two models. Addition-
ally, the RSM is probably the best competent model among all the
models to simulate the surface shapes especially the surface
fluctuations and vortex occurrence in the side-weir for subcritical Fig. 4. Comparison of different turbulence models.
condition [18].

Table 2
Discretization errors.

(h1-p)/h1 Discharges (L/s) e21 e32 r21 r32 pave e21 e32 GCI21
fine (%) GCI32
fine (%)

f1 f2 f3

0.25 7.69 6.68 6.23  1.0066  0.4487 1.11 1.11 11.26 0.131 0.067 7.88 4.04
0.30 9.86 9.37 9.34  0.4858  0.0283 1.11 1.11 11.26 0.049 0.003 2.96 0.18
0.35 12.52 12.30 12.39  0.2175 0.0935 1.11 1.11 11.26 0.017 0.008 1.05 0.46
0.40 15.66 15.46 15.38  0.2018  0.0833 1.11 1.11 11.26 0.013 0.005 0.77 0.32
0.45 19.29 18.86 18.30  0.4385  0.5587 1.11 1.11 11.26 0.023 0.030 1.37 1.78
 M.C. Aydin, M.E. Emiroglu / Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 29 (2013) 1–8
Fig. 5. (a–d) Comparison of Cd coefficients against the dimensionless nappe height.
Fig. 6 (a–d) shows the comparison of Cd values obtained from
CFD and experimental studies against the Froude number. The
results generally indicated that discharge coefficient increases
with increasing Froude number. Agaccioglu and Yüksel [13] also
found the similar tendency. But, the variation of Cd against F1 is
not significant for the small width of the side weir as L/b¼ 0.5.
Moreover, there has been a little reduction of Cd with increasing
Froude number (Fig. 6a) like sharp-crested side weirs. The main
reason of this is the low intensity of secondary motion created by
lateral flow for small value of L/b. However for higher L/b¼1.0 the
increasing of Cd values against F1 is more significant, as shown in
Fig. 6(c–d). The strength of the secondary flow was affected by the
length of the side weir and Froude number. An increase on the
secondary flow causes the growth of the deviation angle and
kinetic energy towards the side weir when the relative side-weir
length increases. Therefore, an increase of F1 values also increases
Cd values. El-Khashab and Smith [9] also mentioned that the
secondary flow condition due to lateral flow is dominant when a
side weir is relatively long (i.e., L/b41).
The development of secondary flow towards the downstream
direction inside the labyrinth side weir is presented in Fig. 7. The
intensity of secondary flow created by lateral flow is defined as the
ratio of the mean kinetic energy of the lateral motion to the total
kinetic energy of main flow at a given cross section. The intensity of
secondary flow is probably created by lateral flow shown in Fig. 8.
Turbulence and velocity streamlines oriented towards the side weir.
By orientation of the velocity streamlines towards side weir, the
Q s ðobservedÞQ s ðCFDÞ
occurrence of the stagnation zone and the vortex plays an important
Q s ðobservedÞ
role in flow interactions (see Fig. 8). The strength of the secondary
5
flow created by the lateral flow was affected by the length of the
side weir, crest height of side weir and Froude number. An increase
in the secondary flow causes the growth of the deviation angle and
kinetic energy towards the side weir when the relative length of the
side weir increases. The occurrence of the vortex near to middle of
labyrinth side weir in XY-plane gets complicated the secondary flow
phenomenon in YZ-plane. Due to the vortex occurrence while the
secondary flow moves counter-clockwise at the upstream of middle
of the weir, the secondary flow moves clockwise at the downstream
of middle of the weir (see Fig. 7).
As it can be seen from Figs. 5 and 6, the discharge coefficients
from CFD analyses are quietly compatible with the experimental
data observed. In Fig. 9, the weir discharges obtained from CFD
analyses and computed from Eq. (1) with Cd values of Emiroglu
et al. [4] were compared. As seen in this figure, the CFD and the
calculated values are in reasonable agreement with 711% errors.
Additionally, to evaluate the accuracy between experimental and
CFD results, the root mean square error (RMSE) and the average
percent error (APE) criteria were used. The RMSE and APE are
given as 2.016% and 10.64% respectively for the side weir
discharges. These values present a satisfactory agreement
between experimental and CFD results.
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u N
u1 X
RMSE ¼ t
2
ðQ ðobservedÞQ s ðCFDÞÞ ð9Þ
Ni¼1 s
N
100 X
APE ¼ ð10Þ
N i¼1
6 M.C. Aydin, M.E. Emiroglu / Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 29 (2013) 1–8

Fig. 6. (a–d) Comparison of Cd coefficients against the Froude number.

Fig. 7. Secondary flows in the different cross sections. (a) Plan, (b) Section II-II, (c) Section III-III, (d) Section IV-IV and (e) Section V-V.
 M.C. Aydin, M.E. Emiroglu / Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 29 (2013) 1–8 7

Fig. 8. Velocity vectors on free surface at junction location. (a) XY-plan, (b) X-component and (c) Y-component.

in which N is the number of data set and Qs is the discharge
of weir.
5. Conclusions
In the present study, the CFD (Fluent) analyses of labyrinth
side weir located on a straight channel were performed to
investigate the effects of some dimensionless parameters as F1
and (h1  p)/p at the certain values of y and L/b. The open channel
boundary conditions used in the CFD models provide an efficient
approach for simulation of the flow over the labyrinth side weir.
The GCI analysis performed with the fine, base (10 mm) and
coarse grid to determine the numerical sensitivity to the grid of
model. It is reported that the fine-grid evaluation of GCI as
between 0.77% and 7.88% in terms of overflow discharges.
Both the results of CFD and physical model showed that while
Cd coefficient decreases with increasing values of (h1  p)/p, it
increases with increasing F1 due to the effects of secondary flow
inside the labyrinth side weir. Only for small values of L/b as 0.5,
Cd values decreases with increase of Froude number, like sharp-
crested side weir because of low intensity of secondary flow. For
all results, it is concluded that a reasonable agreement was
achieved between the CFD results and the experimental observa-
tions. Additionally, an interval error of 711%, RMSE¼2.016 and
APE¼10.64% respect to the side weir discharges between CFD and
experimental results is reported. The presented results in this
study can encourage further the researchers in making new
different designs of labyrinth side weir by using CFD.
8 M.C. Aydin, M.E. Emiroglu / Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 29 (2013) 1–8
Fig. 9. Comparison of the discharges values.
References
[1] Ranga Raju KG, Prasad B, Gupta SK. Side weir in rectangular channel. Journal
of Hydraulics Division 1979;105:547–54.
[2] Hay N, Taylor G. Performance and design of labyrinth weirs. Journal of
Hydraulics Engineering 1970;96(11):2337–57.
[3] Tullis JP, Amanian N, Waldron D. Design of labyrinth spillways. Journal of
Hydraulics Engineering ASCE 1995;121(3):247–55.
[4] Emiroglu ME, Kaya N, Agaccioglu H. Discharge capacity of labyrinth side weir
located on a straight channel. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
2010;136(1):37–46.
[5] Ackers P. A theoretical consideration of side-weirs as storm water overflows.
Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers 1957;6:250–69.
[6] Collinge VK. The discharge capacity of side weirs. Proceedings of the Institute
of Civil Engineers 1957;6:288–304.
[7] Frazer W. The behavior of side weirs in prismatic rectangular channels.
Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers 1957;6:305–27.
[8] Subramanya K, Awasthy SC. Spatially varied flow over side weirs. Journal of
the Hydraulics Division 1972;98(1):1–10.
[9] El-Khashab A, Smith KVH. Experimental investigation of flow over side weirs.
Journal of the Hydraulics Division ASCE 1976;102(HY9):1255–68.
[10] Uyumaz A, Muslu Y. Flow over side weirs in circular channels. Journal of the
Hydraulics Division ASCE 1985;111(1):144–60.
[11] Helweg OJ. Microcomputer applications in water resources. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1991.
[12] Swamee PK, Pathak SK, Ali MS. Side weir analysis using elementary discharge
coefficient. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 1994;120(4):
742–55.
[13] Agaccioglu H, Yüksel Y. Side-weir flow in curved channels. Journal of
Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 1998;124(3):163–75.
[14] Nadesamoorthy T, Thomson A. Discussion of spatially varied flow over side-
weirs. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 1972;98(12):2234–5.
[15] Singh R, Manivannan D, Satyanarayana T. Discharge coefficient of rectangular
side weirs. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 1994;120(4):
814–9.
[16] Yu-Tek L. Discussion of spatially varied flow over side-weirs. Journal of the
Hydraulics Division 1972;98(11):2047–8.
[17] Cheong HF. Discharge coefficient of lateral diversion from trapezoidal
channel. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE 1991;117(4):
461–75.
[18] Aydin MC. CFD simulation of free-surface flow over triangular labyrinth side
weir. Advances in Engineering Software 2012;45:159–66.
[19] Borghei SM, Parvaneh A. Discharge characteristics of a modified oblique side
weir in subcriticalflow. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 2011;22(5):
370–6.
[20] Emiroglu ME, Agaccioglu H, Kaya N. Discharging capacity of rectangular side
weirs in straight open channels. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
2011;22(4):319–30.
[21] Agaccioglu H, Emiroglu ME, Kaya N. Discharge coefficient of side weirs in curved
channels. Proceedings of the ICE—Water Management 2012;165(WM6):
339–52.
[22] Haddadi H, Rahimpour M. A discharge coefficient for a trapezoidal broad-
crested side weir in subcritical flow. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
2012;26:63–7.
[23] Bagheri S, Heidarpour M. Characteristics of flow over rectangular sharp-
crested side weirs. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE
2012;138(6):541–7.
[24] Henderson FM. Open channel flow. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co Inc;
1966 p. 522.
[25] Emiroglu ME, Kaya N, Agaccioglu H. Closure to Discharge capacity of
labyrinth side weir located on a straight channel. Journal of Irrigation and
Drainage Engineering 2011;137(11):745–6.
[26] Bridgeman J, Jefferson B, Parsons SA. The development and application of CFD
models for water treatment flocculators. Advances in Engineering Software
2010;41:99–109.
[27] Aydin MC, Ozturk M. Verification and validation of a computational fluid
dynamics (CFD) model for air entrainment at spillway aerators. Canadian
Journal of Civil Engineering 2009;36:826–36.
[28] Schaffrath A, Fischer KC, Hahm T, Wussow S. Validation of the CFD code
fluent by post-test calculation of a density-driven ROCOM experiment.
Nuclear Engineering and Design 2007;237:1899–908.
[29] Hargreaves DM, Morvan HP, Wright NG. Validation of the volume of fluid
method for free surface calculation: the broad-crested weir. Engineering
Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 2007;1(2):136–46.
[30] Novak P, Cabelka J. Models in Hydraulic Engineering. Pitman Publishing
Limited, London 1981.
[31] F.L.U.E.N.T. Inc. Fluent version 6.2 User’s Guide. N.H. Lebanon: FLUENT Inc.;
2005.
[32] Freitas CJ. Journal of fluids engineering editorial policy statement on the
control of numerical accuracy. Journal of Fluids Engineering, ASME
1993;115:339–40.
[33] Richardson LF. The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of
physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the
stresses in a masonry dam. Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Ser A
1910;210:307–57.
[34] Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE. Procedure for
estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD
applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering, ASME 2008. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1115/1.2960953 078001-1-4.
[35] Roache PJ. Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics.
Annual Review Fluid Mechanics 1997;29:123–60.
[36] Roache PJ. Perspective a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement
studies. Journal of Fluids Engineering 1994;116(3):405–13.