20200325-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re Failing Leadership in Novel Coronavirus Issues, Etc

20200325-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
ISSUE –
Re Failing leadership in Novel Coronavirus issues, etc
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.
* Gerrit, you wrote personally to PM Scott Morrison, did you?

**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, I did indeed.
Are we yet again mislead as to the real causes of death by fabricated Novel Coronavirus
statistics and failing test results to violate our constitutional rights as set out in this
correspondence regarding Prime Minister Scott Morrison failing leadership?
This document can be downloaded from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/452976879/20200324-Mr-g-h-Schorel-hlavka-o-w-b-to-Pm-
Mr-Scott-Morrison
I also received a response as to my previous 19 March 2020 PRESS RELEASE:

QUOTE
RE: Senator David Van - Jagajaga constituent correspondence referral
24 Mar at 6:14 pm
Horner, Michael (Sen S. Ryan) <michael.horner@aph.gov.au>

To: 'inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au' <inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au>
Dear Mr Schorel-Hlavka,
Thank you for writing to Senator David Van regarding the issues of bulk purchasing of household
items at grocery stores and supermarkets. Senator Van forwarded your email to Senator the Hon.
Scott Ryan as the patron senator for your area, who has requested that I respond on his behalf.
We understand the frustration that the stockpiling of household items, either for personal or
commercial means has provided. It is unfair on law-abiding Australians who simply wish to
purchase household necessities when they are needed.
Though the number of individuals seeking to export household necessities outside of Australia is
relatively small, this past week the Commonwealth Government has directed both the Australian
Federal Police, and Australian Border Force catch cases of profiteering from consumer staples at
the border during this time of crisis.
With respect to Australians bulk-purchasing items for individual use, the Government has been
working with the major supermarkets to discourage unnecessary item purchases. Limits of a
maximum of two of the same item (or in some cases only one) have been placed across most goods.
Additionally, the introduction of community hours at both Coles and Woolworths to ensure
Australians who may not necessarily be able to visit supermarkets as often as others have the best
chance to secure items once they are restocked daily. It is the plan of supermarkets to resume their
online delivery services in the near future, which will also ease the burden on ensuring easier access
to consumer staples for those unable to leave home for health reasons.
p1 25-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
It is the hope that these measures will stabilise supermarket purchases over the coming days and
weeks to manageable levels, however should this not be the case the Government and supermarkets
do not rule out further measures in future.
I trust this information is of assistance.
Kind regards,
Michael Horner | Office Manager
OFFICE OF SENATOR THE HON. SCOTT RYAN
President of the Senate
Senator for Victoria
A: Suite 1, 12 Pascoe Vale Road, Moonee Ponds VIC 3039

P: 0447 594 243 E: michael.horner@aph.gov.au
From: Hutton, Briony (Sen D. Van)

Sent: Tuesday, 24 March 2020 9:19 AM
To: Horner, Michael (Sen S. Ryan)
Subject: Senator David Van - Jagajaga constituent correspondence referral
Dear Michael,
Mr Schorel-Hlavka of Viewbank has contacted Senator Van concerning issues facing senior
Australians seeking to purchase household items amid the coronavirus pandemic, and has put
forward his policy suggestions to the Government.
As Mr Schorel-Hlavka resides in the electorate of Jagajaga, I am referring this correspondence to

your office as the patron Senator.
Kind regards,
Briony Hutton
Office of Senator David Van
Senator for Victoria
Suite 4.1, Commonwealth Parliamentary Offices
4 Treasury Place, East Melbourne VIC 3002
P: 03 9660 6660 | M: 0468 308 696 | E: briony.hutton@aph.gov.au
From: Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. [mailto:via@family.org.au]

Sent: Friday, 20 March 2020 12:29 AM
To: Van, David (Senator)
Subject: Re Corona eyegauging and food parcels
END QUOTE

At least this was showing courtesy towards my writings. However, what we need is leadership
from those who are in charge of the various governments.
While Olga (my wife) and I are in the elderly category we have as yet not received a single
correspondence from any Government leader to set out details. While I search the internet it is
appalling that none of our leaders seemed to bother to use Australia Post to write to us in detail
what is going on and what is being done.
We do not watch television or generally listen to the radio and so we have scant information. Just
from some news bulletins we happen to hear at times over the radio.
All this talk about self-isolation but not about how you will survive if you self-isolate, etc.
I have a hearing disability and so tend not to use mobile or telephone and so providing telephone
numbers is useless, besides you might be held at hold for long periods of time. So telling people
about some phone hotline is utterly useless to me.
What should have been done is to avoid panic and that obviously is what the so-called leaders are
better in to cause rather than to avoid.
Now we are told not to line up for Centrelink but then consider:
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/aldi-to-limit-customer-numbers-in-store-to-meet-new-
social-distancing-guidelines/ar-BB11F5yc?ocid=spartandhp
Aldi to limit customer numbers in store to meet new social distancing guidelines
QUOTE
Announced this morning, Aldi said only a specific number of customers – variable on store size – would be
allowed in at any one time.
The grocer also asked shoppers to allow more vulnerable Australians to jump queues that may form outside
stores.
END QUOTE
That means people will have to stand in a que outside the store 1½ meters apart and then how on
earth would anyone know other than checking age, who is more vulnerable? And most may
simply hold that they are responsible for their own family and so not care about others.
In my view we have this gigantic failure of leadership and this needs to be addressed.
If anyone is required to self-isolate then the relevant government provided for all members of
that family that goes in self-isolation a at least 3 weeks survival pack. You may find this a lot
cheaper then to grind the entire economy to a health. Then anyone not self-isolating and able to
go to work is permitted to do so. No use to have able body persons sitting at home doing nothing
when factories, etc, are needed to operate.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/coronavirus/constructing-temporary-coronavirus-hospitals/ss-
BB11EZug?ocid=spartandhp
Constructing temporary coronavirus hospitals
We have in Melbourne a tennis centre that can close its roof and so why not convert this in a
temporary hospital facility? Also let the army build temporary field hospitals to accommodate
those who are infected but are not deemed at risk to die.
Those who are affected by the Novel Coronavirus can then be held in quarantine while the
elderly and those most vulnerable to risk death can be better placed in hospitals.
We saw in Tasmania a man who was infected then was required to be self-isolated but it seems
no system was in place to ensure that he was then provided with 21 days (at least) of survival
items for those 14 days and so he went shopping. This show the appalling lack of leadership also.
Because 14 days is uncertain providing 21 days survival items is a better option. Army food is
very much for soldiers in time of rationing their food at the front line, and those who have special
needs should be able to have government assistance to be provided with it, such as special
medication, etc.
.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-51731422
Coronavirus panic: Why are people stockpiling toilet paper?
By Frances Mao BBC News, Sydney
QUOTE
Prof Garg compares the rush to what occurred in many Asian nations. She notes that in China for example,
there was a greater motivation to stock up on white ply because "there's a thinking that toilet paper can be
substituted for tissues and napkins and to make makeshift masks".
END QUOTE
We had this panic about buying toilet paper, mask, etc, and well people who have families to
care for are responsible enough to make sure they get what they think is needed in the event they
too must self-isolate. That is a lot more responsibility shown then with the NSW Health and the
Federal Border control where they let about 2,700 persons leaving the ruby Princess without
bothering to test any of them. Allegedly the ships doctor claimed they were ok. In my view the
ships doctor might have been under pressure to get rid of everyone of the ship. Well, I view the
ships owners should bear the cost of all those now having to isolate, the 147 reported infected
persons and for the death of this woman. And of course those in NSW Heatkh and Border force
should face legal consequences for their appalling conduct in it all. While Border Force seeks to
blame NSW Health the reality is that Border Force must also cop it as it should have insisted to
have everyone tested. Likewise NSW Health should cop it. And the relevant Ministers should be
held accountable also. That is what our constitutional system is about to hold the “responsible
Minister” accountable.
With the toilet paper issue around the world being purchased big time, being to make mask from
them or otherwise I view the various government should have immediately ordered/caused the
manufacturing of the toilet paper tablets. Those are tablets that when placed for a few second in
water they can become a large bamboo toilet sheet, they use for camping and other situations
instead of carrying a toilet paper roll.
* Where can you find information about those toilet paper tablets?
**#** Try https://rvingreviews.com/plumbing/best-toilet-paper-tablets/ Best Toilet Paper
Tablets. There are also video’s on YouTube how for example in a small container you can have
50 slices of soap.
* Slices?
**#** Check out the video “Best Wilderness Hygiene Kits! Toilet Paper Tablets - Epic Wipes -
Sh!t Kit!” at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr0AevZwTXA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNArvGCBgJ4 Coronavirus: Up To 24 Days Before Symptoms Start

Showing
Incubation period of the novel coronavirus could be as long as 24 ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS5Y7OKOIc4
Anonymous View
10 Feb 2020 ... Coronavirus: Up To 24 Days Before Symptoms Start Showing? - Duration: 20:45. Peak
Prosperity Recommended for you · 20:45 · Coronavirus ...

Coronavirus: Up To 24 Days Before Symptoms ... - Peak Prosperity
https://www.peakprosperity.com/coronavirus-up-to-24-days-before-symptoms-start-showing/
Anonymous View
10 Feb 2020 ... Coronavirus: Up To 24 Days Before Symptoms Start Showing? That would mean MANY
more "infected & contagious yet unaware" cases exist.
I accumulated over the years a few hundred facemask, that is when I use my angle grinder to cut
bricks, etc, I have them. I always was looking out for them on clearance and purchased most say
50 for $5.00. When Officeworks was, a few years ago, selling its bin liners on clearance I
purchase the lot and still have stock for years to come. This is how I always prepared ahead in
case something went wrong. Even growing some food Olga does on a limited scale when I
changed our grass backyard to a garden for her to grow food. As she likes doing that.
* You are aware after the Sept 11, 2001 issue the Federal government went berserk to curtail
citizens rights. What if they do the same regarding the Novel Coronavirus?
**#** While the Commonwealth can legislate as much as it desires in the end as I did you can
challenge the validity and the moment you do it is ULTRA VIRES Ab Initio, unless and until if
ever at all a competent court of jurisdiction declares it to be INTRA VIRUS. I admit I would not
trust the courts at all because as I exposed you got a judge handing down FINAL orders while the
case is still going on for days. Meaning the judge pre-determined the orders regardless what the
case is really about. If for example the Federal Government desires to misuse the Novel
Coronavirus as to prevent people using cash payments, then considering
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
QUOTE
115 States not to coin money
A State shall not coin money, nor make anything but gold and
silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts.
END QUOTE
Then the Commonwealth is bound to ensure sufficient monies is going around for citizens of any
State to be able to do so. The States themselves are prohibited to make anything else as payment.
I have in fact drawn monies from the bank, this so in case the bank lacks access to monies
(as at times eventuates) I still have monies to tie me over for some time.

QUOTE
(xxxi) the acquisition of property on just terms from any State or person for any purpose in respect
of which the Parliament has power to make laws;
END QUOTE
This to in my view prevents the Commonwealth to legislate for Bank bail-in’s this is because it
would technically deal with our monies entitlement as its own to give away to a bank. That
would be unconstitutional unless it provides the equivalent of value back to us. As such, I view
bail-in laws are ULTRA VIRES Ab Initio.
Then with the various states locking up borders we need to consider:
QUOTE
117 Rights of residents in States
A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability
or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen
resident in such other State.
END QUOTE
Hansard 3-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention),
QUOTE
Mr. OCONNOR.-He could not be entitled to greater or less privileges than the inhabitants of the
state itself.
END QUOTE
This means that any quarantine rules a state put in place must be for all persons within the
Commonwealth of Australia and not excluding its own residents.
Hansard 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
Mr. OCONNOR.-No, it would not; and, as an honorable member reminds me, there is a decision on the
point. All that is intended is that there shall be some process of law by which the parties accused must be
heard.
Mr. HIGGINS.-Both sides heard.
Mr. OCONNOR.-Yes; and the process of law within that principle may be [start page 689] anything
the state thinks fit. This provision simply assures that there shall be some form by which a person
accused will have an opportunity of stating his case before being deprived of his liberty. Is not that a
first principle in criminal law now? I cannot understand any one objecting to this proposal.
END QUOTE
It is not to use quarantine to violate s117 by backdoor manner. As such, access to any state
cannot be denied merely because you are not a resident of that state.
*. Is this meaning that this general prohibition cannot be enforced willy-nilly but only against
those who were found to have being infected and only within the legislative powers of the
Commonwealth or the State/Territory if a court determines this?
**#** The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have
CIVIL RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
for the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE
.
HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
END QUOTE
.
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.-Our civil rights are not in the hands of any Government, but the rights of the Crown
in prosecuting criminals are.
END QUOTE

QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-But suppose they go beyond their power?

Mr. GORDON.-It is still the expression of Parliament. Directly a Ministry seeks to enforce improperly
any law the citizen has his right.
END QUOTE
Not uncommon people do comment to me I am wasting my time about the constitution because
politicians do not care less about what is or isn’t permissible within the constitution, however
when I refused to vote in the 2001 and 2004 federal elections and the Commonwealth took me to
court in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I succeeded in both appeals, unchallenged on all constitutional
grounds I raised. That proves that if you stand your ground and make it a big case then the
government may just realize they are never going to succeed against you.
* With all those special conditions regarding the Novel Coronavirus how can you defend
yourself on constitutional grounds?
**#** My 24 March 2020 correspondence to Prime Minister Scott Morrison sets out
considerably the constitutional issues and so no need to repeat the same. Save to say that the
Framers of the Constitution made clear:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/
1. Live'Stay at home': PM announces new restrictions on travel and gatherings to slow coronavirus spread
Scott Morrison now goes on about a “National Cabinet” meaning Federal, State and Territorial;
leaders just ask where in the constitution is such cabinet provided? It simply doesn’t exist. The
Commonwealth is the “National Government” for its area within Commonwealth legislative
provisions, and the States and Territories have their own area of legislative powers. Neither the
Commonwealth Parliament and/or the States/Territorial Parliaments can infringe upon this
constitutional separation of powers. The Commonwealth has no legislative powers to deny me to
meet up with others to my desire or to say close coffee shop and restaurants.

QUOTE
Mr. WISE.-If the Federal Parliament chose to legislate upon, say, the education question-and the
Constitution gives it no power to legislate in regard to that question-the Ministers for the time being in each
state might say-"We are favorable to this law, because we shall get £100,000 a year, or so much a year, from
the Federal Government as a subsidy for our schools," and thus they might wink at a violation of the
Constitution, while no one could complain. If this is to be allowed, why should we have these elaborate
provisions for the amendment of the Constitution? Why should we not say that the Constitution may be
amended in any way that the Ministries of the several colonies may unanimously agree? Why have this
provision for a referendum? Why consult the people at all? Why not leave this matter to the Ministers
of the day? But the proposal has a more serious aspect, and for that reason only I will ask permission to
occupy a few minutes in discussing it.
END QUOTE

QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.- We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of
the Constitution. . It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under
it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-
the Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of
this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow
degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the
guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the
court you are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as
will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of

constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere
of the Commonwealth.
END QUOTE

QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.
As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
END QUOTE
When one is dealing with lawyers who are far to often illiterate as to the true meaning and
application of the constitution but nevertheless call themselves “constitutional lawyers” and
provide advice as such then the very politicians who are supposed to know and understand the
constitution will nevertheless go by their legal advice and as we now have from time to time alter
their decisions and because of this the general community ends up in panic as to them the very
people who are to be the leaders turn out to be mindless and unreliable. That is why panic results
when you lack a competent leader. When I was in charge of a factory and there was a sudden
stop of steel delivery I got the workers together and made clear we would continue with
production regardless as we would simply convert machinery to make product we still had
material for in stock. I was able to settle them down and no panic ensured. Simply they trusted
me, and I proved to be trustworthy. I was well aware that my workers had families to feed and
mortgages to pay and so couldn’t abandon them, but had to improvise. And, afterwards the
company directors complimented me for this. This is what leadership should be about. Show you
are competent and can be trusted and not being some gutless wonder.
As I made clear Olga is in the high category risk but nevertheless that doesn’t mean that we
should accept the erosion of constitutional rights. When I was in management and had a
complaint about a worker being obstinate to her superiors because her husband was in charge and
so they couldn’t tell her anything I invited this worker into my office with the supervisor who
complained and having checked her appalling work record I gave the worker a choice to resign
with 2 weeks pay or be sacked immediately with 2 weeks pay. She made clear I couldn’t sack
her. Well I then did there and then. The workers were surprised that I had terminated the
employment of this worker, as after all she was legally married to me, but I made clear I would
have terminated any employee with such appalling work record and conduct. And, that is what I
view one must do in such circumstances and not give favoritism as that causes division and
problems. Likewise, the States cannot discriminate in quarantine applications.
People who are not know to be infected and not deemed vulnerable should be allowed their rights
to continue to earn an income. After all their financial planning, if any, likely were based upon a
certain weekly/monthly, etc, income. No government can deny a person the right to earn an
income as such without having obtained a specific court order against the particular person.
As I understand it from countries that were in war situations, their leaders didn’t pursue everyone
to hide but rather to be resilient and contribute to the best possible way to maintain society in the
circumstances. And that is what you can consider “LEADERSHIP”!
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

20200325-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re Failing Leadership in Novel Coronavirus Issues, Etc

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

20200325-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re Failing Leadership in Novel Coronavirus Issues, Etc

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

20200325-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

* Gerrit, you wrote personally to PM Scott Morrison, did you?

I also received a response as to my previous 19 March 2020 PRESS RELEASE:

Horner, Michael (Sen S. Ryan) <michael.horner@aph.gov.au>

I trust this information is of assistance.

Michael Horner | Office Manager

OFFICE OF SENATOR THE HON. SCOTT RYAN

President of the Senate

Senator for Victoria

A: Suite 1, 12 Pascoe Vale Road, Moonee Ponds VIC 3039

From: Hutton, Briony (Sen D. Van)

As Mr Schorel-Hlavka resides in the electorate of Jagajaga, I am referring this correspondence to

Office of Senator David Van

Senator for Victoria

Suite 4.1, Commonwealth Parliamentary Offices

4 Treasury Place, East Melbourne VIC 3002

P: 03 9660 6660 | M: 0468 308 696 | E: briony.hutton@aph.gov.au

From: Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. [mailto:via@family.org.au]

p2 25-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNArvGCBgJ4 Coronavirus: Up To 24 Days Before Symptoms Start

Incubation period of the novel coronavirus could be as long as 24 ...

p4 25-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)

Hansard 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

Mr. HIGGINS.-Both sides heard.

Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

p6 25-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

p7 25-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen