Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The main aim of manufacturers is to cast the aluminum alloys without any defects. Hence, in this work
Received 29 November 2019 we present the casting of aluminum alloy LM25 to manufacture intricate automobile components and
Accepted 11 December 2019 compared it with AC4B Nano-composite Alloy through the process of Gravity Die Casting. The mechanical
Available online xxxx
properties of these alloys are characterized by implementing tensile test, hardness test and compressive
test. The Scanning Electron Microscope is used further to test the microstructure investigations. The
Keywords: quantitative results of microstructural study shows the presence of grain refinement, uniform distribu-
Aluminum alloys
tion and less number of pores in nano-composite specimen. Further, the addition of B4C Nano-
Scanning electron microscope
Gravity Die Casting
composite in the aluminum alloys increases the mechanical properties like yield strength, hardness
B4C and ultimate strength. Such improvement in mechanical properties is due to the usage of particle size
Nano-composite and fabrication process.
Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International
Conference on Nanotechnology: Ideas, Innovation and Industries.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.084
2214-7853/Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Nanotechnology: Ideas, Innovation and Industries.
Please cite this article as: T. Sathish and S. Karthick, Gravity Die Casting based analysis of aluminum alloy with AC4B Nano-composite, Materials Today:
Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.084
2 T. Sathish, S. Karthick / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Please cite this article as: T. Sathish and S. Karthick, Gravity Die Casting based analysis of aluminum alloy with AC4B Nano-composite, Materials Today:
Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.084
T. Sathish, S. Karthick / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx 3
Fig. 3. Strength Analysis (a) Ultimate Tensile Strength; (b) Yield Strength.
Please cite this article as: T. Sathish and S. Karthick, Gravity Die Casting based analysis of aluminum alloy with AC4B Nano-composite, Materials Today:
Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.084
4 T. Sathish, S. Karthick / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Table 2 [9] R. Praveen Kumar, P. Periyasamy, S. Rangarajan, T. Sathish, Mater. Today Proc.
Tensile Strength Parameter. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.646.
[10] S. Dinesh Kumar, D. Chandramohan, K. Purushothaman, T. Sathish, Mater.
Test Parameters Aluminum Nano Composite Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.710.
Alloy (LM25) Particle (AC4B) [11] S. Dinesh Kumar, K. Purushothaman, D. Chandramohan, M. Mohinish
Dushyantraj, T. Sathish, Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/
Ultimate Tensile strength 281 286
j.matpr.2019.05.426.
Yield Strength 220 222 [12] S. Karthick, S. Perumal Sankar, T. Raja Prathab. In 2018 International
Elongation 6 2.5 Conference on Emerging Trends and Innovations in Engineering And
Technological Research (ICETIETR), (2018) 1–7.
[13] S.P. Palaniappan, K. Muthukumar, R.V. Sabariraj, S. Dinesh Kumar, T. Sathish,
Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.053.
between the LM25 alloys is not broken by stir casting. Additionally, [14] T. Adithiyaa, D. Chandramohan, T. Sathish, Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.051.
the electromagnetic bonding in C4B increases the percentage of
[15] T. Adithiyaa, D. Chandramohan, T. Sathish, Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://
elongation and C4B during this time acts as an elastic component doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.711.
with Al. The proposed design is tested finally in a 3 point flexural [16] T. Sathish, A. Muthulakshmanan, Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 8 (2018)
1119–1126.
testing machine in order to measure the flexural test and this is
[17] T. Sathish, J. Jayaprakash, Int. J. Mech. Mechatron. Eng. IJMME-IJENS 15 (2015)
tested against ASTM:E290 Standard with the cut specimen. The 59–67.
result shows that proposed design performs well than LM25. [18] T. Sathish, D. Chandramohan, Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 7 (2019) 291–293.
[19] T. Sathish, Int. J. Ambient Energy (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/
01430750.2019.1608861.
4. Conclusion [20] T. Sathish, J. Jayaprakash, Int. J. Logistics Systems Manage. 26 (2017).
[21] T. Sathish, J. Jayaprakash, Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 7 (2017) 551–560.
[22] T. Sathish, J. Jayaprakash, P.V. Senthil, R. Saravanan, FME Trans. 45 (2017) 172–
In this paper we reinforce AC4B nanocomposite in aluminum 180.
alloy LM25, which is fabricated using AC4B through the process [23] T. Sathish, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8 (2019) 4354–4363.
of Gravity Die Casting. The study visualizes the changes associated [24] T. Sathish, K. Muthukumar, B. Palani Kumar, Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 8
(2018) 1515–1535.
with alloys at each stage and the values of ultimate tensile
[25] T. Sathish, M.D. Vijayakumar, A. Krishnan Ayyangar, Mater. Today Proc. 5
strength, yield strength and hardness is noted. It is seen that the (2018) 14489–14498.
present study significantly improves the mechanical properties of [26] T. Sathish, Mater. Today. Proc. 5 (2018) 14416–14422.
aluminum alloy LM25 due to reinforcement of AC4B nanocompos- [27] T. Sathish, Mater. Today. Proc. 5 (2018) 14448–14457.
[28] T. Sathish, Mater. Today. Proc. 5 (2018) 14545–14552.
ite. There are other tests carried out to check the possible extent of [29] T. Sathish, P. Periyasamy, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 13 (2019) 1–6.
enhancement in LM25 mechanical properties. The results shows [30] T. Sathish, P. Periyasamy, Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. (2018) 165–178.
that proposed nanocomposites obtained improved enhancement [31] T. Sathish, Prog. Ind. Ecol. 12 (2018) 112–119.
[32] T. Sathish, S. Dinesh Kumar, K. Muthukumar, S. Karthick, Mater. Today Proc.
in its mechanical properties. In future, the LM25 alloy can be rein- (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.601.
forced with polymer nanocomposites and its mechanical strength [33] T. Sathish, S. Dinesh Kumar, K. Muthukumar, S. Karthick, Mater. Today Proc.
can be tested. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.600.
[34] T. Sathish, S. Dinesh Kumar, S. Karthick, Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.139.
Declaration of Competing Interest [35] T. Sathish, S. Rangarajan, A. Muthuram, R. Praveen Kumar, Mater. Today Proc.,
Elsevier Publisher (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.371.
[36] T. Sathish, S. Saravanan, V. Vijayan, Mater. Res. Innovations (2019), https://doi.
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan- org/10.1080/14328917.2019.1614321.
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared [37] T. Sathish, Trans. Canadian Soc. Mech. Eng. 43 (2019) 551–559.
to influence the work reported in this paper. [38] T. Sathish, Int. J. Ambient Energy 39 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/
01430750.2018.1492456.
[39] T. Sathish, J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 10 (2017) 41–50.
References [40] T. Sathish, J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst. 20 (2017) 161–167.
[41] T. Sathish, Lecture Notes Mech. Eng. (2019) 391–397, https://doi.org/10.1007/
[1] B. Radha Krishnan, V. Vijayan, T. Parameshwaran Pillai, T. Sathish, Trans. 978-981-13-6374-0_45.
Canadian Soc. Mech. Eng. 43 (2019) 509–514. [42] T. Sathish, Lecture Notes Mech. Eng. – Springer (2019) 391–397, https://doi.
[2] G.K. Nagesha, V. Dhinakaran, M. Varsha Shree, K.P. Manoj Kumar, Damodar org/10.1007/978-981-13-6374-0_45.
Chalawadi, T. Sathish, Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/ [43] T. Sathish, A. Muthulakshmanan, J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 11 (2018) 39–44.
j.matpr.2019.08.158. [44] T. Sathish, P. Periyasamy, D. Chandramohan, N. Nagabhooshanam, Int. J. Mech.
[3] K. Gurusami, D. Chandramohan, S. Dinesh Kumar, M. Dhanashekar, T. Sathish, Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. (2018) 711–716.
Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.141. [45] T. Sathish, P. Periyasamy, D. Chandramohan, N. Nagabhooshanam, Int. J. Mech.
[4] Krishnaswamy Haribabu, Muthukrishnan Sivaprakash, Thanikodi Sathish, Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2018 (2018) 705–710.
Arockiaraj Godwin Antony, Venkatraman Vijayan, Thermal Sci. (2019), [46] T. Sathish, V. Mohanavel, J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 11 (2018) 31–37.
https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI190409397K. [47] V. Dhinakaran, J. Ajith, A. Fathima Yasin Fahmidha, T. Jagadeesha, T. Sathish, B.
[5] M. Dhanashekar, P. Loganathan, S. Ayyanar, S.R. Mohan, T. Sathish, Mater. Stalin, Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.159.
Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.052. [48] V. Dhinakaran, M. Varsha Shree, T. Jagadeesha, P.M. Bupathi Ram, T. Sathish, B.
[6] M. Swapna Sai, V. Dhinakaran, K.P. Manoj Kumar, V. Rajkumar, B. Stalin, T. Stalin, Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.079.
Sathish, Mater. Today Proc. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr. [49] V. Mohanavel, M. Ravichandran, T. Sathish, S. Suresh Kumar, M.M. Ravikumar,
2019.09.027. S. Mahendiran, L. Yeshwanth Nathan, J. Balkan Tribol. Assoc. 25 (2019) 342–
[7] Muthukrishnan Sivaprakash, Krishnaswamy Haribabu, Thanikodi Sathish, 352.
Sundaresan Dinesh, Venkatraman Vijayan, Thermal Sci. (2019), https://doi. [50] V. Mohanavel, S. Suresh Kumar, T. Sathish, T. Adithiyaa, K. Mariyappan, Mater.
org/10.2298/TSCI190419398M. Today Proc. 5 (2018) 26860–26865.
[8] K. Muthukumar, R.V. Sabariraj, S. Dinesh Kumar, T. Sathish, Mater. Today Proc. [51] V. Mohanavel, S. Suresh Kumar, T. Sathish, K.T. Anand, Mater. Today: Proc. 5
(2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.140. (2018) 13601–13605.
Please cite this article as: T. Sathish and S. Karthick, Gravity Die Casting based analysis of aluminum alloy with AC4B Nano-composite, Materials Today:
Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.084