4/5/2018 Rulers of the world: read Karl Marx!

- Second time, farce

Second time, farce

Rulers of the world: read Karl Marx!
On his bicentenary Marx’s diagnosis of capitalism’s flaws is surprisingly relevant

Print edition | Books and arts May 3rd 2018

A GOOD subtitle for a biography of Karl Marx would be “a study in failure”. Marx
claimed that the point of philosophy was not just to understand the world but to
improve it. Yet his philosophy changed it largely for the worst: the 40% of
humanity who lived under Marxist regimes for much of the 20th century endured
famines, gulags and party dictatorships. Marx thought his new dialectical science
would allow him to predict the future as well as understand the present. Yet he
failed to anticipate two of the biggest developments of the 20th century—the rise of
fascism and the welfare state—and wrongly believed communism would take root
in the most advanced economies. Today’s only successful self-styled Marxist
regime is an enthusiastic practitioner of capitalism (or “socialism with Chinese
characteristics”).
https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21741531-his-bicentenary-marxs-diagnosis-capitalisms-flaws-surprisingly-relevant-rulers?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/rulerso
4/5/2018 Rulers of the world: read Karl Marx! - Second time, farce

Yet for all his oversights, Marx remains a monumental figure. At the 200th
anniversary of his birth, which falls on May 5th, interest in him is as lively as ever.
Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European Commission, is visiting Trier,
Marx’s birthplace, where a statue of Marx donated by the Chinese government will
be unveiled. The British Library, where he did the research for “Das Kapital”, is
putting on a series of exhibitions and talks. And publishers are producing a cascade
of books on his life and thought, from “Das Kapital”-sized doorstops (Sven-Eric
Liedman’s “A World to Win: The Life and Works of Karl Marx”), to Communist
Manifesto-slim pamphlets (a second edition of Peter Singer’s “Marx: A Very Short
Introduction”).

Get our daily newsletter

Upgrade your inbox and get our Daily Dispatch and Editor's Picks.

Email address Sign up now

None of these bicentennial books is

Latest stories
outstanding. The best short introduction is
Sounding the death knell for Corbynmania
BAGEHOT'S NOTEBOOK
still Isaiah Berlin’s “Karl Marx”, which was
published in 1939. But the sheer volume of
“Tully” is a new look at the old question of
motherhood and identity commentary is evidence of something
PROSPERO
important. Why does the world remain
In religion and economics, cause and effect are
very hard to prove
fixated on the ideas of a man who helped to
ERASMUS produce so much suffering?

See more
The point of madness
The obvious reason is the sheer power of those ideas. Marx may not have been the
scientist that he thought he was. But he was a brilliant thinker: he developed a
theory of society driven forward by economic forces—not just by the means of
production but by the relationship between owners and workers—and destined to
pass through certain developmental stages. He was also a brilliant writer. Who can
forget his observation that history repeats itself, “the first time as tragedy, the
second as farce”? His ideas were as much religious as scientific—you might even
call them religion repackaged for a secular age. He was a latter-day prophet
https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21741531-his-bicentenary-marxs-diagnosis-capitalisms-flaws-surprisingly-relevant-rulers?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/rulerso
4/5/2018 Rulers of the world: read Karl Marx! - Second time, farce

describing the march of God on Earth. The fall from grace is embodied in
capitalism; man is redeemed as the proletariat rises up against its exploiters and
creates a communist utopia.

A second reason is the power of his personality. Marx was in many ways an awful
human being. He spent his life sponging off Friedrich Engels. He was such an
inveterate racist, including about his own group, the Jews, that even in the 1910s,
when tolerance for such prejudices was higher, the editors of his letters felt obliged
to censor them. He got his maid pregnant and dispatched the child to foster
parents. Mikhail Bakunin described him as “ambitious and vain, quarrelsome,
intolerant and absolute…vengeful to the point of madness”.

But combine egomania with genius and you have a formidable force. He believed
absolutely that he was right; that he had discovered a key to history that had eluded
earlier philosophers. He insisted on promoting his beliefs whatever obstacles fate
(or the authorities) put in his way. His notion of happiness was “to fight”; his
concept of misery was “to submit”, a trait he shared with Friedrich Nietzsche.

The third reason is a paradox: the very failure of his ideas to change the world for
the better is ensuring them a new lease of life. After Marx’s death in 1883 his
followers—particularly Engels—worked hard to turn his theories into a closed
system. The pursuit of purity involved vicious factional fights as “real” Marxists
drove out renegades, revisionists and heretics. It eventually led to the monstrosity
of Marxism-Leninism, with its pretensions to infallibility (“scientific socialism”),
its delight in obfuscation (“dialectical materialism”) and its cult of personality
(those giant statues of Marx and Lenin).

The collapse of this petrified orthodoxy has revealed that Marx was a much more
interesting man than his interpreters have implied. His grand certainties were a
response to grand doubts. His sweeping theories were the result of endless
reversals. Toward the end of his life he questioned many of his central convictions.
He worried that he might have been wrong about the tendency of the rate of profit
to fall. He puzzled over the fact that, far from immiserating the poor, Victorian
England was providing them with growing prosperity.

https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21741531-his-bicentenary-marxs-diagnosis-capitalisms-flaws-surprisingly-relevant-rulers?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/rulerso
4/5/2018 Rulers of the world: read Karl Marx! - Second time, farce

The chief reason for the continuing interest in Marx, however, is that his ideas are
more relevant than they have been for decades. The post-war consensus that
shifted power from capital to labour and produced a “great compression” in living
standards is fading. Globalisation and the rise of a virtual economy are producing a
version of capitalism that once more seems to be out of control. The backwards
flow of power from labour to capital is finally beginning to produce a popular—and
often populist—reaction. No wonder the most successful economics book of recent
years, Thomas Piketty’s “Capital in the Twenty-First Century”, echoes the title of
Marx’s most important work and his preoccupation with inequality.

The prophet of Davos

Marx argued that capitalism is in essence a system of rent-seeking: rather than
creating wealth from nothing, as they like to imagine, capitalists are in the
business of expropriating the wealth of others. Marx was wrong about capitalism in
the raw: great entrepreneurs do amass fortunes by dreaming up new products or
new ways of organising production. But he had a point about capitalism in its
bureaucratic form. A depressing number of today’s bosses are corporate
bureaucrats rather than wealth-creators, who use convenient formulae to make
sure their salaries go ever upwards. They work hand in glove with a growing crowd
of other rent-seekers, such as management consultants (who dream up new
excuses for rent-seeking), professional board members (who get where they are by
not rocking the boat) and retired politicians (who spend their twilight years
sponging off firms they once regulated).

Capitalism, Marx maintained, is by its nature a global system: “It must nestle
everywhere, settle everywhere, establish connections everywhere.” That is as true
today as it was in the Victorian era. The two most striking developments of the past
30 years are the progressive dismantling of barriers to the free movement of the
factors of production—goods, capital and to some extent people—and the rise of
the emerging world. Global firms plant their flags wherever it is most convenient.
Borderless CEOs shuttle from one country to another in pursuit of efficiencies. The
World Economic Forum’s annual jamboree in Davos, Switzerland, might well be
retitled “Marx was right”.

He thought capitalism had a tendency towards monopoly, as successful capitalists

drive their weaker rivals out of business in a prelude to extracting monopoly rents.
https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21741531-his-bicentenary-marxs-diagnosis-capitalisms-flaws-surprisingly-relevant-rulers?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/rulerso
4/5/2018 Rulers of the world: read Karl Marx! - Second time, farce

Again this seems to be a reasonable description of the commercial world that is

being shaped by globalisation and the internet. The world’s biggest companies are
not only getting bigger in absolute terms but are also turning huge numbers of
smaller companies into mere appendages. New-economy behemoths are
exercising a market dominance not seen since America’s robber barons. Facebook
and Google suck up two-thirds of America’s online ad revenues. Amazon controls
more than 40% of the country’s booming online-shopping market. In some
countries Google processes over 90% of web searches. Not only is the medium the
message but the platform is also the market.

In Marx’s view capitalism yielded an army of casual labourers who existed from
one job to the other. During the long post-war boom this seemed like a nonsense.
Far from having nothing to lose but their chains, the workers of the world—at least
the rich world—had secure jobs, houses in the suburbs and a cornucopia of
possessions. Marxists such as Herbert Marcuse were forced to denounce capitalism
on the grounds that it produced too much wealth for the workers rather than too
little.

Yet once again Marx’s argument is gaining urgency.

The gig economy is assembling a reserve force of
atomised labourers who wait to be summoned, via
electronic foremen, to deliver people’s food, clean
their houses or act as their chauffeurs. In Britain
house prices are so high that people under 45 have
little hope of buying them. Most American workers
say they have just a few hundred dollars in the
bank. Marx’s proletariat is being reborn as the
precariat.

Still, the rehabilitation ought not to go too far.

Marx’s errors far outnumbered his insights. His
insistence that capitalism drives workers’ living
standards to subsistence level is absurd. The genius of capitalism is that it
relentlessly reduces the price of regular consumer items: today’s workers have easy
access to goods once considered the luxuries of monarchs. The World Bank
calculates that the number of people in “extreme poverty” has declined from 1.85bn
https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21741531-his-bicentenary-marxs-diagnosis-capitalisms-flaws-surprisingly-relevant-rulers?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/rulerso
4/5/2018 Rulers of the world: read Karl Marx! - Second time, farce

in 1990 to 767m in 2013, a figure that puts the regrettable stagnation of living
standards for Western workers in perspective. Marx’s vision of a post-capitalist
future is both banal and dangerous: banal because it presents a picture of people
essentially loafing about (hunting in the morning, fishing in the afternoon, raising
cattle in the evening and criticising after dinner); dangerous because it provides a
licence for the self-anointed vanguard to impose its vision on the masses.

Marx’s greatest failure, however, was that he underestimated the power of reform—
the ability of people to solve the evident problems of capitalism through rational
discussion and compromise. He believed history was a chariot thundering to a
predetermined end and that the best that the charioteers can do is hang on. Liberal
reformers, including his near contemporary William Gladstone, have repeatedly
proved him wrong. They have not only saved capitalism from itself by introducing
far-reaching reforms but have done so through the power of persuasion. The
“superstructure” has triumphed over the “base”, “parliamentary cretinism” over the
“dictatorship of the proletariat”.

Nothing but their chains

The great theme of history in the advanced world since Marx’s death has been
reform rather than revolution. Enlightened politicians extended the franchise so
working-class people had a stake in the political system. They renewed the
regulatory system so that great economic concentrations were broken up or
regulated. They reformed economic management so economic cycles could be
smoothed and panics contained. The only countries where Marx’s ideas took hold
were backward autocracies such as Russia and China.

Today’s great question is whether those achievements can be repeated. The

backlash against capitalism is mounting—if more often in the form of populist
anger than of proletarian solidarity. So far liberal reformers are proving sadly
inferior to their predecessors in terms of both their grasp of the crisis and their
ability to generate solutions. They should use the 200th anniversary of Marx’s birth
to reacquaint themselves with the great man—not only to understand the serious
faults that he brilliantly identified in the system, but to remind themselves of the
disaster that awaits if they fail to confront them.

This article appeared in the Books and arts section of the print edition under the headline "Second time, farce"

https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21741531-his-bicentenary-marxs-diagnosis-capitalisms-flaws-surprisingly-relevant-rulers?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/rulerso
4/5/2018 Rulers of the world: read Karl Marx! - Second time, farce

You’ve seen the news,

now discover the story
Get incisive analysis on the issues that
matter. Whether you read each issue cover to
cover, listen to the audio edition, or scan the
headlines on your phone, time with
The Economist is always well spent.

Enjoy great savings

+ receive a free notebook

https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21741531-his-bicentenary-marxs-diagnosis-capitalisms-flaws-surprisingly-relevant-rulers?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/rulerso