Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IV. CONCLUSIONS
Fig. 1. Variations in calorific value, CFPP, and IP of the
SNME–JME blends with weight percentage of SNME (wt. In conclusion, we have an improved fuel quality of
%). Symbol and line: experimental data and correlation, biodiesel from locally available four non-edible vegetable
respectively. , , and ∆: calorific value, CFPP, and IP, oils by modifying their fatty acid/ester composition via
respectively blending in different volumetric ratios. The determination
and measurement of several physical and fuel properties of
The variations in calorific value, CFPP, and IP of the the biodiesel blends demonstrated the outcomes within the
SNME–JME blends with the weight percentage of SNME permissible limit for B100 along the boundary of
(wt.%) are shown in Fig. 1. As shown, the calorific value of specification of ASTM standard. A SNME–JME blending
the SNME–JME blends slightly varied and had the average ratio of 35:65 by weight can successfully improve high cold
value of about 39.97 MJ/kg. On the other hand, the CFPP filter plugging point (CFPP) of the SNME and poor
and IP significantly increased at a higher blending ratio of oxidation stability of the JME to satisfy all of the biodiesel
the SNME. At first, the CFPP remained approximately specifications. Among the blends at various ratios, yellow
-1°C when the weight percentage of the SNME ranged from oleander:Jatropha (1:2 volumetric ratio) has shown
10 to 30 wt.%. The CFPP then continuously and remarkably advancement in better fuel quality. Moreover, blending of
increased. to 6°C at a higher weight percentage of the different vegetable oils has helped in enhancing the total
SNME. Notably, the CFPP of the SNME–JME blends had feedstock amount. The availability of feedstock varies from
already increased to 0°C by blending the SNME at 35 wt.%. one region to another and if we depend on a single feedstock
However, the IP of the SNME–JME blends was slightly then it will not be possible to meet the optimum production
improved by increasing the weight percentage of the SNME of biodiesel as requirement.
up to 60 wt.%. After this point, the oxidation stability of the
SNME–JME blends started to dramatically increase with REFERENCES
the weight percentage of the SNME. The oxidation stability
[1] Devi A., Das V.K. and Deka D, “Designer Biodiesel: Preparation of
of the SNME–JME blend was observed to be greater than 6 h Biodiesel Blends by Mixing Several Vegetable Oils at Different
when the SNME was 35 wt.% or higher in the blended Volumetric Ratios and their Corresponding Fuel Quality
biodiesel. As a result, the optimum SNME–JME blend Enhancement,” Research Journal of Chemical Sciences, Vol. 5(9), 60-
consisted of the SNME and JME at a 35:65 weight ratio. The 65, September (2015)
optimum SNME–JME blend had the acid value of 0.17 mg [2] Yi-Hung Chen, Tsung-Han Chiang, Jhih-Hong Chen, An optimum
KOH/g, CFPP of 0°C, density of 880 kg/m3 at 15°C ester biodiesel combination: Jatropha and soapnut oil biodiesel blends, Fuel
92 (2012) 377-380.
content of 99.6% (m/m), flash point of 171°C, an iodine
value of 100 g I2/100 g, kV of 4.55 mm2/s at 40°C, and [3] Yi-Hung Chen, Tsung-Han Chiang, Jhih-Hong Chen, “Properties of
soapnut (Sapindus mukorossi) oil biodiesel and its blends with
oxidation stability of 6.0 h. diesel,” Fuel 92 (2012) 377-380
[4] .
[5] Yi-Hung Chen, Tsung-Han Chiang, Jhih-Hong Ch