20200330-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re Are We Facing A Coronavirus Inspired Bank Run

20200330-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
ISSUE –
Re Are we facing a Coronavirus inspired bank run?
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.
* Gerrit, why are you referring to a possible bank run?

**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, I last week already withdrew cash because I suspected that
more than likely we might end up in problems being able to access monies. I yesterday wanted to
pay the Medibank membership of Olga when Optus failed to allow me to activate a simcard to
get on the internet. Mind you had had just been on the internet with another Optus simcard and
so it was rather strange to me being suddenly blocked out. That was at 15.08. I have a computer
screenprint record of the time. By 19.31 I still was unable to access the internet but strangely
Optus itself was available to advise me about “Chat” (Located in India!) being inactive due to
the coronavirus, etc. Finally by 20.31 I was able to active the simcard. It is rather strange that the
“coronavirus” was used to prevent me to contact “Chat” to seek to resolve the problem, and yet
Optus itself was able to allow me to access the activation part but not allow actual activation.
You see, you do not need an activated operating simcard to activate another simcard. So for
about 4 hours and 23 minutes I was prevented to activate the simcard. As I needed to pay the
Medibank monthly fee I wasn’t going to give up on it. While I was not overly concerned because
having previously withdrawn case just in case the banks would prevent any monies to be
withdrawn it nevertheless should be of concern to anyone that any Financial Service Provider
could prevent one to access once financial accounts. We also must consider that the
Commonwealth itself insisted that for example pensions have a Financial Service Account so
that the Commonwealth directly deposit monies into the account instead of forwarding cheques.
Well, monies as such deposited are paid for a pension and I view the Commonwealth cannot
allow any financial Service Provider such as banks to use mot for bail-in. The Commonwealth
cannot give away monies or the entitlement of monies of pensioners.
I just read that the Commonwealth now is in a war mode with a “war cabinet”. As I made clear
in the past the Prime Minister has absolutely no constitutional powers to declare war against any
country. If a country is attacking the Commonwealth of Australia then this in itself is a
declaration of war. If the Commonwealth desires to attack another “friendly” country then only
the Governor-General can publish in the Gazette a DECLARATION OF WAR naming the
country concerned. As such, the claimed WAR ON TERRORISM was utter and sheer nonsense.
Any claim of a War against a Novel Coronavirus is also utter and sheer nonsense.
I have had various feedbacks from my readers that they fear that this coronavirus is going to be
used as an excuse for Medical Martial Law and that banks will prevent people to access their
monies and people may end up starving to death, etc, not having any ability to purchase needed
food and other supplies.
https://needtoknow.news/2020/03/corona-bologna-the-truth-begins-to-leak-out-in-italy-the-overwhelming-
majority-of-deaths-are-linked-to-other-illnesses/
Corona Bologna: The Truth Begins to Leak Out in Italy — The Overwhelming Majority of Deaths Are
Linked to Other Illnesses
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/03/17/corona-bologna-the-truth-begins-to-leak-out/
p1 30-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Corona Bologna Italy: The Truth begins to leak out
QUOTE
Seems the president of the Italian Higher Institute has some smarts. He understands that people who already
have other serious health conditions, which have nothing to do with COV, can and do die from those other
conditions, regardless of the fact that they’ve tested positive (on useless tests) for COV. He gets it. I predict a
great future for him. If he keeps shooting his mouth off, he might find himself working as a weed puller in a
forest. Or he might suddenly be diagnosed with the virus and find himself in isolation.
Grit your teeth and plow through this piece from Rome, 13 March 2020, Agenzia Nova: “Coronavirus: ISS
[Italian National Institute of Health]: in Italy there are only two deaths ascertained so far due to Covid-19”
(Italian, English)
“There may be only two people who died from coronavirus in Italy, who did not present other pathologies.
This is what emerges from the medical records examined so far by the Higher Institute of Health, according
to what was reported by the President of the Institute [Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Italian National
Institute of Health], Silvio Brusaferro, during the press conference held today at the Civil Protection in
Rome. ‘Positive deceased patients have an average of over 80 years – 80.3 to be exact…The majority of
these people are carriers of chronic diseases. Only two people were not presently carriers of [other non-COV]
diseases’, but even in these two cases, the examination of the files is not concluded and therefore, causes of
death different from Covid-19 could emerge. The president of the ISS has specified that ‘little more than a
hundred medical records’ have so far come from hospitals throughout Italy.”
END QUOTE
It appears that a mere 18% had been checked and autopsies indicated that perhaps only 2 persons
could have died directly because of the Novel Coronavirus and all others may have had the
Novel coronavirus but not being the cause of dead.
Let’s say 100 people were killed in motor accident collisions and 60% of them were smokers or
former smokers. So, while those 60% may have had to some degree being affected by their
smoking habits it may have absolutely nothing to do with the real cause of dead of the motor
vehicle collisions. As such, the fact that people died who had some traces of the Novel
Coronavirus doesn’t mean that was the cause of dead.
As now also was reportedly published is that some 80% of positive testing for the Novel
Coronavirus actually were faulty results. Some kind of a test could show a person to be positive
and yet minutes later the same test could show the person to be negative.
The number of persons actually dying from the Novel Coronavirus might in fact be a very small
number of persons compared to those who died due to the flu and other illnesses.
https://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/uk-government-officially-and-quietly-downgrades-covid-19/
UK Government officially (and quietly) downgrades COVID-19
QUOTE
And yet, the British government has reclassified Covid-19 as less of a consequence than SARS (total
global deaths recorded 774), MERS (total global deaths recorded 600), – along with Avian Influenza H7N9,
H5N1, H5N6, and H7N7. Listed as High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID) is even the Andes
Virus Infection (possible one global death) which infected just four people in the UK with no known
deaths.
END QUOTE
As I previously wrote about it is like the insane militarism to slaughter innocent people in Iraq,
etc, about non-existing WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction). Obviously, the complete failure
to hold the politicians then legally accountable somehow seems to make them being invisible
from any legal accountability and so they now are on this madness again.
I received an email with the following content:
QUOTE
Hello EVERYBODY,
behind all this Coronavirus idiocy and all the imposed restrictions (house arrest )
our politician are covering up A TOTAL FINANCIAL COLLAPS. Make sure you have
some Cash in the house, because your credit cards may not work.

They are trying to prevent people from talking to each other and stop riots in the street.
I have this secret video out of Germany .
Erwin.
END QUOTE
This email in itself may underline the concerns people have.

.
We got some purported “National Cabinet” that is constitutionally an utter and sheer nonsense!
Now there is a “War Cabinet” as if the Novel Coronavirus now is invading the Commonwealth
with tanks and naval troops. And immunizations like causing smallpox, not avoid it!
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/coronavirus-panic-pandemic/
Coronavirus … Panic or Pandemic?
QUOTE
Vaccinations became mandatory in England in 1853, and by 1857, fines and imprisonment awaited
people who refused to be vaccinated against smallpox. And as Dr. Humphries just mentioned, once
smallpox vaccination became mandatory in England, massive epidemics began to occur. According to
official figures of the Register General of England, between 1857 and 1859, there were over 14,000
deaths from smallpox. Then, between 1863 and 1865, there were over 20,000 smallpox deaths. A few
years later, there were almost 45,000 smallpox deaths between 1870 and 1872.
END QUOTE
I have written previously that our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) was
in part based upon the USA constitution and its than 14 Amendments and as such Politicians and
others and so also judges should keep in mind that they are constitutional terrorist if they act
contrary to the embedded legal principles of the constitution. As I wrote previously no one can
be held accountable for a crime for exercising his constitutional rights.
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/coronavirus-panic-pandemic/
Coronavirus … Panic or Pandemic?
QUOTE
“BUT IT’S AN EMERGENCY!”
The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and
covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times and under all circumstances.” – Ex
parte Milligan, U.S. Supreme Court (1866)
Today the “coronavirus-panic” gives government fuel and cover for its assaults on freedom and poses a
question the government does not want to answer: If liberty can be taken away in times of crisis, then
is it really liberty; or is it just a license, via a temporary government permission slip, subject to the
whims of politicians in power?
The government has no authority to dictate how many people choose to congregate for any peaceful
purpose.
Our First Amendment states:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble.
Telling people to not attend church is a violation of the constitutional clause, “prohibiting the free
exercise thereof.”
Telling people they cannot gather in groups of more than 20 or 30 (or whatever arbitrary number) is a
clear violation of the constitutional clause, “no law . . . prohibiting . . . the right of the people peaceably to
assemble.”
The coronavirus or any other “emergency” does NOT cancel or negate the Constitution and Bill of
Rights.
We have far more to fear from “Big Government” tyranny than we do from any virus. Moreover,
liberty is natural and personal. You can sacrifice yours, but you cannot sacrifice mine.
END QUOTE
There is no such thing as arbitrary detention merely because some boof-head in power may
desire this. Neither can the Commonwealth start spending monies that are not approved by
Appropriation Bills for the financial year we are currently in.
It is not that the Minister can use the Consolidated Revenue Funds as his personal slush funds
and nilly-willy give it away to make a name for himself while letting the taxpayers in coming
decades end up paying for it.
We got a constitution and no Minister can override the constitution.
The Appropriation Bills that were passed by the Parliament for the financial year 2019-2020
cannot be altered.
Hansard 12-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE
Mr. GLYNN Does that put a maximum on military expenditure?
Mr. PEACOCK: A maximum on all expenditure!
Mr. BARTON: It seems to me to put a maximum on all expenditure, because the whole of the
expenditure cannot exceed the total yearly expenditure in the performance of the services and powers
given by the Constitution, and any powers subsequently transferred from the States to the Commonwealth.
Mr. SYMON: Does that prevent any increase in case of war?
Mr. BARTON: Yes.

END QUOTE
As such purporting that the Novel Coronavirus is some enemy on attack that justify a declaration
of war by the Prime Minister may in my view only underline his gross incompetence to be a
constitutional advisor to the Governor-General.
He may have his personal invisible demons but that doesn’t mean he can subject the general
public to any of his utter nonsense.
* Do you accept there is a coronavirus existing?
**#** From all the report I read there have been various corona viruses going about for decades.
The fact that this Novel coronavirus was detected in November 2019 doesn’t mean it didn’t exist
prior to that. It may very well have been going around for many years but never identified as
being the Novel Coronavirus.
It is like you have been handling monies for decades and suddenly discover that there is a coin
that has a press faulty displayed. It doesn’t mean that this press fault then eventuated when you
discovered it as it would have been at the time it was stamped by the Reserve Bank of Australia
mint section and so could have already been in circulation for many years.
https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/prep-act-invoked-nationwide-for-the-first-time-in-u-s-history-will-martial-law-
follow/
PREP Act Invoked Nationwide for the First Time in U.S. History – Will Martial Law Follow?
QUOTE
What is not mentioned in this summary page provided by HHS are the scary and very concerning legal
powers granted to the Secretary of HHS and further to the local and state health departments.
Hidden in the Act is subsection (7) under declarations by the Secretary of HHS.
(7) JUDICIAL REVIEW. – No court of the United States, or of any State, shall have subject matter
jurisdiction to review, whether by mandamus or otherwise, any action by the Secretary under this subsection.
[3]
Now, how do we interpret this? In the Declarations subsection, whereas the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) has sole power to decide which counter measure or measures used to
combat an epidemic or pandemic, the manufacturer of the said countermeasure will receive immunity from
liability resulting in injury or death.
And there is NO Court system in the land that can override this provision.

There have been seven (7) declarations of Countermeasures covered by the PREP Act. Countermeasures can
include vaccines, drugs, or medical devices to be used against chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
(CBRN) agents of terrorism, epidemics, and pandemics.
END QUOTE
https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/prep-act-invoked-nationwide-for-the-first-time-in-u-s-history-will-martial-law-
follow/
PREP Act Invoked Nationwide for the First Time in U.S. History – Will Martial Law Follow?
QUOTE
No one really knows the extent of the law and how it will affect everyone in the United States, short term and
long term. Most of the media has not even discussed the details of the PREP Act and how it will affect the
general public.
Martial Law?
There is a lot of speculation that we might see martial law across all states. It has been many years since
Martial Law was declared for parts of the United States. The Federal Government has used “State of
Emergency” instead of martial law during Hurricane Katrina and certain sections of New Orleans, or in the
case of searching for the Boston bombers.
The martial law concept in the United States is closely tied with the right of habeas corpus, which is in
essence the right to a hearing on lawful imprisonment, or more broadly, the supervision of law enforcement
by the judiciary.
The ability to suspend habeas corpus is related to the imposition of martial law.
Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be
suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”
The distinction must be made as clear as that between martial law and military justice: deployment of troops
does not necessarily mean that the civil courts cannot function, and that is one of the keys, as the Supreme
Court noted, to martial law.
In United States law, martial law is limited by several court decisions that were handed down between the
American Civil War and World War II. In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids
military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval. [5]
So what happens to those who are injured from a countermeasure as declared by the Secretary of HHS?
END QUOTE
Upon this, I published the following post:

QUOTE Posted 28-3-2020 22:43
I am a constitutionalist (Australia) and because the Framers of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
1900 (UK) based some parts of our constitution upon the USA and its first 14 amendments I am very much
interested in what goes on within the USA.
This article to me is excellently written. Very clear. While the writer does show that the act precludes any
revisions by a court, I am a person who doesn’t accept this to be enforceable if the constitutional demands
justice.
Any act ultimately falls foul if it is in violation with the constitution. No congress/Parliament can validly enact
legislation that is contrary to any constitutional provisions.
For example, I refused to vote in 2001 and 2004 federal elections upon the basis that “compulsory” voting was
unconstitutional. I citied the embedded legal principles of the constitution. See AEC v Schorel-Hlavka 19-7-
2006) After about 5 years of litigation, representing myself, against all Attorney-Generals, I succeeded in both
appeals unchallenged. (Mind you that sometimes I do vote, not because of compulsory doctrine but when I view
there is a worthy candidate standing.) And this I urge every person to consider, that merely because there is some
legislation that denies some remedy in the courts it doesn’t mean that it is constitutionally valid. Take the 1970
Welsh case ( I also relied upon in my past litigation) “WELSH v. UNITED STATES, 398 U.S. 333 (1970), 398
U.S. 333, WELSH v. UNITED STATES, CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, No. 76., Argued January 20, 1970, Decided June 15, 1970”. Here
we had a person determine to rely upon his/her constitutional rights and clearly succeeded in this.
Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would
abrogate them. Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436, 125.
For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party (Corpus Delicti) There can be no sanction or penalty
imposed on one because of this Constitutional right. Sherer v. Cullen 481 F. 945.
BROWN v. TEXAS, 443 U.S. 47 (1979) -- CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 3527. The law helps the vigilant,
before those who sleep on their rights. "A statute does not trump the Constitution." People v. Ortiz,
(1995) 32 Cal.App.4th at p. 292, fn. 2 Conway v. Pasadena Humane Society (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 163
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JERRY ARBERT POOL, C.A. No. 09-10303, IN THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT (Opinion filed September 14, 2010), On

Appeal From The United States District Court For The Eastern District of California "A statutory
privilege cannot override a defendant's constitutional right." People v. Reber, (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d.
523 [223 Cal.Rptr. 139}; Vela v. Superior Ct, 208 Cal.App.3d. 141 [255 Cal.Rptr. 921], however, "the
judiciary has a solemn obligation to insure that the constitutional right of an accused to a fair trial is
realized. If that right would be thwarted by enforcement of a statute, the state ...must yield." Vela v.
Superior Ct., 208 Cal.App.3d. 141 [255 Cal.Rptr. 921 Obviously, administrative agencies, like police
officers must obey the Constitution and may not deprive persons of constitutional rights . Southern Pac.
Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Com., 18 Cal.3d 308 [S.F. No. 23217. Supreme Court of California.
November 23, 1976.] If evidence of a fact is clear, positive, un-contradicted and of such nature it cannot
rationally be disbelieved, the court must instruct that fact has been established as a matter of law.
Roberts v. Del Monte Properties Co., 111 CA2d. 69 (1952) If they can get you asking the wrong
questions, they don't have to worry about answers. Thomas Pynchon They will do whatever we let them
get away with. Joseph Heller ~*~
Let us join around the world to defend our basic constitutional rights as they exist from country to country. A
Constitution is a contract between the state and its people. It means the State has no unilateral powers to override
the terms of the contact that the constitution is.
Any Member of Congress/Parliament is bound to ensure that it opposes any part of legislation that may
contravene constitutional rights.
END QUOTE
What we need is a return to sanity.

As was reported some 80,000 persons died in 14 weeks from flu issues and yet there was
absolutely no such draconic kind of conditions as now are pursued and implemented. I see
absolutely no reason why a person who may be working in some office cannot do so now where
there is a reasonable distance kept with co-workers. I had to go to my specialist and other places
and not the least concerned I might be infected with the Novel coronavirus. Firstly “FEAR” is
what undermines a person ability to fight any invasion as stress from fear weakens a person’s
immune system, at least that is my view. Secondly, in my view, isolating people from each other
can cause severe longterm trauma that can have a lasting serious mental affect upon a person. We
therefore should curtail any drastic action to those who are actually infected. Then a Government
may reasonably apply home detention as a form of security. However, a unilateral form of home
detention upon anyone I do not accept is constitutionally valid.
We must also keep in mind that when it comes to politicians if they can get away with any
unconstitutional conduct now then they likely will try to do this under any excuse another time.
When you consider the article (https://www.christianpost.com/voices/is-the-sky-really-

falling.html) “Is the Sky Really Falling” Re coronavirus, electricity-etc, then you have to
wonder what did the Government do other than to sell off public utilities instead of securing
those utilities as “essential services” to keep in public hands? If the electricity is down then likely
so with the water supply being pumped to houses. Then forget about flushing a toilet this as there
is no water pumped to the cistern.
Where is the fuel security that I wrote about in the past? Well we got politicians who rely upon
the USA but reality is that with a shortcoming the USA might have its priorities.
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/indians-dont-need-to-panic-about-coronavirus-says-who-1652541-2020-03-
05?ref=taboola
Indians don't need to panic about coronavirus, says WHO. Speaking with India Today, Dr Rodrico Ofrin,
Regional Emergencies Director, WHO, said there is no need to panic, as cases tested positive in India were
because of travelling abroad, citizens' caught the virus on foreign land.
QUOTE
Answering the question, Dr Rodrico Ofrin said, "There is no need to panic, the need of the hour is to get more
trained doctors and nurses to treat the infected. We know India has come up with many centres, that's the way
to go about it. Hospitals have isolation wards, those need to be activated as soon as possible."
END QUOTE
So, those countries which have citizens infected should then panic?

When we consider “the need of the hour is to get more trained doctors and nurses to treat
the infected” then let us also consider Governor Cuomo of the State of New York requesting
30,000 ventilators. Oops, he hasn’t got the medical staff trained to operate those number of
ventilators. And that is like having dozens of firefighting planes near a bushfire but no pilots
trained to operate those planes. It is very obvious that we got so called leaders who are handing
out monies as if there is no tomorrow but failed totally to have prepared sufficient medical staff
for such kind of claimed emergency so that if they need to operate ventilators or other items they
can do so.
I was watching a video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjifLmfjMhs) “18 Inexpensive
Items You Should Stockpile Now” and it list about 18 items you should have. Except for the
baby wipes (albeit I have moist handwipes) I have already for years held stock of each and every
item that was indicated needed. Yet I am not aware any Government has indicated to citizens
they should be prepared for so to say a doomsday event. Over the least few years I purchased a
portable toilet, generator, folder wheelchair, etc. I have been so to say been preparing all along
that in case there was some event that I needed items say for my wife then I have them. And that
I view should be a government trajectory that citizens themselves prepare over time for difficult
times.
* Would you accept nationalizing of “essential services” such as electricity, water and other
utilities?
**#** It never should have been sold off in the first place. Look at the crumbling of some cola
systems. We might have political parties going on about preserving earth but let us look at what
eventuated with Mars, the Moon, etc. Is this really what they want to have eventuating with
Earth? Credit to the Chinese and South Africans and other countries which are trying to turn
deserts back into productive lands. In my view the human race are an asset to Earth not a burden.
Look at the annihilation of the dinosaurs, this wasn’t not because of industrialization or the
human race itself. Without the human race Earth may end up like Mars or the Moon. If you kill
off part of the food-chain such as overfishing then there is a flow on effect. The same with the
human race. You do not preserve endangered species if you reduce the human race to zero,
because animals will have absolutely no reasoning to preserve endangered species. As such, only
the humans can do this. We therefore need to value the existence of the human race and not
pursue a reduction.
* Do you view that proper autopsies should be carried out to establish the likely cause of death
and not merely claim it is coronavirus related?
**#** That I view is essential. Not to scare the living daylights out of the elderly and cause them
to be separated from their grandchildren, etc. Nursing homes in my view are notorious for failing
to appropriately care for the elderly. Constitutionally the Commonwealth is responsible for the
elderly but is passing the buck to the States. The Commonwealth should stipulate conditions and
enforce them without any weakness. That is what the Framers of the Constitution had intended.
Once we have a real “responsible” Minister (as is constitutionally required) and not some
weakling/”gutless wonder” then we might see an improvement in the care of the elderly who are
kept in nursing homes. People in their latter part of their lives do not need to be imprisoned
because of gross incompetence of some “responsible” Minister. It is the Ministers duty and
obligation to ensure that the elderly are appropriately cared for. And, that any increases in cost
are also controlled. Not that you have for example increasing Medibank charges from $216.60 to
now $233.80 without any added services. Instead, it has as I understand it cutting down services
while increasing premiums. As Olga (my wife) commented in the current climate and
circumstances Medibank is ignoring this and burdening her with increase of premium. And yet, if
she became a victim of say a coronavirus then the private hospitals will sent her to a public
hospital as they are not catered for providing such service. And, in my view this also underlines
the lack of proper conduct of the Federal Government to ensure that private hospitals are catering
for it’s insured that if they do become sick such as with a corona virus it then is able to provide
the appropriate medical care for them to stay in a public hospital. As I understand it, if a policy
holder were to make too many claims the Private Health Insurance can so to say kick out the
person and that I cannot accept to be appropriate. After all a person could have been paying 50
years or so premiums and then at old age when needing more care may find to be ousted. Why
indeed are people earning a certain income forced to be a member of a Private Health Insurance
when they cannot get the facilities a public hospital can provide? It undermines the very notion
of having Private Health Insurance. It means an unfair burden upon public hospital’s as privately
insured citizens nevertheless have to be admitted in a public hospital.
This I view is the gross incompetence by the Commonwealth failing to ensure that a privately
insured citizen can in fact then have the benefit of a private hospital when to stay overnight in a
hospital.
* Would you like to see survival kits issued by the Government of a State/Territory?
**#** Indeed, I would like to see that. And obviously what happened with Optus to prevent
access to activate a simcard I view is a very serious matter. After all the Federal Government
seems to me to be promoting work from home. Well, if people cannot access the internet then
working from home might be a problem. And, likewise if a person desires to pay bills via the
internet but find unable to access the bank website for whatever reasons then a run on the banks
may very well eventuate. Leadership is not just issuing all kinds of restrictions but to back up any
restriction with a service that compliments any restrictions to be durable for those affected. In
particular where the duration of any restrictions is and remain unknown then to ignore a proper
back up system I view only underlines the gross incompetence of those making decisions.
*.Have you in anyway change your lifestyle because of the Novel corona virus?
**#** Actually, instead of having a coffee flask in the car I now have a water bottle and drink
prior to entering a store and upon leaving so as to keep my mouth moist, which may prevent
falling ill with a virus. Further I have not have had any need to change my lifestyle and do not
fear about the Novel Coronavirus. I was stocked up before the Novel Coronavirus became an
issue and as such it has little or no effect upon my lifestyle. While handrails of escalators always
have been an issue of contaminating people, somehow I am not aware any specific condition
made regarding those rubber handrails to protect people becoming infected by them.
We also should not ignore that conditions/restrictions that may be put in place in the UK or
elsewhere may not be constitutionally permissible in the Commonwealth of Australia.
No Parliament/Government can override the relevant constitution!
What we now have however is that PM Scott Morrison is using the Consolidated Revenue
Funds, as Kevin Rudd did before him, as some personal slush funds.
Let us consider why the constitution was amended and the following was inserted:
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
QUOTE
(xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment,
unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services
(but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family
allowances;
END QUOTE
As far as I understand it this was the result that the High Court of Australia previously had struck
down the Commonwealth making certain payments for which the Constitution didn’t allow for.
Hence there was a referendum subsequently to amend the constitution.
.
We now have as I understand it Solemon Lew internet links, such as:
Solomon Lew – Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomon_Lew
Solomon Lew (born 22 March 1945) is an Australian businessman. His principal commercial activities
involve importing apparel, toys and other goods into ...
Solomon Lew pulls out big guns in stand-off with retail landlords
https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/solomon-lew-pulls-out-big-guns-in-stand-off-with-retail-
landlords-20200326-p54e7t.html
3 days ago ... Solomon Lew is refusing to pay rent on 1250 retail stores owned by his Premier Investments, as
the coronavirus crisis brings his long-running ...
Solomon Lew - Forbes

https://www.forbes.com/profile/solomon-lew/
Solomon Lew chairs Melbourne-based Premier Investments. The company is the largest shareholder in
struggling Australian department store Myer. Lew has ...
Premier Investments Solomon Lew picks perfect time to battle with ...
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/premier-investments-solomon-lew-picks-perfect-time-to-battle-
with-mall-landlords/news-story/3c9b754180336ded7f8dbba0a888ce09
3 days ago ... Solly Lew knows better than most, you should never waste a good crisis, which is why he drew
a big line in the sand in his fight with the ...
Solly Lew takes nuclear option on rent - Financial Review

https://www.afr.com/chanticleer/solly-lew-takes-nuclear-option-on-rent-20200326-p54e3p
3 days ago ... Solomon Lew has just taken the nuclear option. Lew's listed investment vehicle Premier
Investments, home to the likes of Just Jeans, Portmans ...
Solomon Lew counts virus cost as shares in Premier, Breville tank

https://www.afr.com/companies/retail/solomon-lew-counts-virus-cost-as-shares-in-premier-breville-tank-
20200312-p549aa
12 Mar 2020 ... Retail veteran and Financial Review Rich Lister Solomon Lew is personally counting the
cost of the coronavirus crisis amid growing fears the ...
Solomon Lew, Premier smash retail rents with online eviction threat ...
https://www.itnews.com.au/news/solomon-lew-premier-smash-retail-rents-with-online-eviction-threat-
531284
20 Sep 2019 ... Supermarkets might be struggling to make online sales add to their profit margins, but at
Solomon Lew's Premier Investments, online sales are ...
Our Directors - Premier Investments

https://www.premierinvestments.com.au/about-us/our-directors/
Solomon Lew Chairman and Non-Executive Director. Mr. Lew was appointed as Non-Executive Director
and Chairman of Premier on 31 March 2008. Mr. Lew is ...
Solomon Lew - Non-executive Director and Chairman - Premier ...

https://au.linkedin.com/in/solomon-lew-a763b465
View Solomon Lew's profile on LinkedIn, the world's largest professional community. Solomon has 1 job
listed on their profile. See the complete profile on ...
Solomon Lew - 9Finance - Business News, Finance, Shares ...

https://finance.nine.com.au/solomon-lew
Solomon Lew has slammed department store giant Myer after it unveiled a further sales decline and lowered
its performance targets. By Stuart Marsh ...
Considering “3 days ago ... Solomon Lew is refusing to pay rent on 1250 retail stores owned by
his Premier Investments, as the coronavirus crisis brings his long-running ...” and “Solomon Lew
Chairman and Non-Executive Director. Mr. Lew was appointed as Non-Executive Director and
Chairman of Premier on 31 March 2008. Mr. Lew is ...”, “20 Sep 2019 ... Supermarkets might be
struggling to make online sales add to their profit margins, but at Solomon Lew's Premier
Investments, online sales are ...” and “Solomon Lew has slammed department store giant Myer
after it unveiled a further sales decline and lowered its performance targets. By Stuart Marsh ...”
as examples then if a non-Executive Director somehow rule the roost and we have a Federal
Government headed by the Governor-General (as the CEA for and on behalf of the Crown) but
who seems to follow the wimps of the Prime Minister Scott Morrison to then violate
constitutional limitations then we have a major problem. Why indeed have a constitution at all if
politicians can use Consolidated Revenue Funds as some slush-funds? I understood John
Howard did do so to bail out a company of his brother.
Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.
As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
END QUOTE
I am not seeking to judge if Solomon Lew might have a legitimate issue as that would in my
view be a matter up to the courts to decide, however I do not accept that the Prime Minister and
his fellow politicians can use this Consolidated Revenue Funds as their personal slush funds
merely because other politicians before them did so.
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE
I therefore denounce the validity of this so-called “National Cabinet” and decisions it makes
purportedly to safeguard citizens while we know too well that Minister Peter Dutton or for that
Prime Minister Scott Morrison somehow didn’t pursue this kind of importance when it came to
the Ruby Princess debacle. We seem to have only cowards as politicians who instead of being
sentries are going along with the wimps of their political party leaders. They lack stamina to be
sentries. And, with the alleged bail-in provisions which I hold to be unconstitutional I for one
would be surprised if there was not a coronavirus associated bank run for people to withdraw
their monies to prevent banks to usurp them. We clearly lack leadership within our constitutional
framework. Paying rent subsidies for businesses in my view is outside the provisions of our
constitution. For what it is worth, in my view, Solomon Lew and for that any other business
person would have done better to sue the State and Federal Government for their unconstitutional
conduct to prevent stores to maximize their income by curtailing customers and potential
customers to enter stores, etc, and by this cause undue losses to relevant businesses. But, that is
for him to decide if he and/or others desires to do so. In my view if it is unconstitutional then
politicians should be held personally legally accountable, and not the taxpayers.
Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond
the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say
that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the
Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as
any private person would be.
END QUOTE
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

20200330-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re Are We Facing A Coronavirus Inspired Bank Run

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

20200330-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re Are We Facing A Coronavirus Inspired Bank Run

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

20200330-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

* Gerrit, why are you referring to a possible bank run?

p2 30-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

I have this secret video out of Germany .

This email in itself may underline the concerns people have.

Mr. GLYNN Does that put a maximum on military expenditure?

Mr. PEACOCK: A maximum on all expenditure!

Mr. SYMON: Does that prevent any increase in case of war?

Mr. BARTON: Yes.

p4 30-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Upon this, I published the following post:

p5 30-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

What we need is a return to sanity.

When you consider the article (https://www.christianpost.com/voices/is-the-sky-really-

p6 30-3-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Solomon Lew - Forbes

Solly Lew takes nuclear option on rent - Financial Review

Solomon Lew counts virus cost as shares in Premier, Breville tank

Our Directors - Premier Investments

Solomon Lew - Non-executive Director and Chairman - Premier ...

Solomon Lew - 9Finance - Business News, Finance, Shares ...

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen