Sie sind auf Seite 1von 17

Engineering Procedure

SAEP-16 11 December 2018


Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee

Note:
This version of SAEP-16 is applicable for all projects using the new Capital Management
System (CMS).
All other projects will use the previous version of the procedure dated 12 November 2013 for
project phases Study, Project Conception, DBSP and Project Proposal.
Later project stages in this document are applicable to both.

Contents

1 SCOPE.................................................................................................................... 2

2 CONFLICTS AND DEVIATIONS ............................................................................. 2

3 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS .................................................................................. 2

4 DEFINITIONS.......................................................................................................... 3

5 INSTRUCTIONS ..................................................................................................... 7

6 RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................. 14

APPENDIX A - NON-MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS ................................................... 16

Previous Issue: 14 March 2017 Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Page 1 of 17
Contact: Kinsley, John on phone +966-13-8801831

©Saudi Aramco 2018. All rights reserved.


Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

1 Scope

This Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedure (SAEP) defines the procedures and
responsibilities for the execution of Process Automation Systems (PAS) projects.
SAEP-16 is applicable to all Saudi Aramco BI-10 capital projects where the value of the
PAS scope exceeds $2.0 MM. Proponent shall determine the applicability of this
procedure for BI-19 projects. Portions of this procedure are applicable for PAS system
expansion projects. Refer to individual sections below for additional details.

Royalty / custody metering facilities projects are not governed by this procedure. There
execution is governed by SAEP-21 and SAEP-50.

In the event that some or all of the steps are executed by contractors or vendors, the
Saudi Aramco Project Management Team (SAPMT) shall ensure that the project is
executed within the framework of this procedure.

2 Conflicts and Deviations


Any conflicts between this document and other applicable Mandatory Saudi Aramco
Engineering Requirements (MSAERs) shall be addressed to the Engineering
Knowledge and Resources Division (EK&RD) Coordinator.

Any deviation from the requirements herein shall follow internal company procedure
SAEP-302.

3 Applicable Documents

The latest edition of the applicable reference documents shall be applied:

 Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedures


SAEP-12 Project Execution Plan
SAEP-14 Project Proposal
SAEP-25 Estimate Preparation Guidelines
SAEP-31 Corporate Equipment and Spare Parts Data
Requirements
SAEP-250 Safety Integrity Level Assignment and Verification
SAEP-302 Waiver of a Mandatory Saudi Aramco Engineering
Requirement
SAEP-334 Retrieval, Certification and Submittal of Saudi
Aramco Engineering and Vendor Drawings
SAEP-750 Testing Procedures for Process Automation Systems
(PAS)
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use
Page 2 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

SAEP-1610 Preparation of Functional Specification Documents


SAEP-1622 Preparation of technical Bid Evaluation Plan
Document for Process Automation Systems
SAEP-1624 Preparation of System Design Document
SAEP-1628 Preparation of PAS Integration Specifications
Document
SAEP-1650 Main Automation Contractor

 Systems Saudi Aramco General Instructions


GI-0002.710 Mechanical Completion & Performance Acceptance
of Plant/Unit

 Saudi Aramco CMSEEs documentation:


For the latest versions of below Manuals, contact Capital Program Efficiency
Department site, https://Sharek.aramco.com.sa/Orgs/30026862

Front End Loading (FEL) Manual


Integrated Project Team (IPT) Manual
FEL Book of Deliverables
RAPID Matrix FEL 1-3

4 Definitions

4.1 Acronyms
CDR Critical Design Review
DBSP Design Basis Scoping Paper
DCS Distributed Control System
EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction
ERA Expenditure Request Approval
ESD Emergency Shutdown System
FAT Factory Acceptance Test
FEL Front End Loading
FPD Facilities Planning Department
FSD Functional Specifications Document
GI General Instructions

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 3 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

HAZOP Process Hazard and Operability


ID Inspection Department
IFAT Integrated Factory Acceptance Test
LSTK Lump Sum Turnkey
MAC Main Automation Contractor
MCC Mechanical Completion Certificate
MSAER Mandatory Saudi Aramco Engineering Requirements
NCR Non-Conformance Report
NMR Non-Material Requirements
OO Operating Organization/Proponent Organization
PAC Performance Acceptance Certificate
PAS Process Automation System
PAT Performance Acceptance Test
P&CSD Process and Control Systems Department
PCS Process Control System
PDR Preliminary Design Review
PEP Project Execution Plan
PPD Projects Procurement Department
RTU Remote Terminal Unit
SAEP Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedure
SAMSS Saudi Aramco Materials System Specification
SAT Site Acceptance Test
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SDD System Design Document
SDP System Development Plan
VE Value Engineering

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 4 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

4.2 Terms

Bid Evaluation Team: A team that reviews the contractor's or vendor's bids
and prepare technical and commercial recommendations. Refer to the
Contracting Manual for additional information.

Bid Package: Documentation supplied to a bidder to quote the job. A Bid


Package includes Instructions to Bidders, Pro Forma Contract, Job
Specifications, Functional Specifications Document, relevant MSAERs and
other documents as applicable.

Bid Slate: A list of qualified contractors or vendors to bid on the project.

Construction Agency: The organization assigned to execute the project.

Front End Loading (FEL): A project execution process that organizes the project
life cycle into phases, each with defined activities, deliverables and specific
objectives. The FEL process is applicable to all projects that apply the Capital
Management System (CMS). For more details, refer to Front End Loading Manual.

Integrated Project Team (IPT): A team composed of appointed members from


different organizations who work in an integrated manner and have clear roles and
accountabilities toward project planning and execution.

Job Specification: The scope of the work to be performed pursuant to a contract.


It describes or refers to the applicable drawings, standards, specifications as well
as the administrative, procedural, and technical requirements that the contractor
shall satisfy or adhere to in accomplishing the work.

Main Automation Contractor: A highly qualified, large projects experienced,


and well-resourced control systems contractor assigned to engineer,
supply/procure and manage Process Automation Solutions and associated
instrumentation for all project process areas and facilities.

Non-Conformance Report: A report issued by Inspection Department to


highlight any deviation from the standards and specifications.

Non-Material Requirements: The complete set of documentation required


from the vendor and/or the contractor during the design and development phase
of the project. There are three categories of NMRs:
601 NMRs Preliminary drawings for review and approval
602 NMRs Certified drawings, documents and spare parts data/requirements
603 NMRs Operations, maintenance manuals, installation instructions, test
certificates.

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 5 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

Operating Organization /Proponent: The Saudi Aramco organization that owns,


operates, and maintains the completed facility. The Proponent is responsible for
signing the Mechanical Completion Certificate as owner of the facility.

Process Automation System (PAS): A system which is used to monitor and


control an operating facility. PAS covered under the scope of this procedure
include: Distributed Control Systems, Emergency Shutdown Systems,
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Systems (SCADA & RTU), Terminal
Management Systems and Compressor Control Systems.

Project Execution Plan: A document prepared by the SAPMT upon approval


of the DBSP to define the objectives, plans, requirements, and related
information necessary for optimum project execution.

Project Leader: Facilities Planning Department (FPD) representative who leads the
IPT during FEL1 and FEL2 phases.

Project Management: The Saudi Aramco Project Management administrative area


that is the default Construction Agency for Types A, B, and C projects.

Project Manager: A division head-level representative from the Construction


Agency, who provides inputs to the Project Leader during FEL2 and leads the IPT
during FEL3 and the project’s execution phases.

Project Sponsor (PS): An executive or a member of management, appointed by the


proponent organization, who is accountable for meeting project objectives and
steering the IPT towards maximizing investment value.

Project Types A, B, C & C1: Categories assigned to projects based on criteria


evaluating cost and technical, commercial, and stakeholder complexity. Project
categories are determined by FPD. For reference, see Exhibit I in SAEP-12.

Saudi Aramco Project Management Team (SAPMT): The Construction Agency


team that is assigned to the project during project planning and execution.

System Design Document: A document prepared by the vendor and/or the


design contractor that contains the design narratives and the key design issues of
the system.

System Development Plan: A document prepared by the PAS vendor which


outlines the development steps, project schedules and major milestones of a PAS
project. This document should be constantly updated throughout the detail
design phase.

Waiver: The formal approval to waive one or more specified Mandatory Saudi
Aramco Engineering Requirements (MSAERs) on a project basis.

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 6 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

5 Instructions

Projects involving Process Automation Systems are broken down into specific project
phases with specific deliverables, similar to any capital project. The Front-End Loading
(FEL) phases cover the project phases from initiation through Expenditure Request
Approval (ERA). The figure below highlights the FEL project phases. Refer to Front
End Loading (FEL) Manual for further details on FEL phases and deliverables.

After ERA, PAS projects follow the traditional Details Design, construction and
commissioning project phases. Details and procedures related to all project phases are
described below.

Note that the deliverables listed below for FEL phases 1-3 are not a complete listing of
FEL deliverables. The intention here is to define the major deliverables related to
Process Automation Systems for each phase. For a complete list of deliverables, refer
to the FEL Book of Deliverables.

5.1 FEL 1 (Business Case)

The objective of this phase is to validate the feasibility of the project, identify a
comprehensive range of alternatives and develop a preliminary business case.
The main activities of this phase are, the development of the Business Case and
exhaustive identification of viable alternatives.

DELIVERABLES:
 Basic Data Requirements (Initial)
 Cost Estimate (CE2) (+/- 50%)
 Business Case Assessment (Initial)

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 7 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

Note: Some of the deliverables listed as Initial and Updated for FEL phases
may only need to be developed once. Refer to CMS Front End Loading
Manual for further details.

5.2 FEL 2 (Study)

The objective of this phase is to select the optimal alternative for the project.
During this phase, an analysis of the project alternatives is conducted
considering project economics, risks, technology selection and overall lifecycle
of the PAS equipment.

DELIVERABLES:
 Basic Data Requirements (Updated)
 Cost Estimate (+/- 40%)
 Business Case Assessment (Updated)
 Schedule Level I
 Technology Selection Report
5.3 FEL 2 (DBSP)

The objective of this phase is to determine and freeze the project scope and to
secure approval of the scope by all stakeholders. This phase includes definition
of the main elements of the project scope of work and providing the design
contractor the information required to develop the preliminary engineering.

DELIVERABLES:
 Basic Data Requirements (Final)
 Business Case Assessment (Updated)
 Schedule Level II
 Value Engineering (VE) Study – (Initial) (not applicable for C1 projects)
 Procurement Strategy and Material Procurement Plan (Initial)
 Preliminary Funding Request
 Design Basis Scoping Paper (refer to SAEP-1350 for details)
 Cost Estimate (+/- 25%)

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 8 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

5.4 FEL 3 (Project Proposal & Finalize FEL)


The purpose of this phase is to decide on readiness of the Expenditure Request
for Approval based on final business case, preliminary engineering and project
economics. Note that for type C and C1 projects, there is a single approval gate
for both FEL 3 stages, Project Proposal and Finalize FEL.

DELIVERABLES:
 Business Case Assessment (Final)
 Schedule Level III
 Project Execution Plan (PEP)
 Contracting Strategy
 Procurement Strategy and Material Procurement Plan (Final)
 VE Study – (Final) (not applicable for C1 projects)
 Constructability Review Report
 HAZOP Study Report (refer to SAEP-14 for details)
 Project Proposal Package (refer to SAEP-14 for details)
 ER Estimate Package (refer to SAEP-25 for details)
KEY PAS DELIVERABLES FOR PROJECT PROPOSAL
 Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Assignment Report (typically performed
with HAZOP) (refer to SAEP-250)
 System Architecture Drawings – Initial
 PAS Functional Specification Documents (FSD) (refer to SAEP-1610)
 Input / Output (I/O) summary by system type
 Risk Area Segregation Philosophy
5.4.1 Main Automation Contractor (MAC)

MAC contracting strategy is required for all projects which involve


multiple LSTKs where there is a requirement for a single, integrated
process control system and the scope of the PAS is divided between the
multiple LSTKs. MAC contracting strategy is also required for projects
which are single sourced to a MAC vendor and where the scope of the
project is not well defined during FEL 2. P&CSD and Projects
Procurement Department (PPD) shall be consulted in such cases to
determine the applicability of utilizing a MAC.

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 9 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

MAC may be used on projects which do not meet either of the above two
criteria; however, SAPMT shall consult with P&CSD and PPD on the
applicability of MAC in such cases.

The additional deliverables during FEL 3 for projects utilizing MAC are
as follows (refer to SAEP-1650 for additional details):
 MAC Bid Package
 MAC Technical & Commercial evaluation report (refer to SAEP-
1622)
 MAC Agreement
 MAC Preliminary / Beneficial Engineering Package (if applicable)

5.5 Detailed Design


During the detailed engineering phase, the EPC / LSTK contractor will develop
the detailed design for the overall plant facilities, including Instrumentation &
Control.

EPC / LSTK DELIVERABLES:


 Alarm Philosophy Document (prior to CDR) (refer to SAEP-368)
 Alarm Rationalization Report (prior to FAT)
 ESD & Depressurizing Philosophy
 ESD Cause & Effect Diagrams
 ESD Logic Diagrams
 ESD Pre-alarm and Trip setting database
 Input / Output Databases
 Control Narratives
 Pre-commissioning, Commissioning & Startup Plans
 SIL Verification Study
 Spare Parts Data Package (refer to SAEP-31)
The PAS supplier is responsible for developing the PAS design during this
project phase. The PAS design is reviewed at two milestones: Preliminary
Design Review (PDR) and Critical Design Review (CDR).

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 10 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

5.5.1 Preliminary Design Review (PDR)


NMR 601 documents shall be developed during PDR. Saudi Aramco
approval on these NMRs is required prior to equipment order. The PDR is
the basis for finalizing the hardware design. Refer to Appendix A for a
list of required 601 NMRs.

DELIVERABLES: Approved 601 NMRs

5.5.2 Critical Design Review (CDR)


This review consists of a complete review of the design, configuration,
documentation and testing plans/procedures and all 602 NMR
deliverables. The CDR shall serve as the basis for finalizing the PAS
design prior to implementation by the automation vendor. Refer to
Appendix A for a list of required 602 NMRs.

DELIVERABLES: Approved 602 NMRs

5.6 Factory Acceptance Test (FAT)


The purpose of Factory Acceptance Testing is to verify that the system meets the
job specification and all MSAERs. A FAT test procedure shall be developed by the
automation vendor as per SAEP-750 as part of NMR 602 deliverables and
approved by Company. The procedures shall be executed during FAT to test the
hardware/software functionality, system performance, and to confirm
conformance to all project specifications. A technical representative from
P&CSD shall be invited to participate in the FAT for all type A, B and C project
and all C1 project where PAS is the major scope of the project. P&CSD will
assess the extent of its participation on a project by project basis.

DELIVERABLES: FAT Report

5.7 Integrated Factory Acceptance Test (IFAT)


The purpose of the IFAT is to validate interface between the main Process
Control System (PCS) and the other control systems which are interfaced to the
PCS, referred to as 3rd party sub-systems. An I-FAT procedure shall be
developed by the main automation contractor as part of NMR 602 deliverables
as per SAEP-750. IFAT shall be conducted at the FAT testing location using a
representative sample of the 3rd party sub-systems. It is critical that 3rd party
workstations and servers be included in the IFAT to ensure the ability to
integrate into the cyber-security infrastructure.

DELIVERABLES: IFAT Report

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 11 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

5.8 Site Acceptance Test (SAT)


The purpose of the Site Acceptance Test (SAT) is to verify the integrity of the
systems after shipment to site, installation and power-up. It is not to retest items
which have already been tested during FAT. The focus of SAT is to validate the
power and grounding, and network and system cable installation. The SAT
procedure shall be developed by the automation supplier as part of NMR 602
deliverables as per SAEP-750. Site acceptance testing is the responsibility of
the EPC / LSTK. A representative from the automation supplier shall be made
available at site to assist with Site Acceptance Testing. Any ‘Untestable’
interfaces identified during I-FAT shall be thoroughly tested during SAT.

DELIVERABLES: SAT Report

5.9 Pre-Commissioning
A pre-commissioning plan shall be developed by the EPC / LSTK and SAPMT.
Pre-commissioning plan includes all pre-commissioning activities, a listing of
all systems/subsystems, a detailed schedule, procedures required to support each
system, and the activities that need to be performed prior to handover and the
commencement of commissioning, startup and operation. Complete functional
loop testing from the sensing element(s) to the final control element(s) is
performed during pre-commissioning. This test will verify the instruments, the
wiring, the I/O cards, the I/O configuration and the logic. For Safety
Instrumented Systems, complete functional testing of all systems / logic is
performed during pre-commissioning.

DELIVERABLES: Pre-Commissioning Plan


Loop Acceptance Sheets
5.10 Mechanical Completion Certificate (MCC)
MCC is signed off when all “yes” items (items required for start-up) are
resolved, all engineering drawings are marked-up to “As-Built” status and
submitted by SAPMT to to “As-Built” status, and system documentation is
revised to reflect the actual system. The system is then turned over to the
operating organization.

SAPMT is responsible for storage of the ‘as-built’ vendor documents listed


below in iPlant. Refer to SAEP-334, Retrieval, Certification and Submittal of
Saudi Aramco Engineering and Vendor Drawings, for details.
 602.2 System Design Document (SDD)
 602.3 System & Network Architecture Drawings
 602.4 Bill of Materials

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 12 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

 602.5 Detailed Cabinet / Console Layout and Wiring Drawings


 602.6 System cable connection drawings

DELIVERABLES: MCC Form SA-7213

As-Built drawings submission in iPlant

5.11 Start-up and Commissioning


The operating organization with the assistance of the SAPMT commissions the
facilities. Final loop tuning may be required to set the process automation
system to the optimum operating conditions.

DELIVERABLES: None

5.12 Performance Acceptance Test (PAT)


For performance acceptance criteria, refer to GI-0002.710 “Mechanical
Completion & Performance Acceptance of Plant/Unit”.

DELIVERABLES: PAC Form SA-7214

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 13 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

6 Responsibilities

Revision Summary

12 November 2013 Major revision to reflect Safety Lifecycle concept and VE cost savings proposals. Added
requirement for update of Process Automation Installed base database as NMR deliverable.
14 March 2017 Editorial revision deleting the reference to the canceled procedures (SAEP-1630, SAEP-
1634, and SAEP-1638) and adding procedure SAEP-750 as a reference.
11 December 2018 Major revision to incorporate FEL project execution. Major revision to PAS NMR
Deliverables.

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 14 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

Summary of Change Form

No. Paragraph Change Type Technical Change


No.
1 1 Revision Procedure is applicable for BI-10 projects where the PAS scope is $2.0MM
or above. Proponent to determine applicability for BI19 projects.
2 4.2 Addition Added definition of various terms used with CMS project execution
methodology.
3 5.1 Revision Changed “Project Conception” to “FEL1 – Business Case” and updated
deliverables.
4 5.2 Addition Added new project phase “FEL2 – Study with applicable deliverables.
5 5.3 Revision Changed DBSP to FEL2 – DBSP and updated deliverables
6 5.4 Revision Changed Project Proposal to FEL3 – Project Proposal and Finalize FEL and
updated deliverables.
7 5.4.1 New New section related to MAC project execution.
8 5.5 Revision Created new list of LSTK deliverables for PAS during Detailed Design
9 5.6 Revision Changed reference to SAEP-750 for development of FAT procedure
10 5.6 Revision Removed reference to Project Review Board
11 5.7 Revision Changed reference to SAEP-750 for development of IFAT procedure
12 5.8 Revision Changed reference to SAEP-750 for development of SAT procedure
13 5.9 Revision Clarified requirements for Pre-commissioning activities
14 5.10 Revision Added requirement for PMT to upload ‘As Built’ NMR vendor drawings in
iPlant.
15 5.2 (old) Removed Removed section related to Project Review Board
16 6 Revision Changed format of responsibilities section to RAPID matrix and updated.
17 App. A Revision Updated NMR deliverables.

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 15 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

Appendix A - Non-Material Requirements

Non-Material Requirements (NMRs) are developed by the automation vendor and reviewed as
part of the design review process during Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and Critical Design
Review (CDR). This documentation shall be updated throughout the project and final ‘As-built’
documentation provided to the operating organization as part of the project records.

Specific ‘as-built’ documents listed in section 5.10 above shall be uploaded by PMT into iPlant
prior to completion of the project. Refer to SAEP-334 for further details on submission of vendor
documents.

A.1 601 NMRs

Saudi Aramco's approval of these preliminary documents is required prior to any


fabrications. The following list is the minimum requirement. It may be revised as
necessary depending on the project requirements.
601.1 System Development Plan
601.2 System Design Document (refer to SAEP-1624)

601.3 System & Network Architecture Drawings


601.4 Bill of Materials
601.5 Detailed Cabinet / Console Layout and Wiring Drawings (Dimensional outline
diagrams, detailed panel layout diagrams, electric power distribution and
grounding diagrams)
601.6 System cable connection diagrams
601.7 Power & HVAC (Heat-loading) Requirements
601.8 Integration Specifications Document (refer to SAEP-1628)
601.9 Manufacturing, Inspection and Test Plan
601.10 Security Management System design document

A.2 602 NMRs

These certified drawings, parts data and documents should be marked as final.
The following list is the minimum requirement. It may be revised as necessary
depending on the project requirement.
602.1 System Development Plan (revised)
602.2 System Design Document (revised)
602.3 System & Network Architecture Drawings (revised)
602.4 Bill of Materials (revised)
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use
Page 16 of 17
Document Responsibility: Process Control Standards Committee SAEP-16
Issue Date: 11 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 12 December 2021 Project Execution Guide for Process Automation Systems

602.5 Detailed Cabinet / Console Layout and Wiring Drawings (Dimensional outline
diagrams, detailed panel layout diagrams, electric power distribution and
grounding diagrams) (revised)
602.6 System cable connection drawings (revised)
602.8 Integration Specifications Document (revised)
601.10 Security Management System design document (revised)
602.11 HMI Design and Configuration document
602.12 Control Database Design and Configuration document
602.13 FAT, I-FAT, SAT Test Plan and Procedure (refer to SAEP-750 for details)
602.14 Installation and Startup Plan (Including Cutover Plan for PAS expansion or
Upgrade projects)
602.15 Master Alarm System Database

A.3 603 NMRs

The following list is recommended. It may be revised as necessary.


603.1 Software license database
603.2 Operating and Maintenance Instructions / Manuals

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Page 17 of 17

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen