Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
JOHN P. CARROLL,
Plaintiff/Appellant,
Defendants/Appellees.
______________________________/
TABLE OF
CONTENTS................................................................................................................i
SUMMARY OF
ARGUMENT.............................................................................................................1
CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................2
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE...................................................................................................................3
CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE..........................................................................................................3
i
SUMMARY OF ARGUMET
beyond relevance to this appeal. In response, I only point out that the Lower Tribunal
To the issues in this appeal, WaterSound and the other Appellees are incorrect.
This appeal should be reviewed de novo. The lower tribunal misapplied the
WaterSound covenants and the law. WaterSound admitted clearly and distinctly on
record,
“He hasn't finished in that 20 month period, and as such, he's been fined
$1,000 a month since that time. Now, as he mentioned, this fine at this
Florida Statute and WaterSound’s Covenants are clear. It is against the law
Appellees argue against a de novo review. The lower tribunal misapplied the law. The
lower tribunal also misunderstood the clear and unambiguous terms of the WaterSound
1.
Covenants. As fully presented in Carroll’s initial brief, Florida Statute prohibits HOA
COCLUSIO
For the above-mentioned reasons, and those more detailed in the initial brief,
Carroll shows that the trial court committed reversible error and abused its discretion
by denying the Petition for Injunction, and thus Carroll requests that this Court reverse
the trial court’s denial of Injunction and remand with instructions for the immediate
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________
John P. Carroll, pro se
Box 613524
WaterSound, FL 32461
(850) 231-5616 - phone
(850) 622-5618- fax
AAbsolute@aol.com
2.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been
furnished to Christopher L. George, Esq., PO Box 1034, Mobile, AL 36633 and to
Mark D. Davis, Esq., 694 Baldwin Ave. Suite 1, PO Box 705, DeFuniak Springs, FL
32435, and to Gary Shipman, Esq., 1414 County Highway 283 South, Suite B, Santa
Rosa Beach, FL 32459, Attorneys for Appellees, by hand delivery or certified mail this
16th day of December, 2010.
_____________________________
John Carroll, pro se
Box 613524
WaterSound, FL 32461
(850) 231-5616 - phone
(850) 622-5618- fax
AAbsolute@aol.com
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIACE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the lettering in this brief is Times New Roman 14-
point Font and complies with the font requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate
Procedure 9.210(a)(2).
_____________________________
John Carroll, pro se
Box 613524
WaterSound, FL 32461
(850) 231-5616 - phone
(850) 622-5618- fax
AAbsolute@aol.com
3.
TABLE OF COTETS
Transcript……………………………………………………………………………i
Record 1…….............................................................................................................ii
Transcript i
2 FLORIDA
3
JOHN P. CARROLL,
4
5 Plaintiff,
9 Defendant.
10
11 _____________________________________________________
12 PROCEEDINGS
June 14, 2010
13 9:00 a.m.
Walton County Courthouse Annex
14 DeFuniak Springs, Florida
15
BEFORE: The Honorable Howard LaPorte
16 Circuit Judge
17
18 _____________________________________________________
KATHRYN B. PEACOCK
19 Court Reporter
1009 Ridgewood Cove, S.
20 Niceville, Florida 32578
(904)897-2864
21
22
23
24
25
2 APPEARANCES
3
JOHN CARROLL
4 Post Office Box 613524
Watersound, FL 32461
5 Plaintiff Pro Se
12
13 INDEX
14 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 51
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
15 injunction.
22 taking testimony?
9 again.
21 judgment.
4 judgment.
19 hearing.
12 behind us.
16 if you'll go forward.
9 word on that.
14 in here.
18 copy.