Statistical Analysis

Compressive Strength of RSB

--- To determine if there is a significant difference between the mean compressive strength
of RSB in controlled set (set A, without inhibitor) and the other three sets with different ratio of
inhibitor.

Hypotheses of the Study

In this study, the following null hypotheses were formulated:

Ho1: There is no significant difference between the mean compressive strength of RSB in
controlled set (set A, without inhibitor) and the other set with assign ratio of inhibitor.

SET B (1:1)

SET A SET B
SAMPLE NO.
x x² x x²
1 98.90 9781.21 109.70 12034.09
2 100.10 10020.01 101.30 10261.69
3 99.95 9990.00 108.45 11761.40
4 101.25 10251.56 108.45 11761.40
5 101.70 10342.89 108.95 11870.10
6 99.45 9890.30 108.50 11772.25
7 108.20 11707.24 109.15 11913.72
8 109.70 12034.09 108.45 11761.40
9 99.85 9970.02 108.70 11815.69
10 108.50 11772.25 109.50 11990.25
11 108.60 11793.96 109.00 11881.00
12 108.80 11837.44 108.85 11848.32
13 108.70 11815.69 100.15 10030.02
14 109.20 11924.64 108.95 11870.10
15 109.60 12012.16 109.90 12078.01
104.83 165143.47 107.87 174649.5
t= 0.075
where:
X = mean

t
X  X 
2 1
SS = sum of squares
1=without inhibitor
 SS1  SS2  1 1  2= banana & mango extract (1:1)
    n = number of samples
 n1  n2  2  n1 n2  n 1 + n2 - 2 = df
15+ 15 -2 = 28

Table Values of t at 0.05 level

t = 2.101 (two-tailed)
SET C (1:2)

SET A SET C
SAMPLE NO.
x x² x x²
1 98.90 9781.21 109.55 12001.20
2 100.10 10020.01 109.10 11902.81
3 99.95 9990.00 108.95 11870.10
4 101.25 10251.56 109.45 11979.30
5 101.70 10342.89 109.45 11979.30
6 99.45 9890.30 109.15 11913.72
7 108.20 11707.24 108.75 11826.56
8 109.70 12034.09 109.30 11946.49
9 99.85 9970.02 109.65 12023.12
10 108.50 11772.25 108.65 11804.82
11 108.60 11793.96 109.05 11891.90
12 108.80 11837.44 109.20 11924.64
13 108.70 11815.69 109.55 12001.20
14 109.20 11924.64 109.70 12034.09
15 109.60 12012.16 109.20 11924.64
104.83 165143.47 109.25 179023.9
t= 0.109
SET D (2:1)

SET A SET D
SAMPLE NO.
x x² x x²
1 98.90 9781.21 109.55 12001.20
2 100.10 10020.01 109.35 11957.42
3 99.95 9990.00 109.50 11990.25
4 101.25 10251.56 109.25 11935.56
5 101.70 10342.89 109.50 11990.25
6 99.45 9890.30 109.15 11913.72
7 108.20 11707.24 108.95 11870.10
8 109.70 12034.09 109.25 11935.56
9 99.85 9970.02 109.65 12023.12
10 108.50 11772.25 108.75 11826.56
11 108.60 11793.96 109.20 11924.64
12 108.80 11837.44 109.05 11891.90
13 108.70 11815.69 109.05 11891.90
14 109.20 11924.64 109.40 11968.36
15 109.60 12012.16 109.50 11990.25
104.83 165143.47 109.27 179110.8
t= 0.110

SET A SETS W/ Computed Tabulated

PARAMETER Significance
(Control) Inhibitor t value t value
Mean Compressive
104.83 107.87 0.075 2.101 Not significant
strength (kN) : A-B
Mean Compressive
104.83 109.25 0.109 2.101 Not significant
strength (kN) : A-C
Mean Compressive
104.83 109.27 0.110 2.101 Not significant
strength (kN) : A-D

The mean compressive strength of set A is 104.833 while for the three sets are 107.87 kN,
109.25 kN and 109.27 kN. The computed value of t in three parameter is less than the tabulated t
value of 2.101 (two-tailed) at 0.05 level. This means that there is no significant difference between
the controlled set without the inhibitor and sets with inhibitor.

Mass of RSB

--- To determine if there is a significant difference between the mean mass of RSB in
controlled set (set A, without inhibitor) and the other three sets with different ratio of inhibitor.

Hypotheses of the Study

In this study, the following null hypotheses were formulated:

Ho1: There is no significant difference between the mean mass of RSB in controlles set
(set A, without inhibitor) and the other set with assign ratio of inhibitor.

SET B (1:1)

SET A SET B
SAMPLE NO.
x x² x x²
1 750.4 563100.16 749 561001.00
2 731.8 535531.24 738.3 545086.89
3 731.6 535238.56 737.3 543611.29
4 723.9 524031.21 740.8 548784.64
5 734 538756.00 742.1 550712.41
6 755.8 571233.64 733.6 538168.96
7 727.9 529838.41 743.4 552643.56
8 746.2 556814.44 732 535824.00
9 738.3 545086.89 739.6 547008.16
10 740.9 548932.81 739 546121.00
11 748.5 560252.25 744.4 554131.36
12 730.7 533922.49 740.4 548192.16
13 748.4 560102.56 741.1 549229.21
14 730.3 533338.09 732.5 536556.25
15 744.1 553684.81 733.6 538168.96
738.9 8189863.56 739.14 8195239.85
t= 0.00103
 where:
X = mean

t
X  X 
2 1
SS = sum of squares
1=without inhibitor
 SS1  SS2  1 1  2= banana & mango extract (1:1)
   
n = number of samples
 n1  n2  2  n1 n2  n1 + n2 - 2 df
=
15+ 15 -2 = 28

Table Values of t at 0.05 level

t = 2.101 (two-tailed)

SET C (1:2)

SET A SET C
SAMPLE NO.
x x² x x²
1 750.4 563100.16 737.9 544496.41
2 731.8 535531.24 743.5 552792.25
3 731.6 535238.56 737 543169.00
4 723.9 524031.21 738.3 545086.89
5 734 538756.00 743.8 553238.44
6 755.8 571233.64 740.8 548784.64
7 727.9 529838.41 743 552049.00
8 746.2 556814.44 734.8 539931.04
9 738.3 545086.89 726.5 527802.25
10 740.9 548932.81 729.8 532608.04
11 748.5 560252.25 740.4 548192.16
12 730.7 533922.49 741.1 549229.21
13 748.4 560102.56 741.4 549673.96
14 730.3 533338.09 742.9 551900.41
15 744.1 553684.81 744.6 554429.16
738.85 8189863.56 739.05 8193382.86
t= 0.00072

SET D (2:1)

SET A SET D
SAMPLE NO.
x x² x x²
1 750.4 563100.16 736 541696.00
2 731.8 535531.24 733.5 538022.25
3 731.6 535238.56 744.2 553833.64
4 723.9 524031.21 739.5 546860.25
5 734 538756.00 742.5 551306.25
6 755.8 571233.64 733.6 538168.96
7 727.9 529838.41 748.2 559803.24
8 746.2 556814.44 731.2 534653.44
9 738.3 545086.89 732 535824.00
10 740.9 548932.81 719.2 517248.64
11 748.5 560252.25 730.5 533630.25
12 730.7 533922.49 746.3 556963.69
13 748.4 560102.56 745.7 556068.49
14 730.3 533338.09 740.3 548044.09
15 744.1 553684.81 737.6 544053.76
738.85 8189863.6 737.35 8156176.95
t= -0.005

SET A SETS W/ Computed Tabulated

PARAMETER Significance
(Control) Inhibitor t value t value
Mass of RSB (grams):
738.853 739.14 0.0010 2.101 Not significant
A-B
Mass of RSB (grams):
738.853 739.05 0.0007 2.101 Not significant
A-C
Mass of RSB (grams):
738.853 737.35 -0.005 2.101 Not significant
A-D

The mean mass of RSB in set A is 738.825 while for the three sets are 739.13 g, 739.04g
and 737.35 g. The computed value of t in three parameter is less than the tabulated t value of 2.101
(two-tailed) at 0.05 level. This means that there is no significant difference between the controlled set
without the inhibitor and sets with inhibitor.
 Strength of RSB (kN)
RSB Set A Set B Set C Set D
(Control) (1:1)-(B:M) (1:2)-(B:M) (2:1)-(M:B)
1 98.90 109.70 109.55 109.55
2 100.10 101.30 109.10 109.35
3 99.95 108.45 108.95 109.50
4 101.25 108.45 109.45 109.25
5 101.70 108.95 109.45 109.50
6 99.45 108.50 109.15 109.15
7 108.20 109.15 108.75 108.95
8 109.70 108.45 109.30 109.25
9 99.85 108.70 109.65 109.65
10 108.50 109.50 108.65 108.75
11 108.60 109.00 109.05 109.20
12 108.80 108.85 109.20 109.05
13 108.70 100.15 109.55 109.05
14 109.20 108.95 109.70 109.40
15 109.60 109.90 109.20 109.50
104.83 107.87 109.25 109.27

Mass of RSB (grams)

RSB Set A Set B Set C Set D
(Control) (1:1)-(B:M) (1:2)-(B:M) (2:1)-(M:B)
1 750.36 748.98 737.86 736.03
2 731.84 738.26 743.52 733.47
3 731.55 737.30 736.98 744.23
4 723.92 740.78 738.26 739.45
5 733.97 742.13 743.79 742.50
6 755.77 733.56 740.81 733.55
7 727.58 743.42 742.95 748.16
8 746.23 732.00 734.84 731.22
9 738.34 739.55 726.46 732.04
10 740.88 738.95 729.83 719.24
11 748.50 744.39 740.40 730.50
12 730.56 740.38 741.08 746.34
13 748.44 741.11 741.40 745.65
14 730.32 732.52 742.85 740.30
15 744.12 733.61 744.63 737.57
738.83 739.13 739.04 737.35
 STRENGTH OF RSB (kN)
RSB SET A SET B SET C SET D
(CONTROL)(1:1)-(B:M)
(1:2)-(B:M)
(2:1)-(M:B)
1 98.9 109.7 109.55 109.55
2 100.1 101.3 109.1 109.35
3 99.95 108.45 108.95 109.5
4 101.25 108.45 109.45 109.25
5 101.7 108.95 109.45 109.5
6 99.45 108.5 109.15 109.15
7 108.2 109.15 108.75 108.95
8 109.7 108.45 109.3 109.25
9 99.85 108.7 109.65 109.65
10 108.5 109.5 108.65 108.75
11 108.6 109 109.05 109.2
12 108.8 108.85 109.2 109.05
13 108.7 100.15 109.55 109.05
14 109.2 108.95 109.7 109.4
15 109.6 109.9 109.2 109.5
X = 104.833 107.867 109.247 109.273