Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DEVELOPMENT IN
PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
P.UDHAYAKUMAR
of
THANDALAM, CHENNAI-602105.
AUGUST-2011
1
DECLARATION
DECLARATION
DATE: (1021193)
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Dr.C.CHENDROYAPERUMAL Dr.C.CHENDROYAPERUMAL
GUIDE
HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
MBA MBA
SAVEETHA ENGINEERING COLLEGE SAVEETHA ENGINEERING
COLLEGE
THANDALAM, CHENNAI-602105 THANDALAM, CHENNAI-602105
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I first and foremost thank to lord god almighty for giving me grace and
knowledge to complete this project work successfully
Last but not least I submit my thanks to my parents, family members and friends
for providing me their support on my work.
P.UDHAYAKUMAR
(1021193)
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK
CHAPTER-1 Introduction
CHAPTER-2 Review of the literature
CHAPTER-3 Research methodolgy
CHAPTER-4 Data analysis and interpretations
CHAPTER-5 Findings, suggestions & conclusions
ANNEXURE Bibliography,
Questioner.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF TABLES
6
4.7 the duration of the training Program conducted 52
4.8 the opinion regarding the duration of the training Program 53
4.9 the feel of the respondents regarding the training Program 54
4.10 the quality of the trainers 55
4.11 opinion regarding the practical demonstration 56
4.12 opinion regarding the training aids 57
4.13 changes after attending the training 58
4.14 the various fields in which training is provided 59
4.15 training program is related to the work 60
4.16 whether they got opportunity to practice the training methods 61
after attending the training program
4.17 the objective of the Organizations training plan 62
4.18 the accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program 63
LIST OF FIGURES
7
4.17 the objective of the Organizations training plan 62
4.18 the accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program 63
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
The study is conducted to find out the Effectiveness of Training and Development
in Hyundai Motor India Limited with a sample of 100 respondents selected by
convenience sampling method.
Training, education and development are three terms frequently used. On the face
of it there might not appear any difference between them, but when a deep thought is
given, there appears some difference between them. In all training there is some
education in all education there is some training. And the two processes cannot be
separated from development.
Descriptive types of research is used to the find out the existing fact by means of
conducting survey and fact finding enquires of different employees.
The questionnaire schedule is to collect data. The data are analyzed with different
tools such as percentage analysis and Chi square analysis.
8
CH.I - INTRODUCTION
1. INTRODUCTION
A large number of organizations are setting up their own training facilities. They
are also inviting outside faculty to conduct in company courses for executives at all
levels. This trend will continue because new orientation in managerial and technical areas
is necessary for effectively responding to the changing environment of business.
Training is expensive if it does not serve the purpose for which it is given. The
training should be able to improve the capabilities of individuals and collectively that of
the organization.
“Give a man a fish, he will eat it. Train a man to fish, he will feed his family”.
This is a saying which highlights the importance of training. Employee training is the
process whereby people learn the skills, knowledge, attitudes and behaviors needed in
order to perform their job effectively.
Training can be defined as organizationally directed experience designed to
further the learning of specific job behaviors that will contribute to organizational goals.
Many firms are on-the job training (OJT) as their primary skills training approach.
True OJT includes specific procedures for delivering actual training to the employer. One
method for doing this is known as job instruction training (JIT). The JIT system includes
the major characteristics of any effective training program; determination of training
needs recognition of the needs of the trainee feedback to and from the trainee, frequent
appraisal and correction.
9
JIT is an effective method of training for several reasons. First, it can yield
effective method of training results at a relatively low cost. Second, it is relatively easy to
teach to supervisors responsible for providing OJT to their subordinates. Third, since
much of the training is provided by an individual’s supervisor or co-workers, there is
assurance that the training relates directly to the specific work situations.
The off-the job training methods includes lectures and conferences, audio-visuals
aids, interactive video.
CH.I - INTRODUCTION
IMPORTANCE OF TRAINING
Job and organizational requirements are not static, they are changed from time to
time in view of technological advancement and change in the awareness of the Total
Quality and Productivity Management. The objective of the TQM can be achieved only
through training as training develops human skills and efficiency. Trained employees
would be a valuable asset to an organization. Organizational efficiency, productivity,
progress and development to a greater extent depend on training. Organizational
objectives like viability, stability and growth can also be achieved through training.
Training is important as it constitutes significant part of management control.
BENEFITS OF TRAINING
Specifically, the need for training arises due to the following reasons.
employees to enrich them in the areas of changing technical skills and knowledge
from time to time.
Organizational complexity: With the emergence of increased mechanization and
automation, manufacturing of multiple products and by-products or dealing in services of
diversified lines, extension of operations to various regions of the country or in overseas
countries, organization hierarchy. This creates the complex problems of coordination and
integration of activities adaptable for and adaptable to the expanding and diversifying
situations. This situation calls for training
Human relations
Change in the job assignment
Increase productivity
Improve quality of the product
Help a company to fulfill its future personnel needs.
Improve organizational climate.
Improve health and safety.
Prevent obsolescence
Effect personal growth
Minimize the resistance to change.
TRAINING OBJECTIVES
Generally line managers ask the personnel manager to formulate the training
policies. The personnel Manager formulate the following raining objectives in keeping
with the Company’s goals and objectives.
To prepare the employee both new and old to meet the present as well as
the changing requirements of the job and the organizations.
To prevent obsolescence
To impart the new entrants the basic knowledge and skill they need for an
intelligent performance of definite job
To prepare employees for higher-level tasks.
To assist employees to function more effectively in their present position
by exposing them to the latest concepts, information and techniques and
developing the skills they will need in their particular fields.
To develop the potentialities of people for the next level job.
To ensure smooth and efficient working of a department
To ensure economical output of required quality
To promote individual and collective morale, a sense of responsibility, co-
operative attitudes and good relationships.
Training needs are identified on the basis of organizational analysis, job analysis
and man analysis. Training programme, training methods and course content are to be
planned on the basis of training needs. Training needs are those aspects necessary to
perform the job in an organization in which employee is lacking attitude/aptitude,
knowledge, and skill.
Man power Analysis: Individual strengths and weaknesses in the areas of job
knowledge, skills etc.
ASSESSMENT METHOD
The following methods are used to assess the training needs:
Organizational requirement/weakness
Departmental requirements/weakness
Job specifications and employee specifications
Identifying specific problems
Anticipating future problems
Management’s requests
Observation
Interviews
Group Conferences
Questionnaire surveys.
PRINCIPLE OF TRAINING
Providing training in the knowledge of different skills is a complex process. A
number of principles have been evolved which can be followed as guideless by the
trainees. Some of them are as follows:
Motivation
Progress information
Reinforcement
Practice
Full Vs part
Individual differences
TRAINING METHOD
As a result of research in the field of training, a number of programmes are
available. Some of these are new methods. While other are improvements over the
traditional methods. The training programmes commonly used to train operative and
supervisory personnel.
ON-THE JOB METHODS
OFF-THE JOB METHODS
JOB ROTATIONS
This type of training involves the movement of the trainee from one job to
another. The trainee receives job knowledge and gain experience from his supervisor or
trainer in each of the different job assignments.
COACHING
The trainee is placed under a particular supervisor functions as a coach in training
the individual. The supervisor provides who feedback to the trainee on his performance
and offers him some suggestions for improvement. A limitation of this method of
training is that the trainee may not have the freedom or opportunity to express hi own
ideas.
JOB INSTRUCTION
This method is also known as training through step by step. Under this method,
trainer explains the trainee the way of doing the jobs, job knowledge and skills and
allows him to do the job.
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
Under the committee assignment, group of trainees are given and asked to solve
an actual organizational problem. The trainees solve the problem jointly. Its develops
teamwork.
VESTIBULE TRAINING
In this method, actual work conditions are simulated I a classroom. Material, files
and equipment those are used in actual job performance are also used in training.
ROLE PLAYING
It is defined as a method of human interaction that involves realistic behavior in
imaginary situations. This method of training involves action. Doing and practice. The
participants play the role of certain characters.
LECTURE METHODS
The lecture is a traditional and direct method of instruction. The instructor
organizes the material and gives it to a group of trainees in the form of a talk. To be
effective, the lecture must motivate and create interest among the trainees.
CONFERENCE
It is a method in training the clerical, professional and supervisory personnel.
This method involves a group of people who pose ideas, examine and share facts, ideas
and data, test assumptions, and draw conclusions, all of which contribute to the
improvement of job performance.
PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION
In recent year this method has become popular. The subject matter to be learned
is presented in a series of carefully planned sequential units. These units are arranged
from simple to more complex levels of instructions.
TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS
Another critical area for deriving expected benefits from training is the
measurement of training effectiveness how well the training inputs are serving the
intended purpose.
They are three kinds of training outputs that organization need to measure. They
are
Relating to course planning, comprehension and whatever goes on in the teaching
programme and the environment.
The utilization of what is learnt on the job, i.e., transferring the classroom
learning to the job in terms of skills, competencies, decision making, problem-
solving abilities and relationships and the like.
The changes in the mindset such as work related attitudes, values, interpersonal
competencies and personal attributes.
Two kinds of measurements are necessary to evaluate training that aim at influencing
person – related behavior.
Measuring the changes within the individual that the training may have initiated.
These processes are not manifest or observable.
Actual behavior changes at work.
The instrument to measure the impact of training would have to identify the
factors that the individual uses to deal with a live problem before and after training. If the
training has an impact on the situation to factors he may have used before training.
Post training changes in behavior of a participant can be assessed only at the place
of this work.
CH.I - INTRODUCTION
INDUSTRY PROFILE
INDUSTRY PROFILE
The automotive sector is one of the core industries of the Indian economy. The
delicensing of the sector in 1991 and the subsequent opening up of 100 per cent foreign
direct investment (FDI) through the automatic route marked the beginning of a new era
for the Indian automotive industry. Since then almost all the global major automobile
players have set up their facilities in India taking the level of production of vehicles from
2 million in 1991 to 10.83 million in 2007–08.
The industry is estimated to be a US$ 34 billion industry with exports
contributing 5 per cent of the revenues.
The growth of the Indian middle class with increasing purchasing power along
with the strong growth of the economy over the past few years has attracted global major
auto manufacture to the Indian market. Moreover, India provides trained manpower at
competitive costs making India a favored global manufacturing hub. The attractiveness of
the Indian markets on one hand combined with the stagnation of the auto sector in
markets such as Europe, US and Japan on the other, have resulted in shifting of new
capacities and flow of capital to the Indian auto industry.
The Indian automobile industry has been growing at the rate of 15–27 per cent
over the past five years.
According to the United Nations Industrial Development Organization’s
(UNIDO) International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics 2008, India ranks 12th in the list
of world’s top 15 automakers.
Moreover, Indian car makers are earning acclaim worldwide. The home-grown
automaker, Maruti Suzuki has emerged as the fourth most reputed among auto companies
in the world, even ahead of its parent Suzuki Motor Co of Japan, according to the Global
200: The World's Best Corporate Reputations list, compiled by US-based Reputation
Institute.
Development:
In 1953, the government of India and the Indian private sector initiated
manufacturing processes to help develop the automobile industry, which had emerged by
the 1940s in a nascent form.
Between 1970 to the economic liberalization of 1991, the automobile
industry continued to grow at a slow pace due to the many government restrictions.
A number of Indian manufactures appeared between 1970-1980. Japanese
manufacturers entered the Indian market ultimately leading to the establishment of
Maruti Udyog. A number of foreign firms initiated joint ventures with Indian companies.
Following the economic reforms of 1991, the automobile section underwent
deli censing and opened up for 100 percent Foreign Direct Investment. A surge in
economic growth rate and purchasing power led to growth in the Indian automobile
industry, which grew at a rate of 17% on an average since the economic reforms of 1991.
The industry provided employment to a total of 13.1 million people as of
2006-07, which includes direct and indirect employment. The export sector grew at a rate
of 30% per year during early 21st century. However, the overall contribution of
automobile industry in India to the world remains low as of 2007. Increased presence of
multiple automobile manufacturers has led to market competitiveness and availability of
options at competitive costs.
India was one of the largest manufacturers of tractors in the world in 2005-
06, when it produced 2,93,000 units. India is also largely self-sufficient in tyre
production, which it also exports to over 60 other countries. India produced 65 million
tyres in 2005-2006.
Overview:
India’s car market has emerged as one of the fastest growing in the world. The
number of cars sold domestically is projected to double by 2010, and domestic
Production statistics
The production of automobiles has greatly increased in the last decade. It passed the 1
million mark during 2003-2004 and has more than doubled since.
Car % % Total %
Commercial
Year Production Change Change Vehicles Change
Prodn.
2009 2,166,238 17.34 466,456 -4.08 2,632,694 11.40
2008 1,846,051 7.74 486,277 -9.99 2,332,328 3.35
2007 1,713,479 16.33 540,250 -1.20 2,253,999 10.39
2006 1,473,000 16.53 546,808 50.74 2,019,808 19.36
2005 1,264,000 7.27 362, 755 9.00 1,628,755 7.22
2004 1,178,354 29.78 332,803 31.25 1,511,157 23.13
2003 907,968 28.98 253,555 32.86 1,161,523 22.96
2002 703,948 7.55 190,848 19.24 894796 8.96
2001 654,557 26.37 160,054 -43.52 814611 1.62
2000 517,957 -2.85 283,403 -0.58 801360 -2.10
1999 533,149 285,044 818193
CH.I - INTRODUCTION
COMPANY PROFILE
Established in 1967, Hyundai Motor Co. has grown into the Hyundai-Kia Automotive
Group which was ranked as the World’s Fifth-Largest Automaker in 2007 and includes
over two dozen auto-related subsidiaries and affiliates. Employing over 75,000 people
worldwide, Hyundai Motor posted sales of US$74.9 billion in 2007 on a consolidated-
basis and US$32.8 billion on a non-consolidated basis (using the average currency
exchange of 929 won per US dollar). Hyundai vehicles are sold in 193 countries through
some 6,000 dealerships and showrooms. Further information about Hyundai Motor Co.
and its products is available at http://www.hyundai-motor.com.
Hyundai Motor India, continuing its tradition of being the fastest growing
passenger car manufacturer, registering total sales of 327,160 vehicles in the calendar
year (CY) 2007, an increase of 9.2 percent over CY 2006. In the domestic market it
clocked a growth of 7.6 percent as compared to 2006 with 200,412 units, while overseas
sales grew by 11.8 percent, with exports of 126,748 units.
HMIL has set up its second plant, which produces an additional 300,000 units per annum,
raising HMIL’s total production capacity to 600,000 units per annum.
PRODUCT LINE-UP:
The Santro Xing is a stunning combination of
contemporary looks and functional luxury. It
also incorporates the revolutionary
EUROSAFE Passenger Protection System
that meets the latest European safety standards.
The new Santro Xing combines a fresh new
attitude, warmth and comfort
Here’s the car brimming with
innovative ideas and good design that
will put pleasure into every moment
you spend behind the wheels.
The first glimpse of the Sonata V-6 will always
take your breath away. Your quest for automotive
perfection ends with Sonata. This is a car worthy
of a modern day Caesar.
E
v
e
n
t
h
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
s
t
y
l
i
n
g
o
f
the t
seems o
contemporary r
you always q
end up u
comparing it e
with the .
Accent. The
external T
additions of h
the body of i
the Verna s
seem to blend
together with s
the shape and o
this sets it f
apart from the t
Accent -
r
o
a
d
e
The r
Tucson
2.0 CRDi, i
1991cc, 4 s
cylinder,
16 valve h
engine i
comes g
with h
amazing l
power y
122ps and
245Nm of
Getz's
space/comf
This car sits between the Santro and Getz Pri
ort and
presents itself as a good looking VFM family
Santro's
There are options like ABS and airbags al
engine
with features
make Getz
Swift but in essence Getz scores over Swift on
like sunroof to
Prime. A
many parameters.
opt for. All this
very
in a small-car!
practical 2
Won Car of the
car. Fuel Year - 2008
economy
had been a
concern but
with 1.1L
engine, it's
not any
more. Getz
1.3 is still
available
as top-end
versions.
never sell
like
6
HMIL is investing to expand capacity in line with its positioning as HMC’s global
export hub for compact cars. Apart from expansion of production capacity, HMIL plans
to expand its dealer network, which will be increased from 232 to 260 this year.
The year 2007 has been a significant year for Hyundai Motor India. It achieved a
significant milestone by rolling out the fastest 400,000th export car. Hyundai exports to
over 90 countries globally; even as it plans to continue its thrust in existing export
markets, it is gearing up to step up its foray into new markets.
The year just ended also saw Hyundai Motor India attaining other milestones with the
launch of the i10 and yet another path-breaking record in its young journey by rolling out
the fastest 1,500,000th car.
For Environment
ISO 14001
Certification
(EMS) in 2003 from
TUV, Germany
Eco First Award in 2003
from Kanchi Health &
3 Leaves Award in 2001 Education Society
from CSE, New Delhi
27
Energy Conversation & Safety
Safety Appreciation
Award in 2001 from
National Safety Council
National Energy
Conservation Award in
2002 from Govt. of
India
Car of the Year 2008
Car of the Year Small Car of the Year 2008
Compact Car of the Year
29
Hyundai i20 awarded 'Five Star Rating' for Safety by
European New Car Assessment Programme
(NCAP).
30
Hyundai i20 wins the ‘Viewer’s Choice Award’ at
the Overdrive CNBC TV 18 Awards 2010.
The symbol represents an image of Car Company that produces refined cars with
cutting edge technology.
Expresses the will of the management for harmony and stability
The oval shape symbolizes the earth to expresses the global nature of HMC car.
The H logo stands for the first letter of Hyundai motor company
The slanted shape of the H represent progress and a company that will
successfully face future challenges as it continues to raise its standard of quality.
GOALS OF HMIL:
The ultimate goal is to join the ranks of the world’s top 10 automakers.
Focus on developing advanced technology.
Hyundai cars known as world-class cars
Concentrating on building cars that are more environments conscious and further
improving the quality of life for everyone in future.
This has helped the company deliver consistently producing some of the finest cars of the
company.
HMIL VISION
DREAM
STRIVE
ACHIEVE TOGETHER
HMIL MISSION:
INNOVATION FOR HUMANITY
Engineer / Officer
Technical / Business Associate
Technical /Business Associate Trainees
To manufacture and sell a global technology, global quality car reflecting Indian
consumer needs at an appropriate price and attain profitability.
Health:
Regular Health Camps (Eye, Cardiac and Wellness) at the adopted villages
Donated Ultra Sound Machines and Auto Refractometer to Primary Health Center
Infrastructure:
Construction of Cement Roads at Keevalur
Deepening of Ponds in Thandalam & Kattarambakkam
Drinking Water Tank construction at Irrungattukottai
Education:
Construction of High School at Thandalam (Common for Four villages)
Infrastructure Facilities like Fans, Benches for the Schools of nearest 4 villages
Distribution of Note Books and Stationery items to School Children
Picnics for all the 4 school children once a year
CH.I - INTRODUCTION
1.5 OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES
1. To study the various training and development activities exist in Hyundai Motor
India Limited.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
1. To find out the quality of training programme in Hyundai Motor India Limited.
2. To find out training programme is productive to improve their performance or
not.
3. To find out whether they are implementing the knowledge and skills or not.
4. To find out the changes the employees required in their training program.
5. To make suitable suggestion and recommendations for the improvement of
training and development programme based on the opinion of the employees and
findings of the study.
CH.I - INTRODUCTION
II. Team spirit – Training and Development helps in inculcating the sense of
team work, team spirit, and inter-team collaborations. It helps in inculcating
the zeal to learn within the employees.
VII. Health and Safety – Training and Development helps in improving the
health and safety of the organization thus preventing obsolescence.
VIII. Morale – Training and Development helps in improving the morale of the
work force.
IX. Image – Training and Development helps in creating a better corporate image.
X. Profitability – Training and Development leads to improved profitability
and more positive attitudes towards profit orientation.
CH.I - INTRODUCTION
LIMITATIONS
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
CH.I - INTRODUCTION
SCOPE OF STUDY
1.8 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
This study will help to know the present standard of the training and development
process in Hyundai Motor India Limited. This study will help to improve the
performance of the training and development programme than the current
performance. This study will help the company to know the effectiveness of training
and development programme in Hyundai Motor India Limited. This study will help
to know the different opinions and needs and requirements from the different
employees about the training and development activities and programme from the
company.
CH.2 -REVIEW
2.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
This article offers suggestions to avoid age discrimination in training and development.
Two perspectives are examined. First, a lack of training can be detrimental to older
workers. Second, the legal perspective, that a lack of training opportunities may be
discriminatory. Some suggestions for avoiding discrimination in training and
development are offered including: Culture and policies; decisions about training and
development opportunities; supervisors and developmental relationships; and training
managers on stereotypes.
The focus of this article is on age discrimination in training and development. However,
the practical advice offered can be applied generally to all areas of training and
development in the workplace. There are practical steps on how to implement a training
policy to facilitate access to all employees in the organisation. All the important areas of
best practice in delivering training and development programs are identified.
Despite this article’s focus on the US workplace, there are some lessons that can be
translated to the Australian workplace. Namely, organisations can benefit from offering
diversity training to employees. That is, training employees to respect others and not to
act in a discriminatory manner towards fellow employees.
A case study of the London Fire Brigade is outlined demonstrating the benefits of
learning how to manage diversity in the workplace effectively. A brief outline of the
diversity training program is presented. The main focus of the program was to
development communication skills.
5. Mentoring
This article presents two models of mentoring. The traditional view of mentoring is
facilitated mentoring where the more experienced person (mentor) acts as a role model
for the less experienced person (mentee). A case study from the Department of Justice is
used to highlight this facilitated mentoring approach. Another approach is also offered –
guided learning. A more experienced co-worker uses guided learning to teach a less
experienced worker new skills. A further case study is presented to demonstrate the use
of guided learning.
6. A Mentoring Hand
Outlines Ernst & Young’s mentoring program that has enhanced the organisation’s
creditability in light of recent accounting scandals.
This article highlights the advantages and disadvantages a number of training programs
types.
1. Women only training programs
2. Management training for men and women
3. Mentoring Programs
The researchers conclude that women should not be segregated from men when attending
training programs.
Long, S. (2002). New Library World. Vol. 103 No. 1174, pp. 94-97.
This paper investigates mentoring from the perspective of the mentee. The author offers
some handy tips:
trainees liked the training program. The second measurement level, learning, is
designated as the determination of what knowledge, attitudes, and skills were
learned in the training. The third measurement level is defined as behavior.
Behavior outlines a relationship of learning (the previous measurement le vel)
to the actualization of doing. Kirkpatrick recognized a big difference between
knowing principles and techniques and using those principles and techniques on
the job. The fourth measurement level, results, is the expected outcomes of
most educational training programs such as reduced costs, reduced turnover and
absenteeism, reduced grievances, improved profits or morale, and increased
quality and quantity of production.
CH.3 –RESEARCH
METHOD
RESEARCH DESIGN
DATA COLLECTION
The task of data collection begins after a research problem has been defined and
research design chalked out. While deciding about the method of data collection to be
used for the study two types of data namely, primary data and secondary data.
1.PRIMARY DATA
Primary data was collected from respondents through a well structured
questionnaire by interviewing them.
2.SECONDARY DATA
Secondary data was used in the introduction part of the company profile, and was
collected from the website.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
Convenience sampling method
SAMPLE SIZE
The sample size is 100 respondents.
ANALYSIS 1.PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
Percentage refers to a special kind of ratio. Percentage is used in making
comparison between two or more series of data. Percentages are used to describe
relationship. Percentage can also be used to compare the relationship. The destruction of
two or more series of data.
2. CHI-SQUARE TEST
Suppose we are given a set of observed frequencies obtained under some
experiments and we want to test if the experimental results support a particular
hypothesis or theory. Karl Pearson developed a test for testing the significance of
discrepancy between experimental values and the theoretical values obtained under some
theory or hypothesis. This test is known as goodness of fit.
Literally, an attribute means a quality or characteristics. Example of attributes is drinking,
smoking, blindness, honesty, etc.
An attributes may be marked by its presence or absence in a number of a given
population.
² = (O-E)
E
O = Observed frequency
E = Expected frequency
² is used to test whether differences between observed and expected frequencies and
significant.
Note: If the data is given in a series of ‘n’ number then degrees of freedom = n-1.
Let us consider two attributes A and B is divided into two classes and B is divided
into two classes. The various cell frequencies can be expressed in the following table as
2 x 2 contingency table
A a b
B c d
A B a+b
C D c+d
a+c b+d N
Note: In this chi-square test, we test if two attributes A and B under consideration are
independent or not.
ANALYSIS TABLE
4.1
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, vast majorities 32% of
respondents are belonging to male sex and 68% of the respondents are belonging to
female sex.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (68%) are female.
TABLE 4.2
Table showing classification of respondents on Age
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, vast majorities 77% of
respondents are married. Only 23% of the respondents are belonging to female sex.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (48%) belong to the age group of below 21.
21-30, 24%
TABLE 4.3
Table showing classification of respondents on educational qualification
Educational qualification Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
UG 35 35%
PG 65 65%
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, vast majorities 65% of
respondents have studied PG. Then another 35% of the respondents are UG.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents 65% are PG
TABLE 4.4
Table showing the classification of respondents on Year of service
Year of service Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Below 3 years 56 56%
3-6 years - -
50
Above 6 years 44 44%
Total 100 100%
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, a majority 56% of
respondents is having a work experience of Below 3 years. And 44% of the respondents
are having a work experience of more than Above 6 years.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (56%) are belonging to the category of below 3 years
of service.
TABLE 4.5
Table showing weather the company providing training program or not
Training program Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Yes 100 100%
No - -
Total 100 100%
51
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 100% of respondents said
company provide training program.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (100%) agree that their company provide training
program.
No, 0
Yes
No
Yes, 100%
TABLE 4.6
Table showing type of training provided by the company
Training program Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
On the job training 52 52%
Off the job training 48 48%
Total 100 100%
52
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, a vast majority 52% of
respondents are gone for on-the Job Training and 48% of respondents are gone for Off-
the job Training.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (52%) have attended the on the job training.
53%
52%
51%
50%
49%
48%
47% Percentage
46%
TABLE 4.7
Table showing the duration of the training Program conducted
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% Percentage
20%
10%
0%
TABLE 4.8
Table showing the opinion regarding the duration of the training
Program
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Highly satisfied 84 84%
satisfied 12 12%
Moderate - -
Dissatisfied 4 4%
Highly dissatisfied - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 84% of the respondents
said highly satisfied, 12% of the respondents said satisfied, 4% of the respondents said
dissatisfied.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (84%) feel that the duration of the training program is
highly satisfied.
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% Percentage
30%
20%
10%
0%
HighlysatisfiedModerateDissatisfiedHighly
satisfieddissatisfied
TABLE 4.9
Table showing the feel of the respondents regarding the training
Program
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Highly satisfied 84 84%
satisfied 16 16%
No idea - -
Dissatisfied - -
Highly dissatisfied - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 84% of the respondents
feel highly satisfied, 16% of the respondents feel satisfied.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (84%) feel that the training program is highly
satisfied.
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% Percentage
30%
20%
10%
0%
HighlysatisfiedNo ideaDissatisfiedHighly
satisfieddissatisfied
TABLE4.10
Table showing the quality of the trainers
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Very good 84 84%
Good 16 16%
Moderate - -
Poor - -
Very poor - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 84% of the respondents feel very
good, 16% of the respondents feel good.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (84%) feel that the quality of trainers is very good.
Chart showing the opinion about the quality of trainers
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% Percentage
20%
10%
0%
TABLE 4.11
Table showing the opinion regarding the practical demonstration
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Highly satisfied 52 52%
satisfied 48 48%
No idea - -
Dissatisfied - -
Highly dissatisfied - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 52% of the respondents
feel highly satisfied, 48% of the respondents feel satisfied.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (52%) feel that the practical demonstration is highly
satisfied.
Chart showing the opinion regarding the practical demonstration
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10% Percentage
0%
HighlysatisfiedNo ideaDissatisfiedHighly
satisfieddissatisfied
TABLE 4.12
Table showing the opinion regarding the training aids
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Highly satisfied 40 40%
satisfied 60 60%
No idea - -
Dissatisfied - -
Highly dissatisfied - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 40% of the respondents
feel highly satisfied, 60% of the respondents feel satisfied.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (60%) feel that the training aids is satisfied.
Chart showing the opinion regarding the training aid
80%
60%
40%
20% Percentage
0%
TABLE 4.13
Table showing the changes after attending the training
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Confidence 40 40%
Better performance 60 60%
Skill - -
All the above - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 40% of the respondents
feel confidence level has increased, 60% of the respondents feel better performance.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (60%) feel that there is better performance after
attending the training program.
Chart showing the changes after attending the training program
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% Percentage
20%
10%
0%
TABLE 4.14
Table showing the various fields in which training is provided
Training Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Process training 84 84%
Technical training 14 14%
Both - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 84% of the respondents said
process training and 14% of the respondents said technical training.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (84%) have attended the process training.
Chart showing the various feilds in which training is
provided
100%
80%
60%
Percentage
40%
20%
0%
Process training Technical training Both
TABLE 4.15
Table showing that whether the training program is related to the work
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Highly related 68 68%
Related 28 28%
Not related 4 4%
Highly not related - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 68% of the respondents feel that
the training program is highly related to the work, 28% of the respondents feel that the
training program is highly related to the work and 4% of the respondents feel that the
training program is highly not related to the work .
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (68%) of the respondents feel that the training program is
highly related to the work
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% Percentage
20%
10%
0%
TABLE 4.16
Table showing that whether they got opportunity to practice the
training methods after attending the training program
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree 96 96%
Agree 4 4%
Disagree - -
Strongly disagree - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 96% of the respondents strongly
agree that they got opportunity to practice the training methods after the training and 4%
of the respondents agree that they got opportunity to practice the training methods after
the training.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (96%) of the respondents strongly agree that they got
opportunity to practice the training methods after the training.
Chart showing the opinion weather they got opportunity to practise the training methods
TABLE 4.17
Table showing the objective of the Organizations training plan
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Organization goal 4 4%
Individual development 20 20%
Increase productivity and update new 56 56%
technology
All the above 20 20%
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 4% of the respondents feel that
Organizations training plan is for Organization goal 20% of the respondents feel that
Organizations training plan is for individual development, 56% of the respondents feel
that Organizations training plan is to increase productivity and update new technology
and 20% of the respondents feel that Organizations training plan is for all the above
mentioned things.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (56%) feel that Organizations training plan is to increase
productivity and update new technology.
60%
50%
40%
30% Percentage
20%
10%
0%
OrganizationIndividual goaldevelopment
Increase productivity and update new technology
All the above
TABLE 4.18
Table showing the accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training
program
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree 92 92%
Agree 8 8%
Disagree - -
Strongly disagree - -
Total 100 100
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 92% of the respondents strongly
agree that accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program and 8% of the
respondents agree that accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (92%) strongly agree that accidents/mistakes are reduced
after the training program.
Chart showing the opinion weather the accidents and mistakes are reduced after the training program
TABLE 4.19
Table showing the performance has improved after the training
program
Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents
Yes 100 100%
No - -
Total 100 100%
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 100% of the respondents
feel that performance has improved after the training program.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (100%) feel that performance has improved after the
training program.
Chart showing weather the performance has
increased after training
120%
100%
80%
60% Percentage
40%
20%
0%
Yes No
TABLE 4.20
Table showing when they need training program
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 4% of the respondents feel
that they need training program regularly, 48% of the respondents feel that they need
training program occasionally, 16% of the respondents feel that they need training
program periodically and 32% of the respondents feel that they need training program at
the time of appointment .
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (48%) feel that they need training program
occasionally.
Chart showing the opinion about when they need training program
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
RegularlyOccasionallyPeriodicallyAt the
Percentage
time of
appointment
TABLE 4.21
Table showing which type of training program to be conducted
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 48% of the respondents
want on the job training and 52% of the respondent want off the job training.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (52%) want off the job training.
Chart showing what type of training they need
TABLE 4.22
Table showing by whom the training program to be conducted
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 88% of the respondents
want to conduct training by insiders and 12% of the respondents want to conduct training
by outsiders.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (88%) want to conduct the training by the insiders.
Chart showing the opinion about by whom they need to conduct the training
Insiders
Outsiders
TABLE 4.23
Table showing the assistance needed from supervisor to apply the
learned techniques
Interpretation:
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 60% of the respondents
want the assistance from the supervisor and 40% of the respondents do not want to the
assistance from the supervisor.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents (60%) want the assistance from the supervisors.
Chart showing the opinion weather they need assistance from the supervisor
Yes No
2. CHI-SQUARE ANALYSIS
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.1
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT THE DURATION OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 13.60544
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (5-1) (3-1)
= (4) (2) = 8
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 8 the table value is 15.5
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about the duration of the training program.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.2
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT THE TRAINING PROGRAM
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 6.998707
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (5-1) (3-1)
= (4) (2) = 8
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 8 the table value is 15.5
73
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about the training program.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
74
44 47.04 -3.04 9.2416 0.196463
16 13.44 2.56 6.5536 0.487619
24 6.72 17.28 298.5984 44.43429
12 8.96 3.04 9.2416 1.031429
0 2.56 -2.56 6.5536 2.56
4 4.48 -0.48 0.2304 0.051429
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Calculated value of ² 48.76122
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 48.76122
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (5-1) (3-1)
= (4) (2) = 8
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 8 the table value is 15.5
Result
Since the calculated value is higher than the table value. Alternative hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is significant difference between people of different experience and opinion
about the quality of the trainers.
75
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.4
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT THE PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION
76
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Calculated value of ² 4.418498
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 4.418498
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (5-1) (3-1)
= (4) (2) = 8
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 8 the table value is 15.5
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about the practical demonstration.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about the training aid.
Alternative hypothesis: H1
77
There is significant difference between people of different experience and opinion
about the training aid.
TABLE 4.2.5
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT THE TRAINING AID
² = (O-E) ²
E
78
Calculated value of ² = 0.412088
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (5-1) (3-1)
= (4) (2) = 8
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 8 the table value is 15.5
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about the training aid.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.6
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT THE CHANGES AFTER THE TRAINING
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 10.71429
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (4-1) (3-1)
= (3) (2) = 6
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 6 the table value is 12.59
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about the changes after the training.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.7
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT WEATHER THE TRAINING PROGRAM IS REALTED
TO YOUR WORK
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 26.29052
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (4-1) (3-1)
= (3) (2) = 6
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 6 the table value is 12.5
Result
Since the calculated value is higher than the table value. Alternative hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is significant difference between people of different experience and opinion about
weather the training program is related to your work.
To find out the association between different experience and
opinion about weather they got opportunity to practice the
training methods
Null Hypothesis: Ho
;
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about weather they got opportunity to practice the training methods.
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.8
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT WEATHER THEY GOT OPPORTUNITY TO
PRACTISE THE TRAINING METHODS
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 3.27381
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (5-1) (3-1)
= (4) (2) = 8
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 8 the table value is 15.5
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about weather they got opportunity to practice the training methods.
84
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.9
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT THE OBJECTIVE OF THE ORGANIZATION
TRAINING PLAN
² = (O-E) ²
85
E
Calculated value of ² = 33.36735
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (4-1) (3-1)
= (3) (2) = 6
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 6 the table value is 12.59
Result
Since the calculated value is higher than the table value. Alternative hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is significant difference between people of different experience and opinion
about the objective of the organization training plan.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 6.832298
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (5-1) (3-1)
= (4) (2) = 8
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 8 the table value is 15.5
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about weather the accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.11
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT WEATHER AFTER THE TRAINING PERFORMANCE
HAS INCREASED OR NOT
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 0
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (2-1) (3-1)
= (1) (2) = 2
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 2 the table value is 5.99
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about weather after the training performance has increased or not.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.12
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT WHEN THEY NEED TRAINING
90
O E O-E (O-E) ² (O-E) ²/E
4 2.24 1.76 3.0976 1.382857
0 0.64 -0.64 0.4096 0.64
0 1.12 -1.12 1.2544 1.12
24 29.12 -5.12 26.2144 0.90022
8 8.32 -0.32 0.1024 0.012308
20 14.56 5.44 29.5936 2.032527
8 6.72 1.28 1.6384 0.24381
4 1.92 2.08 4.3264 2.253333
0 3.36 -3.36 11.2896 3.36
20 17.92 2.08 4.3264 0.241429
4 5.12 -1.12 1.2544 0.245
8 8.96 -0.96 0.9216 0.102857
Calculated value of ² 12.53434
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 12.53434
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (4-1) (3-1)
= (3) (2) = 6
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 6 the table value is 12.59
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
91
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about when they need training.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.13
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT WHICH METHOD OF TRAINING THEY NEED
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 4.418498
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (2-1) (3-1)
= (1) (2) = 2
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 2 the table value is 5.99
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about which method of training they need.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
93
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about by whom they need to conduct the training program.
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.14
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT BY WHOM THEY NEED TO CONDUCT THE
TRAINING PROGRAM
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 22.36025
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (2-1) (3-1)
= (1) (2) = 2
94
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 2 the table value is 5.99
Result
Since the calculated value is higher than the table value. Alternative hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is significant difference between people of different experience and opinion
about by whom they need to conduct the training program.
Null Hypothesis: Ho
Alternative hypothesis: H1
TABLE 4.2.15
CONTINGENCY TABLE SHOWING THE OBSERVED FREQUENCIES OF
THE OPINION ABOUT WEATHER THEY NEED ASSISTANCE FROM
SUPERVISORS OR NOT
Opinion Year of experience
Below 3 years 3-6 years Above 6 years Total
Yes 32 8 20 60
No 24 8 8 40
Total 56 16 28 100
² = (O-E) ²
E
Calculated value of ² = 2.380952
Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1)
Where r = Number of rows
c = Number of columns
= (2-1) (3-1)
= (1) (2) = 2
At 5% significance level (α) and degree of freedom 2 the table value is 5.99
Result
Since the calculated value is lesser than the table value. Null hypothesis is
accepted.
Inference
There is no significant difference between people of different experience and
opinion about weather they need assistance from supervisors or not.
CH.5
5.1 FINDINGS
CHAPTER 5
FINDINGS:
92% of the respondents strongly agree that accidents/mistakes are reduced after
the training program.
100% of the respondents feel that performance has improved after the training
program.
48% of the respondents feel that they need training program occasionally.
52% of the respondents want off the job training.
88% of the respondents want to conduct the training by the insiders.
60% of the respondents want the assistance from the supervisors.
CH.5
SUGGESTIONS
SUGESSTIONS:
The Following suggestions are made to improve the effectiveness of the training
program.
CH.5
CONCLUSION
5.3CONCULSION:
From this research work it can be concluded that most of the employees in the
organization have the opinion that training is essential for the growth of the organization
and also for developing themselves. Also most of the employees feel that proper feed
back is essential so that training can be made more effective, And so the off job training
is more effective than on job training.
ANNEXURE
6. ANNEXURE
BIBILIOGRAPHY
1. REFRENCES
2. WEBSITES
WWW.WIKIPEDIA.COM
WWW.GOOGLE.COM
WWW.HYNDAI.COM
WWW.ANSWERS.COM
QUESTIONNAIRE
QUESTIONNAIRE
1.Name:
2.Age:
Below21 [ ] 21-30 [ ] above 31[ ]
3.Year of service:
Below 3 years [ ] 3-6 years [ ] above 7 years [ ]
4.Qualification:
UG [ ] PG [ ]
5.Marital status
Single [ ] Married [ ]
6.Nature of work
Technical [ ] Non-Technical [ ]
Practical Demonstration:
Highly satisfied [ Satisfied [ ] No idea [ ] Dissatisfied [ ]
]
] Highly
Dissatisfied [
Training aids:
Highly satisfied [ Satisfied [ ] No idea [ ] Dissatisfied [ ]
]
Highly Dissatisfied [ ]
15. What changes you have noted in your work place after training?
Confidence [ ] better performance [ ] skill [ ] all the above [ ]
18. Have you got opportunity to practice the training methods after the
training programme?
Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] No idea [ ] Disagree [
] Strongly Disagree [ ]
19. Accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program. Do you
agree? Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] No idea [
] Disagree [ ]
Strongly Disagree [ ]
20.Are you satisfied the training program?
Yes [ ] No[ ]
25. Do you need any assistance from your supervisors to apply the techniques
learned? Yes [ ] No [ ]