IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE & JUDICIAL MASITRATE-III,

NAWABSHAH.

CR. CASE NO. 276 OF 2009

Old Case No. 34 of 2007

The State
………..Versus ………

Imdad Leghari & Others.

Crime No. 02 of 2007 P.S 60th Mile.

U/S 337 F(iv), A(i), L(ii), & 504 PPC

REPLY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE

In response to show cause notice u/s 250 Cr.P.C, as given to me

vide Judgment dated: 30.09.2011,it submitted as under:-

1). That I am complainant and I lodged FIR bearing Crime No. 02 of 2007, at
P.S 60th Mile, on 27.02.2007, at 1250 hours, which was incorporated from N.C
Report dated: 05.09.2006, at 1230 hours, wherein I sustained the injuries on my
left arm wherein my left hand was fractured / broken and such medical certificate
for the offence punishable U/S-337-F(iv) .

2). That I have adopted all the legal course by registering N.C. Report, which
was submitted by me at Ex.4-A and FIR at Ex. 4-B.

3). That witnesses namely Sain Bux and Mengal fully supported my version.
P.W Rahmal has supported my case as mashir , who produced memo of injuries
and place of incident.

4). That FIR registering FIR namely Zulfiqar Ali has also supported my case
that FIR was registered by me and N.C. report was already available on record
and he incorporated the same N.C into FIR.

5). That the Medical Officer has also certified the injuries sustained by me but
either his negligence or inefficiency he admitted the suggestion “it is correct that
hard and blunt substance does not only mean lathi, it might be caused due to
accident of falling on the ground” has been made the ground for the acquittal of
the accused, however, there is no fault on my part as well as on the part of eye
witnesses, therefore, I may not be held responsible for that. It is also wroth to
mention here that my advocate is requested the Honourable Court to cross
examine the doctor, but the request was not allowed by the Honourable Curt,
though it has been held by our Superior Court that in injury and murder cases the
preference is to be given to the complainant / injured and legal heirs respectively,
but that rule has been by-passed.

Therefore, I humbly pray that in view of the submission aforesaid

notice mentioned in Judgment dated: 30.09.2011, may kindly be vacated, in the
best interest of justice.

(Hamal S/O Kouro Khan Mari)

Complainant