Sie sind auf Seite 1von 77

Stand zur “Diskussion: Der elektromagnetische Mensch.


bzw. Der Mensch als Frequenz-Wesen.

Vorgehensweise ​ >>

Prof. Martin Pall erklärt in seinen Vorlesungen wie der elektrochemische Gradient (elektrochemisches Potential)
durch elektromagnetische Einflüsse … ​um ca. 7.2 Millionen Mal verstärkt​ werden kann.

Relevante Eigenschaften:

1. e.m. Strahlung (Frequenzen, Resonanz, Modulation)


2. Feld-Theorien und Symmetrie-Theorien
3. elektrischen Widerständen
4. Kondensatoren
5. Transistoren
6. Transformatoren
7. die vielen verschiedenen Radar- und Antennen-Techniken

8. Membranen und spannungs-gesteuerten (spannungs-abhängige) Ionenkanälen


9. Mitochondrien, Mikrotubuli oder (organischer) Polymer-chemie
10. kristalline Strukturen im menschlichen Körper (“Detektorempfänger”)
11. DNS und Stammzellen (bei Kindern vermehrt)
a. Reproduktion, Epigenetik
b. Einzel-Nucleotide-Polymorphism,
(SNPs „Snips“) sind die häufigste Art der genetischen Variation bei Menschen.
Die American Cancer Society (Yale) konnte zeigen, dass solche genetischen Faktoren
einen Unterschied darin machen, wie und ob verschiedene Menschen mehr oder weniger
anfällig für bestimmte Umwelteinflüsse sind, insbesondere für Handystrahlung.

12. ultra-schwachen (“biologischen”) Photonen-Emissionen


13. photosensitive Ganglienzellen (Zirbeldrüse) und extrakranielle Zirbeldrüse-Organe von
Submammalianern (kegeldominierte Photorezeptoren, die für unterschiedliche Wellenlängen des
Lichts empfindlich sind, während intrakranielle Zirbeldrüse-Organe überwiegend stäbchenförmige
Photorezeptorzellen und damit skotopische Lichtrezeptoren enthalten).
Sowohl die elektromagnetische Erforschung an „nicht-visuellen“ Photorezeptoren des tiefen
Gehirns, der Zirbeldrüse-Organe und der Netzhaut, fängt gerade erst an (Stand Anfang 2020).

14. Frequenzen und Bewusstseinszuständen (siehe 16. ​"Spezifische harmonische


Resonanz-Verhältnisse" und Informationsaustausch zwischen ​Skalen / Größenordnungen)
a. Bewusstseins(zustände) durch Frequenz / Informationsverarbeitung in den Mikrotubuli
b. Modulation vs. Biologischen “Rhythmen”
c. (ultra-schwachen) Gehirnströmen und deren natürlichen Interferenzen
d. Herzfrequenzvariabilität (-> “fraktale” frequenz Dynamik)

15. und den vielen weiteren ungezählten organischen Prozessen…


a. es existieren mehr als 300 Zelltypen im menschlichen Körper
b. die verschiedenen Molekül-Mischungen (Permutationen) sind bisher ungezählt.

c. der Körper eines Mannes (70kg) : besteht aus ca. 3*1013 Zellen
d. und er beheimatet ca. 3,9*1013 Bakterien.
e. Tiere und Pflanzen, Bakterien und Viren sind relevant
a. da wir in Symbiose leben
b. Tiere und Pflanzen haben wiederum ganz andere Eigenschaften
c. manche Proteine sind beispielsweise für den Magnetsinn
mitverantwortlich… ​(z.B. bei Bienen!)

f. Des weiteren gibt es Themen die so interdisziplinär / neumodisch sind, dass sie bisher
die “Denke” der klassischen Interdisziplinären (z.B. den Quantenbiologen, Epidemiologie)
wiederum sprengen:

16. Thesen die die ​"Spezifische harmonische Resonanz-Verhältnisse" und Informationsaustausch


​ kalen (Größenordnungen) ​beschreiben wurden bisher ignoriert.
zwischen S
a. die verschiedenen Molekül-Mischungen (Permutationen) sind bisher ungezählt.
b. Molekül-Mischungen als ein Ganzes z.B. Drüsen, Organen, Neuronale Netze,
Flüssigkeitsansammlungen z.B. Gehirn und anderen Organe erzeugen selbst
elektromagnetische Felder und deren natürliche Interferenz werden momentan erst als
Forschungsrelevant erkannt. e.m. Eigenschaften von Mitochondrien, Mikrotubuli, DNS,
Membranen usw. aus. (z.B. deren Antennen-Eigenschaften)
c. Informationsverarbeitung / Energie Interferenz und “Material” -Eigenschaften”
Was wir ​bisher​ “getrennt” hatten als:
i. das Material (Dinge, Materie)
ii. die Abmessungen (auch bezeichnet als: Form, Kammer, Hohlraum)
iii. und ihre geometrische Musterung
iv. sind wichtig in Bezug auf Resonanz und können nun definiert werden:
v. als Randbedingungen spezifischer geometrischer harmonischer
Resonanzverhältnisse.​ (interdisziplinär)
Moleküle, Atome, DNA ... alle Formen in der Natur basieren auf Geometrie
(Symmetrie, Spin)

17. Resonanz polarisierter / unpolarisierter e.m. Strahlung hängen von so vielen Faktoren ab wie z.B.
Eintritt / Austritt-Winkel von Molekül-Mischungen.
18. Nicht Thermale Auswirkungen von Mikrowellenstrahlung hängt größtenteils von Modulation,
Pulsierung ab, untersuchungen zu den verschiedenen Interferenzen mit natürlich vorkommenden
Pulsierungen (Rhythmen) gibt es kaum.

19. Mikrowellen Technologie (auch Handys und Sendemasten) können nicht nur zum spionieren
sondern auch als Waffen eingesetzt werden… (mehr dazu zu einer späteren Zeit)
a. das kann systematisch von Institutionen und Regimen und aber auch von einzelnen
Hackern ausgehend passieren….

20. Es wäre “ungesund” auch ​NUR einen dieser Prozesse​ ​durcheinander​ zu bringen.

ZusatzInformationen: ​"Spezifische harmonische Resonanz-Verhältnisse" und


Informationsaustausch zwischen ​Skalen (Größenordnungen)

*​ Anirban Bandyopadhyay, Roderick G. Eckenhoff, Herbert Fröhlich (Kondensate), Stuart


Hameroff, Mae-Wan Ho, Roger Penrose (Orch-OR und Diósi-Penrose-Kriterium), Elizabeth
Rauscher, Michael Hyson (Frequenz vs. Radius -> Skalierung-Verhältnis) u.a.​ haben
Quanten-Resonanz ​in Membranen, Mitochondrien, Mikrotubuli, Polymer-Moleküle, DNS,
(ultra-schwachen) Gehirnströmen auf verschiedene Arten​ hingewiesen / diese bestätigt.

Also harmonische Beziehung und polarisierbaren Strukturen des Quantenvakuums, die sich in Ф
(phi) -Verhältnissen zeigen. Im Gegensatz zu dem von Hameroff und Penrose vorgeschlagenen
objektiven Reduktions-Mechanismus könnte die chaotische Dynamik der
Quanten-Vakuums-Schwankungen (nichtlinearen Wechselwirkungen, die sich aus
Rückkopplungs-Operationen und einer hohen globalen Kohärenz innerhalb des Systems ergeben,
selbst für kleine Änderungen äußerst empfindlich sein). John Wheelers hat diese
Vakuum-Strukturen als “Schwankungen” beschrieben…

siehe:

Stuart Hameroff ​erklärt wie im Bereich der Mikrotubuli viel höher Frequenzen “walten” (
Kilo-Hertz, Mega-Herz, Giga-Herz und Tera-Hertz).

● Es handelt sich um die überlagerte Resonanz-Ringe in spiralförmigen Bahnen im gesamten


Gitter der Mikrotubuli.
● Die Oszillierende Dipole bilden Qubits. [ Dipole (einzelnen Elektronenwolken) drehen sich “hin
und her”]
● Durch Bindeproteine, wie Mikrotubuli-assoziierte Proteine (MAPs), kann Einfluß “dirigiert”
werden...
● Die Schwingungen sind entweder elektrisch, aufgrund der Trennung von aufzuladen London -
Kräfte oder magnetische, aufgrund der Elektronenspin -und möglicherweise auch durch
Kernspins (das kann für längere Zeit isoliert bleiben) .
weiteres / ähnliches:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/66702?fbclid=IwAR0wEfyAJW199etWDRYAaEusaVFqXHG
Q0cySf4FnVDcNv_XWn9ymQ8EAbFY

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AF-PmFZTAPLdNgKimDhcr4CDipFOngbH?usp=sharing

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3574744?seq=1&fbclid=IwAR27liXNfH5cXeQpcmScGOKIMZvgt3bHL
VkpPmJyvA38ISdGQs-vYn9Y6uA

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByHBJR-9fc-LZXpwSUtxejhaM0E/view?usp=sharing
Wir reden hier von ökologischen Beziehungen (Symbiosen) die Jahrhunderte gebraucht haben
um ein feines Gleichgewicht = Menschliches Leben zu ermöglichen.

● Die Grundsätzliche Aussage: Dass bei Bestrahlung von Körpern, also Erhöhung der
Energie KEINERLEI Auswirkungen auf die Moleküle und verschiedenen Gewebe erfolgt
- ist unmöglich und absurd.

SO WIRKT MEINE HANDY STRAHLUNG AUF MICH

Wodurch entstehen die Geräusche in den Lautsprecher wenn ein Handy daneben liegt?

➢ Kann es im Menschen (oder dessen Symbionten) auch zu solchen “Störungen”


kommen?

(Teil) Zusammenfassungen im Internet zu dem Themen:

https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/5g-gefahren-115.html

https://www.informationszentrum-mobilfunk.de/
file:///home/chronos/u-22c89dbe959ad7a061da44de6ef8be5dfac65ad0/MyFiles/Downloads/beurte
ilung_der_evidenzfuerbiologischeeffekteschwacherhochfreque.pdf

Bisher beobachtete und ​studierte​ Auswirkungen können sein:

● Beeinflussung (Veränderung, Schwächung) ​von Proteinen, Nervensystem,


Immunsystem, ​Erbmaterial, Zellen, Gehirnströmen,
● Diffuser (unbewusster) Stress​.

Untersuchungen und Gespräche zu Pulsierten, Modulation polarisierten* Mikrowellen (4G) (die


möglicherweise sympathische oder anharmonische Oscillation hervorrufen) sind verwirrend;
weil Ingenieure, Physiker, Chemiker und Biologen in der Diskussion verschieden Prioritäten
kultivieren.
https://www.google.com/search?q=symphatic+oscilator&oq=symphatic+oscilator&aqs=chrome..69i57j33.6094j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
https://www.jneurosci.org/content/19/8/3183
https://www.jneurosci.org/content/20/13/5135
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9140035
*​linear : horizontal or vertical, elliptical circular : RHCP or LHCP,Co-polarization, Cross - polarization (X-pw)

Von Politik und Wirtschaft hört man: ​Einerseits sei man auf noch mehr experimentelle Studien,
von Tieren, angewiesen. Andererseits gibt es solche Studien zu vielen Hunderten, u.a. deshalb,
weil ihre Ergebnisse nicht eindeutig sind, bzw. sich widersprechen.

Welche Wissenschaftler (Mitmenschen) sind nun in allen hierfür relevanten


Fachbereichen ausgebildet?

Studien die ​negative ​biologische Effekte dokumentieren:

 
Dr. Devra Davis (HUJI) Zusaemmenfassung at the 2020 Expert Forum: Wireless and Cellphone 
Radiation and Public Policy, Tel Aviv University: 
 
… for reasons jet not understood the FDA has rejected the findings of the NTP
as not relevant to humans; they point out the whole body exposure was not relevant to a
phone exposure
- but in fact what people are getting all the time with phones in their pocket phones
close to your body and its proximity to the body that is the issue we know there's tumor
promoting effects and this is from a number of different studies have shown this and it
may be...

 
 

weitere…

■ es gibt kaum Erfahrung zu: “long term low-power millimeter-wave


exposure”
■ The European REFLEX study (2004) was conducted on behalf of the EU
by 12 institutions for a total budget of 3 million euros. The results show
that even at a SAR value of 1,3W / kg significant biological damage is
done in human cells and especially to the DNA.
■ Non-thermal Biological Effects of Microwaves Igor Belyaev
■ Die Forschergruppe Yakymenko et al. hat 100 Mobilfunk-Studien, auch
über WLAN, zu entzündlichen Erkrankungen durch oxidativen Zellstress
analysiert mit dem Ergebnis:„Schlussfolgernd zeigt unsere Analyse, dass
Hochfrequenzstrahlung niedriger Intensität ein starker oxidativer
Wirkungsfaktor für lebende Zellen ist, mit einem hohen
krankheitserregenden Potenzial.“
■ https://www.emf-portal.org
■ https://bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/
■ https://iddd.de/umtsno/odpsejm/artJohanssonaEN.pdf
■ https://peaceinspace.blogs.com/files/5g-emf-hazards--dr-martin-l.-pall--eu-emf2018-6-11u
s3.pdf
■ https://youtu.be/bsaB7ewFsN0
■ Studienrecherche 2015 zu Funkfrequenz WLAN / WiFi
■ Studien-Report Nr. 2 dokumentiert 90 Studien aus den Jahren 2012 / 2013
■ Übersetzung der US - Studie von Morgan / Davis
■ „Gesundheitsgefahren durch Mobilfunk: Warum wir zum Schutz der Kinder tätig werden
müssen“ - eine Forschungs-Aufarbeitung von angelsächsischen Ärzten und
Wissenschaftlern
■ „Langzeitrisiken des Mobil– und Kommunikations-Funks“ mit Beträgen von Prof. Hardell,
Prof. Kundi, Prof. Adlkofer, Prof. Kühling, Dr. Braun v. Gladiss.

Es heißt dann oft: "In Zukunft wird man einige dieser Fragen genauer beantworten können."
Wobei oft nicht Studien genauer werden... Sondern der (kulturelle) Kontext in
welchem jeweilige Studien an Relevanz gewinnen ausschlaggebend sind.

Unsere technologiegetriebene Gesellschaft hat und wird nicht auf mehr Studien warten,
zumal man bei allen neuen Entwicklungen niemals "alle" Risiken ausschalten "kann"...
Die Geschichte zeigt: diese werden "unter den Tisch gekehrt"
(man erinnere sich an: Nahrungsergänzungsmittel, Isoliermaterialien, Dünger, Rauchen usw.)

Bereits heute leben wir mit einer Vielzahl von elektromagnetischen Wellen in unserer
Umgebung: Stromnetze und alle Elektrogeräte und vor allem die mit Umwandlern (Trafos),
wLan, funkende Kopfhörer, Babyfones, Mobiltelefone, Sensoren, Heimvernetzung,
Induktionsplatten und medizinischen Scans ...

Kommunikations-Probleme -> Worten wie: “Harmonien, Sympathische Resonanz, Oscillation,


Fraktal, Plasma…” ...werden von spezifischen Fachbereiche und während spezifische
Aufgabenstellungen verschieden benutzt. Je nach dem - macht das die Unterhaltung
grundsätzlich​ kompliziert.​

Beispiel: “Rhythmus”
>> genauer und differenzierter Eigenschaften und Interaktionen von e.m. Strahlung werden von
Physikern über “Modulation” definieren (statt “Rhythmus”)
>> ist solch ein Dilemma denn >> die biologische und mikrobiologischen Fachwelt (und selbst in
der akademischen Physik) gibt es Menschen die dieses Wort benutzen und auch so versuchen
klar zu definieren “wie da was geschieht”.

Beispiel: “non-local”
Physicists get a​ little upset ​with cognitive scientists, psychologists or SCI researchers for using
the term non-local to describe the phenomena in “consciousness” research.

https://www.heartmath.org/gci/gcms/live-data/gcms-magnetometer/
http://noosphere.princeton.edu/

Die Sachlage ist / erscheint [fast unendlich] komplex.


Hier besteht WIRKLICH ein hohes Maß an Unwissen.

*​ Um die Sachverhalte noch viel undurchsichtiger zu machen sind Forschungsförderung,


Drittmitteln, Lobbyarbeit u.ä. “vollkommen normaler Alltag”.​ ​weiterlesen >>

 
So wie es nicht genügt Chemiker* zu fragen ob Glyphosat für den Menschen schädlich ist…

Sollten ich nun also als “​NICHT​-Physiker” die Klappe halten?

Denn klar ist die Verbreitung von “gefährliche Halbwissen” auch nicht hilfreich.
Doch das mache ich nicht. ​Im Gespräch frage​ ich ja nur.​ ​Mein Vorgehen >>

Verschiedene Argumente

Was das Argument / eine Analogie zum Thema “Relevanz” angeht:

“...die gravitativen Auswirkungen ​EINES​ Autos zu Mond hin sind vernachlässigbar”

so soll ich mir auch die Wirkung von Mikrowellenstrahlung auf Moleküle
und somit Gehirn, Drüsen usw. vorstellen…

...als viel zu gering.

Dazu kamen mir folgende Gedanken:

● Wenn wir den ganzen Planeten Erde als *eines* nehmen;


Wie hoch ist dann die Wattzahl ... die momentan insgesamt in e.m. Strahlen künstlich
hinzugefügt wird (inklusive militärischen high and low frequency research HAARP,
EISCAT, NCS HEH, CRIRP, JORN usw.)?
● Die Verbildlichung / Analogie vereinfacht zu sehr;
Worum es mir geht ist eben:
> von sachlich korrekten Details ausgehend ​Zusammenhänge​ zu erörtern
> und möglichst viele verschiedenen Eigenschaften, nicht monokausal,
sondern parallel im Weltbild zu integrieren.
● Wie bereits angesprochen:
○ Es gibt kaum Erfahrung zu: “long term low-power millimeter-wave exposure”
○ Resonanz polarisierter / unpolarisierter e.m. Strahlung hängen von so vielen Faktoren ab wie z.B.
Eintritt / Austritt(Winkel) von Molekül-Mischungen.
○ Molekül-Mischungen als ein Ganzes z.B. Drüsen, Organen, Neuronale Netze,
Flüssigkeitsansammlungen z.B. Gehirn und anderen Organe erzeugen “als eines”
elektromagnetische Felder -> Deren natürliche Interferenz werden momentan erst als
Forschungsrelevant erkannt.

Example: At 2.4 Ghz is a maximum dielectric loss point of water.


At 60GHz is the oxygens molecule (98 %) maximum energy absorption property
but EMR (at radio and microwave frequencies) interacts with matter not just over
large numbers of affected individual atoms / molecules but also with (electrical)
fields / organs / glands: largely as a bulk collection of charges.
What we have been segregating as:
○ The material (things, matter)
○ the dimensions (also referred as: shape, chamber, cavity)
○ and their geometric patterning
are just as important regarding resonance.

○ Size is unimportant where information is concerned, since information can travel


to any scale via the wave guide:
○ If the right geometry (proportion) of replication is embraced it is (harmonic) ratio
that has “the power”.
○ Resonance: sympathetic or anharmonic oscillation between these proportional
frequencies transferres not just energy but also ​information​ (pulse).
○ In fact all biologic negentropy is observable as a wave function
precisely because it is not a square multiple, but golden ratio / conjugation (from
Planck). Precisely observable as photosynthesis, hydrogen radii…
● Octaves /square wave functions create maximum destructive wave interference.
Es gibt bereits Hinweise, dass E.M.Strahlung + schädliche Chemikalien in Luft, Nahrung und
Kleidung + einseitige Ernährung oder körperliche Belastungen + Höhenstrahlung +
Infektionskrankheiten + Stress = eine sich gegenseitig "unterstützende" Wirkung haben...

Es gehört wohl zum menschlichen Dasein mit Risiken zu leben


bzw. ihren möglichen Einfluss ​persönlich​ auf ein Minimum zu reduzieren:

Man versucht möglichst wenig ...Pestiziden, Schwermetalle, Antibiotika, Wachstumshormonen,


Schimmelgifte und Mikroplastik, ... zu sich zu nehmen.
Man nutze das Handy umsichtig,
man trägt es nicht dicht an Leib,
telefoniere nicht bei schlechtem Empfang,
nutze das Headset oder die Freisprecheinrichtung
und telefoniert eben nicht stundenlang

hält das Telefon nicht direkt am Ohr​*


und versucht dabei nicht noch
seine Mitmenschen
und sich selbst zu stressen.

*​ sowie von den Herstellern in den Betriebsanleitungen klargestellt:


eingeschaltete Geräte immer mindestens ​1,5 - 2,5 cm ​vom Körper entfernt


n u t z e n u n d t r a n s p o r t i e r e n.

*​Gemessen an einem Phantomkopf (ein “typischer Handynutzer” definiert 1997, also ein Militär >>

der Kopf eines ca. 100 kg schweren Mannes). Bei dem sich die Ionen frei bewegen (in ionisiertem
glucose-haltigem Wasser). >> Wohingegen sich im menschliche Gehirn Ionen auf DIESE ART NICHT
frei bewegen sollten; sonst ist man schwer krank.

Es sind also höchst wahrscheinlich mindestens 8 bis 20 cm Abstand nötig


um die ​momentanen​ Grenzwerte​ bei Frauen und Kindern einzuhalten…

Momentane Grenzwerte sind womöglich irrelevant​ (weil sie das falsche messen)
; so stellt Prof. Martin L Pall (Washington State University, Molecular Biosciences
B.A., Ph.D.) fest…
Ein Blinder-Fleck mit vielen Folgen
Eine meiner Beobachtungen ist durchweg, dass die akademische Physik seit ca. einem
Jahrhundert einen massiven blinden Fleck... kultiviert:

Vakuum-Energie-Dichte >> ​„Renormalisierung“​ >> ​ ​„Vakuum-Katastrophe“

Grundsätzliches dazu:

○ Alles in der Natur / im Universum kann als Druck-Geometrie beschrieben


werden.

○ An vielen "Orten" in der Natur finden wir Verwirbelungen.

○ Dort wo es (für unsere Menschlichen Sinneseindrücke) nicht offensichtlich ist,


kann mit Hilfe von Frequenzsignaturen, selbst die komplexeste Form als eine
Summe von Sinuswellen dargestellt werden.

○ Nun können wir also prinzipiell Alles was uns so in der Natur,
im Uni-ver-"sum" begegnet... als aus einer Wellenform bestehend (der
Sinuswelle) darstellen.

○ Wenn diese Wirbel in Beziehungen des goldenen Schnitts interagieren,


geschieht etwas ​wundervolles​. Es handelt sich um rekursive, konstruktive
Interferenz.

○ Diese Rekursiven, konstruktiven Interferenz ermöglicht es jeder Art von Wellen


(also auch Ladungswellen) nicht nur ihre Wellenlängen, sondern auch ihre
Phasengeschwindigkeit (Überlagerung) zu addieren UND zu multiplizieren
(heterodyne)

○ Nach diesem Prinzip (mehrfach symmetrisch daher von manchen


mehrdimensionaler Wirbel genannt) erzeugen zentripetal Kompression aller
Wellen (Ladung / Energie) in einen Fusions-Punkt und ermöglichen:
Ladungs-Beschleunigung und die perfekte Verteilung von Ladung und
Drehmoment.

Diese Prinzipien und Eigenschaften sind bereits vor mehr als hundert Jahren “Thema”
gewesen… und dann wieder nicht.

○ Einige Schwingungen existieren selbst dann noch, wenn ein System auf den
absoluten Nullpunkt heruntergekühlt wurde – wo man denken sollte, dass die
ganze Energie zum Erliegen kommen müsste.

○ Um "besser damit umgehen zu können", wandten Physiker ein ​Prinzip der


„Renormalisierung“​ an, um mit Hilfe einer Naturkonstante eine endliche
Vorstellung davon zu bekommen, wie dicht die Vakuum-Energie mit all ihren
möglichen Schwingungen sein müsste.

○ Der verwendete Konstante war die Planck-Entfernung- oder -Länge.


Dieser Wert wird als die kleinstmögliche Schwingung betrachtet, und liegt in der
Größenordnung von 10 hoch -33 Zentimetern und einer Masse-Energie in der
Größenordnung von 10 hoch -5 Gramm.

○ Eine andere relevante Berechnungen, die durchgeführt wurden, sollten


herausfinden, wie viele (winzige) Planck-Volumen-Vibrationen in einem
Kubikzentimeter Raum koexistieren könnten.

○ Da jedes Planck-Volumen eine bestimmte Masse hatte, entspräche das Ergebnis


der Masse-Energie-Dichte, die in einem Quadratzentimeter leeren Raumes
existiert.
○ Das Ergebnis war: die Vakuum-Energie-Dichte, die als Planck-Dichte bezeichnet
werden kann, hatte die Größe von 10 hoch 93 Gramm pro Kubikzentimeter
Raum und bekam schnell den Spitznamen „die schlimmste Vorhersage, welche
die Physik je gemacht hat“ oder ​„die Vakuum-Katastrophe“​.

○ Um uns eine Vorstellung davon zu geben, wie "enorm dicht" dieser Wert ist:
Wenn man alle Materie nehmen würde, die wir in unserem Universum heute
beobachten – all die Milliarden von Galaxien mit Milliarden von Sternen, von
denen die meisten sehr viel größer sind als unsere Sonne, und wenn wir all das
in einen Quadratzentimeter Raum stopfen würden, dann wäre die Dichte des
Würfels nur 10 hoch 55 Gramm. Dies ist immer noch rund 38 Größenordnungen
weniger dicht, als die Dichte des Vakuums!

○ ​ äre, und sie


Viele Wissenschaftler dachten daher, dass diese Zahl​ lächerlich w
geriet im Allgemeinen in Vergessenheit.

○ Trotz späteren Experimenten (Casimir-Effekt und dynamische Casimir Effekt)


sind auch heute akademisch ausgebildete Physiker sich - dieses Wertes - nicht
bewusst.

○ -> Als ob die größte Energiemenge, die jemals vorhergesagt wurde, einfach
komplett ignoriert werden könnte.

○ Dabei sind die Vakuum-Fluktuationen entscheidend für unser Verständnis; sie


kann beispielsweise ermöglichen innerhalb der "Teilchenphysik", den Ursprung
der virtuellen Teilchen vorauszusagen.

...

○ Wir können Einsteins Feldgleichungen eine grundlegende Kraft hinzufügen, um


zu zeigen, dass die Raum-Zeit nicht nur gekrümmt ist, um Gravitation zu
erzeugen, S​ ONDERN AUCH *VERWIRBELT*​ – wie ein Wasserwirbel der den
Abfluss hinunter fließt – und dadurch die Rotation aller organisierten Materie von
Galaxien, Sternen und bis zu subatomaren Teilchen produziert...

○ Das Verdrehen des Raumes kann bedeuten, dass der Raum selbst
durchdrungen ist mit Kreisel- und Coriolis-Effekten, die in Einsteins
Geometrisierung von Raum und Zeit noch integriert war.
○ Doch wenn dieser Drehmoment wirklich vorhanden ist, dann sollten wir auch in
der Lage sein, dies auf der kosmologischen Ebene zu erkennen...

ich habe hunderte Bilder hierzu gesammelt.

○ Also nochmal: einige Schwingungen existieren selbst dann noch, wenn das
System auf den absoluten Nullpunkt heruntergekühlt wurde – wo man denken
sollte, dass die ganze Energie zum Erliegen kommen müsste.

○ Und dann ... ist ​Materie​ das Ergebnis einer diskreten Randbedingung des
Raums selbst ist, wie die Rückkopplungs-Iterationen, welche die Teilungen eines
Fraktals​ produziert.

○ Die Masse eines Protons ließ sich somit auf 6 Kommastellen genau aus der
vom Schwarzschild-Proton extrapolierten Größe des Universums
berechnen ​- eine verblüffende mathematische Präzision, wenn man die
Größenordnungen bedenkt.

○ Die nun berechnete Masse für das Proton wich von der experimentell
festgestellten Masse des Protons um exakt jene Größenordnung ab, die
sich aus dem errechneten Einfluss der anderen Protonen ergab - und zwar
auf 0.019% genau.

○ Das was manche “fraktale und hologramm Eigenschaften” nenne tritt auf: da
jeder Punkt des betreffenden Raumes, in jedem Moment die Informationen des
nächsthöheren Ganzen reflektiert.

○ Wasserstoff-Radien sind exakte phasen konjugierte Vielfache von Planck


im Goldenen Schnitt.

○ Die zwei genauen Frequenzen der Photosynthese können vorausbestimmt


werden

○ Ganzzahlige Exponenten der Phasenkonjugation im Goldenen Schnitt


multipliziert mit Planck-Länge und Zeit = können verwendet werden, um die
grund-eigenschaften der Materie zu beschreibe.

○ Codeca / icosa-konjugierte Geometrie von Edelgasen der d-, f-Elektronenhülle


und Metallen der Platingruppe.

○ Es wurde festgestellt, dass die holo (fraktale) grafische Verhältnisbeziehung von


Quantenvakuumschwankungen (QVF) den Ladungsradius des Protons präziser
vorhersagt als jemals zuvor.
○ Anhand von optimierende Rückkopplung / sympathische Resonanz /
perfektionierte Rekursion oder Einbettung (Phasenkonjugation) kann
Selbstorganisation (Negentropie) beschrieben werden.

○ Der Informationsaustausch zwischen verschiedene Skalen (Größenordnungen)


wird ermöglicht

○ Eine geordnete Beziehung zwischen Wellenlängen stellt eine Verbindung


zwischen Frequenzen und Feldern her, die nur bestehen bleiben kann,
wenn sie mit allen Frequenzen und Feldern in Resonanz steht / schwing .

○ Dieses ermöglicht es, Informationen (Form) ohne Impulsverlust zu bewegen.

○ Je näher ein Material dieser Form und diesem Weg kommt, desto größer ist
seine Leitfähigkeit.

○ In der Elektrotechnik und Optik nennen wir dies: Phasenkonjugation


(Supraleitung / Super-Kohärenz)

○ In mancher Literatur auch als perfektioniert Kohärenz oder konjugieren von


Kapazitäten (Fourier) beschrieben.

○ In der Informatik nennen wir dieses Informations-Komprimierung.

○ Auch nach der „Attractor“ -Theorie (Mathematik) konvergieren Wellen in einem


Fokus; diese harmonisieren ineinander ("nestern")

○ Heute wissen wir sogar aus der “Neuro-Physik", wie Plasma-Felder diese
Symmetrien "erzeugen", und zentripetale implosive [Informations-] Kompression
mit einhergeht.

Stuart Hameroff, Anirban Bandyopadhyay, Roderick G. Eckenhoff, Herbert Fröhlich (Kondensate), Mae-Wan
Ho, Roger Penrose (Orch-OR und Diósi-Penrose-Kriterium), Elizabeth Rauscher, Michael Hyson (Frequenz vs.
Radius -> Skalierung-Verhältnis) u.a.​ haben Quanten-Resonanz ​in Membranen, Mitochondrien, Mikrotubuli,
Polymerbiomoleküle, DNS, (ultra-schwachen) Gehirnströmen auf verschiedene Arten​ hingewiesen / diese
bestätigt.

Also harmonische Beziehung und polarisierbaren Strukturen des Quantenvakuums, die sich in Ф (phi) -Verhältnissen zeigen. Im Gegensatz zu dem
von Hameroff und Penrose vorgeschlagenen objektiven Reduktions-Mechanismus könnte die chaotische Dynamik der
Quanten-Vakuums-Schwankungen (nichtlinearen Wechselwirkungen, die sich aus Rückkopplungs-Operationen und einer hohen globalen Kohärenz
innerhalb des Systems ergeben, selbst für kleine Änderungen äußerst empfindlich sein). John Wheelers hat diese Vakuumstrukturen (
“Schwankungen”) als Mini-Planck-Singularitäten beschrieben...
Hilfreiche Konzepte >> Geometrie

Es sind Worte wie "Symmetrie" die uns helfen verschiedene Perspektiven und Wissenschaften
gemeinsame Nenner zu finden.
Offensichtlicherweise ist Symmetrie Teil der Sprache der Natur.
Von der molekularen Ebene an - nutzen Tiere und Pflanzen Symmetrie um sich vom "relativen
Chaos" ihrer Landschaft abzuheben.

Spezifischen Fachbereiche und deren spezifische Aufgabenstellungen (compartmentalizing)


auch oft zu einer künstlichen "Renormalisierung" geführt.

Sehr oft wurde somit an alten Scheuklappen und Glaubenssätze "festgehalten".


● kulturelle Glaubenssätze -> Erhaltung unser bisherigen Kultur
● "Gewohnheiten" aus Politik und Wirtschaft
● sowie subjektive und "ganz normal" menschliche Prioritäten
● familiäre oder unbewussten Ängsten, Karrierewunsch bis hin zu Profilneurosen
haben die Bedingungen für Forschung und Entwicklung strukturiert und möglichen,
eindrucksvollen, Zusammenfassung (Synergien) "gemeinsamen Nenner"
aus verschiedenen Fachbereichen entgegengewirkt.

hilfreicher:
TRANSVERSE INTO LONGITUDINAL EMBEDDING: Phase conjugation converts the vertical
transverse emf waves into longitudinal compressional waves.
Charge rotations embedded by Phi (golden ratio) = PHASE CONJUGATE IMPLOSIVE
CHARGE COLLAPSE. This is the wave mechanics of max constructive wave interference,
and therefore constructive compression, and therefore phase conjugation.

Fractal mathematics teaches the mathematics of infinite compression because the principle of
the golden mean allow for the addition and multiplication of any kind of waves (also charge
and energy); again: golden ratio phase conjugate recursive constructive heterodyning of
phase velocities.
● Ratios are the constants on all scales.
● That's what we meant - when we ​named​ anything (singularized)
● What we meant to define: is ​boundary conditions.

what we call ​matter

What we have been segregating as:


The material (things, matter)
the dimensions (also referred as: shape, chamber, cavity)
and their geometric patterning
are important regarding resonance.

=> Can now be defined:


as boundary conditions of specific geometric
harmonic resonance ratios. (interdisciplinarily)

is the (specific harmonic) interference patterns or


specific geometric harmonic resonance ratios
of quantum vacuum fluctuations
on the proton surface.

● This Resolves the ~122 orders of magnitude discrepancy between the cosmological constant (universal
density or dark energy) and the Planck quantum vacuum density
● Describes the cosmological scale gravitational force as a product of discrete Planck quantities making up
the structure of spacetime
● Identifies the source of mass for the proton which makes up matter
● Resolves the hierarchy problem between the proton mass, the Planck mass, and the gravitational force
● Finds the gravitational-to-strong force coupling constant
● Identifies the source of energy and mass and the mechanism from which the speed of light is defined in
the famous energy mass equivalence equation
● Calculates the angular frequency and period of a holographic proton resulting in the interaction time of the
strong force
● Demonstrates utilizing special relativity that gravity can behave with the range typically associated with
the strong force giving the first analytical solution to confinement and unifying gravity with the quantum
world.

There are many more implications and ramifications to our current physics from these solutions that cannot be
elaborated on here.

These results are derived from first principles and classical considerations alone, ​with zero
free parameters or hidden variables, and extend our generalized holographic solution
to generate a complete picture​ of confinement whether at the quantum scale or the
cosmological scale of black holes.

All this is done without any free parameters (arbitrary numerical values) or hidden variables,
unlike the Standard Model and the QCD model for confinement which utilize between 18 or 19
free parameters (and 7 more if neutrinos are considered).

In kürze: ...​integer exponents of golden ratio phase conjugation


times planck length and time...

○ Ganzzahlige Exponenten der Phasenkonjugation im Goldenen Schnitt


multipliziert mit Planck-Länge und Zeit = können verwendet werden, um die
grund-eigenschaften der Materie zu beschreibe (harmonische Schlüsselsignatur)

○ Diese geordnete Beziehung zwischen Wellenlängen stellt eine Verbindung


zwischen Frequenzen und Feldern her, die nur bestehen bleiben kann,
wenn sie mit allen Frequenzen und Feldern in Resonanz steht / schwing .
(Harmonische Kaskade -> Jakobsleiter).

○ Dieses ermöglicht es​, Informationen ohne Impulsverlust zu bewegen


und

○ den ​Informationsaustausch​ zwischen verschiedene Skalen


(Größenordnungen).

○ Die Masse eines Protons ließ sich somit auf 6 Kommastellen genau aus der
vom Schwarzschild-Proton extrapolierten Größe des Universums
berechnen ​- eine verblüffende mathematische Präzision, wenn man die
Größenordnungen bedenkt.

○ Wasserstoff-Radien sind exakte phasen konjugierte Vielfache von Planck


im Goldenen Schnitt.

○ Die zwei genauen Frequenzen der Photosynthese und die Schwerkraft von
Wasserstoff können vorausbestimmt werden.
Details
THE CONFINING FORCE
Another of the mysteries of Modern Physics is the origin of the “strong force,” also known as the
nuclear force or confining force. As we discussed in Module 3, the strong force was developed
to explain the incredible strength of the bond between nucleons (protons and neutrons) which is
strong enough to overcome the electrostatic repelling force in the nucleus of an atom. Since
there was no solution for quantum gravity, and in general, gravitation was thought to be
extremely weak at small scales, an entirely new force in physics was needed to explain this
powerful bond. However, as we have come to understand black holes in more depth, it is clear
that gravity can in fact be extremely strong in the vicinity of a black hole.
In this section, we will explore how the generalized holographic mass solution generates a
gravitational force strong enough to equal the nuclear confining force, as well as reconciles how
a proton could have the large mass necessary to produce this gravitational field.

Vacuum Energy, Continued


• history: Aether*, bio-crystalline superfluid fabric of space-time
• 1cc is 38 orders of magnitude more mass than the mass of the entire
observable universe ( 1053 kg, W ​ ikilink​)
• Implies there is WAY more mass in “space” than that required for creation of black holes and
wormholes; space (space-time) may be full of microtubule wormholes; we are already
wormhole connected
• From this assumption, answers to physics questions can be derived
Link to Geometry and the Phi Ratio

• Tetrahedron is fundamental Electricity is created ​by rotation and


building block cross-rotation of the electromagnetic
• Platonic solids field (vortex / spining) and this field
works from one place to another. It is
• Phi ratio in nature due to the
based on Tetra / octa / cube -
natural growth – building of
symmetries because those would
structure generate maximum interference
pattern and hence these matrices
1+√5
Phi φ , the golden ration, 2 is found in relating the produce maximum charge isolation (this
Cartesian coordinates of the Platonic solids the new disharmony produces movement...)
equation: = ℓ × φn has been found to fit many natural
Whereas pent / deca - dodeca / icosa -
phenomena and relationships. In large part this is due produce symmetries and implosive
to the Isotropic Vector Matrix (IVM) nature of the fabric centripetal compression and thus
of space-time. The IVM is the only matrix that allows maximum charge inclusion​ (gravity,
for and ​equal and opposite​ force. synchronicity, singularity).
L, ℓ is the Planck Length.
Eggsample:

The voltage generated by a fresh egg


or a pine cone (apparently from the
gravity field by being a fractal attractor
for weak capacitance)- is a sustainable
biologic source of energy. An Egg and
the pine cone are excellent examples of
because as biological capacitors they
implode charge making life. They are
made of biologic dialectric (self-similar
at atomic and molecular symmetry
levels)

Link to Phi Ratio,continued..

𝑂𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 = 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑘_𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 × Golden RatioN


Y earOrbit ≅ tl × φN
Venus Year, 𝑁 = 240
365.25 days (Earth year) divided by PHI gives the days cycle of Venus (225.7).

Wavelength of Light for Photosynthesis

𝜆 = l × φN
• l =Planck length
• Violet (𝜆=427nm)
• N=136

• Green (𝜆≅550nm)
• Non-integer N≅136.5

• Red (𝜆=691nm)
• N=137

What is Mass? -The Problems

• Richard Feynman’s quotes: WikiLink:


• “You can't say A is made of B or vice versa. All mass is interaction.”
• “… why are the masses of the various particles such as quarks what they are? All
these numbers … have no explanations in these string theories – absolutely none!...”
• paraphrased: …someday, possibly, equations will be found for these masses, in simple
fundamental physical constants and geometric ratios…
• Impossible to read all scientific publications, How to keep up?
• Focus on unsolved physics problems:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics
• Mass is information, a vibration in and through the fabric of space-time
• The importance is: understanding mass gives us more of an idea of the behavior of nature.
• It also presents a way to think about how matter and energy in space behave:
• Black-(w)hole dual-toroidal space-time dynamics
• While this is out of the scope of this lecture, it is worthwhile to investigate further

Ordinarily, 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 = 𝐷𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 × 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒


• Example: How much mass is 1 liter of water? (at 3.98C)
• 1 𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 1000𝑚𝑙 𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 1𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑙 = 1000𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑠 = 1𝑘𝑔

What is Mass?
The relationship between the inside and the outside defines the energy of a galaxy, a sun,
microtubules.... This works on all scales of the universe.
On the proton scale: “The Radius of the proton” is the boundary condition, a specific harmonic
relationship. It is the inside plank oscillations meeting the outside plank / vacuum oscillations.

All information of the whole universe is fundamental to this “encoding procedure”.


What we call material reality is “the hologram”: the interference patterns of the quantum fluctuations
of spacetime on the proton.

What problems can we address with the Holographic approach of Haramein?


• The proton mass is a dynamic energetic vibration in the vacuum
• Proton information is exchanged with the immense density of the vacuum
• Proton essentially blinks into and out of the vacuum at a Planck time rate
Where:
• e is the elementary charge;
Proton to Electron Mass Ratio Supports the new solution is correct!
• 𝑟𝑝 = 0.841236𝑓𝑚 is required for derived equations to agree with ALREADY established mass
measurements!
• Clearly proves equations are correct
• No other equations exist or have been derived until now for the proton to electron mass ratio –
many papers written attempting
• Requires completely new whole thinking approach
• Isolated, reductionist approach is incomplete
Relates Six (6) Fundamental Physical
Constants
𝒎𝒑

•𝝁=𝒎 =
𝒆

𝜶𝟐
𝝅𝒓𝒑 𝑹𝑯

= 𝟏𝟖𝟑𝟔. 𝟏𝟓𝟐𝟔𝟕 …

• The fine structure constant and the Rydberg constant are among the most accurately
measured physical constants
• Can be re-written as a new (possibly expensive) way to calculate
• 𝜋=

𝑚𝑒 𝛼 2
𝑚𝑝 𝑟𝑝 𝑅𝐻

• 𝑟𝑝 𝑚𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 0.841236𝑓𝑚 for these well known constants to work


• Implies a geometrical relationship – significant new approach ADDS to previous mainstream
approach – works with it, does not replace it
2

𝑚𝑒 𝛼
𝜋=
𝑚𝑝 𝑟𝑝 𝑅𝐻
Squared error from vs. proton radius
k=

pi(rp )=
MpRp=4LM=ReMe and Torque
• Everything spins
• Torque equation
• 𝜏ҧ = 𝑟ҧ × 𝐹ത
• 𝐹 =𝑚×𝑎
• 𝑇 =𝑟×𝑚×𝑎
Replacing the Strong Force

In QCD, Yukawa potentials are used in strong force calculations. These Yukawa potentials are
curve-fitted to help with empirical analysis. Haramein used a relativistic approach to “…derive
“Hence from the generalized holographic the energy, angular frequency, and period for such a
system utilizing our holographic approach geometric relations of Planck entities, we have and
find that the frequency is the characteristic gamma frequency of the nucleon and the period
derived clear quantum gravitational massis on the order of the interaction time of particle decay
via the strong force. Finally, we calculate energy formulations that define the
the mass dilation due to velocity as a function of radius and plot the resulting gravitational
characteristics of the strong nuclear force, such potential range. We find the range to be a close
correlation to the Yukawa potential typically as the energies to produce it from gravitational
utilized to illustrate the sharp drop-off of the confining force.” Refer to *, section 5. coupling and
its interaction time.” *
Equations:
Force Between Two Masses & Charges
• Force due to gravity between 2 masses
• 𝐹𝑔 = 𝐺

𝑚1 𝑚2
𝑟2

; Newton's law of universal gravitation, modern form

• Force due to electric charge between 2 charges


• 𝐹𝑒 = 𝑘𝑒

𝑞1 𝑞2
𝑟2

; Coulomb's law

• Note form of equations are the same inverse square distance


• How can it be shown that the equation for gravitational force can be
G = Gravitational constant
derived from the electromagnetic force? (TBD)

1
; 𝐶𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑜𝑚𝑏′ 𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡
4𝜋𝜀0
m = mass
q = charge
r = distance
𝑘𝑒 =

Implications
• New worldview: Connected, whole view,

• Energy generation
• Gravitational control
• Space-time defines objects
• Cyclical

Different way of relating to environment


• Restore Earth’s ecology
• Consider all life

• For the benefit of all to the advantage of none


• Different Way of Thinking Requires great courage to go against status quo
• This is simply the beginning of a whole new conceptual way ofthinking of science

ction to
h

Researchers at HIUP publish scientific papers layman papers and articles.

The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution


Haramein, N & Val Baker, A. K. F. (2016). The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution, ​ATINER 4th International
Conference of Physics: Abstract Book​, Page 14

Download the PDF


A computation of the electron mass is found utilizing a generalized holographic mass solution in terms of quantum
electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations. The solution gives a clear insight into the structure of the hydrogen Bohr atom,
in terms of the electron cloud and its relationship to the proton and the Planck scale vacuum fluctuations. Our
electron mass derivation is accurate to within 0.000000002 x 10-28 g (99.99999998%) of the CODATA value. As a
result, an elucidation of the source of the fine structure constant, the Rydberg constant, and the proton-to-electron
mass ratio is determined to be in terms of vacuum energy interacting at the Planck scale.
The Unified Spacememory Network: from cosmogenesis to consciousness
Haramein, N., Brown W., & Val Baker, A. K. F. (2016). The Unified Spacememory Network: from cosmogenesis to
consciousness, ​Journal of Neuroquantology​, preprint.

Download the PDF


The recent developments of advanced models of unified physics have brought a deeper understanding of the
fundamental nature of space, time, energy and matter. It is becoming apparent that information and geometry are
primary to explaining these fundamental agents. In previous work, we demonstrated that the subatomic nucleon
structure of the proton and recently the electron can be derived directly from a spacetime holographic structure of
Planck-scale quantum vacuum oscillators fluctuating as spacetime pixels, demonstrating that spacetime at the very
fine level of the Planck-scale is discrete with information quanta. We have found that when considering the granular
spacetime information-energy structure from which we demonstrate matter and mass arises, the phenomena of
self-organizing systems that leads to self-awareness and consciousness is integral to— and a natural emergent
property of the feedback-dynamics of spacetime information itself. In this work, we describe how the integral function
of the information feedback dynamics of spacetime, which engender mass-energy, is the missing element in
understanding the evolution and development of self-organizing physical systems in general, and the emergence of
the biological organism in particular. We evaluate non-classical quantum mechanical phenomena of physical and
biological systems in light of the Maldacena-Susskind holographic correspondence theorem from which an
equivalence of wormhole spacetime geometry and quantum entanglement is derived. We suggest that the
Planck-scale micro-wormhole entanglement structure of multiple spacetime coordinates engender the
macromolecular assemblies of living cells, and that this wormhole entanglement may function in the memory and
learning capacity of the biological entity. Furthermore, the recursive information encoding feedback processes of the
quantum spacetime micro-wormhole network, which we refer to as spacememory, enables memory and learning in
physical systems across all scales, resulting in universal evolutionary tendencies towards higher levels of ordering
and complexity – foundational to evolution, sentience, and awareness.

Addendum to “Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass” in View of the 2013
Muonic Proton Charge Radius Measurement.
Haramein, N. (2013). Addendum to “Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass” in view of the 2013 Muonic Proton Charge
Radius Measurement, Hawaii Institute for Unified Physics

Download the PDF


We consider the latest results of the measurement of the charge radius of the proton utilizing laser spectroscopy of
muonic hydrogen published in Science on January 25, 2013 by an international team lead by Aldo Antognini and
carried out at the Paul Scherrer Institute Proton Accelerator. Given the new charge radius measurement, we compute
the proton mass utilizing our generalized holographic approach and find that our result is now within 0.00072
×10-24gm of the 2010-CODATA value of the proton rest mass. Our predicted charge radius is now within 0.00036
×10-13 cm and remains within one standard deviation of the new measurement.

Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass


Haramein, N. (2012). Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass, ​Physical Review & Research International,​ ISSN:
2231-1815, Page 270-292

Download the PDF


We find an exact quantized expression of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equations utilizing spherical
Planck units in a generalized holographic approach. We consider vacuum fluctuations within volumes as well as on
horizon surfaces, generating a discrete spacetime quantization and a novel quantized approach to gravitation. When
applied at the quantum scale, utilizing the charge radius of the proton, we find values for the rest mass of the proton
within 0.069×10-24gm of the CODATA value and when the 2010 muonic proton charge radius measurement is
utilized we find a deviation of 0.001×10-24gm from the proton rest mass. We identify a fundamental mass ratio
between the vacuum oscillations on the surface horizon and the oscillations within the volume of a proton and find a
solution for the gravitational coupling constant to the strong interaction. We derive the energy, angular frequency, and
period for such a system and determine its gravitational potential considering mass dilation. We find the force range
to be closely correlated with the Yukawa potential typically utilized to illustrate the exponential drop-off of the
confining force. Zero free parameters or hidden variables are utilized.
Keywords : Quantum gravity; holographic principle; Schwarzschild solution; proton charge radius; strong interaction;
Yukawa potential.

The Schwarzschild Proton


Haramein, N. (2010). The schwarzschild proton, ​AIP Conference Proceedings​, CP 1303, ISBN 978-0-7354-0858-6, pp. 95-100.

Download the PDF


This manuscript received a Best Paper Award in the field of “Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Field Theory,
and Gravitation” at CASYS’09 (Computing Anticipatory Systems) in Belgium.
Abstract: We review our model of a proton that obeys the Schwarzschild condition. We find that only a very small
percentage (~10-39%) of the vacuum fluctuations available within a proton volume need be cohered and converted to
mass-energy in order for the proton to meet the Schwarzschild condition. This proportion is equivalent to that
between gravitation and the strong force where gravitation is thought to be ~10-38to 10-40 weaker than the strong
force. Gravitational attraction between two contiguous Schwarzschild protons can accommodate both nucleon and
quark confinement. We calculate that two contiguous Schwarzschild protons would rotate at c and have a period of
10-23s and a frequency of 1022 Hz which is characteristic of the strong force interaction time and a close
approximation of the gamma emission typically associated with nuclear decay. We include a scaling law and find that
the Schwarzschild proton data point lies near the least squares trend line for organized matter. Using a semi-classical
model, we find that a proton charge orbiting at a proton radius at c generates a good approximation to the measured
anomalous magnetic moment.

Scale Unification – A Universal Scaling Law for Organized Matter


Haramein, N., Rauscher, E.A., and Hyson, M. (2008). Scale unification: a universal scaling law. ​Proceedings of the Unified
Theories Conference.​ ISBN 9780967868776

Download the PDF


Abstract: From observational data and our theoretical analysis, we demonstrate that a scaling law can be written for
all organized matter utilizing the Schwarzschild condition, describing cosmological to sub-atomic structures. Of
interest are solutions involving torque and Coriolis effects in the field equations. Significant observations have led to
theoretical and experimental advancement describing systems undergoing gravitational collapse, including vacuum
interactions. The universality of this scaling law suggests an underlying polarizable structured vacuum of mini white
holes/black holes. We briefly discuss the manner in which this structured vacuum can be described in terms of
resolution of scale analogous to a fractal-like scaling as a means of renormalization at the Planck distance. Finally,
we describe a new horizon we term the “spin horizon” which is defined as a result of a spacetime torque producing
boundary conditions in a magnetohydrodynamic structure.

Spinors, Twistors, Quaternions, and the “Spacetime” Torus Topology


Rauscher, E.A., and Haramein, N., (2007). Spinors, twistors, quaternions, and the “spacetime” torus topology, International
Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems, 1373-5411.
Download the PDF
Abstract: The dual torus topology occupies a central role in the spinor, twistor and quaternionic formulation. This
topology appears to be ubiquitous in astrophysical and cosmological phenomena and is predicted by the U4 bubble
of the affine connection in this solution to Einstein’s field equations. The geometric structure of the complexified
Minkowski space is associated with the twistor algebra, spinor calculus, and the SUn groups of the quaternionic
formalism. Hence quantum theory and relativity are related mathematically through the dual torus topology. Utilizing
the spinor approach, electromagnetic and gravitational metrics are mappable to the twistor algebra, which
corresponds to the complexified Minkowski space. Quaternion transformations relate to spin and rotation
corresponding to the twistor analysis.

Collective Coherent Oscillation Plasma Modes in Surrounding Media of Black Holes


and Vacuum Structure – Quantum Processes with Considerations of Spacetime
Torque and Coriolis Forces
Haramein, N., Rauscher, E. A. (2005). Collective coherent oscillation plasma modes in surrounding media of black holes
and vacuum structure- quantum processes with considerations of spacetime torque and coriolis forces. Orinda: Beyond
The Standard Model: Searching for Unity in Physics, 279-331.
Download the PDF
Abstract: The main forces driving black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, quasars, and supernovae dynamics have
certain commonality to the mechanisms of less tumultuous systems such as galaxies, stellar and planetary dynamics.
They involve gravity, electromagnetic, and single and collective particle processes. We examine the collective
coherent structures of plasma and their interactions with the vacuum. In this paper we present a balance equation
and, in particular, the balance between extremely collapsing gravitational systems and their surrounding energetic
plasma media. Of particular interest is the dynamics of the plasma media, the structure of the vacuum, and the
coupling of electromagnetic and gravitational forces with the inclusion of torque and Coriolis phenomena as described
by the Haramein-Rauscher solution to Einstein’s field equations. The exotic nature of complex black holes involves
not only the black hole itself but the surrounding plasma media. The main forces involved are intense gravitational
collapsing forces, powerful electromagnetic fields, charge, and spin angular momentum. We find soliton or
magneto-acoustic plasma solutions to the relativistic Vlasov equations solved in the vicinity of black hole
ergospheres. Collective phonon or plasmon states of plasma fields are given. We utilize the Hamiltonian formalism to
describe the collective states of matter and the dynamic processes within plasma allowing us to deduce a possible
polarized vacuum structure and a unified physics.

The Origin of Spin: A Consideration of Torque and Coriolis Forces in Einstein’s Field
Equations and Grand Unification Theory
Haramein, N., and Rauscher, E. A. (2005). The origin of spin: A consideration of torque and coriolis forces in Einstein’s

field equations and grand unification theory. Beyond The Standard Model: Searching for Unity in Physics, 1, 153-168.

Download the PDF


Abstract: We address the nature of torque and the Coriolis forces as dynamic properties of the spacetime metric and
the stress-energy tensor. The inclusion of torque and Coriolis effects in Einstein’s field equations may lead to
significant advancements in describing novae and supernovae structures, galactic formations, their center
supermassive black holes, polar jets, accretion disks, spiral arms, galactic halo formations and advancements in
unification theory as demonstrated in section five. We formulate these additional torque and Coriolis forces terms to
amend Einstein’s field equations and solve for a modified Kerr-Newman metric. Lorentz invariance conditions are
reconciled by utilizing a modified metrical space, which is not the usual Minkowski space, but the U 4 space. This
space is a consequence of the Coriolis force acting as a secondary effect generated from the torque terms. The
equivalence principle is preserved using an unsymmetric affine connection. Further, the U 1 Weyl gauge is
associated with the electromagnetic field, where the U4 space is four copies of U1. Thus, the form of metric
generates the dual torus as two copies of U1 x U1, which we demonstrate through the S3 spherical space, is related
to the SU2 group and other Lie groups. Hence, the S4 octahedral group and the cuboctahedron group of the GUT
(Grand Unification Theory) may be related to our U 4 space in which we formulate solutions to Einstein’s field
equations with the inclusion of torque and Coriolis forces.

A QUANTIZED SOLUTION FOR GRAVITY


Already present in modern physics, and elaborated upon in the last module, the Holographic
Principle is defined as the capacity for information storage on the surface of the event horizon of
a black hole, where one “bit” of information is equal to one Planck area, which defines the
entropy (heat or temperature) of the black hole.

Remember from Module 3:

Gerard ‘t Hooft coined the term holographic principle, and described the event horizon of a black
hole similar to pixels on a computer screen, which display the information contained within. His
work was generally a response to Stephen Hawking’s surprising “discovery” that black holes
must radiate…Hawking radiation presented the world of physics with what is commonly known
as the “black hole information paradox.”

In Hawking’s theory (which applied Bekenstein’s bound), quantum information must be


destroyed by a black hole. Gerard ‘t Hooft and Leonard Susskind presented an alternative idea,
that the information of both energy going into a black hole and being radiated from it was fully
recorded on the event horizon. ‘t Hooft showed that there could be “bump-like” impressions on
the event horizon of a black hole where incoming and outgoing radiation were exchanging
information…

Haramein generalized this principle by first redefining the Planck area bit (or pixel) as a Planck
Spherical Unit (PSU) of volume (a quantum voxel), since it is more plausible that the Universe
tiles with spherical units rather than with two-dimensional squares, or with three-dimensional
cubes for that matter. (Pun intended.)

He further demonstrates that there is a simple and fundamental relationship between the
information content, in terms of PSUs inside the volume of a black hole, and the PSU
information on the surface event horizon, giving a ratio that when multiplied by the Planck mass
(the energy of that ratio), generates the exact mass-energy of the black hole. The
Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equations gives the exact same answer for the mass
of a black hole, however, in the case of Haramein’s generalized holographic solution using
quantum voxels, we have a quantized gravitational solution (in fine-grained or discrete
quantities). Since we find the granularity of spacetime to be a Planck, a quantum object, we
have quantum gravity as opposed to the smooth surface of Einstein’s curvature. This reconciles
quantum mechanics with General Relativity by demonstrating that the source of gravitation,
which is currently unknown in standard theory, is the electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations of the
quantum information network (the curvature of spacetime describes the mechanics but does not
identify what spacetime is made of). Another “big problem” in physics is resolved!

Tiling a Sphere with Square Units of Area Fails


Important Reminder: You cannot tile a sphere with square units of area seamlessly.
Triangulated Tiling of an Event Horizon - Scientific American
The artist in this Scientific American article used more correct sphere tiling, since space-filling
intersecting spheres have the independent space of an equilateral triangle when their equators
are mapped on a surface.
Deeper Dive: Quantized solution for the holographic mass of a black hole (click to expand)

Remarkably, in 1973 Buckminster Fuller was already blazing the path for this solution when he
stated:2

“Omnitriangulated geodesic spheres consisting exclusively of three-way interacting great circles


are realizations of gravitational field patterns… The gravitational field will ultimately be disclosed
as ultra high-frequency tensegrity geodesic spheres. Nothing else.”

- Buckminster Fuller

Now it has been disclosed!


Haramein points out in his paper,

It then follows that the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equations could have been
developed in the late 19th Century by computation of tiling Planck quantities independent of
spacetime curvature and singularities, near the time when Max Planck derived his units in 1899.
Had this discovery been made two decades prior to general relativity of 1916, many difficulties
in understanding the source of gravity and mass may have been avoided. Haramein further
states,

Therefore, in the case of the generalized holographic solution, the difficulties associated with
discontinuities and singularity production are precluded from occurring due to the Planck
quantization where the presence of ħ (h-bar), the quantum of angular momentum or the
quantum of action of the energetic vacuum, quantized spacetime and yields a discrete
gravitational mass or quantum gravity.
Visualize yourself in a bathtub with a little rubber duck floating in the water. When you pull the
plug, a gradient differential between the air in the drain and the density of the water generates
an exchange of pressure and a rotating structure of co-moving water molecules in that region,
that can be seen as a little vortex. If the rubber ducky is far from the vortex, it will have little
influence upon it, however, when the rubber ducky enters regions where the particles of water
are accelerating in a coherent fashion it will begin moving in an orbital path and appear to be
gravitationally attracted towards the center of the vortex. The difference between Haramein’s
solution and General Relativity is that Einstein described the surface of the water curving
towards the drain, while Haramein describes the particles that make up the water in the first
place, and thus the source of the surface curvature, which is a secondary effect resulting from
the water spinning.Visualize yourself in a bath (naked), with your little rubber duckie (or
whoever)...
Clearly if this was truly quantum gravity, the same approach should work to calculate gravity at
any scale, including the quantum scale. Let’s have a look…

THE HOLOGRAPHIC NETWORK OF SPACETIME


We have demonstrated that the source of the material world emerges from a fundamental field
of information memory on the structure of space, where every little Planck vortex oscillator
represents a bit of information in the evolution of a universe. Now let’s put the pieces together
between the cosmological scale and the quantum scale and visualize the structure in which our
lives are embedded.
We start with the awareness that the holographic mass-energy value of all of the protons in the
universe, ~1055 grams, is present in terms of information in the vacuum fluctuations inside a
single proton.
Imagine a hard drive with the music of an orchestra on it. The information that makes up the
music fits on a very small region of the magnetic media, while of course, the instruments and the
people that make up the orchestra are not actually on the hard drive. Now imagine that the
music that is on the hard drive is continuously being updated as the orchestra performs — that
is, the music is changing. The media would then be required to be continuously connected to
the orchestra (like a network in sync) so that it can constantly update its information to represent
what is being played. Just like the media of a hard drive, where the information is embedded in
the magnetic medium electromagnetically, the electromagnetic structure of the quantum
vacuum energy holographically encodes information at the Planck bit scale inside of each
proton, what we can call “spacememory.” Just like the interference pattern that records the
image information on a holographic plate, all the information of all other protons is
holographically recorded inside each and every individual proton.

Additional Resources

ARTICLE: Seth Lloyd, Professor of Quantum Mechanical Engineering at MIT discusses the
possibility that the Universe is a computer storing data in atoms or molecules. ​Read the Article​.

PAPER: ​Computational capacity of the Universe


In the Pythagorean concept of Musica Universalis, or “music of the spheres,” he proposed that
there were specific harmonic intervals between planets, the Earth, and the stars.
This holographic encoding of the universal symphony might be called, in honor of the
Pythagorean schools, “the music of the spheres.”
“there is geometry in the humming of the strings; there is music in the spacing of the spheres.”
- Pythagoras
Everything is continuously changing in the universe though, so just as our hard drive needs a
network connection to stay current with the music that is being played by the orchestra, so too
does the proton need to be connected to a network of information pathways so that any
changes locally are continuously updating all other points across all spans of spacememory in
the universe in order to self-organize! How would the universe do that?
When we take Wheeler’s model of vacuum dynamics, described as a sea of turbulent and
extremely energetic fluctuations generating Planck scale wormholes, and apply Haramein’s
holographic mass solution, we can start imagining how the Planck quantum vacuum wormhole
network connects all things. In technical terms, the entire universal structure is entangled in
order to update all localized points and self-organize in a coherent and unified manner.
ENTANGLEMENT
Entanglement is a well known property of the quantum world. And now, more and more
experiments are demonstrating that the macro world of daily objects can as well exhibit
entanglement properties which were previously thought to be reserved only to the quantum
scale of particles. For instance, recently diamonds have been shown to be successfully
entangled.​1​ Einstein called it “spooky action at a distance” and eventually it was confirmed
experimentally that particles can change state in relationship to each other almost
instantaneously when one particle state is changed, no matter what the distance between the
two, even if one of them is on the other side of the universe. Recently some of the most
prominent physicists in the world have come to conclude that this entanglement is actually the
result of wormholes connecting black holes and particles across the universe.​2,3,4,5,6
Additional Resource
ARTICLE:​ Wormhole entanglement solves black hole paradox. ​Read the article
on New Scientist.​
When we calculate the rest mass of the proton, we are observing the local frame, which could
be described as the effect the single proton has on the rest of the information network of the
Universe. When we invert the equation and calculate the holographic mass of the proton, we
account for the non-local information network’s relationship to each proton through
entanglement, where the mass-energy information of the entire Universe is represented
holographically across all protons in the network.

Imagine the surface horizon of the proton treated with Haramein’s holographic solution, in which
each Planck unit on the surface (there are ~1040 Planck on the surface of one proton) is the
termination of a tiny Planck-scale vortex wormhole that is connected to (and thus entangled
with) another Planck on another proton’s surface. Then imagine that each of the ~1040
wormhole Planck terminations of one proton is connected to a different proton, like network
cables connecting one proton with ~1040others in the rest of the universe. Of course, each of
these ~1040protons are themselves connected to another ~1040 protons, which results in
~1080 connected protons, which is the estimated number of protons in the universe today. A
new picture emerges wherein the Planck vacuum structure generates a fractal network of
wormholes where the proton volume is an information hub and the surface is the through-put
capacity of the hub to communicate with other protons.

Now the Planck information within the volume of all protons in the universe is unified and shared
across ~1040 connections on each proton. The result is that all the information of all protons is
present in the volume Planck information of one proton. From what we learned from Haramein’s
holographic solution, the mass of the object is the result of the information within the volume
(~1060 Plancks in each proton) communicating across the boundary through ~1040
connections to all other protons. The difference between the two, what Haramein describes as a
fundamental universal ratio (which he defines with the greek-letter most commonly used for
physical ratios, phi φ) is the mass-energy-information of the Planck Spherical Units inside that
do not have access to a Planck wormhole termination on the surface, adding up to the rest
mass of the proton (~10-20):
The surface to volume ratio gives it’s rest mass of approximately 10-20. This is a direct
reflection of the limit of information capable of crossing the event horizon or charge radius of the
proton.
● In simple terms, there is a larger number of Plancks in the volume than the number of
Planck wormhole terminations on the surface, thus only a certain amount of
information-energy remains expressed locally and that amount of information-energy
happens to equal the mass of the proton.

Additional Resource

ARTICLE: Phenomena like this supermassive quasar cluster suggest there may be major
problems with current mathematical descriptions of the Universe. “Biggest Thing in Universe
Found—Defies Scientific Theory.” ​Read the article on National Geographic.
One could think of it as all the outgoing information inside trying to transmit through the event
horizon, and encountering a resistance or entropy since there is more information within the
volume than the surface can transmit, which leaves a local mass-energy equivalent to the mass
of the proton. Yet, when we examine all the other protons acting on one, or the incoming
information, then the strong confinement mass-energy value is found for the proton to proton
interaction, almost as a pressure exerted by the information of all other protons communicating
with the one:

Since this is true for cosmological objects as well, then the mass and the confining force of
gravity from the nuclei of atoms to universal structures, such as galaxies and stars, are the
result of the “impedance” of the universal information network across event horizons — the
network singing across scales… “the music of the spheres.”
It is important to remember that these are highly dynamic fluctuating connections which may
disconnect and reconnect at a very high rate (Planck time is ~10-44 seconds). A good visual for
this is a plasma ball toy you can buy that has a hub in the center with plasma discharges
fluctuating and arcing to the glass orb around it. Therefore, while two particles may disentangle
(in technical terms, decohere due to the network structure of the wormholes), the information
always has a path to inform the whole. This information network is fractal across all scales as
well, with larger black holes — larger hubs — that connect the network, so that there is the
proton scale connected by the Planck wormholes, and then the stellar black hole scale, the
supermassive black hole galactic center scale, and so on.

Let’s return to our analogy that the universe is a symphony orchestra, where every proton is like
the magnetic medium of a holographic hard-drive recording every moment of its existence in
Planck bits. Each proton hard-drive is then connected through wormholes that act like network
cables with instantaneous transmission, resulting in all the protons in the universe being
synchronized in a superconductive “cloud network” that updates instantly with every change.
One might imagine that the structure of spacetime around each proton is a beautiful lattice of
interconnected spheres with transmission channels traveling in all directions. You could also
see it as bucky-domes or geodesic spheres concentrically surrounding each proton. While the
proton spins, its surface network intersects, attaching and detaching with “harmonic nodes” or
aligned passages in the surrounding network, allowing it to engage with pulses of information
through the standing wave wormhole network that crisscrosses the entire Universe. This
standing-wave network is the vacuum energy fluctuations, an omnidirectional medium made of
light itself, which we quantize as this lattice of Plancks that completely fill all apparently “empty”
space.

A quick calculation will show that the black hole surface event horizon of our universe,
determined in size by its mass (which is all the protons in it), happens to have a one-to-one
relationship with the surface of all protons. That is, if one calculates all the Planck wormhole
terminations present on all protons (approximately 1080 protons each with ~1040 Planck
terminations), it adds up to ~10120 Planck bits, which is exactly the number of Plancks that can
be tiled on the surface event horizon of the black hole universe. This literally warrants the
appellation of a Black Whole coined by Haramein in 1997 in a presentation at the Sequoia
Symposium.

As you may have explored in an earlier section, Seth Lloyd of MIT computed that the Universe’s
“gravitational energy” (or what we call Haramein’s quantum vacuum fluctuations), could have
performed ≈ 10120operations so far.​1
1. Lloyd, S. 2001. Computational Capacity of the Universe. Retrieved from:
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0110141

FUNDAMENTAL HARMONICS OF THE PLANCK


SCALE
From the holographic mass analysis and the unified physics network concept, very specific
fundamental relationships become apparent.
There are ~1040 Plancks on the surface of a proton. Interestingly, the difference between the
radius of the universe of ~1027 to ~1028 cm and the radius of the proton at ~10-13 cm also
turns out to be ~1040 to ~1041 (1027/10-13=1040). Also as we have seen, the difference
between the holographic mass of the proton ~1014g and its rest mass ~10-24g (which we might
also define as the difference between the strong force and the gravitational force) is ~1039. In
addition, the difference between the holographic mass of a proton and the mass of the universe
at ~1055g is ~1041. It is extremely significant that each of these differences are within one or
two orders of magnitude from 1040. Therefore, there is a very strong and obvious correlation
between the micro world of the proton and universal scale structures and forces that seem to be
defined in the large number of 1040. This may in fact be a result of the fundamental ratio found
through Haramein’s equations (for which he uses the greek letter Phi φ).
1. The scaling from the Planck mass ~10-5g to the proton rest mass ~10-24g or
Haramein’s fundamental ratio PHI: 1/φ≈1020
2. The scaling between the proton rest mass ~10-24g and its Schwarzschild holographic
mass ~1014g which is ~1038 or the number of Planck on the surface of a proton ~1040,
3. The ~1040 scaling between the holographic mass of the proton ~1014g and the mass of
the universe ~1055g which is the mass resulting from the number of Plancks inside the
volume of the proton ~1060,
4. The scaling from the rest mass of the proton ~10-24g to the mass of the universe
~1055g or the number of protons in the universe ~1080,
5. The scaling between the Planck mass and the proton rest mass multiplied by the number
of protons in the universe or the number of Plancks in the volume of a proton multiplied
by the number of Plancks on the surface of the proton ~10100,
6. The number of Plancks on the surfaces of a proton ~1040 multiplied by the number of
protons in the universe ~1080 equals ~10120 which is the number of Plancks on the
surface of the horizon of our universe as well,
7. The number of Plancks inside one proton ~1060 multiplied by the number of protons in
the universe ~1080 equaling ~10140
8. the number of Planck in the volume of our universe ~10180
9. and so on…
Looking at the exponent of the above numbers, one can quickly see that there is a pattern of
growth ratio that obeys an exponential growth of 1020 or Haramein’s fundamental ratio. There is
clearly an exponent harmonic relationship between scales, and these relationships define the
structure, the masses, and the forces of our reality. How could this be completely missed over
some 150 years of modern physics? Well, in fact, it wasn’t missed by everybody. A few of the
most prominent physicists in the history of science noticed, one of them being Paul Adrien
Maurice Dirac.

THE LARGE NUMBER HYPOTHESIS


A dimensionless number is a number that does not depend on what system of units you use.
For example, the ratio of masses between fundamental objects or Haramein’s surface to volume
ratio gives a number that is dimensionless, meaning that it has no centimeters, grams, seconds,
or any other units attached to it.
Such numbers are thought of as units of nature and some physicists have been intrigued with
them and their recurrence, especially the large dimensionless numbers whose “coincidence”
was first mentioned by Weyl (1917)​1​ and later by Eddington (1931, 1936, 1946)​2,3,4​ and Dirac
(1937).​5​ Weyl began by comparing the radius of an electron to the radius of a hypothetical
particle whose electrostatic energy was equal to that of an electron’s gravitational energy (which
is basically the ratio of an electrostatic force of an electron to the gravitational force of an
electron), and found it to be the large number of ~1042. He thus speculated that the observed
radius of the universe (ro) might also be the hypothetical radius of a particle whose rest energy
is equal to the gravitational self-energy of the electron i.e. ro/re ~ 1042, which is 2 orders of
magnitude bigger than the observed ratio of 1040 (Stewart, 1931).​6​ Further developments by
Eddington (1931) showed that the exact number of protons in the universe, N ~1078, is equal to
the square of Weyl’s ratio.

Hermann Weyl, a contemporary of Albert Einstein

Albert Einstein and Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington were also colleagues, and a BBC documentary
was made about their relationship.
Following on from the work of Weyl and Eddington, Dirac showed that the ratio of the electric
force and the gravitational force between the electron and the proton was of the order of 1039.
Interestingly, the age of the Universe, determined by measuring the recessional velocity of
galaxies and given in terms of atomic units, is also 1039. In 1937 Dirac proposed the “Large
Number Hypothesis” and stated that this coincidence could be understood if fundamental
constants, such as the Newtonian gravitational constant, G, were in fact variable and
proportional to the age of the Universe. He hoped that, although the effect would be very small,
future observations would be able to check this variation. However, if it was found to be varying,
then this would affect Einstein’s theory of relativity which demands that G should be constant.
The concept of varying G is similar to the work of Milne who, although not inspired by the large
number hypothesis, explored the idea in response to what he saw as the limitations of the
“general” theory of relativity (Milne, 1935).​7​ However Dirac’s theory differed from Milne’s theory
and also proposed continuous matter creation.
The relationship between the number of particles in the Universe and Weyl’s ratio showed that
the number of particles in the Universe should be increasing proportionally to the square of the
age of the universe and therefore matter must be continually created. Steady state cosmology
previously suggested such a concept, but with a constant G as opposed to Dirac and his
variable G.

Paul Dirac proposed the “Large Numbers Hypothesis” and suggested that the age of the
universe may affect fundamental constants. He also proposed continuous matter creation.
In a recent paper (2011),​8​ Haramein resolves this by suggesting that it is the vacuum energy
density, that he demonstrates generates mass and the gravitational field, that is changing
across scales during cosmological evolution, not the gravitational constant G itself. He shows
that the energy density decreases with the increasing size of the Universe, so although the
number of particles in the Universe is increasing, with continuous matter creation the
energy/information is conserved.
In any case, the recurrence of these large numbers should NOT be ignored. Sadly, they have
been for decades, which is remarkable when you consider that some of the brightest and
greatest physicists very deliberately pointed to their importance. Listen to one of the rare
recordings of Paul Dirac. Here he discusses the significance of the Large Number Hypothesis:

Additional Resources
VIDEO (left): Paul Dirac discusses the Large Number Hypothesis. (9.16)ARTICLE: The
following interview with Paul Dirac was conducted by David Peat (DP) and Paul Buckley (PB) in
the early 1970’s for broadcast as part of a CBC radio documentary series entitled Physics and
Beyond. ​Read the interview transcription.
Since the time of Dirac and Eddington the discovery of other large number “coincidences” has
only increased. However, according to Funckhouser (2006),​9​ the large number hypothesis can
be resolved by reducing the terms that constitute the “large number coincidence” to three
irreducible numbers. The following three large pure numbers of order ~ 1040, still remain:

where mo is the mass of the observable universe, mn is the mass of the proton, and mp is the
mass of the Planck.
After having explored the holographic mass solution, these relationships are familiar as they
engender the source of mass and gravity both at the cosmological level and the quantum level.
Therefore, the relationship between the Planck mass, the proton mass, and the mass of the
universe are no longer a mystery (as in the hierarchy problem) as they are all defined by the
fundamental bit size of the Planck entity of our holographic spacetime/spacememory structure.
These harmonic relationships certainly imply that there must be sub-planckian oscillators that
make up the Planck itself, and so on to infinity. Yet now, and most importantly, we understand
the dimensional relationship (the scale relationship) between them, being set by the
fundamental measuring stick ratio φ (~1020), underlying the mechanism that produces masses
and forces making up our experience of the material world around us (and not some mysterious
value that keeps recurring).

1. Bell, J. L. & Korté, H. 2015. Hermann Weyl. Retrieved from:


http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/weyl/
2. Eddington, A.S. 1930. Preliminary Note on the Masses of the Electron, the Proton, and
the Universe. Retrieved from:
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1733360&file
Id=S0305004100009269
3. Ryckman, T. A. 2014. Early Philosophical Interpretations of General Relativity. Retrieved
from: ​http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/genrel-early/
4. Durham, I. T. 2006. Fundamental Theory. Retrieved from:
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0603146
5. Dirac, P. A. M. 1937. The Cosmological Constants. Retrieved from:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v139/n3512/abs/139323a0.html
6. Gorelik, G. 2002. Hermann Weyl and Large Numbers in Relativistic Cosmology .
Retrieved from: ​http://people.bu.edu/gorelik/ES_GG_Large_Numbers.pdf
7. Krogdahl, W. S. N.d. A Critique of General Relativity. Retrieved from:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0711/0711.1145.pdf
8. Haramein, N. 2011. The Cosmological Constant and the Schwarzschild Proton. Retieved
from: ​http://haramein.resonance.is/wp-content/uploads/SP.pdf
9. Funkhouser, S. N.d. A New Large-Number Coincidence and a Scaling Law for the
Cosmological Constant. Retrieved from:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0611/0611115.pdf

COSMOGENESIS
The mass and forces of our universe emerge from a vacuum energy medium composed of
Planck Spherical Units, which produce a holographic structure with very specific ratio
relationships, and a dynamic wormhole-like network connecting all points across scales,
generating a Connected Universe. Of course, such a universe implies the existence of
“feedforward”and feedback loops of information across the entire network structure. This
resolves some of the most significant problems in current theory which, as we have seen in the
Rubik’s cube example of Module 1, cannot explain the occurrence of highly complex
self-organizing systems through random functions. Even the most simple iterations of biological
structure and molecular assemblies demand extremely specific circumstances and universal
values in order to occur.
In their 2014 paper entitled The Unified Spacememory Network: from Cosmogenesis to
Consciousness,​1​ William Brown, Dr. Amira Val Baker, and Haramein, utilize the generalized
holographic principle and the wormhole network to describe the occurrence of biological
structures and the event of cognitive function in the brain by means of non-local interactions of
the microtubule structure of the brain with the vacuum Planck fluctuations. In calculating the
probability of the most simple building blocks of biological structures, they write:
The evolutionary pathway of the DNA-mRNA-tRNA/rRNA transcription and translation system,
which is the information system at the heart of all biology, emphasizes the gap in the description
between the observed extant complexity and the putative processes that would have fostered,
or even driven, the emergence of such complexity. Consider again the ribozyme. The ribozyme
represents the possible link in the chemical evolution between information encoding molecules
and catalytic enzymes. Small ribozymes would have been the primordial precursors of the
ribosomal RNA, the holoenzyme of which is perhaps one of the most complex molecular
structures that we know of, and is one of the three fundamental pillars of the molecular
biological processes underlying all living organisms (the other two being the DNA molecule, and
the DNA/RNA polymerase machinery). There are over 100 naturally occurring nucleosides
(generated by modifying the 4 canonical ribonucleosides) that make up the rRNA molecule.​2​ If
each position of the rRNA subunits were to be tested with each of the 100 possible nucleosides,
then with a length of 4448 nucleotides in some species,​3​ there are 1004448 different possible
configurations – that is 1.0 X 108896 possible first order configurations. The hyperastronomical
number of possible configurations to evolve from demonstrates the rationale behind positing
that there could be an underlying mechanism producing purposeful innovations, and attracting
towards higher levels of structural ordering and functionality.

Class I Ligase Ribozyme – Wikimedia

In this image, you can see the


complexity of the process from
DNA (left) through RNA
transcription (center) and Protein
synthesis (right).
Chaos to Order – Image Remix by Adam Apollo
The probability of our world existing today under random functions is extremely low to
non-existent. Yet with feedback in a connected holographic structure, evolution would occur
very rapidly as systems are updating evolutionary paths from the environmental feedback
across scales. Self-organization, in that case, is not only inevitable but fundamental to the
system.
With this in mind, we can now regard the universal network system as a learning structure in
which each point is learning from the whole, and in turn, the whole is informing each point. In
such an information web which notably resembles the neuronal structure of the brain, the
system’s evolutionary learning process must be recorded as a memory input in the structure of
spacetime, and therefore the holographic surface which is recording the information, must
expand.

In other words, the expansion of the universe could be directly related to the evolution of a
self-organizing holographic surface which is necessary to accommodate its learning. This leads
to a continuous creation model of the universe, instead of the typical one shot big-bang.

GRAVITY AT THE QUANTUM SCALE


One of the most significant outstanding problems in physics has been the question of whether
the same force that we call gravity at the large cosmological scale is also at play at the quantum
atomic scale. Although various attempts have been made to describe quantum gravity,
Haramein eventually derived a solution that not only makes clear that it is indeed the same force
that binds the nucleus of an atom, but that there is also an important dynamic relationship
between the holographic mass inside a proton and the universal mass outside of it, e.g. all other
protons that make up the universe.
In order to achieve a quantum scale solution for gravity, Haramein eventually realized that the
volume-to-surface ratio of “Plancks” (as we might call the Planck Spherical Units) in his
holographic cosmological (large scale) gravitational solution (which we covered in the previous
topic) must be inverted at the quantum scale, so that the surface information content is divided
by the amount of Planck information within the volume (in terms of PSUs) to define the standard
mass of the proton. The result in his first order approximation is extremely compelling. Indeed,
the surface-to-volume Planck ratio, when multiplied by the Planck mass to get the energy of the
ratio, generates a mass for the proton:

This is within 0.069 X 10-24 g of the experimentally measured value. It is important to note here
that Haramein initiates this calculation by using the proton charge radius 2010 CODATA value
(Committee for Data on Science and Technology, which is the standard for all fundamental
values in the scientific community). As well, you may notice an extra factor of “2” in front of the
equation which is common in physics.
One of the most remarkable things about this solution, both at the cosmological level, but even
more prominently at the quantum level, is the fact that such incredibly large numbers like the
mass of the Universe at 1055 g, generated from R=1.280404 X 1060 Plancks, and the number
of Plancks on the surface of the proton η=4.716551 X 1040, would together give an almost
exact value (and we will see that it actually may be the exact value) for the mass of an object
such as a tiny proton with a mass of 10-24g. The probability of such large numbers randomly
producing results with such accuracy is almost non-existent.We will cover more about this in
detail later in this module in the section about the “Large Numbers Hypothesis.”

:::
:::

Let’s look at this from another perspective. In the cosmological (large scale) quantized
Schwarzschild solution, the internal volume Planck-scale information for an object like a black
hole is divided by the information present on the surface of the event horizon in terms of the
number of PSUs, or Plancks. Then in order to achieve the standard mass solution to the proton
at the quantum level, the surface area (from the charge radius) is divided into the internal
information (or volume of the proton).
However, as we discussed earlier the internal mass information value for the Plancks present
inside the proton is equivalent to the mass of the entire visible Universe (all other protons
combined), that is ~1055 g. Therefore, since the information outside the proton (all other protons
that make up 1055 g) is holographically present inside the proton, the equation is inverted
reflecting the influence of one proton on all other protons in the Universe, which is really small.
In later sections, we will see that the uninverted ratio of the quantized cosmological solution is
applied to the proton to generate the correct gravitational force to confine the protons in the
nucleus which in this case, represents all the other protons in the universe influencing the one.
The equivalence between the total mass of all protons in the Universe and the holographic
Planck volume mass within each individual proton being equal to the universal mass is what
allows for the event horizon of a proton to have extreme stability across vast expanses of time
and environment.

“Let’s restate these calculations in simple terms: when calculating the gravity of a cosmological
black hole, we take its total volume of mass-energy and divide that by its surface (charge radius
or event horizon). This tells us how much of an effect the inside information of the object (a
relative amount) has on the outside spacetime (the rest of the universe), which is its gravity.
When calculating the gravity (or mass) of a proton, we invert this and take the outside
information on the surface that we perceive (the relative amount), and divide it by the inside
volume (the universal or holographic amount). The proton has the special property of having an
internal vacuum fluctuation mass-energy equal to the mass of the visible Universe. Therefore,
we’re taking our perceived view of a single instance of a proton (by the size of its charge radius
in Plancks), and dividing it by the internal volume in Plancks (which is a direct holographic
reflection of the Universal mass-energy). This allows us to understand its individual
mass-energy or gravity in relationship to all other protons in the universe.”

Haramein defines this surface-to-volume or volume-to-surface Planck ratio as a fundamental


ratio in the physics of our universe and utilizes the Greek letter Phi ϕ (often used in physics to
designate ratios, and not to be confused with the golden ratio) to identify it.
From Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass, this ratio is derived as:

— or the inverse —

“Consequently ϕ acts as a fundamental constant relating the background Planck vacuum


fluctuation field to the cosmological and quantum scale where it may be the source of
confinement so that scaling from the proton rest mass to the Planck mass requires a
proportional mass-energy conversion of 2ϕ while from the Planck mass to the holographic
gravitational mass requires a factor of ϕ…”
- Nassim Haramein
Eventually when Haramein expands the algebra derivations of the ϕ ratio he finds that 4ϕ2 is
equivalent to the gravitational coupling constant!​3​ This is the relative strength that the
gravitational force would be in order to confine the protons against the electrostatic repulsion
force resulting from their charge.
This is a remarkable result!
Here we arrive at the very critical cornerstone of Haramein’s conjecture, initiated with The
Schwarzschild Proton paper:
● “The confining force that protons experience in the nuclei of an atom (the “so-called”
strong force or strong interaction) is equivalent to the gravitational force energy that two
protons would experience if they were tiny black holes attracting each other.”

THE GRAVITATIONAL COUPLING CONSTANT


In The Schwarzschild Proton paper, the calculations to derive the gravitational force of a proton
generated from its Planck information structure were somewhat loosely made as a first order
approximation utilizing the Compton length of the proton, instead of a precise charge radius.
As we’ve seen in Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass, Haramein predicts an extremely
accurate charge radius for the proton utilizing a fundamental vacuum energy information ratio ϕ,
and was able to compute the gravitational coupling constant or the strength of the strong force
from 4ϕ2. However, when Haramein utilized the current measured proton radius (2010
CODATA value), the value for the force is a little bit off from the standard calculated value.
When he then utilized his predicted radius in these same calculations (calculated force value
from the predicted radius: 4ϕ2=5.90574 x 10-39), the gravitational coupling constant or the
gravitational force of a proton generated from its Planck information structure is not
approximately equivalent to the gravitational coupling constant, but EXACTLY equivalent (the
standard gravitational coupling constant: αg=5.90574 x 10-39).
Haramein’s result for the gravitational force of a proton based on his predicted proton radius:
4ϕ2=5.90574 x 10-39
The standard gravitational coupling constant:
αg=5.90574 x 10-39
This has two very significant meanings:
1. That the predicted radius of the proton must be correct, and precisely accurate.
2. That the strong force is actually gravity at the Planck level produced by vacuum energy
fluctuations.
This means that the confining force of nucleons must be the result of the discrete information
granulate structure of spacetime at the quantum scale. This in turn produces a gravitational
component equivalent to the event horizon of a proton black hole with the exact radius predicted
(and now experimentally confirmed). In his technical paper, Haramein describes the energy of
the vacuum fluctuations of the horizon of the proton generating the gravitational coupling
constant as the unifying energy. He writes:
Hence the gravitational force coupling constant is computed directly from the geometric
relationship of the Planck oscillator surface tiling to the interior volume oscillations of the proton.
This clearly relates the Planck mass to the proton rest mass, and the 2ϕ2 ratio of the proton
mass to the holographic gravitational mass or the Schwarzschild mass. Consequently, the
unifying energy required for confinement is generated by holographic derivations directly from
first principles of simple geometric Planck vacuum fluctuation relationships. Furthermore, the
rest mass of the proton is computed without requiring the complexities introduced by a Higgs
mechanism, which also utilizes a non-zero vacuum expectation value, but which only predicts 1
to 5 percent of the mass of baryons [the proton], and in which the Higgs particle mass itself is a
free parameter.​1​ The standard theory to describe the strong confining interactions is called the
Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics (LQCD). The LQCD accounts for the remaining mass of the
proton by utilizing special relativity to determine the kinetic back reaction of the massless gluons
when they interact with the confining color field. Yet it is critical to note that after almost a
century of computation, there is still no analytical solution to the Lattice QCD model for
confinement… Since there is no analytical solution to LQCD and no framework for the energy
source necessary for confinement, associating the remaining mass of the proton to the kinetic
energy of massless gluons is based on tenuous tenets [to say the least!]. Our results
demonstrate that the holographic gravitational mass-energy of the proton mh is the unification
energy scale for hadronic confinement and that the mass of nucleons is a direct consequence of
vacuum fluctuations.
Let’s return to our bath and our rubber ducky. The picture that emerges from Haramein’s model
is that the structure of space is quantized by tiny Planck voxel spheres that are like the water
molecules in our bath analogy. This next part is very important to remember: the rubber ducky,
when far away from a gradient depression of the drain, is not very much attracted by the
curvature of the vortex because the surface is almost flat. This is because the molecules of
water far from the drain are not moving very fast and are not being so coherent. The rubber
ducky, being far from the drain, is having an experience equivalent to the gravitational fields we
experience in the macro world of cosmology, where gravity appears to be very weak.

When a rubber ducky is far from a vortex (or gradient depression from a massive object), gravity
seems weak. Image adapted from The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene.
When a rubber ducky nears a vortex, gravity is strong, angular momentum increases, as well as
energy.
Yet when the rubber ducky approaches closer to the
depression of the highly curved surface near the drain,
where the water molecules are co-moving in a very
coherent manner, then the rubber ducky is much more
attracted and its angular velocity is increased
dramatically. This is equivalent to the highly curved
structure at the pinpoint center of an atom we call a
proton.
Here, something extremely significant becomes
apparent, and addresses one of the largest enigmatic
problems in physics: If the vacuum energy in the
space is so dense, why is the universe not completely
compressed into the size of a walnut as a result of the
large gravitational impact of such a high vacuum
density? From this picture, we now understand that the universe IS indeed highly curved and
the points in which that high curvature occurs are what we call protons or, if you like, the
material world.

ENERGY AND SPIN OF A PROTON


As is well known, the energy of a proton can be calculated using the simple equation E=mc2. Of
course, it would look a little more like Ep=mpc2 where the mp is the mass of the proton and Ep
is its energy, so that the energy is derived from the mass of the proton. Having demonstrated
that the proton is essentially an agglomeration of Planck-scale electromagnetic fluctuations, one
could imagine that these energy dynamics would be a representation of the bulk rotation of all
the tiny Plancks together, just like the energy of the water vortex generated by the drain of our
bath could be calculated in terms of all the water molecules’ bulk rotation within the co-moving
region.
Of course, now that the mass of the proton has been identified to be the result of the co-moving
Planck Spherical Units (PSU), Haramein converts Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence to an
expression that includes the fundamental geometric universal Planck surface to volume
information ratio ϕ .
Why would we convert Einstein’s equation E=mc2?
If we examine the mass-energy equivalence expression E=mc2, we find that none of the terms
are defined. The source of mass, in the standard model, has not been defined or is unknown
(notwithstanding the Higgs mechanism that is unsuccessful in predicting a large percentage of
proton mass). And although precisely measured in a laboratory, the mechanism that determines
why the value of the speed of light is some 300,000km/second, is generally unknown.
Einstein’s elegant equation is basically a brilliant equivalence between three predominantly
undefined terms.

The source of mass in co-moving planck oscillations.

Faculty Note
For ease of reading these equations, just note that mp refers to the mass (m) of the proton
(lowercase subscript p), and that Ep is the energy of the proton. Also, ml and El refer to the
mass and energy of the Planck (subscript l).
By replacing m by the universal ratio ϕ, Haramein essentially defines the source of mass in the
mass-energy equivalence equation, and as a result defines the source of E as the Planck
quantum vacuum electromagnetic oscillations. Therefore, he is able to write:

Of course, 2ϕml is equal to the mass of the proton mp so that:

is equal to:

Clearly, the new mass-energy equivalence expression demonstrates that both m and E are a
direct consequence of the Planck vacuum energy. This is present in Ep=2ϕmℓc2 since the
energy of a Planck is equal to Eℓ=mℓc2. Therefore, for the first time, the source of mass and
energy in the Einstein mass-energy equivalence formula is defined as resulting from the Planck
oscillators in the vacuum structure.
● So what about c, the speed of light? What is the mechanism that determines its value?
Exploring the algebra of Ep=2ϕmℓc2, Haramein decomposes the Planck energy Eℓ=mℓc2 which
can also be given in terms of the Planck’s constant ħ (h-bar) and the Newtonian gravitational
constant G, in this square root expression:
and eventually arrives at:

For a full derivation of the algebra see ​Quantum Gravity and the
Holographic Mass​equations (59) and (60).

To understand the deeper meaning of the energy of a proton being equivalent to four times ℏ
(h-bar), times the speed of light, divided by the proton radius:
You may recall from Module 3 that Max Planck resolved the black body ultraviolet catastrophe
by determining that the electromagnetic radiation of a body occurs in discrete packets of energy
proportional to their frequency. This proportionality constant is typically given as h (Planck’s
constant) where the energy E of the packet is equivalent to h multiplied by the frequency ν (the
greek letter nu) or E=hν.

Initially Planck thought that all he was doing was fudging the equations by the value of
h=6.626070 x 10-34 J/s (Joules per second) in order to make everything come out right for the
radiation of a black body. After all, when you add energy to a system or heat up something it
seems to rise in temperature in a continuous and smooth fashion, not in some kind of integers.
The concept at the time seemed extremely radical. However, the integers are so tiny that the
energy events appear continuous. Similarly, although spacetime appears continuous and
smooth at the macro-scale, Haramein’s paper demonstrates that it is granular at the tiny level of
the Planck-scale.

Max Planck, the inadvertent father of quantum theory,


and the brilliant mind behind the Planck-scale
constants that form the basis for Unified Physics.
Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr, the minds behind relativity, the atom, and much of
quantum mechanics, and whose contributions are essential to the field of Unified
Physics.

In 1905, Einstein in his seminal work on the photoelectric effect ultimately described the packets
of energy of the electromagnetic field as “photons”, and eventually Niels Bohr in 1913 utilized
those concepts demonstrating that the orbitals of electrons jump from one discrete integer
energy state to another as they absorb or emit the little packets of energy in keeping with
Planck’s constant, making the value h fundamental to the birth of quantum theory.
It then follows that in quantum mechanics even the angular momentum (rotational momentum)
of an electron bound to a nucleus is quantized and is typically described as a quantum of action.
This quantization of angular momentum is commonly calculated in terms of radians per second
or angular frequency ω (the number of cycles it goes around per second or Hertz) which is
multiplied by the frequency ν or ω=2πν. As a result for convenience sake, a reduced Planck
constant was established, denoted by ħ (h-bar), where:
ħ (h-bar) describes the angular momentum quantum of action of quantum mechanics. In other
words, it defines a fundamental unit of rotational action.
Haramein then thought that maybe if he replaced the ħ in the equation

with its full expression

then the meaning of Ep in this equation, which expresses the energy of a proton, may be made
clearer. Maybe the holographic solution of the energy of the proton was describing its angular
momentum — the rotation of a proton.
Therefore, Haramein replaced ħ (h-bar) in the equation with its full expression of h/2π which
resulted in:

Here the meaning becomes fully apparent. The denominator in this equation 2πrp is the
circumference (C) of a circle (C=2πr), in this case a circle with the radius of a proton (rp), and
the c above is how fast it’s going around that circle (at the speed of light).

Nassim Haramein uncovers the secret of the spin of the proton, and brings together the
fundamental elements necessary for an effective foundation in Unified Physics.

Therefore, all this was indicating that the energy of a proton is a direct consequence of the
angular momentum (the spin) which we now know is the bulk rotation of all the little Plancks in
that region of space.
From this equation, Haramein is then able to calculate the angular frequency of a proton in
Hertz (how many times the proton is going around in a second).

Remarkably, this is the characteristic frequency of the gamma ray emissions of nuclei,​1​here
derived directly from a discrete quantum of action of angular momentum and extrapolated from
geometry.
But more importantly, Haramein goes on to find the value of the period of such a system, that is
the amount of time it takes for the proton to go around once, and finds:

And this happens to be the typical interaction time given for the strong force, or how fast the
strong force will “capture” a particle or the time by which a particle orbit approaching the nuclei
will decay via the strong interaction. This is an incredible result!

On the far right of the light spectrum we can see that gamma ray emissions are typically
associated with the nuclei of atoms at frequencies above 1020 Hz. Credit: NASA

Gamma Decay from an Atomic Nucleus


A UNIFIED VIEW EMERGES
Now that we have covered the fundamental elements of Haramein’s solution to quantum gravity
and the foundations for Unified Physics, let’s review the basic picture being painted by this
solution and some of the problems it solves.
Our holographic, geometric description of the dynamics of spacetime uses a fundamental
information bit, what we call a Planck, a spherical unit at the scale of the smallest wavelength of
the electromagnetic spectrum. All structures in space, from the proton to the cosmological black
hole, can be seen as a spinning field of co-moving and oscillating Plancks. Through simply
calculating the ratio relationships between the number of Plancks on the event horizon or
charge radius (surface) of any object to the number of Plancks in the volume of the object, we
can actually generate a solution to gravitational mass for cosmological objects (equivalent to the
Newtonian limit of Einstein field equations, the Schwarzschild solution), and also apply it at the
quantum level to extrapolate the standard mass of the proton.
In addition, we’re able to predict the proton radius with extreme accuracy, output a gravitational
coupling constant for the “strong force,” therefore removing the need for one of the four
“fundamental forces” in physics by unifying it with Gravity. We also establish the angular
frequency of the system and the interaction time of the confinement of that force.
In summary, by examining the dynamics and structure of the vacuum energy at the Planck
scale, we are now able to identify the source of mass (the proton makes up most of the mass in
the universe), compute cosmological gravitation, demonstrate that the strong force is actually
gravitation acting at the quantum scale holding the nucleons together with the correct range,
and for the first time give an analytical solution to nuclear confinement.
By using a theoretical model based upon natural (Planck) units and simple geometric
relationships, a unified solution emerges that is able to answer the biggest questions in physics
today with accuracy and elegance.

Spin is generated by a change in density in space.


temperature gradient causing formation
Many implications emerge from these discoveries.
For instance, until now the source of gravitation was
unknown. Due to Einstein’s work, it is generally
seen as the result of “spacetime curvature,” but no
description was available to define spacetime itself
and its composition. Now it becomes clear that
spacetime is like a sea of discrete, tiny eddies or
vortices composed of spherical Planck oscillators
spinning coherently into larger structures. These
spinning coherent patterns occur simply due to a change in density gradient in the vacuum from
universal size to quantum size, and where there are eddies there is curvature or gravitational
forces. For visualization purposes, remember our rubber ducky bath analogy, where Einstein
described the water curving towards the drain and Haramein described the spinning dynamics
of the co-moving particles of the water (spacetime) that produces the curvature in the first place.
You can see this every day in Earth’s atmosphere, in which slight changes in the temperature
gradient (also based on density) create wind storms and even massively coherent spinning
vortices that form hurricanes and tornadoes.
Therefore, we can now demonstrate that these eddies, composed of co-moving tiny Planck
scale spinning oscillators, are the source of mass (the proton) for all matter in the universe.
Protons themselves, as subatomic particles that make up the nuclei of atoms, stick together
because these tiny Planck eddies collectively produce a gravitational force which is extremely
strong very close to the charge radius or event horizon of the proton (the strong force), which
literally holds the nuclei together — in other words, holding together what we call matter and the
universe as a whole.
So now when we look at E=mc2, we can identify that E and m are the result of vacuum
fluctuations and that the speed of light (c) is derived from the Planck vacuum spinning at that
velocity at the horizon of the proton. The base of reality, what makes up our material world all
around us, is becoming clearly defined. Energy and mass are no longer unknown mystical
entities, but they are clearly the result of the information vacuum fluctuation dynamics self
organizing at different scales, from the center of galaxies to the center nucleus of an atom. A
unified view emerges!

replace the strong force


connect to vacuum energy and control gravity

GRAVITATIONAL FALLOFF AND THE YUKAWA


POTENTIAL
Before screaming “eureka!” there is one order of business that cannot be ignored. If the strong
force is actually the force of gravity acting at the nucleus level of an atom, why then is its range
so short? The cosmological gravitational fields we experience everyday drop off at a square of
the distance, in accord with Newton’s law. Yet in the bond between nucleons (protons), the
strength of the confining nuclear force drops
off much more rapidly. We know from
knocking protons out of a nucleus (using
particle accelerator scattering) that it is fairly
easy to do so. If the strength of the strong
force was to be a gravitational force, then one would have to explain why the strength does not
drop off at the square of the distance from the proton, but almost instantaneously as you move
away from the edge (or charge radius) of each proton which is typically given by a curve fitting
graph of approximated values called the Yukawa Potential.

Haramein knew that for his approach to be considered, this would have to be elucidated, and in
The Schwarzschild Proton paper he had already laid down the foundation to resolve this
mystery. Haramein reasoned that if we are now giving an analytical classical solution to nuclear
confinement, utilizing the quantum structure of the vacuum to generate the classical force of
gravity utilized in general relativity, then the spinning dynamics of this structure (the proton)
would be subject to special relativity and mass-dilation.
From Einstein’s special relativity we know that an object undergoes a mass-dilation (mass
increase) when accelerated near the speed of light. Here we have a proton made out of vast
numbers of little Planck oscillators all spinning together at the speed of light or very close to it.
Yet, as we move away from the surface event horizon of the co-moving Plancks that make up
the proton, Haramein reasoned that the velocity would diminish very rapidly, and if it did, then
the mass-dilation would drop very rapidly too. If the mass dropped, so would the gravitational
force.
So although gravity would have a force that drops at a square of the distance, if the velocity
(from the little Plancks co-moving) dropped exponentially with the distance, which produces the
mass-dilation and thus the gravity, then the gravitational force would drop extremely fast as well.
He went on to calculate how quickly gravity would drop off as the velocity reduced with the
distance from the surface charge radius of the proton rotating at the speed of light (effectively
moving the rubber ducky away from the drain). Remarkably, he found that this matched the
experimental result of the standard range given to the strong confining force, which is typically
given as the Yukawa potential.
We can reflect on what we learned in Module 3 about Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity:
when an object accelerates to nearly the speed of light, it gains an incredible amount of
mass-energy, and likewise when it decelerates from that speed, it loses a huge amount of
mass-energy.
Let’s go back to our rubber ducky in the bath analogy. Of course if the rubber ducky is far from
the drain, it will orbit very slowly, but as it gets closer its orbital velocity will increase rapidly as it
enters the more coherent co-moving water particles that makes up the vortex created by the
gradient of the air-water exchange in the drain. Now imagine that the rubber ducky sped up to
near the speed of light as it approached the drain. The mass increase would have an
equivalence in the gravitational force that the rubber ducky imposes on its environment.
Therefore, if the rubber ducky was moved away from the drain and its velocity reduced, the
gravitational force that they exert upon each other would drop very rapidly because the
mass-dilation of the rubber ducky would drop as well.

When far from the whirlpool, the ducky experiences little movement. In this video clip, imagine
the vortex increasing the duck’s speed to near the speed of light. When you ride an elevator,
roller coaster, or merry-go-round, notice how your weight increases when you accelerate in a
new direction. Your mass continues to dilate as your speed increases…

In this short clip from Haramein’s ADC presentation, you can see what a stable orbital pair of
protons might be like.
Haramein calculated that if two protons are orbiting each other, the amount of mass-dilation
they would experience if they were orbiting very close to the speed of light (c) would be
equivalent to the mass of a black hole or the Schwarzschild condition for a proton. This is
congruent with his earlier calculation showing that the gravitational coupling constant or the
amount of energy necessary for gravity to become the strong force (what Haramein calls the
“unifying energy”) is the relationship between the standard mass of the proton and its black hole
holographic mass. Now we see that the rest mass of the proton is measured when it is at “rest”,
not accounting for light speed acceleration in the nucleus and the mass-dilation that comes with
it.
Haramein finalized his calculations in his paper Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass.
Having proved that the angular momentum of the holographic proton is the speed of light from
his calculation of the energy, he went on to calculate the drop in velocity (or v(r), velocity vs.
radius or v of r) as the protons moved away from each other (the rubber ducky moving away
from the drain), and the drop in mass-dilation resulting from the reduction in velocity. He found
that the drop off is extraordinarily rapid.
That is, if you move one proton away from another proton only by the incredibly miniscule value
of a single Planck length, there is already a reduction in mass of some 28 orders of magnitude
(28 zeroes on the mass number). Therefore, the mass and gravitational attraction of the force
drops exponentially, in fact asymptotically as you move the protons away from each other.
He plotted this on a graph and the result speaks for itself: It is almost a perfect match to the so
called Yukawa Potential, which itself is only an approximation of the range of the strong force.
This provides an analytical classical solution to the strong force — gravity acting at the quantum
scale where systems have relativistic velocities or light speed velocities.

On the right is the typical curve-fitting graph given as the Yukawa potential to describe the range
of the strong force. On the left is Haramein’s calculation of the drop in gravitational force as the
mass-dilation diminishes when two protons are moved apart from each other. It is easy to see
that the two graphs agree with each other and that Haramein’s result defines a precise
constraint on how that force should act, which matches the experimental findings.
Showing that gravity could have a range similar to the strong force was the last part that
Haramein had to prove in order to clearly demonstrate that the strong force is in fact gravity’s
influence at the quantum level and that all of it is the result of the Planck vacuum
electromagnetic fluctuations of spacetime acting at all scales.
This is yet another remarkable result of the quantized holographic approach!

History
There are many old arts / sciences / pragmatics: e.g. yoga, martial arts... through which you
might get consciousness of self awareness; this would be EXPERIENCING zero-point energy,
getting conscious of interconnectedness of all forces (e.g. in different body parts, the hole body
...as a fractal mirror of your outside surrounding).
In all those arts it's about being totally "venerable" in the sense of really totally accepting (in the
sense of emphatically embedding/ integrating) all forces... even attention (consciousness) as an
coherent energy vector embedding...

Casimir Effect and Dynamical Casimir Effect

(Supports existence of vacuum energy)


• Metal plates block outside waves, net
inward pushing on plates
• Experimental proof
• Vacuum fluctuation energy exists!

• Microwave RF photons can be vibrated


out of vacuum “A rapidly moving mirror
that turns virtual photons into real ones
is the first experimental evidence of the
dynamical Casimir effect.”
From:

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/424111/first-observation-of-the-dynamicalcasimir-effect/

"Casimir plates" by Emok - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Commons
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Casimir_plates.svg#/media/File:Casimir_plates.svg

In the ​Casimir effect​, two neutrally charged metallic plates are placed extremely close together
in a vacuum (a chamber devoid of atmospheric molecules). Because some of the
electromagnetic wavelengths of the quantum vacuum will not fit in between the extremely small
space in between the metallic plates, they will cancel out. This results in a slightly lower energy
in between the plates, almost like a low pressure region, and the greater energy around the
area from the more numerous electromagnetic modes will push the plates together.
This is a highly important effect as it not only verifies the pervasive presence of the
electromagnetic oscillations of the vacuum, but is a direct demonstration of extracting energy
from it – because a force is produced from the quantum vacuum simply by canceling some of
the vacuum fluctuations (electromagnetic modes) in a defined region of space. Note that this is
a type of gravitational effect (the plates gravitate together), and hence has been suggested to
be a mechanism by which gravitational control can be achieved.
In more ​recent research​, this phenomenon has been extended to the ​dynamical Casimir effect​,
in which microwave photons are emitted directly from the vacuum. The electromagnetic waves
of the vacuum are described equally precisely as photons. Each photon has a partner that acts
as an anti-particle, forming particle anti-particle pairs that cause the photons to stay bound to
the vacuum state. However, if a mirror is moved at relativistic speeds (speeds close to that of
light) it will match the speed of some of the photons, causing them to disperse and resulting in a
disruption of the normal creation-to-annihilation cycle of the particle anti-particle pairs.
As such, some photons will be emitted from the vacuum as they are separated from their
‘mirror partner’. However, it is extremely difficult to get an actual mirror to move at anything
close to the speed of light, so instead a superconducting quantum interference device
(SQUID) is oscillated at billions of times a second (gigahertz, GHz) with an electrical current
in such a way that it is able to mimic an electromagnetic mirror moving at close to the speed
of light.

If all of the above empirical demonstrations were not enough to establish the importance of
the quantum vacuum beyond simply a virtual field of trivial consequence (and if you talk to
some skeptics, they aren’t), many physicists and researchers – including the team at the
Resonance Project Foundation – are already beginning to develop engines and energy
generators based on utilization and engineering of the quantum vacuum.

Although by conventional thinking such a propulsion device should be impossible, the fact
that it does appear to work is attributed to the polarizable structure of the vacuum – the
quantum vacuum fluctuations. The same energetic oscillating bits utilized by Haramein to
derive the gravitational force at both the quantum and cosmological scales, as well to
describe the properties of the proton and the source of the nuclear binding force. In other
words, such a device would not work if space did not have the Planck-scale structure
described in QGHM.

Note that the concept of the polarizable vacuum is nothing new (​see previous publications​),
as Haramein, Rauscher and others have been explaining and applying the concept of the
polarizable structure of the vacuum for many years to solve previously intractable problems
in physics as well as to expand our understanding of black holes, stellar dynamics, and
quantum processes with considerations of spacetime torque and Coriolis forces.

EmDrive NASA forum (for in depth discussion and analysis)


–http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com...Cannae Drive – ​http://cannae.com/Theory​ of
electromagnetic reactionless drive – Abraham-Minkowski controversy
–​http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abr...​Propulsion Physics Research Group
–​http://ntrs.nasa.gov/arc​hive/nas...​Propulsion Research Ltd.
–​http://emdrive.com/principle.htm...​ of Microwave Propulsion for Spacecraft
–​http://www.newscientist.com/data...​ Polytechnical University report on microwave radiation
thruster –​http://www.emdrive.com/NWPU2010t...​PublicationsSCALE UNIFICATION – A
UNIVERSAL SCALING LAW FOR ORGANIZED MATTER:​http://hiup.org/wp

-content/uploa...SPINORS, TWISTORS, QUATERNIONS, AND THE “SPACETIME”


TORUS TOPOLOGY:​http://hiup.org/

wp-content/uploa...COLLECTIVE COHERENT OSCILLATION PLASMA MODES IN


SURROUNDING MEDIA OF BLACK HOLES AND VACUUM STRUCTURE – QUANTUM
PROCESSES WITH CONSIDERATIONS OF SPACETIME TORQUE AND CORIOLIS
FORCES:​http://hiup.org/wp​.

Gravitational and inertial control devices such as Haramein’s magnetohydrodynamic plasma


resonator, Alcubierre warp-drives, and the like, you may be able to begin exploring other
nearby stellar systems, where countless unimaginable new worlds and discoveries await.

More to Explore

Full Interview: Roger Shawyer, Creator of EmDrive – ​https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=...​The EmDrive NASA forum (for in depth
discussion and analysis) –​http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com...​Cannae Drive – ​http://cannae.com/​Theory of electromagnetic
reactionless drive – Abraham-Minkowski controversy –​http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abr...​Advanced Propulsion Physics Research
Group –​http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nas...​Satellite Propulsion Research Ltd. – ​http://emdrive.com/principle.html​Theory of Microwave
Propulsion for Spacecraft –​http://www.newscientist.com/data...​Northwestern Polytechnical University report on microwave radiation
thruster –​http://www.emdrive.com/NWPU2010t...

Previous Publications

SCALE UNIFICATION – A UNIVERSAL SCALING LAW FOR ORGANIZED MATTER: ​http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploa...​SPINORS,


TWISTORS, QUATERNIONS, AND THE “SPACETIME” TORUS TOPOLOGY:​http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploa...​COLLECTIVE
COHERENT OSCILLATION PLASMA MODES IN SURROUNDING MEDIA OF BLACK HOLES AND VACUUM STRUCTURE –
QUANTUM PROCESSES WITH CONSIDERATIONS OF SPACETIME TORQUE AND CORIOLIS
FORCES:​http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploa...