Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Research article
articleinfo
abstract
Article history:
Received 31 January 2019 Background: Ginsenosides accumulation responses to temperature are critical to quality formation in
Received in Revised form cold-dependent American ginseng. However, the studies on cold requirement mechanism relevant to
21 June 2019 ginsenosides have been limited in this species.
Accepted 25 June 2019 Methods: Two experiments were carried out: one was a multivariate linear regression analysis between
Available online xxx the ginsenosides accumulation and the environmental conditions of American ginseng from different
sites of China and the other was a synchronous determination of ginsenosides accumulation, overall
Keywords: DNA methylation, and relative gene expression in different tissues during different developmental stages
American ginseng of American ginseng after experiencing different cold exposure duration treatments.
Cold temperature
Results: Results showed that the variation of the contents as well as the yields of total and individual
Ginsenosides
ginsenosides Rg1, Re, and Rb1 in the roots were closely associated with environmental temperature
DNA methylation
Gene expression
conditions which implied that the cold environment plays a decisive role in the ginsenoside
accumulation of American ginseng. Further results showed that there is a cyclically reversible dynamism
between methylation and demethylation of DNA in the perennial American ginseng in response to
temperature seasonality. And sufficient cold exposure duration in winter caused sufficient DNA
demethylation in tender leaves in early spring and then accompanied the high expression of flowering
gene PqFT in flowering stages and ginsenosides biosynthesis gene PqDDS in green berry stages
successively, and finally, maximum ginsenosides accumulation occurred in the roots of American
ginseng.
Conclusion: We, therefore, hypothesized that cold-induced DNA methylation changes might regulate
relative gene expression involving both plant development and plant secondary metabolites in such cold-
dependent perennial plant species.
© 2019 The Korean Society of Ginseng, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC. This is an open access article
under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
* Corresponding author. Department of Pharmcognosy, School of Pharmacy, Qingdao University, #38 Dengzhou Road, North District, Qingdao City, Shandong Province
266021, PR China.
E-mail addresses: zhousan3@163.com, zhousan@qdu.edu.cn (S. Zhou).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2019.06.006
Please cite this article as: Hao M et al., Cold-induced ginsenosides accumulation is associated with the alteration in DNA methylation and
relative gene expression in perennial American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) along with its plant growth and development process,
Journal of Ginseng Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2019.06.006
J Ginseng Res xxx (xxxx) xxx
p1226-8453 e2093-4947/$ e see front matter © 2019 The Korean Society of Ginseng, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Please cite this article as: Hao M et al., Cold-induced ginsenosides accumulation is associated with the alteration in DNA methylation and
relative gene expression in perennial American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) along with its plant growth and development process,
Journal of Ginseng Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2019.06.006
2 J Ginseng Res xxx (xxxx) xxx
2.1. Plant
materials
Experiment 1
The objective of this experiment was to study the relationship
between ginsenosides accumulation and environmental factors of
American ginseng. Root samples of 3-year-old American ginseng
were collected at the same time on 21 October 2016 from different
cultivation sites of China including Wendeng, Liuba, Fusong, Jian,
Raohe, and Huairou. Each root sample was carefully washed and
divided into different parts including rhizomes, outer tissues
(periderm and phloem) of main roots, inner tissues (xylem and
pith) of main roots and hair roots; each part was used for
determination of biomass, ginsenosides contents, and ginsenosides
yields, sepa- rately. The biomass of each part of root sample was
determined by measuring the dry weight with an electronic balance
after drying. The ginsenoside contents (Rg1, Re, and Rb1) in
different parts of root samples were determined by high
performance liquid chromatog- raphy (HPLC). The yields of total
and individual ginsenosides in root samples were calculated with
contents multiply by dry weights.
Please cite this article as: Hao M et al., Cold-induced ginsenosides accumulation is associated with the alteration in DNA methylation and
relative gene expression in perennial American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) along with its plant growth and development process,
Journal of Ginseng Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2019.06.006
2 J Ginseng Res xxx (xxxx) xxx
methylation in American ginseng by setting different cold 40e100% A. The injection volume was 10 uL, the flow rate was set
exposure duration treatments in dormant season of at 1.0 mL$min—1, and the column temperature was 40
American ginseng before seedlings emerged. At the end of ○ C. The detection wavelength was set at 203 nm. Standard
October 2016, 2-year-old Amer- ican ginseng plants strictly curves
uniform in shape, size, and weight were collected from were constructed by plotting the peak areas (mAU$min—1) versus
Wendeng (main producing areas of American ginseng in the amount (ug) of each analyte injected. The content in the sam-
Shandong of China) and were transplanted in pots (30 cm in ples was calculated by the formula below:
diameter 40 cm in depth, each pot one plant, with same
volume of fertile sandy loam) under sunshade net in
Medicinal Plant Garden of Pharmacy School, Qingdao ×
University. Temperature treatments began at 1 November
2016; plants were randomly divided into six groups (N 30 per
group at least, by marking on the pots), which were
designated six cold exposure duration treatments including ¼
no cold exposure (CE-0), one month (CE-1, November), two
months (CE-2, NovembereDecember), three months (CE-3,
NovembereJanuary), four months (CE-4,
NovembereFebruary), and cold exposure naturally (CE-N).
There
was a separate constant temperature chamber (18 3.0 ○C) under T
the same sunshade sheds that provided exactly the same
sunshine, soil moisture, and natural photoperiod except
temperature. The plants marked with CE-0 to CE-4 were,
respectively, transferred to the constant temperature
chamber on 1 November 2016, 1 December 2016, 1 January
2017, 1 February 2017, and 1 March 2017. And all the plants
were transferred back to the natural temperature conditions
on 1 April 2017. The CE-N group was exposed under natural
temperature conditions (without any temperature control)
from 1 November 2016 to 1 April 2017 (monthly
temperature
fluctuation range: November —2 ○Cw18 ○C, December —5 ○Cw13
○ C, January —6 ○Cw9 ○C, February —4 ○Cw10 ○C, March —1
○
Cw15
○ C). From 1 April 2017 then on, all the plants in
different cold exposure duration treatments were cultured
under completely identical natural conditions including
temperature, light, photo- period, soil moisture, soil nutrient,
and so on. Plants were sampled during every development
stage by schedule, for determination of plant dry weights,
ginsenosides contents, overall DNA methylation levels, and
relative gene expression in different parts of plants.
3. Results
Table 1
The contents and yields of ginsenosides in the different root parts of 3-year-old American ginseng from different cultivation sites of China
Wendeng Rhizome 4.96 T 0.19 24.15 T 1.16 18.07 T 0.72 47.19 T 2.40 2.76 T 0.29 13.45 T 0.80 10.06 T 1.27 26.28 T 1.11
OM 2.60 T 0.11 15.36 T 0.62 16.76 T 0.50 34.74 T 1.20 11.62 T 0.31 68.46 T 2.71 74.66 T 2.23 154.75 T 5.12
IM 0.73 T 0.10 6.77 T 0.21 8.48 T 0.38 15.99 T 0.91 2.03 T 0.12 18.85 T 0.90 23.62 T 1.25 44.50 T 2.13
Hair root 3.01 T 0.15 21.33 T 1.09 26.92 T 0.87 51.27 T 2.22 3.07 T 0.11 24.12 T 0.92 30.44 T 0.97 57.97 T 2.30
Total Total contents per plant 31.76 T 1.53 Total yields per plant 283.49 T
10.72 HuairouRhizome 8.18 T 0.22 28.08 T 1.17 20.38 T 0.99 56.64 T 1.89 5.21 T 0.22 17.87 T 0.58 12.98 T 0.58 36.06 T 1.32
OM 2.11 T 0.13 12.31 T 0.61 19.37 T 0.71 33.78 T 1.25 10.73 T 0.37 62.71 T 2.12 98.68 T 4.55 172.12 T 7.45
IM 1.28 T 0.07 5.61 T 0.27 7.32 T 0.25 14.21 T 0.50 4.07 T 0.27 17.87 T 0.61 23.30 T 1.07 45.23 T 2.17
Hair root 4.74 T 0.30 28.48 T 1.16 38.01 T 1.20 71.21 T 2.93 5.53 T 0.23 33.24 T 1.67 44.35 T 2.19 83.12 T 4.11
Total Total contents per plant 32.11 T 1.18 Total yields per plant 336.53 T 11.38
Jian Rhizome 7.39 T 0.29 31.32 T 1.02 25.66 T 1.21 64.39 T 3.24 3.21 T 0.14 13.61 T 0.55 11.15 T 0.43 27.97 T 0.91
OM 2.66 T 0.21 18.35 T 0.71 19.77 T 0.73 40.78 T 1.60 9.25 T 0.25 63.77 T 2.95 68.70 T 2.64 141.73 T 6.78
IM 1.08 T 0.28 5.41 T 0.30 8.42 T 0.38 14.92 T 0.80 2.34 T 0.12 11.76 T 0.41 18.30 T 0.57 32.40 T 1.38
Hair root 4.31 T 0.14 33.75 T 1.61 37.99 T 1.23 70.04 T 2.71 3.43 T 0.12 26.88 T 1.18 30.25 T 1.26 60.56 T 2.26
Total Total contents per plant 36.73 T 1.19 Total yields per plant 262.65 T
10.32 Fusong Rhizome 6.71 T 0.20 36.33 T 1.77 27.09 T 0.89 70.13 T 2.31 2.44 T 0.08 13.23 T 0.37 9.87 T 0.38 25.54 T 1.13
OM 3.80 T 0.14 19.77 T 0.81 25.83 T 0.91 49.41 T 2.18 11.08 T 0.31 57.60 T 2.15 75.27 T 3.20 143.95 T 5.29
IM 2.09 T 0.11 8.11 T 0.30 9.08 T 0.41 19.29 T 0.76 3.82 T 0.30 14.76 T 0.57 16.55 T 0.71 35.13 T 1.78
Hair root 3.92 T 0.17 35.71 T 1.24 38.37 T 1.28 77.99 T 2.49 2.62 T 0.08 23.84 T 1.21 25.62 T 1.37 52.08 T 2.15
Total Total contents per plant 42.78 T 2.05 Total yields per plant 256.70 T 11.23
Raohe Rhizome 5.01 T 0.12 31.70 T 0.96 25.23 T 0.73 61.94 T 2.27 2.13 T 0.11 13.49 T 0.48 10.73 T 0.36 26.35 T 0.93
OM 3.96 T 0.27 17.13 T 0.79 23.79 T 0.86 44.88 T 2.15 13.47 T 0.67 58.30 T 2.96 80.96 T 3.88 152.73 T 7.41
IM 0.73 T 0.04 8.80 T 0.31 9.69 T 0.41 19.22 T 1.05 1.56 T 0.07 18.73 T 0.71 20.60 T 1.25 40.89 T 1.84
Hair root 3.79 T 0.15 33.73 T 1.21 39.15 T 1.67 76.68 T 3.81 2.96 T 0.08 20.31 T 1.12 30.54 T 1.30 59.80 T 2.57
Total Total contents per plant 39.89 T 2.08 Total yields per plant 279.77 T 11.35
Liuba Rhizome 6.97 T 0.25 26.07 T 1.26 21.49 T 0.88 54.53 T 2.63 4.80 T 0.22 17.96 T 0.71 14.80 T 0.61 37.56 T 1.81
OM 2.88 T 0.11 14.87 T 0.71 15.91 T 0.72 33.66 T 1.38 15.86 T 0.74 81.94 T 3.71 87.67 T 3.36 185.47 T 7.32
IM 0.66 T 0.03 4.54 T 0.21 7.59 T 0.21 12.76 T 0.64 2.16 T 0.11 15.64 T 0.72 26.14 T 1.27 43.94 T 1.79
Hair root 4.76 T 0.13 23.56 T 1.20 30.13 T 1.10 58.45 T 2.12 6.01 T 0.30 29.75 T 1.32 38.04 T 1.31 73.81 T 2.25
Total Total contents per plant 30.07 T 1.55 Total yields per plant 340.77 T 14.60
Outer tissue of main roots (OM) including periderm and phloem; inner tissue of main roots (IM) including xylem and pith; total contents/yields per plant is the sum of
three individual ginsenosides contents/yields (Rg1 þ Re þ Rb1) according to their weight coefficient of biomass in the four parts (rhizomes þ outer tissue of main roots þ
inner tissue of main roots þ hair roots) of the roots.
Table 2
Multivariate linear regression equation between the temperature factors and the ginsenosides in roots of 3-year-old American ginseng collected from
different cultivation sites of China
Contents Rg1 Y ¼ 0.180 — 0.068 x1 þ 0.013 x3 þ 0.001 x5 (F ¼ 67.958 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.936)
Y ¼ 2.178 — 0.039 x2 þ 0.010 x4 — 0.070 x6 (F ¼ 43.391 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.903)
Re Y ¼ —3.833 — 0.425 x1 þ 0.038 x3 þ 0.001 x5 (F ¼ 105.257 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.958)
Y ¼ 15.993 — 0.231 x2 þ 0.018 x4 — 0.452 x6 (F ¼ 67.899 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.936)
Rb1 Y ¼ 12.467 — 0.278 x1 þ 0.118 x3 þ 0.001 x5 (F ¼ 66.231 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.934) Y
¼ 18.373 — 0.129 x2 þ 0.245 x4 — 0.481 x6 (F ¼ 50.067 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.915)
Total Y ¼ 29.600 — 0.328 x1 þ 0.076 x3 þ 0.001 x5 (F ¼ 77.5 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.943)
Y ¼ 30.728 — 0.069 x2 þ 0.606 x4 — 1.185 x6 (F ¼ 81.007 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.946)
Yields Rg1 Y ¼ —2.393 þ 0.046 x1þ 0.664 x3 — 0.001 x5 (F ¼ 50.983 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.916)
Y ¼ —6.63 — 0.169 x2 þ 0.969 x4 — 0.097 x6 (F ¼ 22.261 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.827)
Re Y ¼ —5.014 þ 0.486 x1 þ 4.220 x3 — 0.004 x5 (F ¼ 11.475 > F0.05, R2 ¼
0.711) Y ¼ —34.048 — 1.198 x2 þ 5.863 x4 þ 0.104 x6 (F ¼ 8.461 > F0.05, R2
¼ 0.645)
Rb1 Y ¼ —12.438 þ 3.031 x1 þ 7.801 x3 — 0.009 x5 (F ¼ 66.320 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.934)
Y ¼ —113.998 — 1.250 x2 þ 10.505 x4 þ 3.479 x6 (F ¼ 34.824 > F0.05, R2 ¼
0.882)
Total Y ¼ 49.776 þ 5.980 x1 þ 11.949 x3 — 0.022 x5 (F ¼ 70.684 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.938)
Y ¼ —185.492 þ 0.259 x2 þ 19.119 x4 þ 2.362 x6 (F ¼ 34.349 > F0.05, R2 ¼ 0.880)
January minimum temperature (x1); January mean temperature (x2); July maximum temperature (x3); July mean temperature (x4); Active cumulative
temperature (x5); Annual mean temperature (x6). Data of temperature factors in different cultivation sites were collected from National Meteorological
Information Center of China (data did not all show).
M. Hao et al / Cold-induced ginsenosides accumulation is associated with the alteration in DNA 5
Table 3
Comparison of the contents of ginsenosides (mg/g) in the leaves, stems, and roots at different growing stages of 3-year-old American ginseng between CE-N and CE-3
Leaves Early leaf stage 5.78 T 0.25 12.21 T 0.41 10.89 T 0.31 28.88 T 3.83 T 0.17 10.80 T 0.41 5.78 T 0.27 20.42 T 0.89
Opened leaf stage 5.98 T 0.23 9.90 T 0.32 0.94 4.19 T 0.21 8.92 T 0.34 6.03 T 0.22 19.14 T 0.57
Flowering stage 6.60 T 0.28 15.87 T 0.76 8.97 T 0.38 24.85 T 1.08 4.70 T 0.21 11.09 T 0.46 7.87 T 0.31 23.67 T 1.17
Green berry stage 3.82 T 0.13 18.06 T 9.32 T 0.43 31.79 T 1.12 2.19 T 0.09 15.07 T 0.55 8.79 T 0.23 26.06 T 1.28
Red berry stage 0.77 13.34 T 0.39 35.23 T 1.61 1.96 T 0.24 15.01 T 0.61 5.70 T 0.27 22.68 T 0.94
Yellow leaf stage 2.09 T 0.07 22.02 T 6.91 T 0.33 31.02 T 1.15 0.85 T 0.05 9.32 T 0.32 2.68 T 0.19 12.85 T 0.59
0.98 6.89 T 0.27 18.02 T
Stems Early leaf stage 0.33 T 0.07 3.06 T 0.17 3.10 T 0.16 6.50 T 0.41
1.04 T 0.04 10.09 T 0.61
Opened leaf stage 0.46
0.23 T 0.03 4.79 T 0.19 3.15 T 0.17 8.41 T 0.23 0.31 T 0.09 3.24 T 0.13 2.07 T 0.11 5.63 T 0.28
4.31 T 0.22 8.73 T 0.42
Flowering stage 0.43 T 0.14 3.66 T 0.13 3.34 T 0.14 7.43 T 0.31 0.20 T 0.02 2.92 T 0.16 2.21 T 0.11 5.34 T 0.31
Green berry stage 0.32 T 0.09 5.19 T 0.41 4.32 T 0.21 9.74 T 0.21 0.25 T 0.03 3.36 T 0.18 2.29 T 0.15 5.92 T 0.31
Red berry stage 0.35 T 0.05 5.57 T 0.27 5.01 T 0.13 10.94 T 0.41 0.17 T 0.01 3.95 T 0.22 2.38 T 0.17 6.52 T 0.34
Yellow leaf stage 0.27 T 0.08 4.78 T 0.32 1.65 T 0.07 6.71 T 0.31 0.14 T 0.01 2.46 T 0.21 1.39 T 0.11 4.00 T 0.25
Roots Early leaf stage 0.71 T 0.01 8.74 T 0.28 14.37 T 0.55 23.83 T 1.52 0.71 T 0.02 7.70 T 0.34 10.21 T 0.46 18.63 T 0.82
Opened leaf stage 0.99 T 0.11 8.13 T 0.31 12.09 T 0.51 21.22 T 0.95 0.67 T 0.01 6.37 T 0.32 9.71 T 0.51 16.76 T 0.53
Flowering stage 0.92 T 0.05 8.20 T 0.41 12.22 T 0.51 22.34 T 1.29 0.67 T 0.05 6.90 T 0.21 9.38 T 0.42 16.96 T 0.61
Green berry stage 1.38 T 0.05 8.97 T 0.22 16.81 T 0.65 27.04 T 1.25 0.98 T 0.09 5.99 T 0.25 9.97 T 0.34 16.94 T 0.58
Red berry stage 1.40 T 0.08 11.07 T 0.38 17.73 T 0.42 30.21 T 1.41 1.23 T 0.07 6.33 T 0.26 10.03 T 0.44 17.60 T 0.64
Yellow leaf stage 1.60 T 0.11 11.43 T 0.24 19.63 T 0.96 32.68 T 1.29 0.96 T 0.04 7.83 T 0.25 12.53 T 0.38 21.33 T 0.96
CE-N, cold exposure naturally; CE-3, cold exposure 3 months.
Table 4
Comparison of the yields of ginsenosides (mg) in the leaves, stems, and roots at different growing stages of 3-year-old American ginseng between CE-N and CE-3
Leaves Early leaf stage 7.63 T 0.21 16.12 T 0.68 14.38 T 0.42 38.14 T 1.23 3.39 T 0.11 9.56 T 0.41 5.12 T 0.25 18.08 T 1.02
Opened leaf stage 10.13 T 0.24 16.77 T 0.31 15.19 T 0.64 42.10 T 2.19 6.39 T 0.38 13.61 T 0.66 9.21 T 0.23 29.21 T 1.54
Flowering stage 18.55 T 0.77 44.59 T 1.67 26.11 T 1.02 89.34 T 3.34 8.25 T 0.22 19.47 T 0.95 13.81 T 0.60 41.55 T 2.11
Green berry stage 10.86 T 0.32 51.38 T 1.95 37.95 T 1.24 100.20 T 3.76 4.63 T 0.31 31.79 T 18.53 T 0.79 54.96 T 2.68
Red berry stage 6.16 T 0.40 64.93 T 2.20 20.39 T 0.75 91.49 T 3.68 5.20 T 0.22 1.31 15.14 T 0.31 60.16 T 2.66
Yellow leaf stage 3.00 T 0.17 28.94 T 1.37 19.76 T 0.83 51.71 T 2.55 2.05 T 0.30 39.82 T 6.45 T 0.28 30.94 T 1.11
1.51
Stems Early leaf stage 0.35 T 0.09 4.32 T 0.21 4.56 T 0.31 9.24 T 0.32 0.29 T 0.02 2.72 T 0.03 5.71 T 0.22
22.44 T 0.98
Opened leaf stage 0.55 T 0.02 5.66 T 0.13 3.71 T 0.08 9.92 T 0.91 0.33 T 0.04 2.20 T 0.17 5.99 T 0.39
2.69 T 0.04
Flowering stage 0.62 T 0.06 5.30 T 0.15 4.83 T 0.21 10.76 T 0.41 0.23 T 0.01 2.52 T 0.11 6.08 T 0.24
3.45 T 0.19
Green berry stage 0.47 T 0.01 7.61 T 0.33 6.35 T 0.21 14.30 T 0.49 0.32 T 0.01 2.88 T 0.09 7.43 T 0.27
3.32 T 0.03
Red berry stage 0.54 T 0.07 8.50 T 0.36 7.65 T 0.14 16.70 T 0.69 0.23 T 0.05 3.08 T 0.13 8.46 T 0.34
4.22 T 0.17
Yellow leaf stage 0.39 T 0.08 5.73 T 0.21 3.15 T 0.13 9.28 T 0.58 0.18 T 0.03 1.71 T 0.14 4.99 T 0.28
5.13 T 0.08
Roots Early leaf stage 5.30 T 0.13 58.98 T 2.15 91.91 T 4.27 156.20 T 5.28 4.70 T 0.21 39.70 T 1.79 66.80 T 3.77 111.21 T 4.23
3.09 T 0.17
Opened leaf stage 7.92 T 0.24 64.92 T 2.38 96.58 T 3.79 169.47 T 8.11 4.82 T 0.25 43.28 T 2.01 66.08 T 2.71 114.19 T 4.76
Flowering stage 7.56 T 0.27 64.94 T 2.76 106.84 T 3.91 179.35 T 6.78 4.95 T 0.27 45.40 T 1.81 68.83 T 3.89 119.19 T 5.75
Green berry stage 11.60 T 0.37 75.10 T 2.23 140.75 T 3.99 226.42 T 8.01 6.49 T 0.25 47.48 T 2.01 69.24 T 2.81 123.22 T 4.69
Red berry stage 12.28 T 0.22 96.83 T 3.69 154.98 T 6.51 264.10 T 9.02 9.28 T 0.31 50.42 T 1.91 75.22 T 3.03 134.93 T 4.63
Yellow leaf stage 15.33 T 0.32 108.92 T 2.98 187.13 T 4.71 311.38 T 12.33 7.62 T 0.27 62.05 T 3.11 99.28 T 3.77 168.95 T 9.79
CE-N, cold exposure naturally; CE-3, cold exposure 3 months.
Table 6
Change of DNA methylation, ginsenosides yields and plant ontogeny characteristics after different cold exposure durations
Cold exposure duration Rhizomes Early leaves Final roots Plant ontogeny characteristics
Rhizomes are sampled at the end of Oct (CE-0), Nov (CE-1), Dec (CE-2), Jan (CE-3), Feb (CE-4), Mar (CE-N); early leaves are sampled at the fifth day after seedling
sprouted; final roots are sampled at the final plant harvest day on 8 October 2017.
A B
Fig. 1. Comparison of relative expression levels. (A) PqDDS genes and (B) PqFT genes in leaves during different developmental stages of 3-year-old American
ginseng between CE-3 and CE-N. 1, early leaf stage; 2, opened leaf stage; 3, flowering stage; 4, green berry stage; 5, red berry stage; 6, yellow leaf stage. CE-N, cold exposure naturally;
Please cite this article as: Hao M et al., Cold-induced ginsenosides accumulation is associated with the alteration in DNA methylation and
relative gene expression in perennial American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) along with its plant growth and development process,
Journal of Ginseng Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2019.06.006
CE-3, cold exposure 3 months. Vertical bars indicate the mean T standard error from three independent experiments.
Please cite this article as: Hao M et al., Cold-induced ginsenosides accumulation is associated with the alteration in DNA methylation and
relative gene expression in perennial American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) along with its plant growth and development process,
Journal of Ginseng Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2019.06.006
8 J Ginseng Res xxx (xxxx) xxx
Fl
Le
o
av we
es rs
Fig. 2. Schematic representation of proposed mechanism of cold-induced ginsenoside accumulation in perennial American ginseng. Along with the seasonal
changes in temperature, the 1-year-old to 2-year-old American ginseng, which are at the stage of plant vegetative growth, experience DNA demethylation, a lower level expression
of PqDDS, a small quantity of ginsenosides accumulation and then plant aerial parts wilted and remaining roots entered a winter dormant state with DNA methylation increasing.
However, the 3-year-old American ginseng, which is at the stage of plant reproductive growth, experience DNA demethylation, a higher levels expression of PqFT, a higher levels
expression of PqDDS, a large quantity of ginsenosides accumulation and then plant aerial parts wilted, and remaining roots entered a winter dormant state with DNA methylation
increasing. The cold temperature in winter plays a decisive role in both plant development and ginsenoside accumulation of American ginseng.
[6] Anderson RC, Anderson MR, Houseman G. Wild American ginseng. Native Plants J [15] Jochum GM, Mudge KW, Thomas RB. Elevated temperatures increase leaf
2002;3:93e105. senescence and root secondary metabolite concentration in the understory
[7] Kim JK, Tabassum N, Uddin MR, Park SU. Ginseng: a miracle sources of herbal herb Panax quinquefolius (Araliaceae). Am J Bot 2007;94:819e26.
and pharmacological uses. Orient Pharm Exp Med 2016;16:243e50. [16] Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s
[8] Liu Z, Wang CZ, Zhu XY, Wan JY, Zhang J, Li W, Ruan CC, Yuan CS. Dynamic Republic of China, vol. I. Beijing: China Medical Science Press; 2015.
changes in neutral and acidic ginsenosides with different cultivation ages and harvest [17] Zhang L, Xu YZ, Xiao XF, Chen J, Zhou XQ, Zhu WY, Dai Z, Zou XY. Develop-
seasons: identification of chemical characteristics for Panax ginseng quality ment of techniques for DNA-methylation analysis. Trends Anal Chem
control. Molecules 2017;22:734e48. 2015;72:114e22.
[9] Xiao D, Yue H, Xiu Y, Sun XL, Wang YB, Liu SY. Accumulation characteristics [18] Murray HG, Thompson WF. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA.
and correlation analysis of five ginsenosides with different cultivation ages from Nucleic Acids Res 1980;8:4321e5.
different regions. J Ginseng Res 2015;39:338e44. [19] Varriale A. DNA methylation in plants and its implications in development,
[10] Liu J, Quan XL, Jiang ML, Li XG, Quan LH, Wu SQ. Effect of cold stress on hybrid vigour, and evolution. In: Rajewsky N, Jurga S, Barciszewski J, editors.
expression characteristic of gene families of ginsenoside biosynthesis Plant epigenetics. RNA technologies. Springer international publishing AG; 2017. p.
pathway. Chin Trad Herb Drugs 2016;47:1956e61. 263e80.
[11] Jia GL, Huang LF, Suo FM, Song JY, Xie CX, Sun J. Correlation between gin- [20] Gady ALF, Alves CS, Nogueira FTS. Epigenetics in plant reproductive devel-
senoside contents in Panax ginseng roots and ecological factors, and opment: an overview from flowers to seeds. In: Rajewsky N, Jurga S, Barciszewski J,
ecological division of ginseng plantation in China. Chin J Plant Ecol 2012;36: editors. Plant epigenetics. RNA technologies. Springer inter- national publishing
302e12. AG; 2017. p. 329e58.
[12] Xie CX, Suo FM, Jia GL, Song JY, Huang LF, Chen SL. Correlation between [21] Lin JY, Hsieh TF. Epigenetic reprogramming during plant reproduction. In:
ecological factors and ginsenosides. Acta Ecol Sin 2011;3l:7551e63. Rajewsky N, Jurga S, Barciszewski J, editors. Plant epigenetics. RNA technol-
[13] Wu QS, Zhu RB, Wan ZH, Ding YP. The correlation between effective ogies. Springer international publishing AG; 2017. p. 405e26.
compo- nents of American ginseng and climatic factors. Acta Ecol Sin [22] Kim YK, Yang TJ, Kim SU, Park SU. Biochemical and molecular analysis of
2002;22:623e6. ginsenoside biosynthesis in Panax ginseng during flower and berry develop-
[14] Huang LF, Suo FM, Song JY, Wen MJ, Jia GL, Xie CX, Chen SL. Quality ment. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 2012;55:27e34.
variation and ecotype division of Panax quinquefolium in China. Acta Pharm Sin
2013;48:580e9.