Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Symposium
on Rock Hechantcs
June L983
LOGISTM
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Where stopes are to be filled with the
In the conceptual planning stages of a purpose of mining the pillars thereafter, the
tabular deposit, the rock mechanics pillar sizes are not as critical from a
practitioner is called upon to supply the size strength point of view since these will
of pillars, as well as the dimensions of the generally be bigger than those discussed above
stopes to be cut. purely from the point of developmentrequire-
ments. (However, the stability of development
Pillar design is reasonably well understood within the pillar becomescritical, but will
in terms of strength formulae. (l) Where rib not be discussed here).
and crown pillars are to be robbed, their size
should be such that they just remain stable In summary, pillar design is reasonably
until blasted; the design therefore is well understood with the uniaxial compressive
critical. strength of the rock massas the essential
input requirement.
687
In deciding on the dimensions of the stope,
the rock mechanics practitioner has not got an
accepted design procedure. This aspect is
generally discussed in the literature (2, 3,
4,) bu• no definite guidelines are given which
could be used in the planning stages of a
future mine. One of the reasons could be that
in the case of massive deposits, all the stope
walls consist of ore, and any material falling
into the stope has no significant influence on
z
the grade; the main difficulty is secondary
blasting at the drawpoints.
•o
However, stope dimensions become critical
where the orebody is relatively narrow (+ 10 •J z
688
EQD
• 80 ß
ß
• 60 ß
I0 20 30 40 50 60
SPAN-- METRES
689
Two of the three systemswere invest- It is concluded that the empirical method
igated andcompared
by Brumleve(7) whofound offers the greatest chance of success.
that the correlation between the systems
In order to arrive at some comparable
developed by Bieniawski and Barton are results it is recommended that
reasonably
reliable. He further givesa list
of advantagesand disadvantagesof both
systemsas foundin practice. The Q-system l) the Q-system of classification be used
was selected by the author as it wasfoundto
be practical and fast to use. 2) the rock mass description be confined to
the i•nediate vicinity of the orebody (and
With a description of the rock mass the orebody itself) say 10 metres either side
in 1 metre intervals.
quality, the next step in the design
procedure
is to obtaina valuefor the loading Acknowledgement
conditions. Howeversince we are not in a
position to calculate thesethe only apparent The author wishes to thank the Management
practical solutionto the problemis to use of AnglovaalLimited for permissionto publish
empirical data.
this paper.
Againreferring to the example
givenfor
block cavingoperations, the overall rock mass REFERENCES
rating, within whicha sublevelstoping
operationcanbe considered,shouldbe Pariseau William, G., 1982, Shear stability of
defined.
mine pillars in dipping seams: 23rd US
Symposium in Rock Mechanics pp. 1077-1090.
This rating mustthenagainbe subdivided
in terms of spanat which failure will Brady, Barry H.G., 1981, Determination of
commence.
stability of underground mine structures":
The abovementioned will make it possible Conference on the desig• and question of
to predict the onset of dilution, but not the cavingandsublevelstopingmines,
amount. Denver pp. 427-436.
In order to be able to predict the amount Alexander, E.S. and Fabjanczyk N.W., 1981,
of dilution it is necessary to subdivide the Extraction designing open stopes for
hangingwall and footwall in 1 m intervals and pillar recovery in the 1100 orebody at
the Q-value for each individual metre is Mount Isa: Conference on the design and
plotted on separate plans for hangingwall and operation of caving and sublevel stoping
footwall. The purpose of this plot is to mines, Denver pp. 437-458.
delineate weak areas in the in•nediate stope
sidewall, and also to determine of how much is Alexander, L.G., Maconochie, D.J.,
likely to collapse into the stope. Matthews, S.M. and Tillman, V.H., 1981,
Observations and analysis of rock
All the abovementioned data must be deformation around some open stopes:
available in the planning stages i.e. data Conference on design and operation of
must be obtained from the prospect boreholes. caving and sublevel stoping mines,
Without this detail it will be difficult to Denver pp. 483-498.
decide whether a sublevel stoping operation is
feasable within the parameters stipulated. Folinsbee, J.C. and Clarke, R.W.D., 1981,
Selecting a Mining method: Conference on
CONCLUSIONS Design and operation of caving and
sublevel stoping mines, Denver pp. 55-65.
The importance of estimating the amount of
dilution to be expected in a sublevel stoping Laubscher, D.H., 1981, Selection of Mass
operation has been pointed out and the ways underground mining methods: Conference on
and means of doing this in the past have been design and operation of caving and
discussed. sublevel mines, Denver pp. 23-38.
Unfortunately this discussion has not Brumleve, Charles B. and Maier, Michael M.,
provided answers but suggestions are made of 1981, Applied investigations of rock mass
how to possibly solve one of the major response to panel caving, Henderson mine,
problems facing the profession until such Colorado U.S.A.: Conference on Design and
time when discontinuous media can be handled operation of caving and sublevel stoping
in a practical manner analytically. Mines, Denver pp. 223-249.
690