DUQM REFINERY PROJECT – EPC PACKAGE 2 QUALITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Revision History

Amendment Revision Amender

Amendment
Date Number Initials

30/07/2018 O1 CC NA

23/09/2018 O2 CC Revised with Company comments incorporated

19/11/2018 B1 CC Issued for Design

Related Documents

Document Number Document Name Description of Content

NA

Holds

Section Number Short Description of Hold

NIL

Definitions and Abbreviations

Term Comment

NA

DRP001-OUF-GMD-Q-000-502 Page 2 of 3 Rev. B1

 Duqm Refinery Project
EPC Package 2 – Utilities and Offsites
Contract No. CNT-1100-1000-007

QUALITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rev. B1

Project No.: JI-2037/SO0267 Month-Year:
Reporting Cumulative Traffic light
Sl.No KPI description Measuring Unit Target Method of measurement Record / Report Responsibility This month Cumulative
frequency (previous month) indication

Quality - HO

1 Vendor Quality Document Review Cycle Time % >80% within 2 weeks % of documents reviewed within 2 weeks vs. Documents Received Monthly QA/QC Report PQM Monthly

2 NCR Response ( For Client NCRs ) % >80% within 1 week No of NCRs responded with proposed corrective actions Monthly QA/QC Report PQM Monthly

Rejection Status at vendors & Site Due to

3 % <1% % rejections vs. inspected items Monthly QA/QC Report PQM Monthly
Quality Shortcoming ( other than ESDR)

IRN within 5 working days of receipt of all IR and supplier documents such
as MTCs & Packing list .
4 Timely IRN Release % >90% Monthly QA/QC Report PQM Monthly
(IRNs on Hold due to Incomplete documentation and Documents with
Quality Issues are not to be considered)

Number of vendor documents approved in code-1 within 2nd revision vs.

5 Vendor Quality document approval (Code-1) % >85% by Second revision Monthly QA/QC Report PQM Monthly
number of vendor documents approved in code-1 after 2nd revision

Inspections visits aborted due to lack of Number of Inspection visits aborted Vs Number of Inspection visits carried
6 % <1% Inspection visits Monthly QA/QC Report PQM Monthly
readiness out
Site Construction Quality
1 Weld Rejections
% weld Joints rejected vs. Weld joints RT tested ( Reshoot joints shall not
1.1 CS Pipeline % Max 5% Joint wise Monthly QA/QC Report Site QC Manager Monthly
be considered )

% weld Joints rejected vs. Weld joints RT tested ( Reshoot joints shall not
1.2 CS Pipeline % Max 1% Linear wise Monthly QA/QC Report Site QC Manager Monthly
be considered )

For Fabshop Max 1% Joint wise % weld Joints rejected vs. Weld joints RT tested ( Reshoot joints shall not
1.3 Utility Piping For Fabshops and Site % Monthly QA/QC Report Site QC Manager Monthly
For Site Max 3% Joint wise be considered )

% weld Linear length rejected vs. Total Linear Weld length RT tested
1.4 Utility Piping % Max 0.5 % Linear Monthly QA/QC Report Site QC Manager Monthly
( Reshoot joints shall not be considered )

% of RFIs rejected vs. RFIs raised

2 Inspection Rejections (RFIs) % Max 2 % Monthly QA/QC Report Site QC Manager Monthly
(Excluding cancellations and postponements)

3 NDE Backlog % Max 10 % No of Joints Radiographed Vs No of Joints offered for Radiographed Monthly QA/QC Report Site QC Manager Monthly

For CS - Utility
150 (Rating) - Max. 5.5 %
300/600 - Max. 11 %
For CS Process -All other services
Excess RT Percentage (for Fabshops and Site 150/600 - Max 11 % Actual % of RT taken for the material type/ Pipe class Vs Specified RT %
4 % Monthly QA/QC Report Site QC Manager Monthly
) For Stainless Steel ( RT taken on Repairs/Reshoot joints shall not be considered )
150 (Rating ) - Max. 5.5 %
300 (Rating) - Max 11 %
Jacketing
Circumferential Seams (All ratings)- 10.5%

No of Hydro tests failed Vs No of Hydro tests performed

5 Hydro test Failures at Project Site % 0% ( Leaks from gaskets/ temperory joints are not considered . Monthly QA/QC Report Site QC Manager Monthly
Leakages from Bare body is considered as failure in Hydro test )

LEGEND:
Meeting the Target
Warning
Not Meeting the Target

DRP001-OUF-GMD-Q-000-502 Page 3 of 3 Rev. B1