Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TllKlClMlE
ELSEVI ER Aquatic Toxicology 57 (2002) 39 49 www.elsevicr.com~locatc~ayuatox
Abstract
Belcws Lake, North Carolina was contwminated by selenium in wastewater from a coal-fired power plant during
the mid-1970s. and toxic impacts to the resident fish community (20 species) were studied for over two decades.
Symptoms of chronic selcnitun poisoning in Belews Lake fish included, (1) tclangiectasia (swelling) of gill lamellae; (2)
elevated lymphocytes; (3) reduced hematocrit and hemoglobin (anemia); (4) cornea1 cataracts; (5) exopthalmus
(popeye); (6) pathological alterations in liver, kidney, heart, and ovary (e.g. vacuolization of parenchymal hepato-
cytes, intracapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis. severe pericarditis and myocarditis, necrotic and ruptured
mature egg follicles); (7) reproductive failure (reduced production of viable eggs due to ovarian pathology, and
post-hatch mortality due to bioaccumulation of selenium in eggs): and (8) teratogenic deformities of the spine, head,
mouth, and fins. Important principles of selenium cycling and toxicity were documented in the Belews Lake studies.
Selenium poisoning in fish can be ‘invisible’, because, the primary point of impact is the egg, which receives selenium
from the female’s diet (whether consumed in organic or inorganic forms), anti stores it until hatching, whereupon it
is metabolized by the developing fish. If concentrations in eggs are great enough (about 10 p&/g or greater)
biochemical functions may be disrupted. and tcratogenic deformity and death may occur. Adult fish can survive and
appear healthy despite the fact that extensive reproductive failure is occurring- 19 of the 20 species in Belews Lake
were eliminated as a result of this insidious mode of toxicity. Bioaccumulation in aquatic food chains causes otherwise
harmless concentrations of selenium to reach toxic levels, and the selenium in contaminated sediments can be cycled
into food chains for ciecades. The ~CSSOIIS learned ii-0111 Belews Lake provide information useful for protecting aquatic
ecosystems as new sclenitm~ issues etncrge. ‘0 2002 Elsevicr Science B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
3.4. E,wr
A
4. 1Scological implications
60
Deformed
50
fish
(%I
40
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
l-‘ig. IO. Relationship between whole-body concentrations of selenium and prevalence of tcratogenic deformities in the fish
community of Rclcws Lake, NC, during the period 1975 1996. Lines represent the best fit exponential function (cubic model,
r’ = 0.881) for plots of data from all lish species combined.
changes in population structure associated with charge into the lake (1974-1985). Highest
elevated selenium (Cumbie and Van Horn, l978), concentrations of selenium were found in fish,
it was far too late to prevent the fishery from followed by benthic macroinvertebrates, plank-
collapsing. ton, and periphyton. The planktonic and detrital
food pathways exposed fish to potential dietary
concentrations of selenium that were some 770
and 510~- 1395 times the waterborne exposure,
Selenium bioaccumulated in the aquatic food
respectively.
chains of Mews Lake and caused severe repro-
Of the 20 species of fish originally present in
ductive failure in fish (Cumbie and V:m Horn,
1978; Lemly, 1985). Concentrations of selenium in Belews Lake, 19 were effectively rendered sterile,
the lake water averaged IO CL&/I (uncontaminated because of reproductive failure. Some persisted as
reference locations had selenium concentrations adults for a few years, but eventually all 19 were
< 1 @I), but were accumulated from 519 times eliminated. Only one of the original resident spe-
(periphyton) to 3975 times (visceral tissue of fish) cies, the seieniurn-tolerant mosquitofish (Grzmlzl-
in the biota. The pattern and degree of accumula- sic/ cifj5ni.y Baird and Girard) survived relatively
tion were essentially complete within 2 years after unaffected, along with two introduced cyprinids.
the initial operation of the power plant, and per- The fishery was decimated without massive fish
sisted throughout the period of selenium dis- kills, because of the subtle, yet lethal mechanism
by which selenium impacts can occur. The severe ganisms were sufficient to cause mortality in
toxic impacts in Belews Lake took place even young bluegill and other centrarchids, because
though concentrations of waterborne selenium of Winter Stress Syndrome, which is a substan-
were only IO-20 times those in nearby uncontam- tial (up to 33%) increase in the sensitivity of fish
inated reservoirs; the flora and fauna contained to selenium during cold weather (Lemly, 1993b,
about lo-50 times as much selenium. 1996).At the ecosystem level, recovery in Belews
Lake was very slow, with impacts on fish repro-
4.3. Persistence i7f impucts duction evident 10 years after the input of sele-
nium stopped (Lemly, 1997). The low inflow of
In response to concerns about the fishery water and long retention time (volume replace-
problems in Belews Lake the electric utility ment time about 1500 days), combined with low
company switched to a dry-ash handling system productivity (oligotrophic), tend to reduce natu-
that disposed the waste in a landfill rather than ral flushing and enhance recycling of selenium
a wet-basin. By late 1986, selenium-laden within the reservoir. Projections indicate that
wastewater no longer entered the lake (NCDN- several more decades may be necessary for the
RCD, 1986), and in subsequent years a stocking ecosystem to fully recover (Lemly, 1997). The
program was successful in re-establishing adult latent effects occurred, because, selenium per-
populations of sport fish (e.g. centrarchids such sisted in sediments, where it was mobilized
as largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides Lace- through the food chain gradually, yet continu-
pede, and bluegill Lepomis mcrcrochirzu ally, and accumulated to toxic levels in fish
Rafinesque). Follow-up studies were conducted eggs. Impacts to reproduction persisted even
in 1996 to assess recovery of the ecosystem in though adult populations were re-established
Belews Lake (Lemly, 1997). Selenium concentra- through a stocking program.
tions and associated impacts to fish were mea-
sured and compared with pre-1986 conditions to
determine how much change occurred during 5. Conclusions
the decade since selenium inputs stopped. Find-
ings were also examined using a hazard assess- The findings from Belews Lake serve as clear
ment protocol (Lemly, 1995) to determine if evidence of how selenium can rapidly, yet insidi-
ecosystem-level hazards to fish and aquatic birds ously, impact fish populations. Moreover, this
had changed as well. Results showed that water- case example demonstrates that selenium can ac-
borne selenium fell from a peak of 20 pg/l be- cumulate and be biologically magnified to toxic
fore 1986, to < 1 pg/l in 1996; concentrations in levels when waterborne concentrations are only
biota were 85-95% lower in 1996. Hazard rat- 5- 10 pg/l. This information was instrumental in
ings indicated that high hazard existed prior to the US Enviromnental Protection Agency’s deci-
1986 and that moderate hazard was still present sion to lower the US national water quality
in 1996, primarily due to selenium in the sedi- criterion for selenium from 35 to 5 pg/l
ment-detrital food pathway. Concentrations of (USEPA, 1987).
selenium in sediments fell by about 65.-75% In the United States, anthropogenic distur-
during the period but remained sufficiently ele- bances have greatly increased the likelihood that
vated (l-4 pg/g) to contaminate benthic food aquatic ecosystems will experience elevated sele-
organisms of fish and aquatic birds. Field evi- nium. From the 1960s through the 198Os, two
dence confirmed the validity of the high hazard disturbances stood apart as the major human-re-
ratings. Developmental abnormalities in young lated causes of selenium mobilization on a re-
fish persisted in 1996, indicating that selenium- gional and national scale. These were, (1)
induced teratogenesis and reproductive impair- combustion of fossil fuels; and (2) agricultural
ment were still occurring. Moreover, the irrigation of seleniferous soils in arid and semi-
concentrations of selenium in benthic food or- arid regions (Lemly, 1985; Lemly et al., 1993~).
During the 199Os, other issues have emerged as S e l e n i u m p o i s o n i n g i n f i s h e s . Proceedings of the
Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 36, 519
potentially important factors in the mobilization
522.
and bioaccumulation of hazardous concentrations Ganthcr, H.E., 1974. Biochemistry of selenium. In: Zingaro.
of selenium, including, (1) phosphate mining; (2) R.A., Cooper, W.C. (Eds.), Selenium. Van Nostrand Rcin-
use of constructed wetlands to treat selenium- hold. New York, NY. pp. 546 614.
laden wastewater; (3) accumulation of animal Lemly. A.D.. 1985. Toxicology of selenium in a freshwater
rcscrvoir: implications for environmental hazard evalua-
waste at livestock feedlots and intensive rearing
tion and safety. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
facilities; and (4) landfill disposal of ash from IO, 314 338.
coal-fired power plants. These new selenium Lemly, A.D., Finger, S.E., Nelson, M.K., 1993. Sources and
threats may be sufficient to cause widespread, impacts of irrigation dl-ainwater contaminants in arid wct-
unihrseen impacts on fish populations (Lemly, lands. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 12,
1999). Lessons learned from Belews Lake regard- 2265 2279.
Lemly, A.D., 1993a. Teratogenic effects of selenium in natural
ill& the mode, rate, and persistence of selenium
populations of freshwater fish. Ecotoxicology and Environ-
toxicity provide a foundation for protecting mental Safety 26, I81 -204.
aquatic ecosystems as new selenium issues emerge Lcmly, A.D., 1993b. Metabolic stress during winter increases
in the USA and elsewhere. the toxicity of selenium to fish. Aquatic Toxicology 27,
133 158.
Lemly, A.D., 1995. A protocol for aquatic hazard assessment
of selenium. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 32,
280 288.
Acknowledgements
L e m l y , A.D.. 1 9 9 6 . W i n t e r S t r e s s S y n d r o m e : A n i m -
portant consideration for hazard assessment of aquatic
I am indebted to the Department of Biology at pollutants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 34,
Wake Forest University for facilities and technical 223 227.
support that allowed me to investigate the land- Lemly, A.D., 1997. Ecosystem recovery following selenium
contamination in a freshwater reservoir. Ecotoxicology and
mark selenium pollution event at Belews Lake,
Environmental Safety 36, 275 --281.
North Carolina. In particular, the assistance of Lemly, A.D., 1999. Selenium impacts on fish: an insidious time
Michael Riggs and John Foil, Jr came at a pivotal bomb. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 5. 1139-
time and produced field data which became the 1151.
cornerstone for understanding selenium bioaccu- NCDNRCD (North Carolina Department of Natural Re-
mulation and toxicity in fish. The Media Produc- sources and Community Development), 1986. North Caro-
lina Water Quality Standards Documentation: the
tion Service’s PhotoGraphics Lab at Virginia
freshwater chemistry and toxicity of selenium with an
Tech University prepared illustrations. emphasis on its effects in North Carolina. Report number
86-02. NCDNRCD. Raleigh, NC, USA.
O’Toolc. D.. Rnisbeck, M.F., 1998. Magic nulnbers, elusive
lesions: comparative pathology and toxicology of selenosis
eferences in waterfowl and mammalian species. In: Frankenberger,
W.T. Jr, Engberg, R.A. (Eds.), Environmental Chemistry
Coylc. J.J.. Buckler, D.R.. Ingersoll, C.G.. Fairchild. J.F.. of Selenium. Marcel Dckker, New York, USA, pp. 355
May. T.W.. 1993. Efl>cta of dietary selenium on the 395.
ireproductive success o f hlucgills (Lc/~~mis rl~rrcr.oc/fi~r/.r). Reddy, C.C., Massnro, E.J., 1983. Biochemistry of selenium:
E n v i r o n m e n t a l T o x i c o l o g y a n d C’hcmistry 12, 55 I an overview. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 3,
565. 431 436.
(‘nmbie. P.M., Van I Iorn, S.L., 1978. Selenium accumulation Shearer. T.R.. David, L.L., Anderson, R.S., 1987. Selenite
associated with fish mortality and reproductive failure. cataract: a review. Current Eye Research 6, 289 300.
Proceedings of the Annual Confer-cnce of the Southeastern Sorensen, E.M.B., 1986. The effects of selenium on freshwater
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 3 2 , 6 1 2 telcosts. In: Hodgson, E. (Ed.). Reviews in Environmental
624. Toxicology 2. Elscvier, New York, NY, USA, pp. 59.
Diplock. AT., liockstra, W.G., 1976. Metabolic aspects of 116.
sclcnium action and toxicity. CRC Critical Reviews in Sorensen, E.M.B., Cumbie, P.M., Bauer, T.L., Bell, J.S., Har-
Toxicology 5, 271 329. lan, C.W.. 1984. ~iistopathological, hematological, condi-
Ellis. M.M., Motley. H.L., Ellis. M.D., Jones, R.O.. 1937. tion-factor, and organ weight changes associated with
selenium accumulation in fish from Relews Lake, North nal of the American Organic Chemistry Society 61, IX91
Carolina. Archives of Environmental Contamination and 1900.
Toxicology 13, I53 162. USEPA (US Enviromnental Protection Agency), 19X7. Ambi-
Stadtman, T.C., 1974. Selenium biochemistry. Science 183. ent Water Quality Criteria for Selenium 1987. EPA-44O!
OIS--922. S - 8 7 - 0 0 6 . USEPA, Office of Water Regulations and
Sun&, R.A., 1984. The biochemistry of selenoproteins. Jour- Standards. Washington. DC, USA.