Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(a)
Oct. 1 Cash ($6,000 + $780) ............................................ 6,780
Sales ............................................................. 6,000
Sales Tax Payable ($6,000 × 13%) .............. 780
(b)
Oct. 1 Cash ($6,000 + $899) ............................................ 6,899
Sales ............................................................. 6,000
Sales Tax Payable [($6,000 × 5%) +
($6,000 × 9.975%)] .................................... 899
LO 1 BT: AP Difficulty: S Time: 10 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
(a)
Apr. 30 Property Tax Expense ($36,000 ÷ 12 × 4)................. 12,000
Property Tax Payable ........................................ 12,000
(b)
July 15 Property Tax Payable ................................................ 12,000
Property Tax Expense ($36,000 ÷ 12 × 2.5).............. 7,500
Prepaid Property Tax ($36,000 ÷ 12 × 5.5) ............... 16,500
Cash .................................................................. 36,000
(c)
Dec. 31 Property Tax Expense ............................................... 16,500
Prepaid Property Tax ........................................ 16,500
LO 1 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 10 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
BRIEF EXERCISE 10-3
(a) Aug. 24 Salaries Expense ................................................... 15,000
Employee Income Tax Payable .................... 6,258
CPP Payable................................................. 743
EI Payable..................................................... 282
Cash ($15,000 – $6,258 – $743 – $282) ...... 7,717
a) The advantage of the fixed interest rate option is that the rate will not change
during the 10-year period, regardless of what happens to interest rates in the
future. One could view this feature as a disadvantage in that a decline in interest
rates will not result in a reduction of interest costs. In order to lock in the interest
rate for such a long period of time, the monthly instalment payment and the
amount of interest is higher.
The disadvantage of the fixed interest rate option becomes the advantage of the
floating interest rate option. When interest rates decline, the loan interest and the
monthly instalment payment are reduced. The disadvantage is that if interest
rates increase, the opposite will occur.
b) Students generally have limited income upon graduation and so the additional
risk of possible increases in instalment payments for student loans should be
avoided. The fixed interest rate is recommended. Alternately, choosing the
floating rate makes the initial monthly payments smaller, during the time when
earnings may be at their lowest. As long as rates do not increase too much, it
could be the less expensive alternative.
LO 2 BT: AN Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
BRIEF EXERCISE 10-7
(b) The current portion of the note at the end of period 3 is the amount of principal
reduction in the next year (period 4), which is $10,000. This leaves $10,000
($20,000 less current portion of $10,000) as the non-current portion of the debt.
LO 2 BT: AP Difficulty: C Time: 15 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
BRIEF EXERCISE 10-8
(a) [1] $50,000 × 7% = $3,500
[2] $12,195 fixed cash payment
[3] $12,195 [2] – $2,891 = $9,304 or $41,305 – $32,001
[4] $12,195 fixed cash payment
[5] $12,195 [4] – $9,955 = $2,240 or $32,001 × 7%
[6] $32,001 – $9,955 = $22,046
[7] $12,195 fixed cash payment
[8] $12,195 [7] – $1,543 = $10,652 or $22,046 [6] – $11,394 = $10,652
[9] $12,195 fixed cash payment
[10] $11,394 – $11,394 = $0
(b) The current portion of the note at the end of period 3 is the amount of principal
reduction in the next year (period 4), which is $10,652 [8]. This leaves $11,394
($22,046 [6] less current portion of $10,652) as the non-current portion of the
debt.
LO 2 BT: AP Difficulty: C Time: 15 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
BRIEF EXERCISE 10-9
(a) Fixed principal payment
(B) (C)
(A) Interest Reduction of (D)
Monthly Cash Expense Principal Principal
Interest Payment (D) × 4% ÷ ($300,000 ÷ Balance
Period (B) + (C) 12 months 120) (D) ̶ (C)
Nov. 30, 2017 $300,000
Dec. 31, 2017 $3,500 $1,000 $2,500 297,500
Jan. 31, 2018 3,492 992 2,500 295,000
2017
Nov. 30 Cash ......................................................................... 300,000
Mortgage Payable ............................................ 300,000
2018
Jan. 31 Interest Expense ....................................................... 992
Mortgage Payable ..................................................... 2,500
Cash ................................................................. 3,492
BRIEF EXERCISE 10-9 (CONTINUED)
(b) Blended principal and interest payment
(B)
Interest (C) (D)
Monthly (A) Expense Reduction Principal
Interest Cash (D) × 4% ÷ of Principal Balance
Period Payment 12 mos. (A) – (B) (D) – (C)
Nov. 30, 2017 $300,000
Dec. 31, 2017 $3,037 $1,000 $2,037 297,963
Jan. 31, 2018 3,037 993 2,044 295,919
01476.73 22,000
2017
Nov. 30 Cash .................................................................. 300,000
Mortgage Payable ..................................... 300,000
2018
Jan. 31 Interest Expense ................................................ 993
Mortgage Payable .............................................. 2,044
Cash .......................................................... 3,037
LO 2 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 10 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
BRIEF EXERCISE 10-10
a. Non-current liability
b. Current liability
c. Current liability
d. Neither – any unused portion is not a liability and no balance is outstanding but
line of credit limits should be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements
e. Current liability
f. Neither – obligations are reported in the notes to the financial statements
g. Non-current liability
h. Current liability
i. Neither – current asset
j. Current liability for the $5,000 due next year. The remaining $70,000 balance is a
non-current liability.
k. Neither – because the outcome has a remote probability, it is neither recorded nor
disclosed
LO 3 BT: K Difficulty: S Time: 10 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
(in $ millions)
(b) Although Fromage’s debt to total assets ratio improved in 2018, its times interest
earned ratio deteriorated. Fromage’s overall solvency appears to have
deteriorated because even though liabilities relative to assets has fallen, the
company is generating less income before income tax and interest relative to its
interest expense than it did in the prior year.
(b) Interest expense on the first semi-annual interest payment = bond carrying
amount x effective interest rate x 6/12
$192,000 x 7% x 6/12 = $6,720
(c) The semi-annual interest payment based on the coupon rate of 6% x face value
of the bonds x 6/12 = $200,000 x 6% x 6/12 = $6,000
The amortization of the bond discount is $6,720 less $6,000 or $720
The amortization of the bond discount is added to the bond carrying amount of
$192,000 making the carrying amount after the first interest payment $192,720.
LO 4 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 10 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
*BRIEF EXERCISE 10-14
(a) The proceeds received from the issue of the bonds = face value of the bonds X
price.
$100,000 x 109 = $109,000
(b) Interest expense on the first semi-annual interest payment = bond carrying
amount x effective interest rate x 6/12
$109,000 x 3% x 6/12 = $1,635
(c) The semi-annual interest payment based on the coupon rate of 5% x face value
of the bonds x 6/12 = $100,000 x 5% x 6/12 = $2,500
The amortization of the bond premium is $2,500 less $1,635 or $865
The amortization of the bond premium is deducted from the bond carrying
amount of $109,000 making the carrying amount after the first interest payment
$108,135.
LO 4 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 10 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
*BRIEF EXERCISE 10-15
(a) Key inputs: Future value (FV) = $500,000
Market interest rate (i) = 2.5% (5% × 6/12)
Interest payment (PMT) = $15,000 ($500,000 × 6% × 6/12)
Number of semi-annual periods (n) = 10 (5 years × 2)
Note to the instructor: Rounding discrepancies may arise depending on whether present
value tables, calculators, or spreadsheet programs are used to determine the present
value.
LO 4 BT: AP Difficulty: C Time: 15 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
*BRIEF EXERCISE 10-16
(a) CARVEL CORP.
Bond Premium Amortization
LO 4 BT: AP Difficulty: C Time: 10 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
*BRIEF EXERCISE 10-17
(a)
Jan. 1 Cash ............................................................ 521,881
Bonds Payable .................................... 521,881
(b)
Jan. 1 Cash ............................................................ 500,000
Bonds Payable .................................... 500,000
(a)
Mar. 17 Cash ............................................................. 56,000
Sales .................................................... 50,000
Sales Tax Payable ($2,500 + $3,500) .. 6,000
(b)
Dec. 31 Property Tax Expense .................................. 26,400
Prepaid Property Tax ........................... 26,400
(c)
April 1 Bank Loan Payable ........................................... 100,000
Interest Payable ................................................ 1,000
Interest Expense ............................................... 1,000
Cash ......................................................... 102,000
LO 1 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 20 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10-5
(a) and (b)
Issue of Mortgage
LO 2 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10-5 (CONTINUED)
(a) and (b) (continued)
(c) Interest expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 is the same
amount of $3,750 whether the payment is blended or based on fixed principal
payments because for this first period, the amount of the principal balance of the
loan is the same, at the initial amount of $150,000. Once the six-month period is
completed, the principal balance of the mortgage payable on which interest
charges are applied changes by a different amount based on whether the
principal payment is fixed or is blended with interest, based on the repayment
terms of the loan. Thereafter, the interest expense will differ under the two
approaches.
LO 2 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10-7
(a) This is a blended principal and interest payment schedule, as the cash payment is
constant at $23,097.48 each year.
EXERCISE 10-9
($ in thousands)
(1) Based only on the current ratio, Fruition’s liquidity is improving in 2018.
There are proportionately more current assets to pay the current liabilities.
(2) To make a proper assessment, information concerning the due dates for the
liabilities and the type of current assets that make up the remaining assets
would need to be scrutinized. For example, if current assets consisted
mainly of cash rather than inventory, we would conclude that the company
had greater liquidity. Knowing the quality of receivables and the turnover of
the inventory would be useful.
Before:
$4,744
= 1.6:1
$3,011
After:
$4,744 - $1,000
= 1.9:1
$3,011 - $1,000
Paying off the $1 million improves Fruition’s current ratio from 1.6:1 to 1.9:1. This
is because $1 million represents a greater percentage of the denominator than it
does the numerator. The greater percentage decrease to the denominator makes
the ratio rise.
EXERCISE 10-9 (CONTINUED)
(c) Having access to an operating line of credit means that cash is available
on a short-term basis and therefore the assessment of the company’s short-term
liquidity is better than it first appeared. Although the ability to access cash
improves the liquidity position, it does not necessarily mean that drawing down
the operating line of credit will improve the current ratio. If the unused line of
credit were to be fully drawn down, Fruition’s current assets would increase by
the addition of $4 million of cash. At the same time, the current liabilities would
increase by the addition of a $4 million bank loan payable. As is demonstrated in
the calculation below, the current ratio would deteriorate to 1.2:1.
$4,744 + $4,000
= 1.2:1
$3,011 + $4,000
LO 3 BT: AN Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001, cpa-t005
CM: Reporting and Finance
EXERCISE 10-10
($ in millions)
(a)
2014
$2,258
Debt to total assets = = 57.9%
$3,900
2015
$2,559
Debt to total assets = = 58.3%
$4,388
(b) Having access to an operating line of credit means that cash is available
on a short-term basis. None of the total line of credit available in the amount of
$300 million has been drawn down at the date of the financial statements. Since
no liability exists at the end of the year, only a note disclosure of the available
operating line of credit will be needed.
LO 3 BT: AN Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
PROBLEM 10-1A
(a) (continued)
(c)
MOLEGA LTD.
Statement of Financial Position (partial)
March 31, 2018
Current liabilities
Accounts payable ($42,500 – $10,000 – $30,000).................. $ 2,500
Notes payable ......................................................................... 10,000
Unearned revenue ($15,000 – $11,300) ................................. 3,700
Employee income tax payable ($5,515 – $5,515 + $5,870) .... 5,870
Property tax payable ............................................................... 4,500
Sales tax payable ($5,800 + $5,200 + $1,300 - $5,800) ......... 6,500
CPP payable ($2,680 – $2,680 + $792 + $792) ...................... 1,584
EI payable ($1,123 – $1,123 + $301 + $421) .......................... 722
Interest payable ....................................................................... 50
Total current liabilities .................................................. $35,426
LO 1,3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 30 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
PROBLEM 10-4A
(a)
Interest
Semi-annual Cash Expense Reduction of Principal
Interest Period Payment 6.5% × 6/12 Principal Balance
(b) 2017
June 30 Cash ......................................................... 700,000
Mortgage Payable ........................... 700,000
(c) 2017;
Dec. 31 Interest Expense....................................... 22,750
Mortgage Payable .................................... 25,395
Cash ................................................ 48,145
2018
June 30 Interest Expense....................................... 021,925
Mortgage Payable .................................... 26,220
Cash ................................................ 48,145
(d)
STARLIGHT GRAPHICS LTD.
Statement of Financial Position (Partial)
June 30, 2018
Current liabilities
Current portion of mortgage payable ............................... $ 55,024*
Non-current liabilities
Mortgage payable ............................................................ 0593,361
*($27,072 + $27,952) = $55,024
LO 2,3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 40 min. AACSB: Analytic CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
PROBLEM 10-7A
(a)
2015 2014
(in millions)
5. Times
interest earned $613+$237+$73 = 12.6 times $534+$225+$69 = 12.0 times
$73 $69
PROBLEM 10-7A (CONTINUED)
(b) Saputo’s current ratio has improved significantly and is more in line with industry
averages in 2015. The receivables turnover ratio also improved from 12.9 times
in 2014 to 13.4 times in 2015 and now matches the industry average. The
inventory turnover improved as well from 7.7 times in 2014 to 7.9 times in 2015.
In this respect, Saputo is well ahead of industry averages. This means that
Saputo is collecting its receivables and moving its inventory more quickly in 2015
than in 2014. Improvements in the receivable and inventory turnover ratios likely
lead to the improvement in the current ratio in 2015 because as the turnovers
improved, cash was collected faster and used to pay down current liabilities. It is
the reduction in the denominator of this ratio that caused the most significant
change in the current ratio increase in 2015. . Overall, Saputo’s 2015 liquidity
ratios are quite healthy.
During 2015, Saputo’s debt to total assets ratio improved from 55.3% in 2014 to
46.6% in 2015. The company’s times interest earned ratio also improved. In
comparison to the industry average, Saputo is carrying less debt compared to
total assets (partly due to the lower current liabilities mentioned in the previous
paragraph), and its times interest earned ratio is significantly higher. This
indicates that the company appears to be earning more than enough net income
to make the required debt interest payments or the majority of the debt is non-
interest bearing. Therefore, there do not appear to be any significant concerns
regarding Saputo’s solvency in 2015.
(c) Saputo has secured a line of credit that helps it through short-term liquidity
problems during its operating cycle. The fact that it has used only 15% of the
$1.1 billion line of credit as of the end of 2015 demonstrates that it is not in great
need of cash to meet its obligations. Saputo is ready to take advantage of
opportunities that may come up in the future that would require significant
amounts of cash. As for the rise in the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar
in 2015, this has a detrimental effect on Saputo as the business must purchase
U.S. dollars to repay the debt. In addition, balances for any U.S. dollar debt
would be reported at higher exchange rates as of the date on the statement of
financial position.
PROBLEM 10-7A (CONTINUED)
(a) When reviewing the liquidity ratios for the two companies, it would appear that
Sun-Oil is less liquid than Petro-Zoom. Sun-Oil has a lower current ratio than
Petro-Zoom. Although it is turning its receivables over faster than Petro-Zoom,
Petro-Zoom is able to move its inventory much more quickly than Sun-Oil.
Furthermore, neither Petro-Zoom’s nor Sun-Oil’s receivables turnover ratios are
of particular concern. Both are collecting their receivables within an average 30-
day collection period (365 days divided by either 12 or 13 is approximately 30
days).
What is of concern is Sun-Oil’s inventory turnover of 10 times which is well below
Petro-Zoom’s of 16 times and the industry average of 19 times. This may be of
concern to a lender or other creditor as a company will not be able to generate
cash in the short-term if it cannot sell its inventory.
Based on the concerns over Sun-Oil’s inventory turnover, I would think that
Petro-Zoom is the more liquid of the two companies. I would be more inclined to
lend money to Petro-Zoom.
(b) In reviewing the solvency of these two companies we see that Petro-Zoom’s debt
to total assets ratio is marginally higher (worse) than Sun-Oil’s ratio, indicating
that Petro-Zoom has a higher percent of its assets financed by debt. Sun-Oil also
appears to be in a better position to make its interest payments, as indicated by
the higher times interest earned ratio (24 times for Sun-Oil compared to 21 times
for Petro-Zoom).
When compared to the industry, we can see that both companies have debt to
total assets ratios higher than the industry average. On the other hand, these
ratios are not far off the industry average and their high times interest earned
ratios leave little doubt that both companies are able to make their respective
interest payments on the debt.
PROBLEM 10-9A (CONTINUED)
(b) (Continued)
Based on the debt to total assets ratio and times interest earned ratio, Sun-Oil
seems to be the more solvent of the two. However, both companies appear to be
generating sufficient income to cover interest payments so I would not be
significantly concerned about the solvency of either company.