Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The mutual fund industry in India started in 1963 with the formation of
Unit Trust of India, at the initiative of the Government of India and the
Reserve Bank. The history of mutual funds in India can be broadly divided
into four distinct phases
1987 marked the entry of non- UTI, public sector mutual funds set up by
public sector banks and Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and
General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC). SBI Mutual Fund was the
first non- UTI Mutual Fund established in June 1987 followed by Canbank
Mutual Fund (Dec 87), Punjab National Bank Mutual Fund (Aug 89),
Indian Bank Mutual Fund (Nov 89), Bank of India (Jun 90), Bank of
Baroda Mutual Fund (Oct 92). LIC established its mutual fund in June
1989 while GIC had set up its mutual fund in December 1990.At the end
of 1993, the mutual fund industry had assets under management of
Rs.47,004 crores.
With the entry of private sector funds in 1993, a new era started in the
Indian mutual fund industry, giving the Indian investors a wider choice of
fund families. Also, 1993 was the year in which the first Mutual Fund
Regulations came into being, under which all mutual funds, except UTI
were to be registered and governed. The erstwhile Kothari Pioneer (now
merged with Franklin Templeton) was the first private sector mutual fund
registered in July 1993. The 1993 SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations were
substituted by a more comprehensive and revised Mutual Fund
Regulations in 1996. The industry now functions under the SEBI (Mutual
Fund) Regulations 1996.
The number of mutual fund houses went on increasing, with many foreign
mutual funds setting up funds in India. The industry has also witnessed
several mergers and acquisitions. As at the end of January 2003, there
were 33 mutual funds with total assets of Rs. 1,21,805 crores. The Unit
Trust of India with Rs.44,541 crores of assets under management was way
ahead of other mutual funds.
In February 2003, following the repeal of the Unit Trust of India Act 1963
UTI was bifurcated into two separate entities. One is the Specified
Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India with assets under management of
Rs.29,835 crores as at the end of January 2003, representing broadly, the
assets of US 64 scheme, assured return and certain other schemes. The
Specified Undertaking of Unit Trust of India, functions under an
administrator and under the rules framed by Government of India and does
not come under the purview of the Mutual Fund Regulations.
The second is the UTI Mutual Fund Ltd, sponsored by SBI, PNB, BOB and
LIC. It is registered with SEBI and functions under the Mutual Fund
Regulations. With the bifurcation of the erstwhile UTI which had in
March 2000 more than Rs.76,000 crores of assets under management and
with the setting up of a UTI Mutual Fund, conforming to the SEBI Mutual
Fund Regulations, and with recent mergers taking place among different
private sector funds, the mutual fund industry has entered its current
phase of consolidation and growth. As at the end of June 30, 2003, there
were 31 funds, which manage assets of Rs.104762 crores under 376
schemes.
Indian mutual fund industry is more than three decades old. The monolith
investment intermediary - Unit Trust of India has come a long way since
its inception in July 1964. This big brother of Indian mutual funds
flourished in a competition free market and grew as a hybrid investment
company till 1987 when Rajiv Gandhi opened up mutual fund industry to
the public sector banks. From 1987 to 1990, five public sectors banks
sponsored their mutual funds. This gold rush was again witnessed when
the Indian economy was opened up to the private sector in 1991. The
Indian private sector mutual funds made their debut in 1992. The process
of liberalization saw the entry of foreign mutual funds in our land in the
year 1994.
A history of 32 years is not a long one when compared with the US mutual
fund industry, which is 72 years old with 4000 funds and aggregate assets
under management of US$ 6.9 trillion. Yet, there is a vast potential for
the rapid growth of the industry in India. The foray of public sector banks
into the mutual fund business in the late eighties had then added color and
competition to the industry. Bt the same token, the entry of private sector
thereafter has accelerated the process of all round growth of the Indian
mutual funds in terms of product innovation, investor education and
customer service.
STRUCTURE OF THE INDIAN MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY
The Indian Mutual Fund industry was dominated by the Unit Trust of
India which, prior to its bifurcation, had a total corpus of Rs 700 Billion
collected from over 20 million investors. The UTI has many funds/
schemes in all categories i.e. Equity, balanced, income etc. with some
being open ended and some being closed ended. The Unit scheme 1964
commonly referred to as US 64, a balanced fund, which even today is the
biggest scheme, had at one time a corpus exceeding Rs20000 crores. UTI
was floated by financial institutions and is governed by a special act of
Parliament. Most of its investors believe that the UTI is government
owned and controlled, which, while legally incorrect, is true for all
practical purposes.
The third category of mutual funds, which today is the largest, is the ones
floated by the private sector and by foreign asset management companies.
The largest of these are HDFC Asset Management, Prudential ICICI AMC
and Birla Capital AMC and. The aggregate corpus of the assets managed
by this category of AMC’s is about Rs.85000 crores.
In terms of market share, the position of the different categories of funds
as on 31 s t August, 2003 is as under:
Assets Under
Category Sales-All Schemes Redemption
Management
Total
From Total Cumulative Cumulative
From new For As on 31st
Existing For the Apr'03 to Apr'03 to
schemes the August 2003
schemes Month Aug '03 Aug '03
Month
No. Amount Amount
A) Bank
- - 2219 2219 14616 2891 12928 23025
Sponsored (5)
B) Institutions
2 58 1751 1809 7655 1472 5668 6308
(3)
C) Private
Sector
1 Indian
- - 11866 11866 48606 9717 42396 17312
(8)#
2 Foreign
- - 1566 1566 6552 1358 5943 2508
(1)
3 Joint
Ventures :
- - 10829 10829 52595 9352 43690 28537
Predominantly
Indian(5)#
4 Joint
Ventures :
- - 17205 17205 79894 15639 66725 43350
Predominantly
Foreign (9)
Total
- - 41466 41466 187647 36066 158754 91707
(1+2+3+4)
Grand Total
2 58 45436 45494 209918 40429 177350 121040
(A+B+C)
There are many entities involved and the diagram below illustrates
the organizational set up of a mutual fund:
All mutual funds comprise four constituents – Sponsors, Trustees, Asset Management
Company (AMC) and Custodians.
Sponsors: The sponsors initiate the idea to set up a mutual fund. It could
be a registered company, scheduled bank or financial institution. A
sponsor has to satisfy certain conditions, such as capital, track record (at
least five years’ operation in financial services), de-fault free dealings
and general reputation of fairness. The sponsors appoint the Trustee, AMC
and Custodian. Once the AMC is formed, the sponsor is just a stakeholder.
Fund Managers/ AMC: They are the ones who manage money of the
investors. An AMC takes decisions, compensates investors through
dividends, maintains proper accounting and information for pricing of
units, calculates the NAV, and provides information on schemes. It also
exercises due diligence on investments, and submits quarterly reports to
the trustees. A fund’s AMC can neither act for any other fund nor
undertake any business other than asset management. Its net worth should
not fall below Rs. 10 crore. The AMC fee should not exceed 1.25 percent
of collections below Rs. 100 crore and 1 percent of collections above Rs.
100 crore. SEBI can pull up an AMC if it deviates from its prescribed
role.
All the capital market instruments have varying degrees of risk, the degree
of risk being the highest in equities, lower for debt and least for money
market instruments. The risk factor is highlighted in the respective offer
documents as well as in the abridged offer documents. The investor
therefore is in the full knowledge and understanding of the risks involved
in various schemes. As per SEBI regulation all mutual funds disclose their
portfolio periodically and all open-ended funds offer exit option to
investors at NAV based price.
In recent years, the share market had passed through a bear phase with
prices falling across the board, and more steeply in the technology scrips.
Reflecting this fall in share prices, the NAVs of most of the equity
schemes in general and of the technology funds in particular had also
fallen. This fall in the NAVs should be viewed in the context of the fall in
the share prices, a phenomenon which was then worldwide. The fall in
NAVs not only affects the investors but it has an impact on the fees and
earnings of the investment managers also.
It may be recalled that the mutual funds have given good returns while the
market was in the upswing and even in the current financial year, with the
bull run in the stock market, equity schemes have so far provided very
competitive rates of returns as compared to debt schemes. With interest
rates continuously moving down, investors would necessarily have to go
for equity investments to earn decent returns over the long term.
Open
Ended
Schemes: As the name implies the duration of the scheme (Fund) is open
– i.e., not specified or pre-determined. Entry to the fund is always open to
the investor who can subscribe at any time. Such fund stands ready to buy
or sell its units at any time. It implies that the capitalization of the fund is
constantly changing as investors sell or buy their units. Further, the units
are normally not traded on the stock exchange but are repurchased by the
fund at announced rates. Open-ended schemes have comparatively better
liquidity despite the fact that these are not listed. The reason is that
investor can any time approach mutual fund for sale of such units. No
intermediaries are required. Moreover, the realizable amount is certain
since repurchase is at a price based on declared net asset value (NAV). No
minute-to-minute fluctuations in rates haunt the investors. The portfolio
mix of such schemes has to be investments, which are actively traded in
the market. Otherwise, it will not be possible to calculate NAV. This is
the reason that generally open-ended schemes are equity based. Moreover,
desiring frequently traded securities, open-ended schemes hardly have in
their portfolio shares of comparatively new and smaller companies since
these are not generally traded. In such funds, option to reinvest its
dividend is also available. Since there is always a possibility of
withdrawals, the management of such funds becomes more difficult as
managers have to ensure sufficient liquidity at all times to meet
redemption pressure. Difficulty may be on two fronts, one is, that
unexpected withdrawals require funds to maintain a high level of cash
available every time implying thereby idle cash. Fund managers have to
face questions like ‘ what to sell’. He could very well have to sell his
most liquid assets. Second, by virtue of this situation such funds may fail
to grab favorable opportunities. Further, to match quick cash payments,
funds cannot have matching realizations from their portfolio due to
intricacies of the stock market. Thus, success of the open-ended schemes
to a great extent depends on the efficiency of the capital market.
Close Ended Schemes: Such schemes have a definite period after which
their units are redeemed. Unlike open-ended funds, these funds have fixed
capitalization, i.e., their corpus normally does not change throughout its
life period. Close ended fund units trade among the investors in the
secondary market since these are to be quoted on the stock exchanges.
Their price is determined on the basis of demand and supply in the
market. Their liquidity depends on the efficiency and understanding of the
engaged broker. Their price is free to deviate from NAV, i.e., there is
every possibility that the market price may be above or below its NAV. If
one takes into account the issue expenses, conceptually close ended fund
units cannot be traded at a premium or over NAV because the price of a
package of investments cannot exceed the sum of the prices of the
investments constituting the package. If at all any premium exists that
may exist only on account of speculative activities. In India as per SEBI
(MF) Regulations every mutual fund is free to launch any or both types of
schemes.
BY INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE:
GROWTH FUNDS
INCOME FUNDS
BALANCED FUNDS
The aim of balanced fund is to provide both growth and regular income.
Such schemes periodically distribute a part of their earning and invest
both in equities and fixed income securities in the proportion indicated in
their offer documents. In a stock market, NAV of these schemes may not
normally keep pace, or fall equally when the market falls. These are ideal
for investors looking for a combination of income and moderate growth.
LOAD FUNDS
A load fund is one that charges a commission for entry or exit. That is ,
each time an investor buys or sells units in the fund, he is charged a
commission to cover the transaction costs. Typically entry and exit loads
range from 1% to 2% . It could be worth paying if the load fund has a
good performance history.
NO-LOAD FUNDS
A no-load fund is one that does not charges a commission for entry or
exit. That is no commission is payable on purchase or sale of units in the
fund. The advantage of a no load fund is that entire corpus is put to work.
OTHER SCHEMES
These funds can survive and thrive only if they can live up to the hopes
and trusts of their individual members. These hopes and trusts echo the
needs of such investors who face following constraints while making
direct investments:
(a) Limited resources in the hands of investors quite often take them away
from stock market transactions.
(d) To buy shares, investors have to engage share brokers who are the
members of stock exchange and have to pay their brokerage.
(f) It is difficult for them to know the developments taking place in share
market and corporate sector.
(g) Firm allotments are not possible for small investors when there is a
trend of over subscription to public issues.
WHY MUTUAL FUNDS?
vi. Tax Shelter : Depending on the scheme of mutual funds, tax shelter is
also available. As per the Union Budget 2003, income earned through
dividends from mutual funds is 100% tax-free in the hands of investors..
The different entities such as the Mutual Fund, the Asset Management
Company and the Custodian operate as per the provisions of the SEBI
Mutual Fund Regulation 1996 and the rules and guidelines issued by
SEBI. Each of these entities has independent Boards of Directors and
separate auditors.
SEBI keeps a close watch on the mutual funds through periodical reports
and every three months, each mutual fund submits to SEBI a report
conforming compliance with regulatory provisions and mutual funds are
required to record their investment decisions. Any deficiency or non-
compliance is dealt with suitably by SEBI.
Every year, each mutual fund is inspected by SEBI and such inspection is
both a detailed scrutiny of operations and a rectification exercise. Thus,
the mutual funds are strictly supervised and regulated entities and the
regulatory provisions match with international standards.
RBI is the monetary authority of the country and is also the regulator of
the banking system. Earlier bank sponsored mutual funds were under the
dual regulatory of RBI and SEBI. Money market mutual funds, which
invested in short term investments, were also regulated by RBI. These
provisions are no longer in vogue. SEBI is the regulator of all the mutual
funds. The present position is that RBI is involved with the mutual fund
industry, only to the limited extent of being the regulator of the sponsors
of bank-sponsored mutual funds. Specifically, if the sponsor has made any
financial commitment to the investor of the mutual funds, in the form of
guaranteeing assured returns, such guarantees can no longer be made
without the prior approval of the RBI.
Recent Trends in the Mutual Funds Industry
The most important trend in the mutual fund industry is the aggressive
explosion of the foreign owned mutual funds companies and the decline of
the companies floated by nationalized banks and small private sector
players.
Many nationalized banks got into the mutual funds business in the early
nineties and got of to a good start due to the stock market boom prevailing
then. These banks did not really understand the mutual funds business and
they viewed it as another kind of banking activity. Few hired specialized
staff and generally chose to transfer staff from parent organizations. The
performance of most of the schemes floated by these organizations was
not good. Some schemes had offered guaranteed returns and there parent
organizations had to bail out these AMCs by paying large amount of
money as the difference between the guaranteed and actual returns. The
service levels were also not up to the mark. Most of these AMCs have not
been able to retain staff, float new schemes etc. And it is doubtful
whether, barring a few exceptions, they have serious plans of continuing
the activity in a major way.
The experience of some of the AMCs floated by the private sector Indian
companies was also very similar. They quickly realized that the AMC
business is a business, which makes money in the long term and requires
deep- pocketed support in the intermediate years. Some have sold out to
foreign owned companies, some have merged with others and there is a
general restructuring going on.
The foreign owned companies have deep pockets and have come here with
the expectations of a long haul. They can be credited with the introduction
of many new practices such as new product innovation, sharp
improvement in the service standards and disclosure, usage of technology,
broker education and support etc. In fact, they have forced the industry to
upgrade itself and service levels of organizations like UTI have improved
dramatically in the in the last few years in response to the competition
provided by these funds.
Last six years have been the most turbulent as well as exciting ones for
the industry. New players have come in, while others have decided to
close shop by either selling of or merging with others. Product innovation
is now passé with the game shifting to performance delivery in fund
management as well as service. Those directly associated with the fund
management industry like distributors, registrars and transfer agents, and
even the regulators have become more mature and responsible. The
industry is also having a profound impact on financial markets. While UTI
has always has been a dominant player on the bourses as well as the debt
markets, the new generations of private funds, which have gained
substantial mass, are now seen flexing their muscles. Fund managers, by
their selection criteria for stocks have forced corporate governance on the
industry. By rewarding the honest and transparent management with
higher valuations, a system of risk-reward has been created where the
corporate sector is more transparent then before.
Mutual funds are now also competing with commercial banks in the race
for retails investors’ saving and corporate float money. The power shift
towards mutual funds has become obvious. The coming few years will
show that the traditional saving avenues are losing out in the current
scenario. Many investors are realizing that investment in savings accounts
is as good as locking up their deposits in a closet. The fund mobilization
trend by mutual funds in the current year indicates that money is going to
mutual funds in a big way.
India is at the first stage of a revolution that has already peaked in the
U.S. The U.S boasts of an asset base that is much higher than its bank
deposits. In India, mutual fund assets are not even 10% of the bank
deposits, but this trend is beginning to change and it is expected that over
time the rate of growth in mutual funds will out-strip the growth in bank
deposits. This is forcing a large number of banks to adopt the concept of
narrow banking wherein the deposits are kept in gilts and some assets,
which improves liquidity and reduces risks. The basic fact remains that
banks cannot be ignored and they will not close down completely. Their
role as intermediaries cannot be ignored. It is just that mutual funds are
going to change the way banks do business in future
ROLE OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN PROMOTING CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Mutual funds can play a very active role in promoting healthy corporate
governance practices. They have now, the most efficient tool to promote
corporate governance in the investor companies- the voting power. This
has been conferred to them by The Companies (Amendments) Bill,1996.
There are two ways of promoting better corporate governance practices
through mutual funds:
1. Behavioral Interventions.
2. External Interventions.
BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS
The mutual funds may enhance their role of the trustee of investors’
money. For example, if today a particular mutual fund is holding shares of
a company which is not traded or traded infrequently at insignificant
prices compared to their true worth, then it will hold those shares or
dispose them off at the earliest opportunity. A more sensitive mutual fund
will find out the company and initiate board reforms to release high value
returns for the shareholders and ultimately for its unit holders.
2. Mutual funds as Partners in Business
EXTERNAL INTERVENTIONS
1. Devise Guidelines
Mutual funds may devise a set of guidelines for activism on the corporate
boards which may enable them to take decisions not only on the basis of
inputs by the management but more importantly on the basis of third party
opinions.
Mutual funds can ensure that the boards take active interest in the
strategic planning of the company by initiating a corporate restructuring
exercise when it is warranted. The benchmark would be the shareholders’
value expected to be released by such decisions. For example, potentially
sick companies, at the initial stage, may initiate negotiations and a
political process to turnaround the company. Later, they may solicit bids
for the company. This may lead to competition for corporate control.
The net asset value of the fund is the cumulative market value of the asset
fund net of its liabilities. In the other words, if the fund is dissolved or
liquidated, by selling off all the assets in fund, this amount that the
shareholders would collectively own. This gives rise to the concept of net
asset value per unit, which is the value, represented by the ownership of
one unit in the fund. It is calculated simply by dividing the net asset value
of the fund by the number of units. However, most people refer loosely to
the NAV per unit as NAV, ignoring the “per unit”.
CALCULATION OF NAV
The most important part of the calculation is the valuation of the assets
owned by the fund. Once it is calculated, the NAV is simply the net value
of assets divided by the number of units outstanding. The detailed
methodology for the calculation of the asset value is given below.
The Future
The growth and expansion of the industry so far is by no means
meagre. In a span of just over 3 decades, we have 32 mutual funds more
than 350 schemes with a corpus fund exceeding Rs.120000 crores.
So one can only hope that the funds keep up the smart turn around
and retain the investor confidence in good shape. Consistently better
performance, improved services, greater disclosure, more transparency.
prudent accounting norms and sustained investor communication - all
these shall go a long way in making the funds investor-friendly and
ensuring them an enduring and exponential growth.
DISCLOSURE NORMS FOR MUTUAL FUNDS
Under section 115R, the fund will be liable to pay additional income tax
@12.5% plus surcharge on the income distributed by the fund (other than
in open ended equity oriented funds ).
WEALTH TAX
Units held under the scheme of the fund are not treated as assets within
the meaning of Section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, and are,
therefore, not liable to Wealth Tax.
GIFT TAX
Units of the fund may be given as gift and no gift tax will be payable
either by the donor or the donee, as the Gift Tax Act has been abolished.
RESTRICTIONS ON INVESTMENT.
Once a scheme is listed after completion of due formalities, its units are
traded like shares of any other company and are subject to the same
procedure of sale and purchase through the brokers, governed by similar
transfer mechanism and regulated by the same guideline of the stock
exchange where the scheme is listed.
OBEJECTIVES OF LISTING
THE TRUSTEE
HDFC Trustee Company Limited, a company incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 is the Trustee to the Mutual Fund vide the Trust
deed dated June 8, 2000, as amended from time to time. HDFC Trustee
Company Ltd is wholly owned subsidiary of HDFC.
HDFC ASSET MANAGEMET COMPANY (AMC)
HDFC was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, on December 10,
1999, and was approved to act as an Asset Management Company for the
Mutual Fund by SEBI on July 3, 2000. The registered office of the AMC
is situated at Ramon House, 3rd Floor, H.T. Parekh Marg, 169, Back bay
Reclamation, Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020. In terms of the Investment
Management Agreement, the Trustee has appointed HDFC Asset
Management Company Limited to manage the Mutual Fund. The paid up
capital of the AMC is Rs. 75.161 crore.
The present share holding pattern of the AMC is as follows:
HDFC 50.10
UTI MUTUAL FUND
UTI Mutual Fund has come into existence with effect from 1st
February 2003. UTI Asset Management Company presently manages
42 NAV based domestic SEBI compliant schemes and 4 Offshore
funds having a corpus Rs.15,243 crore from about 10 million investor
accounts.
UTI Mutual Fund is poised to meet the challenges of the future with
its dedicated human resources, vast reservoir of funds and 38-year
track record. Speed, Quality and Transparency is the edifice on which
it desires to stride ahead for the benefit of its investors.
UTI MUTUAL FUND
Corpus under management (Rs.16388 Crs. as on Jul 31, 2003)
NO. OF SCHEMES 20
NO. OF SCHEMES (incl. Options) 42
EQUITY SCHEMES 1
DEBT SCHEMES 41
SCHEMES
BALANCED FUND
SCHEMES
DIVERSIFIED EQUITY FUNDS
Templeton India Growth Fund (TIGF)
Franklin India Blue chip Fun (FIBCF)
Franklin India Index Fund (FIIF)
Franklin India Tax shield (FIT)
DEBT FUNDS
Templeton India Income Fund (TIIF)
Templeton Monthly Income Plan (TMIP)
Templeton India Government Securities Fund (TGSF)
FT India Gilt Fund (FTIGF)
Templeton Floating Rate Income Fund (TFIF)
HYBRID FUNDS
FT India Asset Allocation Fund (FTIAAF)
Templeton India Children's Asset Plan (TICAP).
Franklin India Balanced Fund (FIBF)
SELECT MUTUAL FUNDS & ASSETS UNDER
MANAGEMENT
(Rs.in crores)
NET
MUTUAL NO. OF INC/DEC
FUND SCHEMES AS ON CORPUS AS ON CORPUS IN
CORPUS
JULY31 JUNE
42 2003 16388.00 30 2003 16015.00 373
UTI
AUG 31 JULY
75 2003 13,119.00 31 2003 12,421.09 697.91
HDFC
AUG 29 JULY31
FRANKLIN 95 2003 13,033.00 2003 12,002.00 1031
TEMPLETON
The best way for him to get rid of all these shortcomings of direct
investment in equity market is to invest in Mutual Funds. By investing
in mutual funds, he will get the services of experienced and skilled
professionals, backed by a dedicated investment research team that
analyses the performance and prospects of companies and selects suitable
investment options at right time.
But even now the exact problem is not solved as he may end up in losses
as NAVs of mutual fund can also decline and if right timing is not done an
investor may end up loosing his money.
Coaches never win matches for the players. Not long back, the markets
were touching new highs with each passing day. This was in the first
quarter of Y2K, when the InfoTech sector was booming. The result of a
stock market boom was that the NAVs of equity funds were touching dizzy
heights. Annualized returns jacked up to astronomical levels. At this
stage, some investors, who had invested prior to the market frenzy,
withdrew from the peaking market having made a bounty. However,
consider the plight of people who got in to the funds at such high levels.
Because the markets have since then been engulfed in a turmoil rarely
seen, the NAVs have been spiraling downwards for most funds. Under
these conditions, some investors, not having the nerves of steel,
succumbed to the pressures of depreciating investments and redeemed
under losses. What had then appeared to be a necessary correction in the
overheated market robbed many such investors of hard-earned money. The
investors, who sustained the pressure and understood the concept of
market correction, stayed invested for a long period and reduced the
losses after the market bounced back. It is advised that the investment
made during peak days is not going to bear any fruit till the markets reach
the levels again. The most important mantra for successful investor is of
"getting in" & "moving out" at the right time. An ideal investor is one
who enters the market at its bottom or at average levels and leaves the
market when it gives the first sign of sinking. Since, it is not possible for
a common investor to correctly time the market, it is advisable to invest
regularly in small amounts when the market appears to be low and
withdraw regularly in small amounts when market appears to be high.
In any case, he should at least avoid entering at the market peaks and exiting at bottoms.
The effect of "moving in" at a wrong time i.e. at market peak, can be negated to some
extent if one can stay put for a long period. This is because the market cycles will take
care of the intermediate volatility. The effect of "moving out" at wrong time however,
will continue to haunt the investors should they fall victim to greed.
"Even a bumper crop may not help farmer have high yields, if there is delay in
harvesting"
The Budget 2003-04 has brought some cheers to the mutual fund industry.
The budget has following proposals for the MF investors:
Investors, once again, will get the tax-free dividends from MF units.
Dividends from Equity Funds will be tax free While Debt Mutual
Funds have to pay distribution tax amounting to 12.5 percent of the
dividends declared.
Long-term capital gains tax on equity funds remains at 20 per cent
with indexation, or 10 per cent, whichever is lower. Investments
made in listed equity shares, for one year from April 2003, will be
exempted from long-term capital gains tax.
Administered interest rates on PPF and small-savings have been
reduced by 1 per cent. Interest on Relief and Savings bonds will
also be reset accordingly. This is likely to give a boost to the debt
schemes of mutual funds.
Personal Taxation
After having determined one’s risk level the financial planning process
revolves round determining a set of investment options commensurate
with risk taking ability of the individual. While there are several
instruments available for investment, debt mutual finds are an option,
which provides several benefits to investor regardless of their risk profile
Debt mutual funds generally provide superior returns compared to bank deposits taken
for the same period. At the same they offer comparable liquidity wherein one can enter or
exit an open ended scheme any time. Technically one can invest in these funds
continuously for 30 to 40 years, i.e. till one retires and thereby one can take the advantage
of the ‘power of compounding’. Leading International and Indian asset management
companies such as ICICI, HDFC, TATA, TEMPLETON etc offers such schemes have
proven track record and the returns generated by diversified Debt funds in last 1 to 3
years have been more than the returns generated by any other class of asset like Gold,
Real Estate, Equity Markets, and Bank Deposits.
10. Know when to sell your mutual funds: Knowing when to exit a
fund too is of utmost importance. One should book profits
immediately when enough has been earned i.e. the initial
expectation from the fund has been met with. Other factors like
non-performance, hike in fee charged and change in any basic
attribute of the fund etc. are some of the reasons for to exit.
Worrisome news it is, for the investor who still believes MFs are a route
to manage one’s money in a better and safe manner. The recent wild
movements in the NAVs of several equity funds have belied all
expectation of a diversified portfolio from the fund managers when the
basic tenet behind portfolio management is risk management. Mr. Shyam
Bhat, Fund Manager-Tata Asset Management Ltd. said ‘Indian Mutual
fund industry is not using statistical techniques of risk management but is
using diversification effectively within the market limitations. As far as
use of derivatives is concerned, they are not presently used because of the
low volumes, low liquidity and absence of sufficient hedging products in
the market ’.
Aggression has been the key word followed by the AMCs when it comes to
taking positions in stocks. With investment in volatile ICE sectors being
the driver of growth last season, almost everybody had taken big
exposures to them. Birla MF maintained its exposures in Infosys to almost
25 percent in all of its equity schemes throughout last year. The same is
true of ING Savings Trust that has Rs. 60 crores invested in Wipro and
Infosys out of the total fund size of 135 crores in its growth fund. The
result of these exposures is that the fund witnessed a movement of almost
9 percent in a single day on budget when the market saw an appreciation
of around 4.36 percent. In their quest for growth, many funds have seen
very volatile movements in NAVs. The investor confidence may not be
lost but such volatility sure dents it. The point is not whether AMCs
should be chastised or not but just to question the practices as the fate of
many investors is linked to it. An ordinary investor considers mutual
funds as the experts in investment decisions and so naturally expects the
decision of investing in mutual funds to bear fruit. However, AMCs often
leave a lot to be desired as they falter on important fronts like NAV and
portfolio disclosure besides posting high fluctuations and poor returns.
It is unfortunate that the fund managers are not taking due care for
minimizing the risk and are in a race to post higher and higher returns
during the phase of bull-run. They should understand that the investors
forget the high returns posted in any specific period very soon but they
take hell lot of time to forget the burns they get during periods of losses.
Hence for maintaining the confidence of the retail investors it is very
important to control wild fluctuations in the NAVs. The basic technique of
portfolio management thrusts on diversification, which preaches inclusion
of negative beta, stocks in the portfolio so as to minimize the impact of
fluctuation in the market. Diversification always has a cost and investors
are willing to pay for it if it is properly done. The fund manager should
disclose what they are doing at the hedging front. They should come up
and tell their investors as to what they do at times of high fluctuations.
Normally it has been seen that they outperform the broad market indices
during the bull-runs and under-perform the indices during the bear-phases.
The industry needs to revise their attitude and try to streamline their
actions with their objectives. Some mutual fund houses are quite
disciplined but every body should embrace the same spirit. There are some
infrastructural problems but fund managers need to be more vigilant on
the market movements. Mr. Bhupinder Sethi, Fund Manager - Dundee
Mutual Fund said ‘We are actively monitoring the market movements and
taking calls accordingly. Though we are presently not using derivatives
for hedging of risk because of lack of depth in the market for the product,
but we go into cash when we see the expectations of huge corrections
coming in.’
ARTICLES
AMFI, SEBI sing different tunes on making AMFI an SRO (On Sep 13,
2003)
Mutual Fund industry could not stop itself from getting wowed. Mr. K. K.
Mittal, Fund Manager of Escorts Mutual Fund said "This is the right time
to invest in mutual funds as the stock market is very low and the interest
rate in the economy has stabilised. Intelligent investors will have
confidence in the industry and mutual funds will garner good portion of
the money collected by VRS". The Fund-houses have started the arduous
task of educating the VRS beneficiaries with vigor through camps and
banners at banks and other strategic places. Especially designed danglers,
posters and advertisements in the media are trying their might to attract
investors. The huge money of around Rs. 20,000 crores flowing from the
VR scheme can revolutionise the industry.
If mutual funds are trying to woo the VRS beneficiaries, they are not
doing anything, which is against the investors’ interest. As an investment
option, Mutual funds have no match in terms of the benefits provided by
them. They are tailored to match the requirements of the investors. The
only problem the industry is facing in India is in terms of low level of
awareness about the product among investors and their irrational
expectations.
For a VRS beneficiary regular returns and safety are the basic
requirements apart from liquidity and tax efficiency. Banks can be
one of the options for parking VRS money but the investor will have to
compromise on the return front. The returns from bank deposits are
very low implying a high premium for the level of safety provided by
them. If the investor has the capability to understand his requirements,
the best product for a VRS beneficiary can be Open Ended Debt funds.
Open Ended Debt funds provide high quality customer service. As far
as safety of the investments is concerned, Debt Funds are highly safe
as they invest in very high quality debt instruments and that too after a
rigorous research by a team of experts. The portfolio is disclosed
regularly to imbibe confidence among the investors. The net asset
value (NAV) is announced daily and sale / purchase of units is done on
the NAV related prices on any working day. Above all, the dividends
are tax-free in the hands of the investors. At redemption, the Long
Term Capital Gains from mutual fund units are taxed at a maximum
rate of 10 % whereas the maturity proceeds from a bank deposit are
considered to be Short Term Capital Gains and are taxed at normal
rates depending upon the tax slab of the investor and can go as high as
38.5%. In mutual funds, investors can ask for dividends at convenient
frequency. The best part is that investors can do away with the interest
rate risk that is attached to the bank deposits by investing in open
ended debt funds. The investor in a bank deposit at a particular rate
can not get the gains of increase in market rate of interest but this
element of risk is not there in Mutual Funds. The NAV of mutual fund
schemes are marked to market regularly and the movements in the
interest rate are adjusted on the daily basis. The only challenge before
the industry in India is to juxtapose the right mutual fund schemes and
the investors according to the investors’ risk profile. This is the only
reason why our mutual fund industry is not as huge as that in the
developed economies. As far as performances of the fund managers are
concerned, we have world-class fund managers but we are unable to
match the collection in the industry to that in banking industry because
of lack of awareness among investors.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India has cautioned mutual funds
again on the concentration of few investors in some of their schemes and
risks emerging from upsurge in the stock prices especially mid-cap
scrimps.
"Early this week, chairman GN Bajpai held meeting with directors of some
asset management companies and discussed issue of few schemes being
run exclusively for some investors", Sebi sources said on Thursday.
The current market situation also came up for review and Sebi officials
expressed concern over the surge in mid-cap stock, sources said
The growth funds -- schemes which invests most of their corpus in equity
and equity related instruments -- saw a net inflow of Rs 498 crore in
August (Rs 779 crore last month) and their AUMs stood at Rs 15,752
crore, AMFI said in its data released on Friday.
The total sales and redemptions for the reporting month were Rs 45,494
crore and Rs 40,429 crore, respectively, AMFI said.
The asset management companies raised only Rs 58 crore through two new
schemes.
The liquid\money market funds witnessed net inflow of Rs 491 crore with
sales and redemption/repurchases of Rs 27,779 crore and Rs 27,288 crore,
respectively while AUM of these schemes stood at Rs 23,578 crore as on
August 31, 2003.
Net Asset Value is the market value of the assets of the scheme minus its
liabilities. The per unit NAV is the net asset value of the scheme divided by
the number of units outstanding on the Valuation Date.
Sale Price
Is the price you pay when you invest in a scheme. Also called Offer Price. It
may include a sales load.
Sales Load Is a charge collected by a scheme when it sells the units. Also
called, ‘Front-end’ load. Schemes that do not charge a load are called ‘No
Load’ schemes.
*****