0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
50 Ansichten1 Seite
- The rubric evaluates student participation in a town hall meeting on a given topic across four criteria: participation, clarity of position, use of evidence, and a reflection paper.
- For each criteria, the rubric describes the requirements for an emerging, proficient, or mastery level of performance. For example, to receive a proficient score for participation, a student must take notes, have a prepared speech or questions, and contribute to generating debate.
- The rubric evaluates student participation in a town hall meeting on a given topic across four criteria: participation, clarity of position, use of evidence, and a reflection paper.
- For each criteria, the rubric describes the requirements for an emerging, proficient, or mastery level of performance. For example, to receive a proficient score for participation, a student must take notes, have a prepared speech or questions, and contribute to generating debate.
- The rubric evaluates student participation in a town hall meeting on a given topic across four criteria: participation, clarity of position, use of evidence, and a reflection paper.
- For each criteria, the rubric describes the requirements for an emerging, proficient, or mastery level of performance. For example, to receive a proficient score for participation, a student must take notes, have a prepared speech or questions, and contribute to generating debate.
Participation in -Student is familiar with the topic and -Student is knowledgeable about the -Meets the criteria for proficient AND his/her role topic and his/her role -student makes connection to Meeting -Student must be prompted to speak -Student takes notes during the town relationship between stakeholder 30 pts -Student asks general or simple hall meeting group and issue questions that do not further the -Student has a prepared speech or -uses prepared notes when speaking meeting or infrequently generates questions that contributes to the -asks insightful questions debate meeting and generates debate -makes connections with points from -Student supports other group other students, and contributes to the members in their arguments meeting with persuasive assertions and rebuttals Clarity of Position -Student’s opinion is clear, but contains -Student expresses a well-thought out, -Student expresses a well-thought out, little detail to support it detailed position detailed, and persuasive position 25 pts -Student shows some consideration to -Student explicitly addresses likely contradictory arguments arguments against their position and gives data to contradict them Use of Evidence -Student occasionally cites primary and -Student frequently cites credible -Student consistently cites credible secondary sources during delivery of primary and secondary sources during primary and secondary sources during 25 pts statements, rebuttals, and questioning delivery of statements, rebuttals, and delivery of statements, rebuttals, and -Student demonstrates an questioning questioning understanding of issue in statements -Student demonstrates an -Student demonstrates thorough and questioning understanding of issue in statements, understanding of issue and real world rebuttals, and questioning implications in statements, rebuttals, and questioning Reflection Paper -Student expresses opinion but offers -Student thoughtfully expresses opinion -Meets criteria for proficient AND, little to no support and directly makes connections to -makes meaningful connections 20 pts points in meeting. between assessment and relationships in real world setting.