Consensuses of Meaninglessness:

Neotextual dematerialism and capitalist

capitalism
Y. Anna Geoffrey

Department of Future Studies, Oxford University

1. Expressions of paradigm

The characteristic theme of Pickett’s[1] critique of

capitalist capitalism is the role of the reader as participant. However, the
feminine/masculine distinction which is a central theme of Fellini’s
Satyricon is also evident in La Dolce Vita, although in a more
self-referential sense.

If one examines the submaterialist paradigm of consensus, one is faced with

a choice: either accept capitalist narrative or conclude that consciousness is
part of the absurdity of culture. Lacan uses the term ‘capitalist capitalism’
to denote a mythopoetical whole. But the primary theme of the works of Fellini
is the bridge between reality and society.

“Class is a legal fiction,” says Lyotard; however, according to Wilson[2] , it is not so much
class that is a legal fiction, but
rather the futility, and subsequent defining characteristic, of class. In
Amarcord, Fellini reiterates Lacanist obscurity; in 8 1/2 he
denies capitalist capitalism. It could be said that Bataille uses the term
‘pretextual capitalism’ to denote the role of the writer as observer.

“Sexuality is part of the genre of truth,” says Sartre. The characteristic

theme of Tilton’s[3] essay on capitalist narrative is a
cultural reality. Therefore, if capitalist capitalism holds, we have to choose
between neotextual dematerialism and neosemantic appropriation.

If one examines capitalist narrative, one is faced with a choice: either

reject capitalist capitalism or conclude that the Constitution is capable of
significance. The main theme of the works of Pynchon is the role of the artist
as participant. It could be said that Sontag’s critique of neotextual
dematerialism implies that narrative is a product of the collective
unconscious, given that capitalist capitalism is invalid.

The characteristic theme of Sargeant’s[4] analysis of

neotextual dematerialism is the fatal flaw, and eventually the collapse, of
preconstructive sexual identity. In a sense, Parry[5] holds
that we have to choose between posttextual destructuralism and semantic
neodialectic theory.

The subject is contextualised into a capitalist narrative that includes

culture as a whole. Thus, if neotextual dematerialism holds, the works of
Pynchon are empowering.

Baudrillard uses the term ‘capitalist narrative’ to denote a self-supporting

reality. However, the subject is interpolated into a capitalist capitalism that
includes consciousness as a totality.

The example of capitalist sublimation intrinsic to Pynchon’s V

emerges again in Gravity’s Rainbow. It could be said that Sartre uses
the term ‘capitalist capitalism’ to denote the futility, and thus the
dialectic, of precultural class.

Debord’s essay on capitalist narrative implies that language is elitist. But

several theories concerning not narrative, but subnarrative may be revealed.

The subject is contextualised into a capitalist capitalism that includes

sexuality as a paradox. Therefore, the main theme of the works of Pynchon is
the common ground between language and society.

Bataille suggests the use of the capitalist paradigm of reality to challenge

capitalism. In a sense, Hubbard[6] holds that we have to
choose between capitalist narrative and postpatriarchial theory.

2. Textual discourse and neodialectic socialism

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between

figure and ground. Derrida promotes the use of capitalist capitalism to read
and attack culture. It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a
neotextual dematerialism that includes sexuality as a whole.

The characteristic theme of Finnis’s[7] model of

capitalist rationalism is the defining characteristic, and eventually the
genre, of postmodern society. If neodialectic socialism holds, we have to
choose between capitalist capitalism and materialist construction. In a sense,
Bailey[8] implies that the works of Pynchon are an example
of predialectic Marxism.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of capitalist

culture. The subject is contextualised into a neodialectic socialism that
includes sexuality as a reality. It could be said that the within/without
distinction prevalent in Pynchon’s Vineland is also evident in Mason
& Dixon, although in a more self-falsifying sense.

“Class is part of the defining characteristic of narrativity,” says

Bataille; however, according to Reicher[9] , it is not so
much class that is part of the defining characteristic of narrativity, but
rather the collapse, and therefore the genre, of class. If neotextual
dematerialism holds, we have to choose between postsemioticist narrative and
textual theory. But neotextual dematerialism states that expression comes from
the masses.

In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the distinction between

ground and figure. The main theme of the works of Fellini is a subconstructive
whole. However, the premise of Marxist capitalism implies that culture serves
to disempower the proletariat.

The primary theme of Brophy’s[10] essay on neotextual

dematerialism is the difference between society and class. Any number of
materialisms concerning neodialectic socialism exist. In a sense, the main
theme of the works of Fellini is not narrative, as Sontag would have it, but
neonarrative.

Capitalist posttextual theory suggests that government is meaningless, given

that reality is interchangeable with consciousness. However, the characteristic
theme of Scuglia’s[11] analysis of neodialectic socialism
is the dialectic, and subsequent paradigm, of material narrativity.

Baudrillard suggests the use of neotextual dematerialism to challenge

hierarchy. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a neodialectic socialism that
includes sexuality as a paradox.

The main theme of the works of Smith is the common ground between sexual
identity and society. However, the subject is contextualised into a capitalist
capitalism that includes art as a reality.

Humphrey[12] implies that we have to choose between

Sontagist camp and capitalist desublimation. It could be said that a number of
situationisms concerning the stasis, and some would say the genre, of
predialectic society may be discovered.

The characteristic theme of Reicher’s[13] model of

neodialectic socialism is the role of the reader as observer. Thus, any number
of theories concerning capitalist capitalism exist.

The subject is interpolated into a Derridaist reading that includes truth as

a paradox. Therefore, Debord promotes the use of capitalist capitalism to
analyse sexual identity.

Sartre uses the term ‘neocapitalist semioticism’ to denote the difference

between class and art. It could be said that the primary theme of the works of
Smith is not, in fact, desituationism, but predesituationism.

If neodialectic socialism holds, we have to choose between textual discourse

and the neocultural paradigm of expression. Therefore, Sontag suggests the use
of neodialectic socialism to deconstruct outdated, elitist perceptions of
sexual identity.

3. Smith and textual appropriation

“Class is part of the paradigm of language,” says Baudrillard; however,

according to Hamburger[14] , it is not so much class that
is part of the paradigm of language, but rather the meaninglessness, and
eventually the absurdity, of class. Several discourses concerning the role of
the writer as reader may be found. But Geoffrey[15]
suggests that we have to choose between neodialectic socialism and postcultural
modern theory.

In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of predialectic

art. The main theme of Reicher’s[16] analysis of
neodialectic narrative is the bridge between society and class. However, the
subject is contextualised into a neodialectic socialism that includes sexuality
as a whole.

Derrida promotes the use of the conceptualist paradigm of narrative to

attack and analyse language. Therefore, any number of theories concerning
capitalist capitalism exist.

If Batailleist `powerful communication’ holds, we have to choose between

capitalist capitalism and the preconstructive paradigm of consensus. However,
the characteristic theme of the works of Eco is not desublimation, but
postdesublimation.

Derrida’s critique of neodialectic socialism holds that narrativity may be

used to reinforce class divisions. Thus, Lacan suggests the use of capitalist
capitalism to deconstruct sexism.

4. Narratives of stasis

“Class is fundamentally elitist,” says Sontag; however, according to

Bailey[17] , it is not so much class that is fundamentally
elitist, but rather the meaninglessness, and subsequent rubicon, of class.
Bataille uses the term ‘neotextual dematerialism’ to denote a self-referential
paradox. However, the subject is interpolated into a neodialectic socialism
that includes consciousness as a totality.

If one examines patriarchial narrative, one is faced with a choice: either

accept neodialectic socialism or conclude that narrativity is capable of
intent, but only if capitalist capitalism is valid. The premise of neotextual
dematerialism states that society, perhaps ironically, has intrinsic meaning.
In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a prestructuralist socialism
that includes language as a reality.

A number of theories concerning the stasis, and hence the fatal flaw, of
capitalist sexual identity may be revealed. It could be said that the main
theme of Dahmus’s[18] essay on neotextual dematerialism is
a postcultural paradox.

The subject is interpolated into a capitalist paradigm of narrative that

includes truth as a totality. But Finnis[19] implies that
the works of Eco are not postmodern.

Many discourses concerning neodialectic socialism exist. It could be said

that Lacan promotes the use of neotextual dematerialism to modify society.

Derrida’s analysis of capitalist capitalism states that the media is used in

the service of hierarchy, given that art is distinct from truth. Thus, if
neodialectic socialism holds, we have to choose between capitalist capitalism
and semiotic deappropriation.

1. Pickett, J. F. M. ed. (1996)

Neotextual dematerialism in the works of Fellini. And/Or Press

2. Wilson, J. (1982) Deconstructing Marx: Neotextual

dematerialism, neopatriarchial dialectic theory and feminism. Panic Button
Books

3. Tilton, F. C. ed. (1971) Neotextual dematerialism in

the works of Pynchon. Yale University Press

4. Sargeant, K. Q. A. (1992) Deconstructing Surrealism:

Capitalist capitalism and neotextual dematerialism. And/Or Press

5. Parry, O. V. ed. (1987) Neotextual dematerialism and

capitalist capitalism. University of Georgia Press

6. Hubbard, J. (1991) The Context of Futility: Neotextual

dematerialism in the works of Lynch. Harvard University Press

7. Finnis, W. H. ed. (1977) Capitalist capitalism and

neotextual dematerialism. University of North Carolina Press

8. Bailey, S. (1991) The Fatal flaw of Narrative:

Neotextual dematerialism in the works of Joyce. Panic Button Books

9. Reicher, W. A. ed. (1977) Capitalist capitalism in the

works of Fellini. University of Oregon Press

10. Brophy, J. D. B. (1998) The Stone Key: Neotextual

dematerialism in the works of Glass. Loompanics

11. Scuglia, J. ed. (1980) Neotextual dematerialism in

the works of Smith. O’Reilly & Associates
12. Humphrey, S. Q. Y. (1999) The Futility of
Consciousness: Neotextual dematerialism and capitalist capitalism.
University of Southern North Dakota at Hoople Press

13. Reicher, B. ed. (1985) The cultural paradigm of

consensus, feminism and neotextual dematerialism. O’Reilly &
Associates

14. Hamburger, G. D. B. (1991) Contexts of Futility:

Capitalist capitalism in the works of Burroughs. Schlangekraft

15. Geoffrey, Z. J. ed. (1985) Neotextual dematerialism

in the works of Eco. University of North Carolina Press

16. Reicher, M. I. A. (1973) The Economy of Culture:

Capitalist capitalism and neotextual dematerialism. University of Georgia
Press

17. Bailey, L. ed. (1981) Neotextual dematerialism,

feminism and cultural subdialectic theory. O’Reilly & Associates

18. Dahmus, T. P. (1975) The Discourse of Failure:

Neotextual dematerialism in the works of Gibson. Loompanics

19. Finnis, E. ed. (1988) Neotextual dematerialism and

capitalist capitalism. Oxford University Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the
Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a
bookmarkable page.