CASTILLO, JOFREY U.

INSTITUTION OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF JUDGES AND JUSTICES

3RD YEAR
PROBLEM AREAS IN LEGAL ETHICS Is the form and
substance sufficient?
How instituted? NO DISMISSED

1. MOTU PROPIO by the Supreme

Court; YES Did the respondent filed his
2. Upon a VERIFIED COMPLAINT comment within ten days?
NO
filed before the Supreme Court
supported by:
a. Affidavit of persons who SERVED COPY
have personal knowledge of TO THE
the facts alleged therein; or RESPONDENT
OFFICE OF THE COURT HEARING
b. Documents which may
ADMINISTRATOR
substantiate said allegations.
3. ANONYMOUS COMPLAINT
YES
supported by public records of
indubitable integrity filed with SUPREME
the Supreme Court.  DISMISSAL FROM THE SERVICE COURT
 FORFITURE OF ALL OR PART OF THE BENEFIT AS THE COURT
MAY DETERMINE
 DISQUALIFICATION FROM REINSTATEMENT OR APPOINTMENT GUILTY ? NO
TO ANY PUBLIC OFFICE, INCLUDING GOCC
 SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE WITHOUT SALARY AND OTHER
BENEFITS FOR MORE THAN 3 MOS. BUT NOT EXCEEDING 6MOS. YES
 SUSPENSION FROM THE OFFICE
 FINE OF MORE THAN P20,000 BUT NOT EXCEEDING P40,000
WITHOUT SALARY AND OTHER
BENEFITS FOR NOT LESS THAN ONE
MO. NOR MORE THAN THREE MOS. SERIOUS CHARGE
 FINE OF MORE THAN P10,000 BUT  FINE OF NOT LESS THAN P1,000 BUT
NOT EXCEEDING P20,000 LESS SERIOUS CHARGE
NOT EXCEEDING P10,000
 CENSURE LIGHT CHARGE
 REPRIMAND
 ADMONITION WITH WARNING