Sie sind auf Seite 1von 5

200 HEALING OF CORONOID PROCESS FRACTURES

currence of primary and metastatic tumors in this re- metastasis of small cell carcinoma oflung to the pre-auricular
gion. region. Jpn J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:1894, 1991
3. Thoma KH: Tumors of the condyle and temporomandibular
The 12 cases of metastatic esophageal cancer, in- joint. Oral Surg 7:1091, 1954
cluding our case, were all carcinomas. Histologically, 4. Anderson RS, Peeples WJ: Mandibular osseous metastasis from
there were eight cases ofSCC,s,7,9.12,14 three of AC,4,6,13 esophageal carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48: 188, 1980
5. Harada T, Tanaka M, Kishimoto H, Yoshimura Y: Esophageal
and one of small cell carcinoma," Interestingly, com- carcinoma metastasized to the mental region. Jpn J Oral
pared with AC, which metastasized to bone and in- Maxillofac Surg 31:2415,1985
vaded the surrounding soft tissue, SCC metastasized 6. Jones DC: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus presenting as a
mandibular metastasis. J Oral MaxiIlofac Surg 47:504, 1989
to soft tissue and invaded the bone. All the patients 7. Kurashina K, Takeda S, Yamagishi K, et al: Esophageal carci-
were males and half were Japanese. The incidence of noma metastatic to the mandible. J Jpn Stomatol Soc 30: 121,
1981
esophageal cancer in Japan is high, as is its frequency
8. Miyahara H, Umatani K, Senba 0, Yoshino K.: Metastatic tumors
in men. to the head and neck region. J Otolaryngol Jpn 86:951, 1983
The histologic type is almost always SCc. 16 The av- 9. Robinson ER, Stuteville OH: Metastatic tumors to the tongue.
Oral Surg 15:980, 1962
erage age at diagnosis was 55.8 years. In four of the 12
10. Sakashita H, Miyata M, Hayashi M, Kurumaya H: Three cases
cases,6,IO,12,13 the patients had symptoms of mandibular of metastatic carcinoma in oral and neck region. J Jpn Sto-
or maxillary pain and swelling as the initial manifes- matol Soc 39:90, 1990
II. Shimizu T, Nishimura T, Kaneko M, Morita T, Mizuno A, Su-
tation of malignant disease. The prognosis of these pa-
giyama A: Metastatic tumors to the gingiva. Jpn J Cancer
tients was very poor, with only one reported to be alive Clin 36:719,1990
when the report was published." The mean period from 12. Socolosky M, Bouquot JE, Graves RW: Esophageal carcinoma
metastatic to the oral cavity. J Oral MaxiIlofac Surg 44:825,
the appearance of metastasis to death was 5.05 months 1986
(Table 1). 13. Tideman H, Arvier JF, Bosanquet AG, Wilson OF: Esophageal
adenocarcinoma metastatic to the maxilla. Oral Surg 62:564,
1986
References 14. ZegareIli OJ, Tsukada Y, Picken JW, Greene GW: Metastatic
tumor to the tongue. Oral Surg 35:202, 1973
15. Cash CD, Royer BQ, Dahlin DC: Metastatic tumors of the jaws.
I. Meyer I, Shklar G: Malignant tumors metastatic to mouth and Oral Surg 14:897, 1961
jaws. Oral Surg 20:350, 1965 16. Robbins SL, Cotran RS: Pathologic Basis of Disease (ed 2). Phil-
2. Takahashi Y, Yanagisawa T, Onoe Y, et al: A case of suspected adelphia, PA, Saunders, 1982, p 926

J Oral Maxillofac Surg


51:200-204,1993

Healing of Fractures of the


Coronoid Process:
Report of Cases
YASUHARU TAKENOSHITA, DDS, DDSc,* TAKASHI ENOMOTO, DDS,t
AND MASUICHIRO OKA, MD, DMSc+
Fractures of the coronoid process are rare, and little calized force.4,s Concomitant fractures ofother portions
has been written about them because oftheir relatively of the mandible should be looked for when coronoid
unimportance.l-' Isolated fractures in this area are ex- fractures are present. Very little is known about the
ceedingly uncommon and are often the result of 10- changes that occur in the fractured coronoid tip over
time. This article describes the findings in five cases.
Received from the Second Department of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. Report of Cases
* Associate Professor.
t Former Resident.
* Professor.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Takenoshita:
Five cases of coronoid process fracture were treated
in a 6-year period between 1980 and 1985 (Table I).
Second Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Follow-up showed that the patients could open their
Dentistry, Kyushu University 61, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashiku, Fu- mouths an average of 35 mm, measured as the inter-
kuoka, 812 Japan.
incisal distance. The lateral excursions to both sides
© 1993 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons were also within normal limits. Three typical cases are
0278-2391/93/5102-0018$3.00/0 described.
TAKENOSHITA, ENOMOTO, AND OKA 201

Table 1. Data on Patients With Fractures of the Coronoid Process

Case Age Max. Mouth Opening


No. (yr) Sex Etiology Point of Force Fracture Treatment at Follow-up (mm) Result

25 M AP Right cheek Right zygoma mandibular C >35 Separated


body DBW
MMF4W
2 16 M MC Right cheek Right zygoma DBW 40 Reattached
3 21 F AP Menton Right condylar neck DBW 35 Reattached
mandibular body Plate
MMF3W
4 46 M BC Left cheek Left zygoma TA 48 Reattached
5 18 M AD Left lower lip Right condylar neck, Plate 55 Reattached
symphysis Plate
MMF3W

Abbre viations: AP, automobile accid ent-passenger's seat; MC, motorcycle; BC, bicycle; AD, automobile accident-driver; C, conservative;
DBW, direct bone wiring; TA, Gillies' temporal approach.

Case 1 atively, the patient had good mandibular movement (Fig 6),
and her occlusion has remained stable and normal. She can
A 25-year-old man received an injury to the right cheek chew without any difficulty. A year after operat ion, the mini-
and upper lip in an automobile accident . The lower incisors plate was removed . At that time, the coronoid process and
were avulsed, and radiologic examination revealed a linear condylar neck showed osseous healing (Fig 7).
right zygomatic fracture, fracture ofthe mandible in the right
cani ne region, and a transverse fracture of the coronoid pro-
cess (Fig 1).lntraosseous wiring of the mandibular body was Discussion
performed through an intraoral route. No treatment was
provided for the fractured coronoid process. Maxillornan-
dibular fixation (MMF) was applied for 4 weeks, and the Because of their protected position under the zygo-
healing process was uneventful. matic arch or zygomaticomalar complex, coronoid
At 2-year follow-up, there was no osseous bridging of the fractures due to direct trauma are very uncommon.v'
fractured coronoid process (Fig 2). It was assumed that there WalkerS has described two types of fracture, oblique
was a fibrous union or false joint formation. The patient had and vertical, whereas Brener and Alley?classified them
no mandibular dysfunction but complained of some facial
pain. Consequently, the wires in the canine region were re- as transverse and longitudinal. These two classifications
moved. The patient had a stable occlusion, with a maximum differ in the path of the fracture line.
mouth opening of 35 mm. Several theories have been proposed to explain the
pathogenesis of these fractures . Generally, they are be-
Case 2 lieved to be caused by reflex muscular contracture of
the strong temporalis muscle, which then displaces the
A 16-year-old boy was referred to our department for the
treatment of a right zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture.
On radiologic examination, a fracture of the tip of the coro-
noid process on the right side, with slight displacement, was
noted (Fig 3). The fracture of the zygoma was reduced with
a bone hook and fixed with a single stainless steel wire at the
infraorbital rim. MMF was not applied. At l- year follow-up,
the coronoid process had healed by bony union (Fig 4), and
the patient was able to open his mouth 47 mm.

Case 3
A 23-year-old woman was injured in an automobile ac-
cident. She was sitting in the passenger's seat. On radiologic
examination, a high condylar neck fracture with anteromedial
dislocation , a coronoid process fracture, and a canine region
fracture were present on the right side (Fig 5). The dislocated
condyle was repositioned and fixed by direct wiring via a
preauricular approach and a submandibular incision. In the
right canine area, a mini plate osteosynthesis was done. The
coronoid process fracture was treated conservatively. MMF FIGURE 1. Panoramic radiograph demonstrating a fracture of the
was released 3 weeks after operation and followed by phys- mandibular coronoid process on the right side with little displacement.
iotherapy for restoration of mandibular function. Postoper- Fractures in the right lower canine region and zygoma are also present.
202 HEALING OF CORONOID PROCESS FRACTURES

FIGURE 2. The fractured tip ofthe coronoid process is in position FIGURE 4. Radiograph showing possible reattachment of the cor-
2 years after injury. However, note the possible formation of a false onoid process to the ramus IO months after injury.
joint appearing as radiolucent line between the tip and the ascending
ramus.
exceedingly violent, the protective musculature may
tear and the fractured coronoid then may be displaced
fragment upward into the infratemporal fossa.2, 10 A into the temporal fossa." Thus, a coronoidectomy is
similar mechanism has been proposed for fracture of sometimes performed to remove the superior pull of
the genital tubercle of the mandible. I 1,12 The coronoid the temporalis muscle.'" It is difficult to diagnose the
process is also sometimes fractured during such oper- coronoid fractures on clinical examination because
ations as extraction of lower third molars, cystectomy, they often present minimal findings.v'? Definitive di-
or the sagittal split osteotomy. The frequency of coro- agnosis, in many cases, is based on radiographic evi-
noid process fractures is reported to be 1% to 3% of dence. These fractures can be demonstrated in lateral
the mandibular fractures?,9,13.ls and 0.6% to 4.7% of oblique radiographs of the mandible and especially in
all facial or maxillofacial fractures. 16 Isolated coronoid the panoramic radiograph.v'"
fractures usually occur concomitantly, with other frac- The muscular splinting of the temporalis is usually
tures such as the neck of the condylar process or zygo- sufficient to hold the fragment in position until healing
matic bone,S,I? The symptoms of coronoid fractures occurS.9,I3,16 Treatment is controversial and depends
vary according to the severity of the injury. Isolated on the degree ofdisplacement of the fractured coronoid
fractures can cause lateral cross-bite, limitation of and the severity ofsymptoms. Authors such as Kruger!'
mandibular movement, and slight to moderate swelling and Converse'? advocate conservative treatment when
in the region of the zygomatic arch. 4,16 there is minimal displacement, and others have advised
Coronoid fractures are usually simple and linear and no treatment. 2,4,16,1?,19-21
show little displacement. When the traumatic force is Pain and reflex spasm in the muscles are undoubt-
edly relieved by limitation of mandibular movement.
The lateral cross-bite is usually self-correcting after 1

FIGURE 3. Panoramic radiograph showing a sharply defined ra-


diolucent line extending from the apex of the right coronoid process
to the anterior rim of the ramus (arrow). The fractured mandibular FIGURE 5. Panoramic radiograph showing an undisplaoed fracture
coronoid process is rotated and elevated from its original position of the right coronoid process. No treatment was necessary except for
by the temporalis muscle. the fractures of right condyle and symphysis.
TAKENOSHlTA, ENOMOTO, AND OKA 203

18.11I up 18... up

right an~

38 .11I 28 .,

right
38 11I11I

-58.. dewn -58.. dewn

Front~l Horizont~l S~gitt~l


[SHIMIZU-1J
870715
FIGURE 6. Mandibular kinesiogram tracing 8 months postoperatively. The patient's mandibular function is normal.

to 2 weeks. The temporalis and masseter muscles will case ofa fractured coronoid process with displacement
act as a balance against displacement of the fragment, toward the temporal fossa due to a periosteal tear,
just as with subcondylar fractures. Limitation of man- function is usually completely restored without any
dibular movement improves as the primary inflam- treatment. 17
mation subsides. In general, a broad contact between the fractured
Coronoid process fractures can be treated simply fragments usually ensures consolidation. Allen et al 22
with a soft, nonchewy, diet. A head bandage or MMF studied the healing following coronoidotomy in an an-
may be used if the fracture is symptomatic.P:" MMF imal model and concluded that bony union with the
for about 3 weeks relieves discomfort and encourages
prompt healing.2,4,17, 19,20 In the case ofa severely com-
minuted fracture of the zygoma, it must be remem-
bered that mobilization of the mandible should be en-
couraged to prevent ankylosis. 16,20 Walker, 1,8 however,
warns that any active movement undoubtedly increases
the displacement and delays union.
Surgical exposure usually is not indicated. However,
when the fragment is large enough and impedes man-
dibular function, or if there is marked lateral displace-
ment that prevents osseous contact with the ramus,
intraoral open reduction and intraosseous wiring has
been advised. 3,13,16 If reduction of the fragment is not
feasible, it should be removed. However, there is no
justification for an operation to do this when there is
already fibrous union.
In the cases with limitation of movement due to the
fibrosis of the temporalis muscle, removal of the coro- FIGURE 7. Postoperative panoramic radiograph showing bony
noid process is recommended.? However, even in the union of the fracture of the coronoid process.
204 PROBABLE COCAINE-INDUCED HYPERTHERMIA

ramus may be due to the minimal amount of separa- 8. Walker DG: Fractures of the ramus, condyloid and coronoid
process of the mandible. Br Dent J 123:1, 1943
tion. On the other hand, clinically it has been described 9. Brener MD, Alley RB: Longitudinal fracture of the coronoid
that following coronoidotomy the coronoid process process of the mandible. Oral Surg 29:676, 1970
may retract into the temporal fossa and remain separate 10. Banks P: Killey's Fractures ofthe Mandible (ed 3). Bristol, Wright
or possibly form a false joint with the ramus: IO,22,23 PSG, 1983
II. Rowe NL, Williams JLl: Maxillofacial Injuries, vol I. Edinburgh,
Currarr'" described a 24-year-old woman treated with Churchill Livingstone, 1985
bilateral coronoidotomy in whom union of the coro- 12. Takenoshita Y, Horinouchi Y, Yamamoto M, et al: Mental spine
(genial tubercle) fracture; report of three cases [in Japanese].
noid processes took place in an acceptable position. Jpn J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:187, 1989
On the other hand, Taylor-Monks" reported a case of 13. Kruger GO: Textbook of Oral Surgery (ed 4). St Louis, MO,
a false joint 12 years after coronoidotomy. Shepherd" Mosby, 1974
14. Grabb WC, Smith JW: Plastic Surgery (ed 3). Boston, MA, Little,
reported that in two out of 13 patients, the sectioned Brown, 1979
coronoid process remained separated after 5 years or 15. Anderson L, Hultin M, Kjellman 0, Nordenram A, Rastrom
more. Furthermore, nonunion in fractures ofthe coro- G: Jaw fractures in the country of Stockholm (1978-1980).
Swed Dent J 13:201, 1989 .
noid process may be more common than generally 16. Rapidis AD, Papavassiliou D, Papadimitoriou J, et al: Fractures
supposed." In our series, case I showed that the coro- of the coronoid process of the mandible, an analysis of 52
noid process remained separate without any compli- cases. Int J Oral Surg 14:126, 1985 •
17. Converse JM: Kazanjian & Converse's Surgical Treatment of
cations. -Facial Injuries (ed 3). Baltimore, MD, Williams & Wilkins,
1974
References 18. Peterson U, Ellis EIII, Hupp JR, Tucker MR: Contemporary
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. St Louis, MO, Mosby Com-
I. Walker DG: Fractures of the ramus, condyloid and coronoid pany, 1988
process of the mandible. Br Dent J 122:265, 1942 19. Dingman RO, Natvig R: Surgery of Facial Fractures. Philadel-
2. Zaydon TB, Brown JB: Early Treatment of Facial Injuries. Phil- phia, PA, Saunders, 1964
adelphia, PA, Lea & Febiger, 1964 20. Spiessl B, Schroll K: Spezielle Frakturen- und Luxationslehre.
3. Thoma KH: Oral Surgery, vol I (ed 5). St Louis, MO, Mosby, Bandl/I, Gesichtsschaedel, Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag,
1969 . 1972
4. Schultz KC: Facial Injuries(ed 2). Chicago, IL, Year Book Med- 21. Waite DE: Textbook of Practical Oral Surgery (ed 2). Philadel-
ical, 1977 phia, PA, Lea & Febiger, 1978
5. Schwenzer N, Grimm G: Zahn- Mund- und Kiefer-heilkunde. 22. Allen PG, Reade PC, Steidler NE: Healing following coronoid-
Band 2, Spezielle, Chirurgie, Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag, ectomy in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 18:109, 1989
1981 23. Taylor-Monks F: Bilateral hyperplasia of the mandibular coro-
6. Stanley RB: Pathogenesis and evaluation of mandibular fractures. noid processes; a case report. Br J Oral Surg 16:31, 1978
III Mathog RH (ed): Maxillofacial Trauma. Baltimore, MD, 24. Curran JB: Coronoid surgery after subcondylar osteotomy, report
Williams & Wilkins, 1984, pp 136-147 of cases. J Oral Surg 29:344, 1971
7. Johnson RL: Unusual (coronoid) fracture of mandible; report 25. Shepherd JP: Changes in the mandibular ramus following os-
of case. J Oral Surg 16:73, 1958 teotomy-A long-term review. Br J Oral Surg 18:189, 1980

J Oral Maxillofac Surg


51:204·205, 1993

Probable Cocaine-Induced Hyperthermia


in an Anesthetized Patient:
A Case Report
VENKATA S. RAVI, MD,* WALTER P. ZMYSLOWSKI, MD,*
AND JOSEPH MARINO, DMDt

Received from Boston City Hospital and Boston University School Cocaine ingestion is a growing problem in society
of Medicine. at large and any acute medical service, including the
* Staff Anesthesiologist, Boston City Hospital; Assistant Clinical anesthesiology department serving a surgical trauma
Professor in Anesthesiology, Boston University School of Medicine.
t Chief Resident in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. unit, can expect to see patients with acutely high levels
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Ravi: City of of this drug. With the increasingly large numbers of
Boston Department of Health and Hospitals, 818 Harrison Ave, Bos- medical complications due to cocaine ingestion, health
ton, MA 02118.
care providers must be aware of possible alterations in
© 1993 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons normal physiology. We wish to document the intra-
0278-2391/93/5102-0019$3.00/0 operative occurrence of hyperthermia associated with

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen