Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Previous practice defined crossplot response curves based on observations of tool readings in blocks considered
representative of clay-free rock material. For logs recorded in liquid-saturated, mineralogically-pure rocks, this approach
may lead to points plotting slightly to the northwest of the appropriate curve. In the following set of Porosity-Mineralogy
Crossplots, Halliburton employed mathematical modeling and test pit data to establish neutron tool responses in the
pure minerals quartz, calcite, and dolomite. These data are plotted as curves which define the northwestern edges of three
bands representing common ranges of clean field rock materials (sandstone, limestone, and dolostone). Σma labels
identify the response in specific field rocks. For example, Σma = 10.0 c.u. is often used to represent a typical sandstone,
while Σma = 4.6 c.u. describes a perfectly clean quartz matrix. In dolostones, Σma = 4.7 c.u. is thought to represent a
pure primary dolomite while Σma = 20.0 c.u. is considered more characteristic of secondary dolomitization.
Chart: CPCNT-K-1a (Porosity-Mineralogy Crossplots: Bulk (Log) Density versus
Neutron Porosity (CNT-K), Fluid Density = 0.85 g/cc)
Applications: Determination porosity and mineralogy mix from density and neutron logs
Nomenclature: φNLS . . . . . . . . formation porosity from neutron measurement made assuming a limestone matrix
ρb . . . . . . . . . . formation bulk density
ρf . . . . . . . . . . formation fluid density in zone of investigation
ΣQ . . . . . . . . . quartz matrix thermal neutron capture cross section
ΣC . . . . . . . . . calcite matrix thermal neutron capture cross section
ΣD . . . . . . . . . dolomite matrix thermal neutron capture cross section
φDN . . . . . . . . . formation porosity from combined neutron and density data
Procedure: From φNLS = 17% on the Neutron Limestone Porosity axis, project vertically into the chart. From
ρb = 2.34 g/cc on the Bulk Density axis, project horizontally into the chart. Note that the point of
intersection of the two projections (later called the plotted point) lies between the Quartz and Calcite
curves on the chart as well as between the Quartz and Dolomite curves. Thus, the constituent minerals
can be quartz and calcite, or quartz and dolomite.
To determine the porosity and mineralogy mix if the constituent minerals are quartz and calcite, construct
a line segment containing the plotted point and connecting points of equal porosity on the Quartz and
Calcite curves. This line segment should connect the 19% porosity points on the two curves, indicating
that φDN = 19%. By using the plotted point to proportion the segment, you can estimate that the matrix
contains about 35% quartz and 65% calcite, with calcite having the higher percentage since the plotted
point is closer to the Calcite curve.
To determine the porosity and mineralogy mix if the constituent minerals are quartz and dolomite,
construct a line segment containing the plotted point and connecting points of equal porosity on the
Quartz and Dolomite curves. This line segment should connect the 20% porosity points on the two
curves, indicating that φDN = 20%. By using the plotted point to proportion the segment, you can estimate
that the matrix contains about 70% quartz and 30% dolomite, with quartz having the higher percentage
since the plotted point is closer to the Quartz curve.
Answer: If the constituent minerals are quartz and calcite, then φDN = 19% and the mineralogy mix is approximately
35% quartz and 65% calcite. If the constituent minerals are quartz and dolomite, then φDN = 20% and
the mineralogy mix is approximately 70% quartz and 30% dolomite.
Notes: As long as the rock matrix is composed of two of the three common minerals quartz, calcite, and dolomite,
the crossplotted porosity is relatively insensitive to the mineralogy mix. To resolve ambiguities regarding
which minerals are present (e.g., quartz and calcite versus quartz and dolomite), you can use a Mineral
Identification Plot.
Individual crossplots of two porosity logs define the mineralogy percentage mix for two known minerals.
Three minerals require three porosity logs. More minerals require more measurements.
ρ
Σ
φ
ρ
Σ
φ
ρ
Σ
φ
Chart: CPCNT-K-2a (Porosity-Mineralogy Crossplots: Bulk (Log) Density versus Sonic)
Applications: Determination of porosity and mineralogy mix from density and sonic logs
Procedure: From ∆tc = 82 µs/ft on the Interval Transit Time axis, project vertically into the chart. From
ρb = 2.22 g/cc on the Bulk Density axis, project horizontally into the chart. Note that the point of
intersection of the two projections (later called the plotted point) lies between the empirical Calcite
and Quartz curves as well as between the empirical Calcite and Dolomite curves. Thus, the constituent
minerals can be calcite and quartz, or calcite and dolomite.
To determine the porosity and mineralogy mix if the constituent minerals are calcite and quartz, construct
a line segment containing the plotted point and connecting points of equal porosity on the empirical
Calcite and Quartz curves. This line segment should connect the 26% porosity points on the two curves,
indicating that φSD = 26%. By using the plotted point to proportion the segment, you can estimate that
the matrix contains about 75% calcite and 25% quartz, with calcite having the higher percentage
since the plotted point is closer to the empirical Calcite curve.
To determine the porosity and mineralogy mix if the constituent minerals are calcite and dolomite,
construct a line segment containing the plotted point and connecting points of equal porosity on the
empirical Calcite and Dolomite curves. This line segment should connect the 27.6% porosity points
on the two curves, indicating that φSD = 27.6%. By using the plotted point to proportion the segment,
you can estimate that the matrix contains about 85% calcite and 15% dolomite, with calcite having
the higher percentage since the plotted point is closer to the empirical Calcite curve.
Answer: If the constituent minerals are calcite and quartz, then empirically φSD = 26.0% and the mineralogy mix
is approximately 75% calcite and 25% quartz. If the constituent minerals are calcite and dolomite, then
empirically φSD = 27.6% and the mineralogy mix is approximately 85% calcite and 15% dolomite.
Notes: As long as the rock matrix is composed of two of the three common minerals quartz, calcite, and dolomite,
the crossplotted porosity is relatively insensitive to the mineralogy mix. To resolve ambiguities regarding
which minerals are present (e.g., calcite and quartz versus calcite and dolomite), you can use a
Mineral Identification Plot.
Individual crossplots of two porosity logs define the mineralogy percentage mix for two known minerals.
Three minerals require three porosity logs. More minerals require more measurements.
Reference: Wyllie, M.R.J., “Elastic Wave Velocities in Heterogenous and Porous Media,” Geophysics, Vol. 21, 1956, p. 41.
Krief, M., Garat, J., Stellingwerff, J., and Ventre, J.: “A Petrophysical Interpretation Using the Velocities
of P and S Waves (Full-Waveform Sonic).”Presented at the 12th International Formation Evaluation
Symposium, Paris, France, Oct. 24-27, 1989, paper HH.
∆ µ
ρ
∆ µ µ
∆ µ
∆ µ
ρ
ρ
∆
∆ µ
∆ µ
ρ
∆ µ∝ µ
∆
Chart: CPCNT-K-3 (Porosity-Mineralogy Crossplots: Sonic versus Neutron Porosity
(CNT-K))
Applications: Determination of porosity and mineralogy mix from sonic and neutron logs
Procedure: From φNLS = 21% on the Neutron Limestone Porosity axis, project vertically into the chart. From
∆tc = 74 µs/ft on the Interval Transit Time axis, project horizontally into the chart. Note that the point of
intersection of the two projections (later called the plotted point) lies between the empirical Quartz and
Calcite curves on the chart as well as between the empirical Quartz and Dolomite curves. Thus, the
constituent minerals can be quartz and calcite, or quartz and dolomite.
To determine the porosity and mineralogy mix if the constituent minerals are quartz and calcite, construct
a line segment containing the plotted point and connecting points of equal porosity on the empirical
Quartz and Calcite curves. This line segment should connect the 22.8% porosity points on the two
curves, indicating that φSN = 22.8%. By using the plotted point to proportion the segment, you can
estimate that the matrix contains about 30% quartz and 70% calcite, with calcite having the higher
percentage since the plotted point is closer to the empirical Calcite curve.
To determine the porosity and mineralogy mix if the constituent minerals are quartz and dolomite, construct
a line segment containing the plotted point and connecting points of equal porosity on the empirical
Quartz and Dolomite curves. This line segment should connect the 22.8% porosity points on the two
curves, indicating that φSN = 22.8%. By using the plotted point to proportion the segment, you can
estimate that the matrix contains about 55% quartz and 45% dolomite, with quartz having the higher
percentage since the plotted point is closer to the empirical Quartz curve.
Answer: If the constituent minerals are quartz and calcite, then φSN = 22.8% and the mineralogy mix is
approximately 30% quartz and 70% calcite. If the constituent minerals are quartz and dolomite, then
φSN = 22.8% and the mineralogy mix is approximately 55% quartz and 45% dolomite.
Notes: As long as the rock matrix is composed of two of the three common minerals quartz, calcite, and dolomite,
the crossplotted porosity is relatively insensitive to the mineralogy mix. To resolve ambiguities regarding
which minerals are present (e.g., quartz and calcite versus quartz and dolomite), you can use a
Mineral Identification Plot.
Individual crossplots of two porosity logs define the mineralogy percentage mix for two known minerals.
Three minerals require three porosity logs. More minerals require more measurements.
Reference: Wyllie, M.R.J., “Elastic Wave Velocities in Heterogenous and Porous Media,” Geophysics, Vol. 21, 1956, p. 41.
Krief, M., Garat, J., Stellingwerff, J., and Ventre, J.: “A Petrophysical Interpretation Using the Velocities
of P and S Waves (Full-Waveform Sonic).”Presented at the 12th International Formation Evaluation
Symposium, Paris, France, Oct. 24-27, 1989, paper HH.
µ
µ
∆
∆
∆ µ µ
φ
Chart: MIPCNT-K-4 (Mineral Identification Plot - ρmaa Determination)
Applications: Determination of apparent formation matrix density
Given: ρb = 2.34 g/cc (from density log corrected for borehole effects)
φNLS = 17% (from CNT-K log corrected for borehole effects)
Find: ρmaa
Procedure: From φNLS = 17% on the Neutron Limestone Porosity axis, project vertically into the chart. From
ρb = 2.34 g/cc on the Bulk Density axis, project horizontally into the chart. The point of intersection of
the two projections lies between the ρmaa = 2.66 g/cc and ρmaa= 2.68 g/cc curves. Use the intersection
point to interpolate between the two curves and estimate ρmaa to be 2.675 g/cc.
Notes: You enter the value of ρma that you determine from this chart into MIP-1 (Chart MIPCNT-K-7) or MIP-2
(Chart MIPCNT-K-8).
ρ
ρ
ρ
φ
Chart: MIPCNT-K-5 (Mineral Identification Plot - ∆tmaa Determination)
Applications: Determination of apparent sonic compressional interval transit time in formation matrix
Find: ∆tmaa
Procedure: From φNLS = 17% on the Neutron Limestone Porosity axis, project vertically into the chart. From
∆tc = 74.0 µs/ft on the Interval Transit Time axis, project horizontally into the chart. The point of
intersection of the two projections lies very near the ∆tmaa= 52.5 µs/ft curve. Thus, estimate ∆tmaa to
be 52.5 µs/ft.
Notes: You enter the value of ∆tmaa that you determine from this chart into MIP-1 (Chart MIPCNT-K-7).
Reference: Wyllie, M.R.J., “Elastic Wave Velocities in Heterogenous and Porous Media,” Geophysics, Vol. 21, 1956, p. 41.
Krief, M., Garat, J., Stellingwerff, J., and Ventre, J.: “A Petrophysical Interpretation Using the Velocities
of P and S Waves (Full-Waveform Sonic).”Presented at the 12th International Formation Evaluation
Symposium, Paris, France, Oct. 24-27, 1989, paper HH.
∆
∆ µ µ
∆
∆
φ
Chart: MIPCNT-K-6 (Mineral Identification Plot - Umaa Determination)
Nomenclature: φNLS . . . . . . . . formation porosity from neutron measurement made assuming a limestone matrix
ρb . . . . . . . . . . formation bulk density
ρf . . . . . . . . . . formation fluid density in zone of investigation
Pe . . . . . . . . . . photoelectric factor
U .. . . . . . . . . volumetric photoelectric factor
Umaa . . . . . . . . apparent matrix volumetric photoelectric factor
φta . . . . . . . . . apparent total formation porosity
Find: Umaa
Procedure: Use φNLS = 17% and ρb = 2.34 g/cc in Chart CPCNT-K-1b to determine that φta = 19.9%. (Refer to the
example accompanying Chart CPCNT-K-1a for the procedure to use.)
To determine the point at which to enter the U axis on the chart, use the nomograph at the bottom of the
page. Construct a line segment through ρb = 2.34 g/cc on the ρb leg and through Pe = 2.41 on the Pe
leg. Extend the segment to intersect the U axis of the chart. The segment intersects the U axis at
U = 5.69.
From U = 5.69 on the U axis, project vertically into the chart. From φta = 19.9% on the φta axis, project
horizontally into the chart. The point of intersection of the two projections lies on the Umaa = 7.0 curve.
Thus, estimate Umaato be 7.0.
Notes: You enter the value of Umaa that you determine from this chart into MIP-2 (Chart MIPCNT-K-8).
φ
ρ
Chart: MIPCNT-K-7 (Mineral Identification Plot (MIP-1) ρmaa versus ∆maa)
Applications: Determination of formation mineralogy from the apparent density and apparent sonic compressional
interval transit time of the formation matrix
Procedure: From ∆tmaa = 52.5 µs/ft on the ∆tmaa axis, project vertically into the chart. From ρmaa = 2.675 g/cc on
the ρmaa axis, project horizontally into the chart. The intersection of the two projections is located between
the quartz and dolomite points on the chart. Assuming that the formation is shale-free, the position of
the intersection point indicates that the formation mineralogy is approximately 60% quartz and 40%
calcite.
Answer: The formation matrix is comprised of approximately 60% quartz and 40% calcite.
Notes: If you know that the rock matrix is comprised of any three minerals shown on MIP-1, then you can
construct a proportionality triangle to determine the percentages of each.
ρ ∆
∆ µ
ρ
∆ µ
Chart: MIPCNT-K-8 (Mineral Identification Plot (MIP 2) - ρmaa versus Umaa)
Applications: Determination of formation mineralogy from the apparent density of the formation matrix and from the
apparent matrix volumetric photoelectric factor.
Procedure: From ρmaa = 2.675 g/cc on the ρmaa axis, project horizontally into the chart. From Umaa = 7.0 on the
Umaa axis, project vertically into the chart. The intersection of the two projections is located near the
quartz point on the chart. Thus, the formation mineralogy is most likely to be predominantly quartz.
If you assume the formation to be composed of only the primary minerals quartz, calcite, and dolomite,
you can estimate the percentage of each by using the triangular figure in the chart. The previously found
point of intersection of the projections into the chart lies between the 60% and 80% Quartz lines (the
diagonally oriented lines running lower-left to upper-right) in the triangle. From the position of the point
between those two lines, you can estimate that the formation contains about 72% quartz. The intersection
point also lies between the 20% and 40% Calcite lines (the diagonally oriented lines running upper-left
to lower-right). From the point’s position between the Calcite lines, estimate that the formation contains
about 21% calcite. Finally, the point lies between the 0% and 20% dolomite lines (the approximately
horizontally oriented lines). From the point’s position between the Dolomite lines, estimate that the
formation contains about 7% dolomite.
Answer: The formation is predominantly quartz. if you assume that the formation contains only quartz, calcite,
and dolomite, then the mineralogy is approximately 72% quartz, 21% calcite, and 7% dolomite.
Notes: You can select any three minerals to from a proportionality triangle such as the one shown in the chart.
ρ
ρ