Chapter VI: Genome mapping

YEAR III PHARM.D

DR. V. CHITRA
 Genetic and Physical Maps

• genome mapping methods can be divided into two

categories.
• Genetic mapping:uses genetic techniques to construct
maps showing the positions of genes and other sequence
features on a genome. Genetic techniques include cross-
breeding experiments or, in the case of humans, the
examination of family histories (pedigrees).
• Physical mapping uses molecular biology techniques to
examine DNA molecules directly in order to construct
maps showing the positions of sequence features,
including genes.
 Markers for genetic mapping

• The first genetic maps, constructed in the organisms

such as the fruit fly, used genes as markers.
• The only genes that could be studied were those
specifying phenotypes that were distinguishable by
visual examination. Eg. Eye color, height.
• Some organisms have very few visual characteristics
so gene mapping with these organisms has to rely on
biochemical phenotypes
 Biochemical markers in Human

• In human the biochemical phenotypes that can be

scored by blood typing. These include the standard
blood groups such as the ABO series and also the
human leukocyte antigens (the HLA system).
• A big advantage of these markers is that many of the
relevant genes have multiple alleles. For example,
the gene called HLA-DRB1 has at least 290 alleles
and HLA-B has over 400. This is relevant because If
all the family members have the same allele for the
gene being studied then no useful information can be
obtained.
 Drawbacks of using gene as marker

y Genes are very useful markers but they are by no

means ideal. One problem, especially with larger
genomes such as those of vertebrates and flowering
plants, is that a map based entirely on genes is not
very detailed
 DNA markers

y As with gene markers, a DNA marker must have at

least two alleles to be useful. There are three types of
DNA sequence feature that satisfy this requirement:
restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs),
simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs), and
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
 RFLP

• The DNA molecule on the left has a polymorphic

restriction site (marked with the asterisk) that is not
present in the molecule on the right. The RFLP is
revealed after treatment with the restriction enzyme
because one of the molecules is cut into four fragments
whereas the other is cut into three fragments.
Simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs)

• SSLPs are arrays of repeat sequences that display length

variations, different alleles containing different numbers
of repeat units
• Unlike RFLPs that can have only two alleles, SSLPs can
be multi-allelic as each SSLP can have a number of
different length variants. There are two types of SSLP,
both of which were described in
• Minisatellites, also known as variable number of tandem
repeats (VNTRs), in which the repeat unit is up to 25 bp
in length;
• Microsatellites or simple tandem repeats (STRs),
whose repeats are shorter, usually dinucleotide or
tetranucleotide units.
 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

•
These are positions in a genome where some
individuals have one nucleotide (e.g. a G) and
others have a different nucleotide (e.g. a C)). There
are vast numbers of SNPs in every genome, some
of which also give rise to RFLPs, but many of which
do not because the sequence in which they lie is not
recognized by any restriction enzyme. In the
human genome there are at least 1.42 million
SNPs, only 100 000 of which result in an RFLP
 SNP

y Although each SNP could, potentially, have four

alleles (because there are four nucleotides), most
exist in just two forms, so these markers suffer from
the same drawback as RFLPs with regard to human
genetic mapping: there is a high possibility that a
SNP does not display any variability in the family
that is being studied.
 SNP

• The advantages of SNPs are their abundant numbers

and the fact that they can be typed by methods that
do not involve gel electrophoresis. This is important
because gel electrophoresis has proved difficult to
automate so any detection method that uses it will be
relatively slow and labor-intensive. SNP detection is
more rapid because it is based on oligonucleotide
hybridization analysis.
 Oligonucleotide hybridization

y Oligonucleotide hybridization can therefore

discriminate between the two alleles of an SNP.
Various screening strategies have been devised
including DNA chip technology and solution
hybridization techniques.
 Linkage analysis is the basis of genetic mapping

• Chromosomes are inherited as intact units, so it was

reasoned that the alleles of some pairs of genes will
be inherited together because they are on the same
chromosome. This is the principle of genetic linkage,
• Pairs of genes were either inherited independently,
as expected for genes in different chromosomes, or,
if they showed linkage, then it was only partial
linkage: sometimes they were inherited together and
sometimes they were not
 sequence with no linkage

• the frequency with which the genes are unlinked by

crossovers will be directly proportional to how far
apart they are on their chromosome. The
recombination frequency is therefore a measure of
the distance between two genes
• If you work out the recombination frequencies for
different pairs of genes, you can construct a map of
their relative positions on the chromosome
 The LOD score

• The LOD score often used for linkage analysis in

human populations, and also in animal and plant
populations. Computerized LOD score analysis is a
simple way to analyze complex family pedigrees in order
to determine the linkage between Mendelian traits (or
between a trait and a marker, or two markers).
• The method briefly, works as follows:
• Establish a pedigree
• Make a number of estimates of recombination frequency
• Calculate a LOD score for each estimate
• The estimate with the highest LOD score will be
considered the best estimate
 LOD score

y The LOD score is calculated as follows:

y LOD = Z = Log10 probability
of birth sequence with a given linkage
probability of birth sequence with no linkage

y By convention, a LOD score greater than 3.0 is considered evidence for

linkage.

y On the other hand, a LOD score less than -2.0 is considered evidence to
exclude linkage.
 Physical Mapping

y A map generated by genetic techniques is rarely

sufficient for directing the sequencing phase of a
genome project. This is for two reasons:
y The resolution of a genetic map depends on
the number of crossovers that have been
scored.
y Genetic maps have limited accuracy
 physical mapping techniques

• Restriction mapping, which locates the relative

positions on a DNA molecule of the recognition
sequences for restriction endonucleases;
• Fluorescentin situhybridization (FISH), in
which marker locations are mapped by hybridizing a
probe containing the marker to intact chromosomes;
• Sequence tagged site (STS) mapping, in which
the positions of short sequences are mapped by PCR
and/or hybridization analysis of genome fragments.
 The basic methodology for restriction mapping

y The simplest way to construct a restriction map is to

compare the fragment sizes produced when a DNA
molecule is digested with two different restriction
enzymes that recognize different target sequences.
 Limitations of Restriction mapping

• Restriction mapping is more applicable to small rather

than large molecules, with the upper limit for the
technique depending on the frequency of the restriction
sites in the molecule being mapped. In practice, if a DNA
molecule is less than 50 kb in length it is usually possible
to construct an unambiguous restriction map for a
selection of enzymes with six-nucleotide recognition
sequences.
• The limitations of restriction mapping can be eased
slightly by choosing enzymes expected to have infrequent
cut sites(rare cutter) in the target DNA molecule.
 rare cutters

y These ‘rare cutters' fall into two categories:

y Enzymes with seven- or eight-nucleotide
recognition sequences
y Enzymes whose recognition sequences
contain motifs that are rare in the target
DNA
Gel stretching and molecular combing
 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)

•
FISH ( Heiskanen et al., 1996). As in optical
mapping, FISH enables the position of a marker on a
chromosome or extended DNA molecule to be
directly visualized. In optical mapping the marker is
a restriction site and it is visualized as a gap in an
extended DNA fiber. In FISH, the marker is a DNA
sequence that is visualized by hybridization with a
fluorescent probe.
Fluorescent in situ hybridization
 Importance of gene mapping

#Gene map is the anatomy of human genome. It is a

perrequisite to understand functioning of human
genome.

#Helps in analysis of the heterogeneity and

segregation of human genetic diseases.

#Helps to develop methods for gene therapy.

#Provides clinically useful information about linkage