Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Populism

Populism, defined either as an ideology, or (more uncommonly) a political


philosophy, or a type of discourse, i.e., of sociopolitical thought that compares "the
people" against "the elite", and urges social and political system changes. It can also be
defined as a rhetorical style employed by members of various political or social
movements. It is defined by the Cambridge dictionary as "political ideas and activities
that are intended to represent ordinary people's needs and wishes". It can be understood
as any political discourse that appeals to the general mass of the population, to the
"people" as such, regardless of class distinctions and political partisanship - "a folksy
appeal to the 'average guy' or some allegedly general will". This is in opposition to
statism, which holds that a small group of professional politicians know better than the
people and should make decisions on behalf of them. Nevertheless, populist discourse
frequently - specially, but not always, in the Latin American case - buttresses an
authoritarian, top-down process of political mobilization in which the leader addresses
the masses without the mediation of either parties or institutions.
Some scholars argue that populist organizing for empowerment represents the
return of older "Aristotelian" politics of horizontal interactions among equals who are
different, for the sake of public problem solving. Populism has taken left-wing, right-
wing, and even centrist forms, as well as forms of politics that bring together groups and
individuals of diverse partisan views. The use of populist rhetoric in the United States has
recently included references such as "the powerful trial lawyer lobby", "the liberal elite",
or "the Hollywood elite". An example of populist rhetoric on the other side of the
political spectrum was the theme of "Two Americas" in the 2004 Presidential Democratic
Party campaign of John Edwards.
Populists are seen by some politicians as a largely democratic and positive force
in society, while a wing of scholarship in political science contends that populist mass
movements are irrational and introduce instability into the political process. Margaret
Canovan argues that both these polar views are faulty, and has defined two main
branches of modern populism worldwide — agrarian and political — and mapped out
seven disparate sub-categories:
Agrarian
Commodity farmer movements with radical economic agendas such as the US People's
Party of the late 19th century.
Subsistence peasant movements, such as the Eastern European Green Rising militias,
which followed World War I.
Intellectuals who romanticize hard-working farmers and peasants and build radical
agrarian movements like the Russian narodniki.
Political
Populist democracy, including calls for more political participation through reforms such
as the use of popular referendums.
Politicians' populism marked by non-ideological appeals for "the people" to build a
unified coalition.
Reactionary populism, such as the white backlash harvested by George Wallace.
Populist dictatorship, such as that established by Getulio Vargas in Brazil.

1
History in Europe
Classical populism
The word populism is derived from the Latin word populus, which means people
in English (in the sense of "nation", as in: "The Roman People" (populus Romanus), not
in the sense of "multiple individual persons" as in: "There are people visiting us today").
Therefore, populism espouses government by the people as a whole (that is to say, the
masses). This is in contrast to elitism, aristocracy, synarchy or plutocracy, each of which
is an ideology that espouse government by a small, privileged group above the masses.
Populism has been a common political phenomenon throughout history. The Populares
were an unofficial faction in the Roman senate whose supporters were known for their
populist agenda. Some of the most well known of these were Tiberius Grachus, Gaius
Marius, Julius Caesar and Caesar Augustus, all of whom eventually used referendums to
bypass the Roman Senate and appeal to the people directly.
Early modern period
Populism rose during the Reformation; Protestant groups like the Anabaptists
formed ideas about ideal theocratic societies, in which peasants would be able to read the
Bible themselves. Attempts to establish these societies were made during the German
Peasants' War (1524–1525) and the Münster Rebellion (1534–1535). The peasant
movement ultimately failed as cities and nobles made their own peace with the princely
armies, which restored the old order under the nominal overlordship of the Holy Roman
Emperor Charles V, represented in German affairs by his younger brother Ferdinand.
The same conditions contributed to the outbreak of the English Revolution of 1642–1651,
also known as the English Civil War. Conditions led to a proliferation of ideologies and
political movements among peasants, self-employed artisans, and working class people in
England. Many of these groups had a dogmatic Protestant religious bent. They included
Puritans and the Levellers.
Religious revival
Romanticism, the anxiety against rationalism, broadened after the beginnings of
the European and Industrial Revolutions because of cultural, social, and political
insecurity. Romanticism led directly to a strong popular desire to bring about religious
revival, nationalism and populism. The ensuing religious revival eventually blended into
political populism and nationalism, becoming at times a single entity and a powerful
force of public will for change. This paradigm shift was marked by people looking for
security and community because of a strong emotional need to escape from anxiety and
to believe in something larger than themselves.
The revival of religiosity all over Europe played an important role in bringing
people to populism and nationalism. In France, François-René de Chateaubriand provided
the opening shots of Catholic revivalism as he opposed enlightenment's materialism with
the "mystery of life", the human need for redemption. In Germany, Friedrich Daniel Ernst
Schleiermacher promoted pietism by stating that religion was not the institution, but a
mystical piety and sentiment with Christ as the mediating figure raising the human
consciousness above the mundane to God's level. In England, John Wesley's Methodism
split with the Anglican church because of its emphasis on the salvation of the masses as a
key to moral reform, which Wesley saw as the answer to the social problems of the day.

2
Rejection of ultramontanism
Chateaubriand's beginning brought about two Catholic Revivals in France: first, a
conservative revival led by Joseph de Maistre, which defended ultramontanism, which is
a religious philosophy placing strong emphasis on the supremacy of the Pope, and a
second populist revival led by Felicite de Lamennais, an excommunicated priest. This
religious populism opposed ultramontanism and emphasized a church community
dependent upon all the people, not just the elite. It stressed that church authority should
come from the bottom up and that the church should alleviate suffering, not merely
accept it. Both of these religious principles are based on populism.

The People's Party, also known as the "Populists", was a short-lived political
party in the United States established in 1891. It was most important in 1892-96, then
rapidly faded away. Based among poor white cotton farmers in the South (especially
North Carolina, Alabama, and Texas) and hard-pressed wheat farmers in the Plains states
(especially Kansas and Nebraska), it represented a radical crusading form of agrarianism
and hostility to banks, railroads, and elites generally. It sometimes formed coalitions with
labor unions, and in 1896 endorsed the Democratic presidential nominee, William
Jennings Bryan. The terms "populist" and "populism" are commonly used for anti-elitist
appeals in opposition to established interests and mainstream parties.

United States
In U.S. history, politically oriented coalition of agrarian reformers in the Middle
West and South that advocated a wide range of economic and political legislation in the
late 19th century.

Throughout the 1880s local political action groups known as Farmers' Alliances
sprang up among Middle Westerners and Southerners, who were discontented because of
crop failures, falling prices, and poor marketing and credit facilities. Although it won
some significant regional victories, the alliances generally proved politically ineffective
on a national scale. Thus in 1892 their leaders organized the Populist, or People's, Party,
and the Farmers' Alliances melted away. While trying to broaden their base to include
labour and other groups, the Populists remained almost entirely agrarian-oriented. They
demanded an increase in the circulating currency (to be achieved by the unlimited
coinage of silver), a graduated income tax, government ownership of the railroads, a tariff
for revenue only, the direct election of U.S. senators, and other measures designed to
strengthen political democracy and give farmers economic parity with business and
industry.

In 1892 the Populist presidential candidate, James B. Weaver, polled 22 electoral


votes and more than 1,000,000 popular votes. By fusing with the Democrats in certain
states, the party elected several members to Congress, three governors, and hundreds of
minor officials and legislators, nearly all in the northern Middle West. In the South,
however, most farmers refused to endanger white supremacy by voting against the
Democratic Party. Additional victories were won in the 1894 midterm election, but in
1896 the Populists allowed themselves to be swept into the Democratic cause by their

3
mutual preoccupation with the Free Silver Movement. The subsequent defeat of
Democratic presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan signalled the collapse of one
of the most challenging protest movements in the U.S. since the Civil War. Some of the
Populist causes were later embraced by the Progressive Party.

Movie 1 (Populist Party 19th century.mp4)


Movie 2 (Populism in Ten Minutes.mp4)
Movie 3 (Kennedy's opening statement - 1960 debate.mp4)

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen