DEFINITION OF A NARCISSIST

Narcissistic personality is a mental disorder in which people have an exaggerated sense

of their own significance and a deep requirement for approbation. Those with

narcissistic character disorder consider that they're better than others and have little

concern for other people's thoughts. But at the back of this facade of ultra-confidence

lies a delicate self-esteem, susceptible to the smallest of amount criticism. [Campbell,

W. K. (1999)]

Narcissistic character disorder is one of more than a few types of behavior disorders.

Personality disorders are circumstances in which people have qualities that root them to

feel and act in socially upsetting ways, preventing their aptitude to function in

relationships and in other areas of their life.

The terms narcissism denote incongruous conceit and are functional to people whose

desires and aspirations are a large amount grander than their obvious talents.

Sometimes these terms are functional to people who are merely full of themselves --

even when their actual achievements are impressive. Exceptional performers are not for

all time are self-effacing, but they aren't ostentatious if their self-assessments are

pragmatic; e.g., Muhammad Ali, subsequently known as Cassius Clay, was disreputable

for boasting "I am the greatest!" and also indicating that he was the prettiest, but he was

the supreme and the prettiest for a long time, so his self-assessments weren't

extravagant. Some narcissists are flamboyantly proud and self-aggrandizing, but a lot of

are inconspicuous in public, saving their self-importance and despotic opinions for their

loved ones. [Buss, D. M., & Chiodo, L. M. (1991)] Common noticeable pretentious
behaviors include expecting extraordinary behavior or approbation on the basis of

claiming (a) to know significant, influential or famous people or (b) to be extraordinarily

intellectual or brilliant.

The favorite theory give the impression to be that narcissism is rooted by extremely

early affective deficiency, yet the medical material tends to portrays narcissists as

reluctant rather than incapable, thus treating narcissistic behaviors as volitional -- that

is, narcissism is named a character disorder, but it tends to be talked about as a

character disorder. This dissimilarity is significant to prognosis and treatment

possibilities. If NPD is caused by immature damage and resultant developmental short-

circuits, it almost certainly represents an irreversible condition. Alternatively, if

narcissism is a conduct pattern that's erudite, then there is some hope, though tenuous,

that it's an action pattern that can be untrained. The medical literature on NPD is

extremely abstract, theoretical, and general, with bare case substance, suggesting that

clinical writers have little knowledge with narcissism in the soft tissues. There are

several motives for this to be so:

-- The occurrence of NPD is expected at 1% in the wide-ranging population, although

haven't been able to determine the basis of this approximation.

-- Narcissists hardly ever enter medico-treatment and, once in treatment, advance

extremely unhurriedly. We're talking about two or more years of recurrent sessions

previous to the narcissist can recognize even that the psychoanalyst is now and again

helpful. [Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998)] It's complicated to keep narcissists

in treatment sufficient for development to be made -- and only some people, narcissists

or not, have the inspiration or the wealth to practice treatment tins the mind of a
narcissist there is no margin between themselves and others. This approach can be

established in the saying, “If you don’t serve up, then move the hell around.” Those that

give way to the will of a narcissist will be taken care of as an expansion of them where

they have potentials of them that involve them to sacrifice their own independence that

produces so little so late.

Narcissists prefer to dangle around only those who will deify them and will not droop

around people who don’t think they are tremendous, even if those people aren’t

unavoidably saying anything terrible about them. They do not like to hang up around

anyone who believes themselves an equivalent unless that set of people is superior

than everybody else in some way.

Humbert is a narcissist. One hesitates to travel around the emotional connections, if

any, among narcissism and conventional paedophilia (and Freud ought to have been a

few good, one suspects, to have bedeviled the grand Nabokov so), yet both

circumstances are evidently regressive or anorexic, showing a unwillingness to discard

the sentimentally scaled- down excellence of youth. 'Rope-skipping, hopscotch . . . Ah,

go away from me,' moans Humbert, 'in my teenage park, in my mossy garden. Let them

play just about me for ever. Never grow up.' The path of self- love is forever a rocky

one. But the love shared by Humbert Humbert, for all its uneven and smooth, is

indisputably the real thing.

The narrator Humbert, in literature, I think, goes on about his physical splendor

(narcissism) as passionately and foolishly as the storyteller of Lolita. With his 'striking if

somewhat brutal good looks', the younger, Paris-based Humbert knows all too well that
he could obtain, at the snap of his fingers, his choice of 'the many crazed beauties' who

lash his 'grim rock': 'Let me do again with quiet force: I was, and still am, in spite of

mesmalheurs, an extraordinarily handsome male; slow-moving, tall, with soft dark hair

and a gloomy but all the more seductive cast of demeanour.'

Humbert Humbert at the basis of this humorous contempt lays tremendous narcissism,

and this narcissism worms its approach through Humbert Humbert’s magnetic façade

and efficiently exposes it. On page 205, Humbert launches into an ornately cruel

portrayal of a man, a partial friend, with whom he plays chess.

Humbert as a narrator is unpredictable to the reader as the book is told exclusively from

his viewpoint.  He recognizes he is mentally ill (and almost certainly a bit of a narcissist),

and his illness is evident at times when he moves off on tangents.  Humbert is an erratic

narrator.

At ones Thomieres, the renowned novelist, make use of of Humbert's narcissism is

the fact that Humbert hardly ever allows his "girls" to converse for themselves.  Annabel

and Lolita "have to supply their bodies and reject their minds so as to personified that

desire for Humbert Humbert"

Another exuberantly written work of art concerning such a cozening, narcissistic

creature: Humbert Humbert. "The century's only convincing love story" make known

Vanity Fair upon the face cover, and this is pretty true: if the love regularly crosses that

agitated line between reality and fantasy; if the love is that of a engrossment fixated

upon with horrifying strength and shaped merely through the wishful longings of the
lover, with negligible view for the concrete thoughts and feelings of the most wanted

object - in other words, if the love is, at heart, a cavernous and abiding love for oneself.

Many authors have noticed and conversed how Humbert’s “sickness” features in Lolita,

as above, and recognized that his sickness turn out to be the standard with which the

whole narrative flows, by sublimating itself into art. This work of narrative subsists only

insofar as it affords me what I shall honestly call visual bliss that is a sagacity of being

somehow someplace, associated with other states of being where art (tenderness,

curiosity, kindness, ecstasy) is the standard.”

Regardless of how they actually feel, if they experience at all. They will explicitly deny

any form of be repentant and explicitly deny any thankfulness toward others. They will

not understand you or neither say thanks nor will they feel be repentant for anything

they do to you. They look forward to things to go how they are thought to in their own

little world.
Reference

- Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism,

self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate

lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.

- Buss, D. M., & Chiodo, L. M. (1991). Narcissistic acts in everyday life. Journal of

Personality, 59, 179–215.

- Campbell, W. K. (1999). Narcissism and romantic attraction. Journal of

Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1254–1270

- Lucy B. Maddox, ‘Necrophilia in Lolita’, in Lolita, ed. by Harold Broom (Chelsea

House Publishers, 1993), p. 80

Medico sites

http://www.halcyon.com/jmashmun/npd/dsm-iv.html

http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2013/december-

13/narcissism-unleashed.html