Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Facts:
Ruling:
The Court ruled against the respondent and reprimand him with
a warning that repetition of the same act will be dealt with more
severely.
Roan I. Libarios vs. Judge Rosarito F. Dabalos
Facts:
Corvera Jr. and some supporters staged a rally praying for the
issuance of warrant for the accused and respondent was talked to by
Corvera Jr. praying for the issuance of the warrant. On the same day,
respondent produced warrant for the accused: No bail for Macapas,
but bailable of Php50,000 for Calo Jr. and Alloco. Respondent judge
fixed bail for the temporary release of accused Calo, Jr. and Allocod
on the ground that they were not charged as co-principals by
cooperation or inducement, and that the evidence of guilt against
them was merely circumstantial and that their guilt is not as strong.
Issue:
Ruling:
Facts:
The investigation also revealed six total missing cases from the
Sala of the judge, though the latter contended that it was in
possession of the court. The complainant added a total of more 12
unresolved cases by this court and furnished the Court with an
affidavit from Judge Pitao of the MCTC, saying that the respondent-
judge intervened on a case at a lower court where he attached a
handwritten letter by the respondent delivered to Pitao through the
wife of the accused.
Issues:
Ruling:
Facts:
Issue:
Ruling:
As per Rule 2.01 and Rule 2.03, Canon 2 of the Code of Judicial
Conduct, “a judge should behave at all times as to inspire public
confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary” and that
“the prestige of judicial office shall not be used or lent to advance the
private interests of others, nor convey or permit others to convey the
impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge.”
Constant company with a lawyer tends to breed intimacy and
camaraderie to the point that favors in the future may be asked from
respondent judge which he may find hard to resist.
Facts:
She then met the judge sometime in April 2001 at a night life
restaurant in QC. Judge was with some Buboy and Fernan while the
Complainant is with the Prosecutor and Prosecutor’s sister. When she
is waiting in her car, for her to leave, a man came over and asked if
he could have advance, to which she understood as payment, which
she didn’t acceded to. The man went back inside the restaurant.
Subsequently, the respondent called her home and told her not to go
to the promulgation because she already knows his decision.
Issue:
Ruling:
Facts:
While the said case was still on the sala of former judge,
respondent allegedly walked two times to wish for lifting of the lis
pendens which the former judge didn’t entertained. When Judge
Cosico retired, the case was obtained by the respondent through a
raffle by petitioner’s motion, to which the respondent tried to inhibit
himself because of his acquaintance to one party. Through the
consent of both parties, he stayed as judge of the case and lifted lis
pendens. Eventually, parties came into an accord and filed a joint
motion to dismiss.
Issue:
Ruling:
Facts:
OCA then found that the judge violated Canons 1 and 4 of the
Judicial Code of Conduct and recommended the imposition of a fine
of ₱5,000.00 on Judge Ocampo with a stern warning that a repetition
of the same or similar act shall be dealt with more severely.
Issue:
Ruling:
Facts:
Issue:
Ruling:
Facts:
Issue:
Ruling:
Facts:
Issue:
Ruling: