Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Panorama

JULY 2010 ISSUE ONE

•Overview of telecom sector


•3G bidding strategies
•News updates

Indian telecom sector - An Overview


This article explores the The total number of subscribers in the technological advancements, liberal
important terms, value chain telecom sector has grown from 22.81 policy initiatives and healthy competition.
and discussions on performance million in 1999 to more than 650 million
metrics in the telecom sector (May 2010). This includes both
wireless (618 million) and wireline
TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of (36 million) subscribers as per the Important Terms
India)Act 1997 d e fi n e s definition of this sector by TRAI.
telecommunication services as “service of Between 2005 and 2009 the
any description (including electronic mail, number of subscribers has nearly
quadrupled. While the number of ARPU-Average Revenu
voice mail, data services, audio tex e Per User
service, video tex services, radio paging wireless subscribers has been
growing at a healthy rate, the RP M-Revenue Per Minute
and cellular mobile telephone services)
which is made available to users by number of wireline subscribers has
been declining.
MoU -Minutes of Usage
means of any transmission or reception
of signs, signals, writing, images and In terms of internet subscribers,
less than half of the wireline
internet connections (about 15
Subscriber base million) are broadband while there
(in millions)
500 are about 120 million wireless internet Telecom Infrastructure
subscribers.
In order to maintain low costs to support
375 As a watchdog over telecom, a network low tariffs, controlling infrastructure costs
natural monopoly, TRAI (Telecom is critical. The industry needs two kinds
250
Regulatory Authority of India) is of infrastructure: passive and active.
125 responsible for creating policy guidelines Passive infrastructure consists of telecom
and for creating conditions for the growth towers, wires etc. while active
0 of telecommunications in India. The infrastructure consists of the network
telecom space includes well-established equipment, computers etc. required to
1999 2002 2005 large wireless providers like Airtel, run operations. Some operators have
2008
RCom, Vodafone, BSNL and new come together to share network
entrants like Tata Docomo and MTS. infrastructure both by pooling passive
sounds or of any nature, by wire, radio, infrastructure (e.g. towers) and forming
The explosive growth, especially in
visual or other electro-magnetic means alliances with the equipment providers.
wireless sector, has been largely
but shall not include broadcasting contributed by a low tariff regime which Performance metrics
services.” has been borne out of several factors
Industry performance is measured
The growth story including an innovative cost structure,
through various metrics and some

1
Revenue per subs
crib er per month
common ones used are: ARPU (Average T h e Te l e c o m Va l u e 300
Revenue Per User), RPM (Revenue Per Chain GSM CDMA
Minute), and MoU (Minutes of Usage).
These measure the revenues being All three parts of the chain 225
earned per subscriber, per call minute have witnessed changes in
and the number of minutes used on the the recent times. While 150
network respectively. mobile operators have either
Over the past few years, due to the low pooled resources to share
passive infrastructure like 75
tariffs ARPU’s have been falling. A more
worrying aspect for the telecom towers, several new mobile
companies has been the decline in RPM’s operators like Videocon, 0
Uninor etc. have Oct-Dec 2008 A
pr-Jun 2009 Oct
joined in. The -Dec 2009
Telecom Sector Value VA S b u s i n e s s
Chain continues to grow Positive TRAI initiatives such as granting
with the largest music revenue subsidies from its Universal Service
in the country being generated Obligation Fund (USOF) encouraged
through caller-tunes etc. infrastructure sharing in its initial phase.
Looking at telecom towers in Value Added Services is a low capex,
more detail, this is a highly high technology business. Advent of
Capex intensive business. Mobile VA S has taken
Here, tenancy ratios drive the telecommunications to the next level by
payback periods. Companies providing easy accessible and cost-
with larger asset base can rap effective services to mobile users.
economies of scale as each Unlimited mobile Internet (GPRS) and
tower has different rental bundling of various SMS VAS services
due to lower tariffs inspite of rising agreements and costs. The are the main drivers of VAS growth in
MoUs. This has been driven by the price companies mostly work on one of the India. This space is mostly fragmented
wars unleashed with aim of wrestling four business models: with a lot of start-ups, attracting PE/VCs
more share from the market leaders. The Captive: Towers are owned & operated for investments in the businesses.
players are therefore looking at other by telecom operators
avenues like Value Added Services (VAS) Recent Changes
to be a key driver for future growth in Operator Controlled: Operator The recent 3G spectrum allocation has
revenues. With the advent of 3G, data consolidates tower infrastructure and
made the telecom space more complex.
hives it off as a separate company e.g.
services are expected to increase revenues Bharti Infratel The price wars and new offerings are
through raised RPMs which will more expected to continue as firms seek to
than compensate for a decrease in the Pool and share: Operators jointly setup differentiate themselves in a market that
voice RPMs. Operators are actively an independent company for sharing seems to have, going by the history of
scouting for opportunities to provide tower infrastructure e.g. Indus towers developed markets, more players than it
focused content e.g. Airtel’s tie up with Build and operate: Independent tower might have been able to accommodate
Manchester United to provide exclusive companies operate on a ‘build-and
content. operate’ model

3G - Bidding Strategies
The recent 3G auctions saw various Bharti Airtel circles for Rs 11,617 crores, while
operators compete fiercely for the three Bharti Airtel, India’s market leader, won foregoing a few big circles where it does
licenses to operate 3G in 22 circles in 13 circles which cover 59% of India's not enjoy leadership or has a substantial
India. T he gover nment raised a cellular subscribers—the maximum 3G- difference to the leader like Karnataka
whooping Rs 67,719 crores from the coverage any telecom operator has and Rajasthan. Vodafone’s strategy
process. The bid values exceeded the managed. These circles account for 61% clearly seems to be focusing the entire
DoT expected valuation of 2x to 3x the of Indian telecom revenues. The nine kitty that they have on the top circles so
reserve prices and the average bid was circles where Bharti has lost the license, as to actually make a meaningful business
4.8x the reserve price (representing Rs. its ARPU is 15-20% lower than the out of the 3G friendly circles or circles
16,571 crore for a pan-India license). national ARPU. Bharti has a unique with uptick.
Finally, none of the operators bid for the advantage that large parts of its networks
pan India licenses but opted for select are already 3G-enabled lowering Reliance
circles. In this article we try to analyze the deployment time and capex required. Reliance Communications (RCOM)
strategy behind the choice of circles by bagged 3G-spectrum in 13 circles
the bid-winning operators. Vodafone including all the metros and category ‘C’
Vodafone India seemed to have followed circles. Reliance Communications put up
a ‘defensive’ strategy like Bharti, by an aggressive show in the 3G auctions
acquiring spectrum in key markets, 9 implying that RCOM may dilute equity
2
to fund the payout. The tower business
looks to be the likely source of dilution.
The company plans to strongly leverage 3G spectrum winners
i t s m e d i a , g a m i n g, c i n e m a a n d (Operator, Present 2G market share)
broadcasting capabilities to offer its
customers a unique 3G-experience.
CIRCLE HIGHEST 2ND HIGHEST 3RD HIGHEST OTHER
Aircel MKT SHARE MKT SHARE MKT SHARE WINNERS
Aircel, 74% owned by Malaysia’s Maxis, OF REVENUE OF REVENUE OF REVENUE
with a strong presence in Southern and
Eastern India concentrated on circles like Delhi Airtel (37.6%) Vodafone (23.6%) RCOM (13.1%)
Tamil Nadu and the North-East. Its main
focus was to ensure contiguity – presence Mumbai Vodafone (35.9%) Airtel (20.6%) RCOM (18.0%)
in all the southern circles and Assam,
West Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. Aircel’s
Maharashtra Idea (30.4%) Airtel (21.9%) Vodafone (20.7%) Tata
strategy helped it to defend 93% of its
revenues. Airtel and Aircel won 13 circles
each but Aircel paid only half of that Gujarat Vodafone (39.9%) Airtel (20.9%) Idea (18.0%) Tata
paid by Airtel. Aircel’s bid is still
aggressive at 1.5 times its annual
A.P. Airtel (39.6%) Idea (16.8%) Vodafone (12.6%) Aircel
revenues.

Tata Tele
Karnataka Airtel (54.4%) Vodafone (15.9%) RCOM (9.7%) Tata, Aircel
Tata Tele was able to capture only 9
circles, which are mostly in category A
and B, enabling it to protect its presence Tamil Nadu Airtel (32.9%) Aircel (20.4%) Vodafone (20.1%)
in 43% of it 2G revenue-generating
areas. Tata Tele’s 3G coverage of its 2G
Kolkata Vodafone (31.4%) Airtel (30.1%) RCOM (18.1%) Aircel
footprint is the lowest among the six
successful bidders. Tata focused on
obtaining contiguous licenses in the Kerala Idea (28.4%) Vodafone (20.8%) Airtel (19.9%) Tata, Aircel
Western parts of India, while avoiding
Category C circles to maximize capex Punjab Airtel (38.4%) Vodafone (17.8%) RCOM (6.5%) Tata, Idea,
utilization. Aircel

Idea Haryana Vodafone (19.4%) Idea (16.0%) Airtel (15.3%) Tata


Idea Cellular, the 3rd largest GSM
mobile service operator won 3G spectra
in 11 circles. Idea went for higher U.P. East Vodafone (31.0%) Airtel (28.7%) RCOM (12.1%) Idea, Aircel
geographical coverage and avoided the
metros, especially Delhi and Mumbai, U.P. West Idea (27.7%) Vodafone (23.7%) Airtel (18.2%) Tata
which saw the most aggressive bidding. It
managed to win licenses covering 77% of Rajasthan Airtel (44.8%) Vodafone (22.8%) RCOM (8.2%) Tata
its subscriber base and its 3G Spectrum
footprint covers 81% of the total national
revenues. M.P. Airtel (30.3%) Idea (28.7%) RCOM (20.8%) Tata

CDMA operators viz. Reliance and Tata West Bengal Vodafone (36.5%) Airtel (28.6%) RCOM (13.3%)
Tele plan to leverage the EVDO services
already available on their CDMA
H. Pradesh Airtel (12.3%) RCOM (5.2%) Idea (1.8%) S Tel
network. EVDO services are ones that
are available on data cards and are
almost equivalent to 3G services. Their Bihar Airtel (24.7%) RCOM (9.9%) Tata(3.7%) Aircel, S Tel
strategy would be to combine the prowess
of CDMA and GSM technologies to Orissa Airtel (17.6%) RCOM (7.5%) Tata (3.6%) Aircel, S Tel
provide seamless high-speed data access
on dual mode handsets.
Assam Aircel (34.3%) Aircel (25.2%) RCOM (19.0%)
With none of the private teleco’s having a
pan India 3G presence, roaming North East Airtel (37.7%) Aircel (29.5%) RCOM (6.7%)
agreements between the different
operators would play a vital role in J&K Airtel (46.6%) Aircel (21.6%) RCOM (3.32%) Idea
recovering the huge license bid amounts.
The state owned BSNL and MTNL are Indicates that Operator has WON 3G Spectrum
in huge demand as partners for roaming
agreements.
Indicates that Operator could NOT WIN 3G Spectrum
3
News Updates
Sun TV buys 37% stake in Spicejet competing alliance against ‘oneworld’.
The onboarding process into the alliance
A 37% stake was bought in Spicejet by will result in Kingfisher giving better
Chief Executive of Sun TV, Kalanithi product offering and improved service
Maran, through his airlines- KAL standards, spelling good news for
Airways. He has also made an offer of customers.
additional 20 per cent stake. After the Please send in your suggestions and
acquisition, the name of SpiceJet will be Retail sector watchdog in the offing comments to
changed to Sun Airways. (Source: Business Standard)
teamconsult@iimahd.ernet.in
It seems a good time to invest in air In a move being seen as a precursor to
transport. SpiceJet made a profit of 274 opening the retail sector, the government
million rupees in Q12010 as opposed to is contemplating setting up a regulatory
the 78 million rupee loss in Q12009 and body for the retail sector. At present,
expanded to fly overseas to Maldives, India does not allow foreign investment in Team Consult
Nepal and Bangladesh. multi-brand retail, while up to 51 per
cent is allowed in single brand retail.
Amber Maheshwari
Kingfisher to join ‘oneworld’ Foreign direct investment (FDI) of up to Agam Khurana
alliance 100 per cent is allowed in wholesale cash- Chaithanya Rao
and-carry trade. The commerce ministry Gurveen Bedi
Kingfisher has announced its intention to is keen to extend FDI to retail of
join the ‘oneworld’ alliance, which foodgrain with a view of creating a
Kommu Nageen
consists of 12 airline members currently. parallel to the inefficient public Mohit Garg
This alliance will bring 56 Indian cities distribution system. FDI is expected to Murali Nair
on the map of ‘oneworld’ alliance, bring in addition to investment, lower Simit Batra
increasing its reach to cover 800 cost products and provide support to Utsav Kheria
destinations in almost 150 countries. The small manufacturers within the country.
customers will be a happy lot as this will However, the concerns that 'kirana' stores
Vamsi Krishna
m a k e K i n g fi s h e r ’s f re q u e n t fl ye r will be impacted adversely is a real one,
programme valid across all the alliance going by the large-scale closures resulting
partners, which consist of leading global from new Walmart stores in the US.
brands. Hence, the need for a regulator to create
a level-playing field.
Kingfisher is India’s first private airline to
join any such alliance. It is said that Air
India and Jet Airways are moving
towards joining Star Alliance, the

Ruling in the Ambani case


On 7th May 2010, the Supreme Court to supply gas at the previously agreed
delivered a landmark judgment in the upon lower price. Did you know?
dispute between Reliance Industries Limited While contracts between
two parties are in
(RIL) and ADAG, a company owned by The Supreme Court cited that the their private domain, the
y could be
estranged brother Anil Ambani. The court MOU between the Ambani brothers challenged in the court of
law under
ruled that RIL need not supply gas to in 2005 as a personal agreement "public interest", that is
the larger good of
wh i ch i s n o t b i n d i n g o n t h e the nation. The contract
ADAG at the previously agreed price, in question falls
companies and ruled that RIL is not under the domain of na
putting the profitability of many power tural resources
bound to supply gas at a lower price. making it all the more am
plants of the younger sibling under threat enable to such
litigation.
and tightening government control over gas The court further instructed both the
pricing. parties to renegotiate favorable terms
for gas supply within six weeks.
According to a private MOU between the
two brothers in 2005, RIL was supposed to The judgment impacts the
industries as it sets a precedent that
supply gas to Anil’s company at a lower profitability of environment friendly gas
Government policy can be retroactively
price of $2.34 per million British thermal based power generation plants with an
applied to commercial agreements between
units (mmBtu). However, in 2007, the overall capacity of 10,000 MW. This may
parties.
government of India revised the gas price to affect the power generation capabilities in
$4.20 per mmBtu, to make it in line with the the near future. Moreover, this could be a
international prices. This prompted RIL not landmark judgment that could affect other

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen