Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Internet Services
1 Introduction
T.B. Pedersen, M.K. Mohania, and A M. Tjoa (Eds.): DaWaK 2009, LNCS 5691, pp. 229–243, 2009.
c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009
230 B.Q. Huang, M-T. Kechadi, and B. Buckley
2 Evaluation Criterias
After a classifier or predictor is available, it will be used to predict the further
behaviour of customers. As one of important step to ensure the model generalise
well, the performance of the predictive churn model have to be evaluated. Table
1 shows a confusion matrix [10], where a11 is the number of the correct predicted
churners, a12 is the number of the incorrect predicted churners, a21 is the number
of the incorrect predicted nonchurners, and a22 is the number of the correct
predicted nonchurners. From the confusion matrix, the most common evaluation
criterias for a predictive model are introduced as follows:
– The overall accuracy (AC) is the proportion of the total number of predic-
tions that were correct, calculated by a11 +aa11 +a22
12 +a21 +a22
.
predicted
CHUN NONCHU
Actual CHU a11 a12
NONCHU a21 a22