Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By Amulya Bandari
According to a study done by the RAND corporation, a nonprofit global policy think tank, the
average American household can spend anywhere from 16 percent to 33.9 percent of their income on
health care.i To put that into perspective, Americans are spending roughly $5,000 per person per year
on health care, a $2,000 spike from a decade ago, according to an analysis done by big data company
Clever on the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditures Survey.ii Households with lower income,
tend to spend more of their income on healthcare. However, many tend to underestimate or neglect the
issue. Instead, Americans are forced to spend an immense amount of their income on healthcare.
People in the United States tend to regard this situation as the normal. They do not question why the
costs are so high, and rather comply to the status quo. If this continued, health care prices will continue
to skyrocket. Although the issue has been brought to light, especially do to the Covid-19 outbreak and
the current presidential election, it is important to find a concrete solution to the issue. It is important
for all Americans to have access to proper health care without having to worry about the costs, with
subcategories. Medical care consists of both mental well-being as well as physical well-being. There are
different levels and aspects of health care. It encompasses simple medications and routine medical
checkups to complex state of the art medical procedures. It also includes mental health, skin care,
dental care, eye care and much more. These medications and procedures can cost individuals thousands
of dollars. Free Universal Healthcare is a healthcare system where all residence of a region free of
charge. That means that all doctor appointments, medications and procedures will be paid by the
government instead of individuals. This system has been adopted by countries all around the world,
Insurance in America
The United States operates with a different system. Due to the United States being a capitalistic
society, mostly everything is owned by the private sector. This means that individual corporations and
businesses oversee hospitals and other aspects of medical care, unlike countries that practice free
universal healthcare, where the government operates it. To compensate for this, insurance companies
were created, which reduce the burden of medical expenses. First, an individual pays a premium, which
is a monthly bill that various depending on person. Then, if a medical expense arises, such as a sudden
lifesaving surgery that could cost hundreds of thousands, the health insurance company will pay part of
the bill, reducing the burden. In countries with free universal health care, the companies that individuals
pay premiums for is the government. This could also come in the form of a tax. The funds from the
population are taken by the government and are given back to the people through free medical care.
This also gives countries the lowest possible price for certain medical necessities, since an entire country
is demanding lower prices compared to a small insurance company, which has relatively few people
underneath it. The United States on the other hand primarily relies on the private sector for health
insurance, leading to high costs in healthcare. During recent years, the healthcare system has shifted to
a hybrid system rather than a purely private system. This has been due to events and demands
throughout history.
The notion of the government providing medical care for its people had been around for
centuries. In the United States, the first ever prepaid medical care plan was established in July 16 th, 1798
by President John Adams, which provided aid for sick and disabled seamen. It led to the creation of
The movement for free health really picked up during the mid 19 th and 20th century, due to a
number of events. Activist Dorthea Dix revolutionized the medical field. She fought for the proper
treatment of those with mental illness and part of her campaign was to have the government fund the
rehabilitation of the mentally ill.iv Her activism was the spark for the Progressive movement, which
The early 20th century was marked with the Progressive movement, which fought against
problems caused by industrialization, urbanization and political corruption. The main goal of the
movement was for social reform and advancement for the people. This encompassed healthcare and
medical reform. The movement led to employers providing for insurance rather than all the burden be
on the workers. Throughout the great depression universal health care was proposed, however, the
federal government decided to allow third party insurance companies to take over.
It was not until the 1960s and 70s that the healthcare system started to take shape into the
current system. With the rise in the elderly and uninsured led to increase in support for health care
reform. President Lyndon B. Johnson used the support built up to pass Medicare and Medicaid, which
provided aid for those over 65, those with certain disabilities and certain low-income groups. v This was a
huge step forward and a major accomplishment for those who supported free universal healthcare.
After that major stride, many ideas were brought to the table, especially during Clinton and
Bush’s presidency. However, none of them were passed. It was not until the Obama administration that
another major stride was taken. On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into effect The
Affordable Care Act, also known as Obama care, which is the largest healthcare reform act since
Medicare.vi This act increased the number of people insured by around 20 to 24 million, creating the
All the reforms and policies stated above have created the current established health care
system. The United States uses a mixed system of private and public insurance. As of 2019, of the 330
million individuals living in the United States, the 59 million that are 65 or older fall under Medicare, so
they are insured. Of the 273 million that are under 65, 159 million have employer-based insurance, 84
million have some other form of coverage and 30 million people are still uninsured. More than 20
million people gained healthcare coverage after the Affirmative care act was passed, so the number of
uninsured went down to 30 million. To put this into perspective, the number of non-elderly uninsured
went from 17% in 2012 to 10.4% in 2018, so nearly 7% decrease in just six years. viii
Figure 1 This is the current distribution of health insurance coverage in the United States. There are still roughly 30 million
individuals uninsured, and the number will only continue to rise if things continue as they are. Credit to CBO gov
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/51385.
This is a major stride in the right direction, however, there are still more than 30 million people
who are completely uninsured. Furthermore, those who are insured still might not be able to afford
their costs even after insurance has covered them. This has led to many people fearing for the future
and some even skip necessary health screenings due to the cost. According a survey done by the Kaiser
Family Foundation (KFF), a health policy analytic group and journal, of those who have insurance, 24%
were worried about if they could afford their co-pay payments, 28% were worried about the cost per
month for health insurance and 34% were worried about the cost of deductibles.ix If these percentages
are applied to the whole United States population, of the 314 million Americans insured, at least 75
This high cost and lack of insurance can be detrimental to people. Due to high costs, some
individuals decide not to get certain treatments done or take certain medications. This often leads to
worsening symptoms and even death. According to a pole done by Gallup, 58 million people have been
unable to afford prescribed medication at least once in the past 12 months.xi This has become a
common theme, and some even decide to not undergo life saving treatments due to high costs.
Throughout the decades, health care costs have also been on the rise. Even though the United
States does not offer free universal health care, its health care expenditure per capita is higher than all
countries that offer free health care. The United States spent $10,586 per capita on health care
compared to Italy, which even though offers free universal healthcare, spent much less than the United
States at $3,428 per capita.xii With such high costs and increasing problems, there needs to be change.
Figure 2 This graph shows the rise in health care expenditure over the years. The costs continue to rise, even though the United
States does not offer Free Universal Health Care. A new system must be implemented to not only reduce costs, but also provide
better care. Credits to KFF https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/u-s-spending-healthcare-changed-time/#item-
nhe-trends_year-over-year-growth-in-health-services-spending-by-quarter-2010-2019.
With the increase in prices, the burden on the people of the United States has increased. Even
those with health insurance are struggling to deal with the costs of health care and worry about
affording basic medical necessities. If the situation continues like this, soon more people will suffer, and
more people will die to the lack of proper health care. Especially right now, the topic of health care has
taken the limelight, due to the Covid-19 epidemic taking the country by storm, which has left more than
1.8 million people infected and nearly 120,000 people dead. The number of infected and dead is only
speculated to increase as time goes on.xiii Many experts agree that the spread of Covid-19 would be
minimized and treatment would be more effectively administered if the United States had adopted a
Free Universal Health care system. It would also prevent future pandemics and epidemics from
becoming too severe. So, it is important, now more than ever, to give everyone access to proper health
Implementation
There are a multitude of methods to implement free universal healthcare. One option is through
the single payer system. This option eliminates privately owned services. Instead, all services are
government owned and operated. Physicians work under the government instead of private hospitals,
and hospitals are government owned. Insurance companies are also eliminated in this option, and all
medical care is free. Instead of individuals paying, the costs are paid for by the government with tax
revenue. This option would significantly reduce costs, since the government would have all the
purchasing power for medication, employment and other medical supplies. Basically, in this option all
One common argument against this system is that the cost for healthcare would increase
drastically, however, that is not the case. The shift to a one payer system would actually save money. It
is estimated that the if the United States shifts to a single payer system, it will save more than $150
billion dollars annually just in administrative costs.xiv Including all other factors and costs, the United
States could save nearly $500 billion annually. Many countries around the world have adopted this idea,
such as the United Kingdom, Spain and New Zealand. The United Kingdom is a prime example of the
effectiveness of the single payer system. The United Kingdom spends only 9.5% of its GDP on health
care, whereas the United States, which many expect would have lower costs since it does not offer free
universal health care, spends nearly double at 17.2% of GDP on health care.xv
Another major counter argument to this policy is that the quality of health care would decrease,
since the government would have to manage everything rather than individual specialized companies.
However, this has not been a huge problem in countries that have implemented this system. For
instance, In the United Kingdom, quality is consistent, and if one hospital is lacking, it is easy to transfer
a patient to a larger hospital. The government operating hospitals also removes many bureaucratic
hurdles, so hospitals can focus on their patients. The government also does not have to worry about
profits compared to privately owned hospitals. They system has been extremely effective, with
Furthermore, this concept is not unknown territory for The United States. The United States
uses the single payer system for military personnel. Military personnel receive free treatment and have
designated military hospitals, with state-of-the-art procedures. Since this system is already implemented
Another way to implement universal health care in the United States is by implementing the
social health insurance system. In this system, it would be mandatory for individuals to have insurance,
which is obtained through an employer or the government. The taxes and revenue collected by the
insurance will then go into a government fund, which will then be distributed back into medical costs.
One major benefit of this system is that hospitals are still privately owned, and physicians still
work for privately owned hospitals. Individuals can receive care from any hospital in the country, and
they would receive affordable care since everyone has insurance. This would also make the transition to
this system much easier, since hospitals are still privately owned. In the single payer system, hospitals
are owned by the government, so in the United States, all hospitals would have to be purchased by the
government, which could take decades. This problem is eliminated with the social health insurance
system.
This system is also beneficial because the government can control insurance prices. Since the
government controls the insurance, it also controls rates and copays. This means that the government
could implement a progressive insurance rate. This means that those of lower incomes will pay less in
copays compared to those who can afford treatment, or the government could implement a standard
insurance rate. Furthermore, this system allows copays to be tailored to an individual. For instance, on
average a copay for a normal visit in Germany is on average $10 for the lower middle class, whereas in
the United States it can cost more than $100 for the same treatment.xvi
This system has also been implemented and has been gaining popularity in the United States.
Medicare is the United States’ implementation of the social health insurance system. Like previously
states, the government provides insurance for those who qualify. However due to the thousands of
loopholes, thousands of individuals have been left uninsured. Since the United States already has
implemented this system on part of the population, it will be easy to apply it to the entire country and
remove its loopholes. This has led to the rise in the Medicare-For-All movement, which popular
One common counter argument to this option is that the cost would outweigh the benefits,
however, just like the one payer system, the social health insurance system will also save money. It is
estimated that if Medicare-for-all in implemented, the United States would save 13% in national health-
care expenditure, which is equivalent to $450 billion annually and 68,000 lives would be saved
annually.xvii This system in not only beneficial, but highly feasible, since it has gained popularity, and the
As of now, the United States still does not offer Free Universal Healthcare, however, recent
legislative has been pushing the United States healthcare system to a free universal healthcare system.
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the government has offered free testing as well as significant reduction
in costs for treating Covid-19. This action is one of the most recent steps towards free universal
healthcare in the United States. As of now, more than 70% of Americans are in favor of universal
healthcare.xviii With the gaining popularity through politics and the Covid-19 pandemic showcasing the
importance of healthcare, the movement will continue to increase in popularity. Soon more steps will be
taken to reach a free universal health care system, and thousands of lives will be saved.
i
Carman, Katherine Grace, Jodi Liu, and Chapin White. “Accounting for the Burden and Redistribution of Health
Care Costs: Who Uses Care and Who Pays for It.” Wiley Online Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, January 27, 2020.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.13258
ii
Carman, Katherine Grace, Jodi Liu, and Chapin White. “Accounting for the Burden and Redistribution of Health
Care Costs: Who Uses Care and Who Pays for It.” Wiley Online Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, January 27, 2020.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.13258.
iii
“Healthcare.” healthcare noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes | Oxford Advanced Learner's
Dictionary at OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com. Accessed April 12, 2020.
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/healthcare?q=health+care.
iv
Vaida, Bara. “Health Care Policy.” Penn State WebAccess Secure Login, October 17, 2019. https://library-cqpress-
com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqr_ht_health_care_2019.
v
“A Brief History: Universal Health Care Efforts in the US.” PNHP. Accessed April 12, 2020. https://pnhp.org/a-
brief-history-universal-health-care-efforts-in-the-us/.
vi
“Health Insurance Coverage and the Affordable Care Act, 2010 - 2016.” ASPE, June 30, 2017.
https://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/health-insurance-coverage-and-affordable-care-act-2010-2016.
vii
“Affordable Care Act (ACA) - HealthCare.gov Glossary.” HealthCare.gov. Accessed April 12, 2020.
https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/affordable-care-act/.
viii
US Census Bureau. “Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2018.” The United States Census Bureau,
November 8, 2019. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2019/demo/p60-267.html.
ix
Tolbert, Jennifer, Kendal Orgera, Natalie Singer, and Anthony Damico. “Key Facts about the Uninsured
Population.” The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, February 10, 2020. https://www.kff.org/uninsured/issue-
brief/key-facts-about-the-uninsured-population/.
x
Kirzinger, Ashley, Cailey Muñana, Bryan Wu, and Mollyann Brodie. “Data Note: Americans' Challenges with Health
Care Costs.” The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, February 6, 2020. https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-
brief/data-note-americans-challenges-health-care-costs/.
xi
Witters, Dan. “Millions in U.S. Lost Someone Who Couldn't Afford Treatment.” Gallup.com. Gallup, April 8, 2020.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/268094/millions-lost-someone-couldn-afford-treatment.aspx.
xii
McCarthy, Niall. “How U.S. Healthcare Spending Per Capita Compares With Other Countries [Infographic].”
Forbes. Forbes Magazine, August 8, 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2019/08/08/how-us-
healthcare-spending-per-capita-compares-with-other-countries-infographic/#480fac49575d.
xiii
“Coronavirus Cases:” Worldometer. Accessed April 12, 2020. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.
xiv
“Single-Payer Myths; Single-Payer Facts.” Single-Payer Myths; Single-Payer Facts | Physicians for a National
Health Program. Accessed April 12, 2020. http://www.pnhp.org/facts/singlepayer_myths_singlepayer_facts.php.
xv
Galvani, Alison P, Alyssa S Parpia, Eric M Foster, Burton H Singer, and Meagan C Fitzpatrick. “Improving the
Prognosis of Health Care in the USA.” The Lancet. Elsevier, February 13, 2020.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673619330193.
xvi
Underwood, Anne. “Health Care Abroad: Germany.” The New York Times. The New York Times, September 29,
2009. https://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/health-care-abroad-
germany/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0.
xvii
Oecd. Health Status. Accessed April 12, 2020. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_STAT#.
xviii
Reports, Special. “Progressive Movement Stirs Democrats.” Reuters. Thomson Reuters, August 23, 2018.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-election-progressives/.