Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
punishment
The proceeds of crime act is so often called Draconian by the press and many lawyers
and is a get rich quick scheme for the powers that be the outright misuse of power is
shocking and does not give right to a fair trial in any respect to a defendant to rip a
defendants whole life about just of the basis of assumptions is a disgrace and if the
state is that desperate for money then I worry for the world I can understand if you
have been watching a defendant over a period of time and calculate the benefit from
what you see or the amount of substance in drugs related case but to deem a
defendants whole life criminal because he commits one crime and has money is very
far out and far fetched at the point of restraint you have no real evidence whatsoever
and disbarring funds obviously is a crippler for anyone and to go back 6 years and say
that all funds ever transacted are gained from a criminal lifestyle even worse this is a
real injustice within the justice system and a real abuse of power the statement
creating assumptions for a criminal lifestyle is of no high credibility does not go into
any detail and cannot warrant any such assumption in any way shape or form this is a
highly developed societal scam on peoples lives. You should be tried for the crime at
hand not the amount of money you have If police Soca have been watching a
defendant i.e and operation and or catch a defendant blatantly selling drugs and they
have been charged for other drug related cases previously then by all means they are
guilty beyond reasonable doubt and therefore a need for a criminal life assessment is
just and deserved but still you cannot claim back money that has vanished or money
that is in the defendant s possession based of assumptions that is piracy on every level
in an infringement of human rights.
2) Restraint Orders
3) Fair Trial
4) Confiscation Order
The prosecuting authority receives a cut of the proceeds seized
from people convicted and subjected to confiscation orders and
senior staff receives bonuses
The introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998 on 2nd October 2000
fundamentally influences all aspects of policing. The Act incorporates
aspects of the European Convention for Human Rights into UK Law. As
a result, British citizens who feel that their rights have been violated now
have redress in UK courts.
The Act safeguards the rights of the individual against interference by
Public Authorities, i.e. the police. All policing tactics and actions will be
judged against the principles of the Act. Any action taken by the police
will be judged against the following principles which are:-
1.Was the action taken legal, i.e. was it covered by a statute, code etc?
2.Was there a necessary and legitimate aim for the action taken, i.e.
public safety, national security etc?
3.Were the action(s) taken proportionate to the legitimate aims being
pursued, i.e. was the interference necessary in a democratic
society?
The Human Rights Act will sit over all current and future domestic
statutes. In practice this means that aspects of the Act will be
considered in all judgements.