Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Upside
How to Turn Big Threats into Growth
Breakthroughs
Prepared for:
MMC Riyadh Seminar
C O N F I D E N T I A L | www.oliverwyman.com
Increasing risk and volatility
Human
Hazard Financial Operating Strategic
Capital
35% 35%
31%
30%
30% 30%
25% 25%
23%
Percent of total
Percent of total
20%
20% 20% 18%
15%
15% 14% 15%
12%
10% 10%
5% 5%
0% 0%
1985 1990 1995 2004 1985 1990 1995 2004
$160
$140
$120
$100
$BB
$80
$60
$40
$20
$
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2007
$60 $60
$BB
$BB
$40 $40
$20 $20
$ $
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Siemens Merck
$100 $250
$80 $200
$60 $150
$BB
$BB
$40 $100
$20 $50
$ $
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
I II III
0 months 80 months
Most companies are neither in Column I (they don’t practice Strategic Risk Management),
nor in Column II (they’re not organized to move fast).
The vast majority are in Column III (many with dangerously long response times).
Blockbuster/Netflix BB 58 months
Synopsis
Case studies . . .
Toyota Prius, Apple iPod, Coach, Tsutaya, Target, Netflix,
Continental AG, Air Liquide, and others
Technology shift Double betting Double bet to surprise the other guy
Unique competitor Early warning system Avoid the gorilla; be the gorilla in a
Shift in business design different space
Project risk Realistic determination of the true odds Risk control system
Smart sequencing
Stepping stone method
Develop excess options
Market stagnation risk Early warning system Growth system: Upward spiral
Demand innovation
Industry-leading thinking and research on how companies can reverse strategic risk
We have a solid framework AND we understand your business
– Not only do we conduct management surveys and interviews to catalog the risks your organization sees,
but we bring in our industry experts to assess global trends, anticipate and estimate risks you will likely be
facing
Enables greater Board/senior management visibility and understanding of strategic risk and financial
implications, as well as links between ERM and strategy
Cost-effectiveness of fixing today vs. at the time of crisis (cents vs. dollars), and identification of valuable
quick hits
Process engages and mobilizes management on risk, identifies comprehensive set of risks for focus, forces
management to assess size and probabilities, and work against the feeling that “we can’t do anything about
it” or “that’s just the business we’re in”
Process brings together cross-functional groups with linked responsibilities to address common risks and
organizational roadblocks
Move beyond a “checklist” mentality of risk management to explore strategic alternatives
Shift to a comparable risk-return decision-making process, within an integrated and common framework
Adaptable to client needs: Depending on degree of sophistication of current risk infrastructure, can
emphasize integrated risk identification and mitigation, risk sizing and trade-off modeling, and/or capability
development
Implementation
plan
Enterprise risk mapping and mitigation planning
1.1 ERM framework definition 1.2 ERM governance model 1.3 Risk reporting
Review current stage of Research on ERM governance Define the risk reporting contents,
enterprise risk management models structure and responsibilities
Develop ERM vision statement, Design ERM related Develop the ERM guide book
particularly around objectives, organization, management Develop the risk database
anticipated results and ownership system and processes prototype 3 Implementation plan
Recommend ERM related KPIs
Scorecards for evaluating
corporate performance Develop implementation plan
including timeline, milestones,
key decision points, resource
requirements and
implementation ownership
2.1 Risk identification 2.2 Risk quantification 2.3 Risk prioritization & high- Adjust capital decisions based
level mitigation planning on risk assessments
Ongoing risk monitoring and
Identify the main risks Quantify the magnitude and Prioritize major risks based on management
– Financial, hazard, likelihood of major risks probability and severity and
operational Develop the detailed risk profile develop overall risk map
– Seven major strategic for each major risk Identify and assess “upside”
categories alternatives, business design
Conduct major functions’ survey changes
and selected interviews with Develop the high-level risk
senior managers mitigation action plan to eliminate,
Leverage Oliver Wyman industry reduce or counter key risks
expertise
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
>400
300-400
Severity ($MM)
200-300
100-200
<100
Risk 1
Risk 2
Senior management
Risk 3 judgment
External market data
Risk 4 + + Internal input from
Risk 5
Inputs
Strategic Operational
Customer value management Core business planning processes
Senior Brand strategy and execution Supplier management
management Increased international competition
Post-merger integration
interviews Industry consolidation and mergers
Operational reliability
Pricing and revenue management
optimization Human capital and talent strategy
Fit and alignment of potential strategic Information management and decision
partnerships
support capabilities
Infrastructure ability to support future growth
Survey Critical systems
Matching capacity supply with market
responses demand
Financial
Fuel price risk
Interest rate increase
Capital structure
Oliver Wyman Hazard Exchange rate fluctuations
expertise Pandemic
Cash flow risk
Accident or incident
4.4
Core business
International
planning processes Matching competition
High capacity with
Human capital demand
and talent
Risk probability
Fuel
Operational
Maintenance reliability
3.4
Financial structure
Consolidation
Brand Strategy
Supplier-related
Moderate
Customer value
management
Safety -related
2.4
Low High
Risk Probability Scale Risk severity
5 Very High (~100%) (Annual earnings-at-risk, CNY in BN)
4 High (75 - 100%)
3 Moderate (50 - 75%)
2 Low (25 - 50%)
1 Very Low (0 -25%) Our earnings at risk quantification relied upon deep industry
expertise and tailored approaches for individual risks