Sie sind auf Seite 1von 67

2.

008x

Casting
MIT  2.008x

Prof.  John  Hart


2.008x
2.008x

What  is  casting?

Why  is  it  a  useful  and  


important  manufacturing  
process?

How  does  it  compare  


and  contrast   to  
processes   we  have  
studied  already?
à Casting  is  the  process  
2.008x
whereby  a  part  is  produced  by  
solidification   (of  a  molten  
metal)  to  take  the  shape  of  a  
mold.

à Why  casting?
§ Versatile  to  many  types  of  
metals
§ Potential  for  rapid  and  cost-­
effective  production
§ Wide  range  of  length  scales  
(mm  to  m!)
§ Complex  part  geometries  
(including  internal  cavities)
Engine  block  by  160SX  ( talk)  -­ 160SX  ( talk)'s  file,  CC  BY-­SA  3.0,  
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7899838
Brass  r at  by  Pigsfly33  at  English  Wikipedia,  CC  BY  3.0,  https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=31980643,  
Casting  and  history
Left:  Bronze  s tatue  of  a  man,  
2.008x
Hellenistic  period,  mid-­2nd-­1st
century  B.C.,  H.  73  in  (185.4  c m)
Below:  Herakles  (Son  of  Zeus)

Bessemer  s teel  converter  (enabled  reduction  of  


carbon  content  in  Iron  à steel),  1865

http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/257580
https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-­of-­art/28.77/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessemer_process#/media/File:Bessemer_converter.jpg (Public  
domain)  
The  engine  from  the  1903  Wright  Flyer  had  an  aluminum  crankcase.  The  Wrights  
contracted  a  local  Dayton  foundry,  the  Buckeye  Iron  and  Brass  Works,  to  cast  the  
aluminum  crankcase.  Buckeye  acquired  their  raw  aluminum  from  the  nearby  Pittsburgh   2.008x
Reduction  Company,  renamed  Alcoa  in  1907,  the  world’s  leading  producer  of  aluminum.

http://airandspace.si.edu/explore-­and-­learn/multimedia/detail.cfm?id=5817
Global   cast  iron  and  steel  production  
(millions   of  tons) 2.008x

World  census  of  c asting  production:  


http://www.afsinc.org/multimedia/contentMCDP.cfm?ItemNumber=16433
Agenda:
Casting 2.008x

§ Classification  of  casting  methods


§ Sand  casting
§ Die  casting
§ Casting  process  physics:
§ Fluidity  and  cooling  (with  
demonstration)
§ Solidification  and  microstructure
§ Investment  casting
§ Comparison  and  conclusion
2.008x

Casting:

2.Classification   of  
casting  methods
Classification   of  casting  processes
2.008x

General  sequence  (all  casting  processes):


§ Pattern/mold  making
§ Melt  preparation
§ Mold  filling
§ Cooling  and  solidification
§ Removal  (‘breakout’)  of  the  parts
Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology
Sand  casting
2.008x

Groover,  Fundamentals  of  Modern  Manufacturing


Important  criteria  for  
casting  materials 2.008x

§ Melting  point  and  latent  heat


§ Density  versus  temperature
§ Solubility  with  other  elements
§ Diffusion  rates
§ Reactivity  (especially  to  oxygen)
§ Outgassing  (vapor  pressure)
2.008x

3000° C
Tungsten  Carbide  (WC)
Tungsten Carbide, WC,
Silicon Carbide, SiC Cubic Zirconia, ZrO2
Silicon  Carbide  (SiC)
Molybdenum
Molybdenum

Alumina Al2O3
Alumina  (Al 2 O 3 ;;  2072 C)
o
2000° C
Platinum, Pt
Titanium, Ti
Platinum,  Titanium  
IronFE, Plain Carbon Steels,(1668  
low alloy, C)
o
stainless
Nickel, Ni
Iron  and  steels,  Nickel,   Silicon
Silicon, Si
Nickel Allows

1000° C Copper, Cu, Bronze, Brass


Copper,  Bronze,  Brass

Aluminum   (660  oC)


Aluminum
Magnesium
Magnesium Nylon
Zinc  (420  
Zinc, Zn o C)
Acetal
PTFE
Tin (Teflon)
Tin, Sn
0° C HDPE
2.008x

Casting:

3.  Sand  casting
Sand  casting
2.008x

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSOtZj2Y8is  
Sand  casting
2.008x

§ Mold  cavity  is  formed  by  packing  


sand  around  a  pattern.
§ Interior  geometry  is  defined  by  a  
core  (disposable).
§ The  pattern  is  removed  and  the  
cavity  has  the  desired  shape.
§ Sand  for  the  mold  is,  for  example,  
90%  sand,  3%  water  and  7%  clay.  

Groover,  Fundamentals  of  Modern  Manufacturing


Sand  casting:  key  attributes
2.008x
§ Low  surface  detail;;  post-­machining  often  required  for  
high  tolerances.
§ It’s  the  most  common  casting  method  (by  total  weight);;  
can  make  VERY  large  parts.
§ Because  mold  filling  is  gravity-­driven  (more  to  come  
later),  must  pay  most  careful  attention  to  flow  and  
shrinkage.
§ It’s  a  (relatively)  labor-­intensive  process  with  long  cycle  
time  (why?)
§ 3D  printing  of  molds  and  complex  cores  (though  one-­
time  use)  can  achieve  previously  impossible  geometries.
2.008x

Voxeljet:  3D  printed  


sand  molds
2.008x

Casting:

4.  Die  casting
Die  casting  of  aluminum  wheel  caps
2.008x

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6ODcxK8_lg  
Die  casting:  attributes
2.008x

§ Pressure:  ~1-­1000  MPa  (how  


does  this  compare  to  IM?)

§ Cycle  time:  ~10’s  of  seconds  for  


average  components  (tools/toys)

§ Parts  have  many  similarities  to  


IM,  i.e.,  ejector  pin  marks,  
parting  lines,  gates/runners.

§ Dies  are  endangered  by  heat-­


induced  cracking  and  corrosion  
(accelerated  at  high  
temperature)  à need  tool-­grade  
steel  or  other  special  materials.
Die  casting:  hot  chamber   method
2.008x

:  cold  chamber   method

Groover,  Fundamentals  of  Modern  Manufacturing


Hot  Wheels!
2.008x

Image:  http://www.amazon.com/Hot-­Wheels-­9-­Car-­Gift-­Styles/dp/B006EFMSSM
Which  processes?
2.008x
20  for  $15  (Amazon);;  how  is  that  possible?
2.008x
2.008x
DFM:  Integral  rivets!
2.008x
Ferrari   F12  Berlinetta
2.008x

Wheelhouses:  
sand  casting

Frame  components:  
High  pressure  die  
casting

Top  image:  s creenshot  from  http://auto.ferrari.com/en_US/sports-­cars-­models/car-­range/f12-­berlinetta/#design-­360_exterior-­5  


Bottom  image:  http://auto.ferrari.com/en_EN/wp-­content/uploads/sites/5/2013/07/architecture11.jpg  
2.008x

Casting:

5.  Fluidity  and  cooling


Surface   tension  and  viscosity
2.008x

Ux
Ux(H) = Ux

∂U
τ =µ Ux(y) h
∂y
Ux(0) = 0

Surface  tension, σ Dynamic viscosity, μ


Water  (25 C) 0.07  N/m 1×10-­3  kg/m-­s  [Pa-­s]
Honey  (25  C) ~0.06 ~10  
Liquid thermoplastic ~0.03 102-­103
Molten aluminum  (600  C) 0.90 3×10-­3
Fluid  flow  
considerations   for   2.008x

good  casting
à If  gravity-­driven,  pressure  ‘head’  
must  be  sufficient  to  overcome  flow  
resistance  to  fully  infiltrate  mold  
cavity.

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Fluid  flow  
considerations   for   2.008x

good  casting
à Flow  must  remain  laminar  to  
prevent  air  entrainment.avoid
abrupt  direction  change.    Trapped  
air  leads  to  ‘dross’  (oxide  flakes)
à same  as  
μ  (viscosity)

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Testing  ‘fluidity’  for  casting
2.008x

Al  with  increasing  
content  of  
reinforcing  
particles  (SiC)

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Behera et  al.  “Effect  of  Reinforcement  Particles  on  the  Fluidity  and  Solidification  Behavior  of  the  Stir  Cast  Aluminum  Alloy  
Metal  Matrix  Composites”,  American  J ournal  of  Materials  Science,  2012;;    2(3):  53-­61
Demonstration:   Cooling  in  sand  casting  vs.  
die  casting  (‘wood’s  metal’) 2.008x
Solidification   time
2.008x

80

70
Sand Casting
60

Temperature [°C]
50
Die Casting
40

30

20

10

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200


Time [s]
Chvorinov’s rule
2.008x
n
"V %
tsolidify = C ⋅ $ '
# A&

§ V =  volume  of  the  


casting
§ A =  surface  area  of  the  
casting
§ C =  mold  constant,  
depends  on  mold  
material  and  thermal  
properties  of  casting  
metal

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Solidification:   sand  cast  versus  die  cast
2.008x
~0.1  cm2/s
αsteel
αsand ~0.01  cm2/s αaluminum ~0.9  cm2/s

LIQUID!
SOLID!
LIQUID!
SOLID!
SAND METAL

TM! TM!

T0! T0!
0 0
2
"V % "V %
tsolidify = C ⋅ $ ' tsolidify = C ⋅ $ '
# A& # A&
à Like  injection  molding,  but   à Lower-­bound  (assumes  
mold  has  low  thermal  conductivity constant  mold  temp)
2.008x

Casting:

6.  Solidification   and  
microstructure
Solidification   of  pure  metals
§ Metal  releases  latent  heat  as  it  freezes;;  this  accounts  for   2.008x
up  to  ~50%  of  the  energy  transfer.
§ As  a  result,  solid  and  liquid  co-­exist  in  the  mold  for  a  
significant  time.

1/Temperature

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Formation  of  cast  microstructure
2.008x

Columnar

Shell  zone  
(‘Chill’)

Grain  size  is  


inversely  
proportional  to  
cooling  rate.

Shell  has  finer  


Hall-­Petch model: smaller  grains   grains  à
give  higher  strength thinner  die  
σ0 =  stress  to  start  dislocation  movement cast  parts  are  
ky =  material  hardening  constant typically  
d =  grain  size ky stronger
σ y = σo +
d grain
Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology
Alloys:  dendrites  and  the  ‘mushy  zone’
2.008x

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


2.008x

Casting:

7.  Defects
What  causes  the  voids? 2.008x
Shrinkage!
2.008x

Groover,  Fundamentals  of  Modern  Manufacturing


Shrinkage!
2.008x

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Casting:  general  defects
2.008x
§ Misrun:  solidification  before  complete  filling
§ Cold  shut:  lack  of  fusion  due  to  premature  freezing
§ Cold  shot:  metal  splatter  entrapped  in  casting
§ Shrinkage  cavity:  depression  in  surface  caused  by  
solidification  shrinkage  (or  hot  tear  =  internal  void)

Groover,  Fundamentals  of  Modern  Manufacturing


2.008x

Casting:

8.  Investment   casting
Investment   (‘lost  wax’)  casting
2.008x

Image  from  http://www.custompartnet.com/wu/investment-­casting


An  industrial  investment   casting  process
2.008x

Screenshot  from:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cptlGzWYFEk


Investment   casting:  key  points
2.008x
§ Use  of  wax  template  enables  excellent  surface  finish  
with  little/no  post-­processing.
§ Ceramic  shell  enables  casting  of  high  melting  point  
metals/alloys.
§ Metal  typically  poured  in  vacuum  oven  (reduces  
defects).
§ Very  labor  intensive  à robots!

Why  investment  casting?


§ Jewelry:  complex  geometries,  high  tolerances  and  fine  
features.
§ Jet  engine  parts:  smooth  surface  finish,  compatibility  
with  high  temperature  alloys.
2.008x
2.008x

Image  from  ATI  Aerospace  (http://www.slideshare.net/johnpsilk/ati-­jet-­engine);;  s ee  also  


http://www.geaviation.com/commercial/engines/genx/;;  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1ahHWXGx5Y
Investment   casting  of  turbine  blades
à Careful  control  of  solidification  can  give  single  crystal  blades  (=  very   2.008x
high  strength  and  fatigue  life  under  cyclic  load  at  high  temperature)

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Image  at  right  from  http://www.chromalloy.com/files/newspressrelease/7ac07680-­0adb-­460b-­8f27-­f7d47745a4c4.pdf  
Great  article:  ‘The  metal  that  brought  y ou  c heap  flights’  http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-­32749262  
2.008x

Casting:

9.  Comparison   and  
conclusion
What  casting  method  was  used  and  why?
2.008x
1 2

Die  casting: Small  parts,  precision   Sand  casting: Larger  parts,  rough  
features,  good  surface  finish surface  finish

Investment  casting: Complex  curves,  good  surface  finish  (at  right)

Aluminum  castings  from  the  s and  mold  ( modified):  photograph  taken  by  G lenn  McKechnie -­ Own  work,  CC  BY-­SA  2.0,  
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=109988
An  investment  c ast  turbocharger  turbine,  Nuclear  v alve  by  Mark  Bolton  -­ CC  BY-­SA  3.0,  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10729027,  
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6078994
2.008x

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Why  would  I:
2.008x

à Choose  die  casting  instead  of  


injection  molding?
Need  metal  (strength,  durability)  
instead  of  plastic

à Choose  investment  casting  


instead  of  die  casting?
Higher  melting  point  material,  
complex  internal  cavities,  high  
precision

à Choose  machining  instead  of  die  


casting?
Higher  tolerances;;  better  control  of  
microstructure/properties  (can  use  
wrought/forged  material)
Reflection:  the  big  four
2.008x

Sand Investment Die

Rate Medium Low High

Quality Low Medium High

Cost Low Medium High

Flexibility Low-­Medium Medium Low


2.008x

Top  image  from:  


http://www.alcoa.com/global/en/innovation/alcoa_micromill.asp
Article:  Automotive  News,  September  14,  2015.
Continuous  casting  of  aluminum  sheet
(Alcoa  ‘micromill’   process) 2.008x

Furnace  (molten  Al)

Continuously  
moving  sheet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH2QcNGM87w
http://www.alcoa.com/global/en/innovation/alcoa_micromill.asp
References
2.008x
1  Introduction

Photo  of  Fire  Hydrant  by  User:  KeystonePetPlace on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Photo  of  Die  Cast  BMW  Car  by  User:  RockyHorror on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Photo  of  Cast  Elbow  Pipes  by  User:  Dyanap on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Photo  of  Wheel  Rims  by  User:  Pashminu on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Photo  of  Jet  Engine  Turbine  by  User:  Michael  Schwarenberger on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  
public  domain.

Photo  of  Engine  Block  by  160SX   (160SX  (talk)'s  file)  on  Wikimedia.  (CC  BY-­SA)  3.0

Photo  of  Propeller  Blade  by  User:  seehund on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Photo  of  MIT  Class  Ring  by  User:  Pigsfly33  on  Wikimedia.  (CC  BY-­SA)  3.0

Image  of  Herakles Statue  ©  2000–2016   The  Metropolitan  Museum  of  Art

Image  of  Bronze  Statue  of  a  Man  ©  2000–2016   The  Metropolitan  Museum  of  Art
References
2.008x
Image  of  Bessemer  Converter  Diagram  from  "Discoveries  &  Inventions  of  the  Nineteenth  Century"  
by  R.  Routledge,  published  1900.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Image  of  Wright  Brothers  Engine   from  the  National  Air  and  Space  Museum  ©  The  Smithsonian.

Image  of  Wright  Brothers  Flyer  from  the  National  Air  and  Space  Museum  ©  The  Smithsonian.

Image  of  US  and  China  Casting  Production  ©  American  Foundry  Society

Image  of  Global  Cast  Iron  and  Steel  Production  ©  IKB  Deutsche  Industriebank AG

2  Classification

Casting  Process  Classification:  Figure  II.3  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering  &  Technology  (7th  
Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Sand  Casting  Mold  Features:  Figure  10.2  b)  from  "Fundamentals   of  Modern  Manufacturing  (4th  
Edition)"  by  Groover.  ©  John  Wiley  &  Sons  Inc.  (2010).
References
2.008x
3  Sand  Casting

Video  of  Sand  Casting  ©  2006   -­ 2016  ChinaSavvy.  All  Rights  Reserved.
Sand  Casting  Mold  Features:  Figure  10.2  b)  from  "Fundamentals   of  Modern  Manufacturing  (4th  

Edition)"  by  Groover.  ©  John  Wiley  &  Sons  Inc.  (2010).

4  Die  Casting

Video  of  Die  Casting  ©  2016   Die  Castings  China

Hot  Chamber  Die  Casting:  Figure  11.13  1)  and  2)  from  "Fundamentals   of  Modern   Manufacturing  
(4th  Edition)"  by  Groover.  ©  John  Wiley  &  Sons  Inc.  (2010).

Cold  Chamber  Die  Casting:  Figure  11.14  1)  and  2)  from  "Fundamentals   of  Modern  Manufacturing  
(4th  Edition)"  by  Groover.  ©  John  Wiley  &  Sons  Inc.  (2010).

Image  of  Ferrari  F12  Berlinetta by  Ferrari  S.p.A.  Copyright  2016.  All  Rights  Reserved.

Image  of  Ferrari  Aluminum  Chassis  by  Ferrari  S.p.A.  Copyright  2016.  All  Rights  Reserved.
References
2.008x
5  Fluidity  /  Cooling

Gated  Casting  with  Risers:  Figure  10.8  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  
Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Spiral  Test  Casting:  Figure  10.9  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  
Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Image  of  Changing  Fluidity  Index  ©  2012  Scientific  &  Academic  Publishing

Temperature   Distribution  at  Mold  Wall:  Figure  10.10  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  
Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  
(2014).

6  Solidification

Temperature   Evolution  over  Time:  Figure  10.1  a)  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering  &  Technology  
(7th  Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Change   in  Specific  Density:  Figure  10.1  b)  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  
Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).
References
2.008x
Casting  Cross-­Section:  Figure  10.2  b)  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering  &  Technology  (7th  
Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Phase  Diagram:  Figure  10.4  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  
Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

7  Defects

Shrinkage  and  Cavity  Formation:  Figure  10.8  2)  and  3)  from  "Fundamentals  of  Modern  
Manufacturing  (4th  Edition)"  by  Groover.  ©  John  Wiley  &  Sons  Inc.  (2010).

Shrinkage  Allowances:  Table  12.1  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  
by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Common  Casting  Defects:  Figure  11.22  a)  -­ d)  from  "Fundamentals  of  Modern  Manufacturing  (4th  
Edition)"  by  Groover.  ©  John  Wiley  &  Sons  Inc.  (2010).
References
2.008x

8  Investment  Casting

Image  of  Investment  Casting  Process  ©  2009  CustomPartNet

Video  of  Investment  Casting  Process  ©2011  Wisconsin  Precision  Casting  Corporation

Image  of  Jet  Engine  Materials  ©  2016  ATI.  All  Rights  Reserved.

Single  Crystal  Turbine   Blade:  Figure  11.25  b)  and  c)  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  
Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  
(2014).

Image  of  Wax  Patterns  for  Turbine   Blades  ©  SouthComm Publishing  Company  2015.

9  Conclusion

Photo  of  Threaded   Faucet  Connection  by  User:  byrev on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  
domain.

Photo  of  Bearing  by  User:  petitgiovanni on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.
References
2.008x
Photo  of  Toy  Truck  by  User:  da_hammer on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Photo  of  Sand  Cast  Parts  by  User:  Graibeard on  Wikimedia.  (CC  BY-­SA)  2.0

Photo  of  Investment  Cast  Turbocharger  Turbine   Blades  by  MarkBolton at  English  Wikipedia.  (CC  
BY-­SA)  3.0

Photo  of  Valve  for  Nuclear  Power  Station  by  MarkBolton at  English  Wikipedia.  (CC  BY-­SA)  3.0

Compatison of  Casting  Methods:  Table  11.2  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  
Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Image  of  Micromill ©  2016  Alcoa  Inc.

Article  on  F150  Production  ©  Crain  Communications,  Inc.

Image  of  Ford  F150  Chassis  ©  2014  Sustainable  Enterprises  Media,  Inc.

Image  of  Ford  F150  ©  2016   Ford  Motor  Company

Image  of  Micromill Plant  ©  2016  Alcoa  Inc.

Video  of  Micromilling ©  2016  Alcoa  Inc.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen