Sie sind auf Seite 1von 63

Standards, specifications

and procedures

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Standards and coating systems

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Who makes the specification?

• The owner
• The consultant
• The management company
• The contractor
• The paint supplier

They may all have a greater or smaller input


to the content in the final specification

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Who decides on the specification?

The final decision is with the one paying


the bill!

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


What should a surface treatment
specification contain?

• Surface preparation
• Paint application
• Quality control / equipment
• Repair
• Safety aspects
• Qualification of material and personnel
• Documentation / reports

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Surface preparation

• Pre blasting preparations


• Approved surface preparation methods
• Demands of surface cleanliness and
roughness
• Methods of control / acceptance
• Demands of environmental conditions

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Quality control

• What tests shall be carried out?


• What methods are to be used?
• What are the acceptance criteria?
• Consequences if work is non-conforming?
• Comments

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


PROCEDURES

ISO 12944:
• The part of the document that describes
the way the paint work is to be carried
out, in conformity with the project
specification and the protective paint
system specification, as well as with the
inspection and assessment specification

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Specifications and procedures
Specification
• A document stating what we wish to achieve
– how and at what quality level a certain piece of work must be
carried out

Procedure
• A document explaining how we shall achieve the
requirements in a specification
– Processing instruction, check points, quality control

Procedure à Specification
how (to meet) requirements
Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007
STANDARDS
Refer to:
• NS 476:2004,
– Annex A.5 (page 25)

• “Corrosion Protection”,
Inspector’s book of reference
– Chapter 13 (pages 310 to 369)
– Appendix to Chapter 13 (pages 370 to 393)

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Surface preparation
Standard for deciding rust grades

ISO 8501 - 1
Rust grade A, B, C and D

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8501-1
Evaluation of rust grades
Rust grade A Rust grade B

Cd-0631-59 Cd-0631-58

Rust grade C Rust grade D

Cd-0631-57 Cd-0631-56

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Mill scale on pipes

• Corrosion and mill scale, rust grade B


• Rust and mill scale must be removed prior to paint application.
• Mill scale can be removed by blast-cleaning

Cd-4930-86

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8501 - 1
Standard for deciding preparation grades

Sa: Blast cleaning (grades 1, 2, 2 ½ and 3)

St.: Hand and power tool cleaning


(grades 2 and 3)

Fl: Flame cleaning (one grade)

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8501-1

Hand and Power Tool Cleaning (St)

St 2 Thorough hand and power tool cleaning.


When viewed without magnification, the surface shall be free
from visible oil, grease and dirt, and poorly adhering mill scale,
rust, paint coatings and foreign matter.

St 3 Very thorough hand and power tool cleaning.


As for St 2, but the surface shall be treated much more
thoroughly to give a metallic sheen arising from the metallic
substrate.

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8501-1

Abrasive Blast Cleaning (Sa)


Sa 1 Light blast cleaning
When viewed without magnification, the surface shall be free from visible
oil, grease and dirt and from poorly adhering mill scale, rust, paint
coatings and foreign matter.

Sa 2 Thorough blast cleaning


When viewed without magnification, the surface shall be free from visible
oil, grease and dirt and from most of the mill scale, rust, paint coatings
and foreign matter. Any residual contamination shall be firmly adhering.

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8501-1

Abrasive Blast Cleaning (Sa)

Sa 2½ Very thorough blast cleaning.


When viewed without magnification, the surface shall be free from visible
oil, grease and dirt and from poorly adhering mill scale, rust, paint
coatings and foreign matter. Any remaining traces of contamination shall
show only as slight stains in the form of spots or stripes.

Sa 3 Blast cleaning to visually clean steel.


When viewed without magnification, the surface shall be free from visible
oil, grease and dirt, and shall be free from mill scale, rust, paint coatings
and foreign matter. It shall have a uniform metallic colour.

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8501 - 1
Standard for deciding preparation grades

• Left: Blast standard agreement


• Right: Hand tooling of C steel to St 2

4932-76 0631-55

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8501 - 2
Surface preparation

As for ISO 8501-1, but:


For steel where previous coating has been removed
locally, not completely.

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8501 - 2
Standard for deciding preparation grades

PSa : Localised blast cleaning


(grades 2, 2 ½ and 3)

PSt : Localised hand and power tool cleaning


(grades 2 and 3)

PMa : Localised machine abrading (one grade)

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8501 - 3
Surface preparation. Design

Visual assessment of surface design

Preparation grades of welds, cut edges and


surface imperfections.

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Waterjetting

ISO 8501-4 Preparation grades of coated and uncoated


steel substrates after removal of rust and previous
coatings by hugh=pressure water-jetting
– Photographic standard in progress, showing grades DC A, DC
B, DC C1, DC C2, DC D

SSPC VIS-4 Guide and Reference Photographs for Steel


Surfaces prepared by waterjetting.
– WJ 1 Surface free of all rust, coatings, mill scale and
foreign matter.
– WJ 2 95% removed.
– WJ 3 Two thirds removed.
– WJ 4 All loose rust, mill scale and coatings removed.

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8502
Assessment of surface cleanliness (1 of 2)

Part 1 Field test for soluble iron corrosion products

Part 2 Laboratory determination of chloride on cleaned


surfaces.

Part 3 Assessment of dust on steel surfaces prepared for


painting (pressure- sensitive tape method)

Part 4 Guidance on the estimation of the probability of


condensation prior to paint application.

Part 5 Measurement of chloride on steel surfaces


prepared for painting. Ion detector tube method.

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8502
Assessment of surface cleanliness (2 of 2)

Part 6 Extraction of soluble contaminants for analysis.


The Bresle method.

Part 9 Conductometric measurements of soluble salts

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8502-3
Assessment of dust
Steel Surfaces Prepared for Painting.
Tape Blast cleaned steel

Approved
Not approved

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8502 - 3
Assessment of dust

Assessment of dust on
steel surface prepared for painting

1. Quantity ratings 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5


corresponding to pictorial references

2. Dust size classes 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8502 - 3
Assessment of dust
• Left: Dust on steel beam
• Right: Control of dust according to standard

0866-14
0866-13

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8502 - 3
Assessment of dust

Assessment of dust on steel


surface prepared for painting

1. Quantity ratings 1, 2, 3, 4
and 5 corresponding to
pictorial references
2. Dust size classes:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

Inspection / Dust_control1

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8503
Surface roughness of blast-cleaned steel

Specifications and definitions for ISO surface


Part 1 profile comparatives for the assessment of
abrasive blast-cleaned surfaces.
Method for the grading of surface profile of abrasive
Part 2
blast- cleaned steel - Comparator procedure.
Method for the calibration of ISO surface profile
Part 3 comparators and for the determination of surface
profile- Focusing microscope procedure.
Method for the calibration of ISO surface profile
Part 4 comparators and for the determination of
surface profile - Stylus instrument procedure
Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007
ISO 8503
Surface roughness

• Example of a reference
comparator
• Surface profile comparator
comprising four segments.
• Grit (G)
• Shot (S)
Cd-4932-86
• Check if the profile is
according to specification and
the paint manufacturer’s
recommendation

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 8503 - 1
Limits of profile grades
a) Comparators for steel. Blast-cleaned with grit abrasives
Profiles equal to segment 1 and up to,
Fine (G)
but excluding segment 2 (25-50 micr)
Profiles equal to segment 2 and up to,
Medium (G)
but excluding segment 3 (50-85 micr)
Coarse (G) Profiles equal to segment 3 and up to,
but excluding segment 4 (85-130 micr)

b) Comparators for steel. Blast-cleaned with shot abrasives


Fine (S) Profiles equal to segment 1 and up to,
but excluding segment 2 (25-35 micr)
Medium (S) Profiles equal to segment 2 and up to,
but excluding segment 3 (35-60 micr)
Profiles equal to segment 3 and up to,
Coarse (S)
but excluding segment 4 (60-85 micr)
Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007
ISO 8503 - 1
Nominal values and tolerances
a) Comparators for steel, blast-cleaned with grit abrasives

Segment Nominal reading Tolerance


µm µm
1 25 3
2 60 10
3 100 15
4 150 20

b) Comparators for steel, blast-cleaned with shot abrasives


Segment Nominal reading Tolerance
µm µm
1 25 3
2 40 5
3 70 10
4 100 15

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Ry – the maximum peak-to-valley
height occuring over a sampling length

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Ry – the maximum peak-to-valley height
occuring over a sampling length

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Ra – average roughness

Ra = the mean distance of all points on the profile to the centre line

Centre line

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 12944
General standard for corrosion protection:
Paints and varnishes - Corrosion protection
of steel structures by protective paints systems.
Part 1 General introduction.
Part 2 Classification of environments.
Part 3 Design considerations.
Part 4 Types of surface and surface preparation.

Part 5 Protective paint systems.


Part 6 Laboratory performance test methods.
Part 7 Execution and supervision of paint work.

Part 8 Development of specifications for new work


and maintenance.

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 12944, CORROSION CLASSES

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 12944, CORROSION CLASSES

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007
Checklist for coating selection

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 12944, SYSTEM EXAMPLES

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 12944, SYSTEM EXAMPLES

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 11124
Content of the standard
Specifications for metallic blast-cleaning abrasives.
The standard consists of 5 parts

Part 1 Introduction

Part 2 Chilled iron grit

Part 3 High carbon cast steel shot and grit

Part 4 Low carbon cast steel shot

Part 5 Cut steel wire

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 11125
Content of the standard
Methods of test for metallic blast-cleaning abrasives.
The standard consists of 8 parts
Part 1 Sampling
Part 2 Determination of particle size distribution
Part 3 Determination of hardness
Part 4 Determination of apparent density
Part 5 Determination of defective particles
and microstructure
Part 6 Determination of matter
Part 7 Determination of moisture
Part 8 Abrasive mechanical properties
Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007
ISO 11126
Content of the standard
Specification for non-metallic blast-cleaning abrasive.
The standard consists of 10 parts

Part 1 Introduction
Part 2 Silica sand
Part 3 Copper refinery slag
Part 4 Coal furnace slag
Part 5 Nickel refinery slag
Part 6 Iron furnace slag
Part 7 Fused aluminium oxide
Part 8 Olivine sand
Part 9 Staurolite
Part 10 Garnet
Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007
ISO 11127
Content of the standard
Test methods for non-metallic blast-cleaning abrasives.
The standard consists of 8 parts

Part 1 Sampling
Part 2 Determination of particle size distribution
Part 3 Determination of apparent density
Part 4 Determination of hardness by a glass slide test
Part 5 Determination of moisture content
Part 6 Determination of water soluble
contamination by conductive measurement
Part 7 Determination of water soluble chlorides
Part 8 Abrasive mechanical properties

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Contamination of abrasives

The abrasives can be contaminated with:

• Water
• Oil and grease
• Chlorides
• Sulphates

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 11127 - 5
Content of humidity of the abrasives

•Laboratory test

•Requirement: Maximum 0.2 %

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 11127 - 6
Content of water soluble contaminants

Conductivity measurements
• A sample of 100 g. of the abrasives
• 100 ml of water
• Shake for 5 minutes and let rest for 1 hour
• Shake again for another 5 minutes
• Measure the conductivity at a temperature
of 10 oC

Requirement: Maximum conductivity of 25 mS/m

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


How to check the abrasives

• According to ASTM D 4940


• Mix 300 ml of abrasive and 300 ml water
• Stir for 1 min. let stand for 8 min., stir again for 1 min.

Conductivity (AB-1) Oil content (AB-1)


Fill the liquid for test No presence of oil,
and measure the either on top or as an
conductivity. emulsion after 30 min.
Max 25 mS/m

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Is the abrasive free from
oil and grease ?

• Put a handful of the abrasives into a


beaker

• Pour clean, fresh water into the beaker


• Shake the mixture
• A film of oil will form on top of the
water if oil or grease are present

This is of particular importance to


check when abrasives are recycled

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Is the abrasive free from
oil and grease ?

• ASTM D 4940
• Put a handful of the
abrasives into a beaker

• Pour clean, fresh water


into the beaker

• Shake the mixture


• A film of oil will form on
top of the water if oil or
grease are present

Shopprimer/ Abrasive_test1

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 2808 - 97
Determination of film thickness (1 of 2)

Method 1: Determination of wet film thickness.

Method 2: Determination of dry-film thickness by


calculation from mass
Method 3: Measurement of dry-film thickness by
mechanically contacting method
Method 4: Measurement of dry-film thickness by the
profilometer method
Method 5: Measurement of dry-film thickness using
microscope method

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 2808 - 97
Determination of film thickness: (2 of 2)

Method 6: Magnetic method

Method 7: Eddy current method

Method 8: Non-contact methods

Method 9: Gravimetric method (dissolving methods)

Method 10: Determination of dry-film thickness on


blast-cleaned steel substrates

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 4628

• Evaluation of degradation of paint coatings

• Designation of intensity, quantity and size of


common types of defect

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 4628
Content of the Standard
The standard consists of six parts
Part 1 General principles and rating schemes
Part 2 Designation of degree of blistering
Part 3 Designation of degree of rusting
Part 4 Designation of degree of cracking
Part 5 Designation of degree of flaking
Part 6 Designation of degree of chalking

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 4628 / 1
General principles and rating schemes

Uniform deterioration.
Rating scheme for designation the intensity of deterioration
consisting of a uniform change in the
visual appearance of the paint coating.

Rating Intensity of change


0 unchanged, i.e. no perceptible change
1 very slight, i.e. just perceptible change
2 slight i.e. clearly perceptible change
3 moderate, i.e. very clearly perceptible change
4 considerable, i.e. pronounced change
5 severe, i.e. intense change

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 4628 / 1
General principles and rating schemes
Scattered defects.
Rating scheme for designating the quantity of defects consisting
of discontinuities or other local imperfections of the paint coating.

Quantity of defects
Rating (relative to a test surface area of 1 to 2 dm²)
0 none, i.e. no detectable defects
1 very few, i.e. some just significant defects
2 few, i.e. small but significant amount of defects
3 Moderate, i.e. medium amount of defects
4 considerable, i.e. serious amount of defects
5 dense, i.e. dense pattern of defects

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 4628 / 1
General principles and rating schemes
Rating scheme for designating
the size (order of magnitude) of defects

Class Size of defect


0 not visible under 10 X magnification
1 only visible under magnification up to 10 X
2 just visible with normal corrected vision
3 clearly visible with normal corrected vision (up to 0,5 mm)
4 range 0,5 to 5 mm
5 larger than 5 mm

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 4628 / 1
Test report
The test report shall contain at least the following
information:
a) the type and identification of the product tested
b) a reference to this International Standard (ISO 4628/1)
c) the type of defect
d) the intensity of the defect (table 1) or,
e) the quantity of the defect (table 2)
f) the rating, if any, of the size of the defect in brackets
preceded by the letter “S”.
Examples: cratering of top coat : 2 (S3)
whitening : 4
rivelling : 3 (S2)

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


ISO 4628 / 3
Designation of degree of rusting
Rating
Designate the degree of rust formation by reference to
the pictorial standards

Degree Area rusted %


Ri 0 0
Ri 1 0,05
Ri 2 0,5
Ri 3 1
Ri 4 8
Ri 5 40/50
Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007
Assessment of area ratio
for coating breakdown
0.1 % 1.0 %
. .
. . . .
.
. . .

3.0 % 10 %

20 % 30 %

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007


Standards and coating systems

Nguyen Cong Thuan/JPS DNV Vinashin Training/ 2007

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen