Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AÑO XIX, BOGOTÁ, 2013, PP. 489 509, ISSN 2346 0849
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
Der vorliegende Artikel befasst sich mit dem Konzept und der Reichweite der Figur der
Überprüfung der völkerrechtlichen Vertragskonformität im Hinblick auf das Internationa-le
Recht der Menschrechte. Insbesondere werden Inhalt und Kontext dieser Rechtsfigur
anhand der Entwicklung der Rechtsprechung des Interamerikanischen Gerichtshofs für
Menschenrechte analysiert. Damit soll die These begründet werden, dass diese Über-
prüfung nichts anderes ist als die richterrechtliche Konkretisierung der Verpflichtung, die
Menschenrechte im innerstaatlichen Rahmen zu garantieren.
ABSTRACT
This paper deals with the concept and scope of conventionality control in the light
of International Human Rights Law. Specifically, it provides a contextual and
conceptual analysis using the evolution of the Inter-American Court of Human
Rights’ case law, to show that this type of control is simply the judicial mechanism
for complying with the duty to guarantee human rights within the country.
1. Introducción
1
-B ĕHVSB EFM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE DPO EJDIB EFOPNJOBDJØO FT EF SFDJFOUF EFTBSSPMMP FO MB EPHNÈUJDB EF
KVSÓEJDP FTUÈ FTUSFDIBNFOUF SFMBDJPOBEB DPO MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT RVF JNQPOF MB $POWFODJØO "NFSJDBOB EF %FSFDIPT )
BNQMJBNFOUF EFTBSSPMMBEP FO FM ÈNCJUP JOUFSOP EF MPT &TUBEPT Z FO FM DPODFQUP EF iDPOUSPM JOUFSOBDJPOBMw¤2 &O
OP CBTUB DPO MB NFSB JODPSQPSBDJØO GPSNBM EF MPT USBUBEPT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT EF EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT
%F BIÓ RVF TFB SFMFWBOUF QMBOUFBSTF MB QSFHVOUB ¿Cuál es el alcance de la figura del control de convencionalidad
a la luz del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos? -P RVF RVJFSP TPTUFOFS FT RVF FM DPOUSPM EF
JOUFSOP¤ 4V QBSUJDVMB
1
4F SFBMJ[B FM BMDBODF QVFTUP RVF MB GVODJØO EFM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE TF EFTBSSPMMB EFTEF MB FOUSBEB FO WJHPS EF
MB $POWFODJØO "NFSJDBOB
QFSP OP FT TJOP FO MPT ÞMUJNPT B×PT FO RVF FTUB MBCPS TF IB DBSBUVMBEP CBKP EJDIP DPODFQUP¤ &O FTUF TFOUJEP
WFS ,BSMPT $BTUJMMB i&M DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE VO OVFWP EFCBUF FO .ÏYJDP B QBSUJS EF MB TFOUFODJB 3BEJMMB 1BDIFDPw
WPM¤ 9*
QQ¤ šťş
ŢťŠ
ŞŜŝŝ¤
Q¤ šťţ
Z +VBO $BSMPT )JUUFST i$POUSPM EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBE Z DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE¤ $PNQBSBDJØO DSJUFSJPT ĕKBEPT QPS MB
B×P ţ
O¤¡ Ş
ŞŜŜť
QQ¤ ŝŜť
ŝŞŤ
Q¤ŝŝŜ¤
2
&M DPOUSPM JOUFSOBDJPOBM TF VUJMJ[B QBSB SFGFSJSTF BM DPOKVOUP EF QSPDFEJNJFOUPT Z UÏDOJDBT EFTUJOBEPT B WFSJĕDBS TJ FM
7FS 'FSOBOEP .BSJ×P Derecho internacional público, parte general, .BESJE 5SPUUB
ŞŜŜš
Q¤ Ššš¤
ANUARIO DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL LATINOAMERICANO 491
SJEBE FT RVF NBSDB VO QVOUP EF DPOWFSHFODJB SPCVTUP FOUSF MPT TJTUFNBT EF QSPUFDDJØO OBDJPOBM F
JOUFSOBDJPOBM¤
%JDIP MP BOUFSJPS
SFTVMUB JNQPSUBOUF BDMBSBS EFTEF VO JOJDJP RVF FTUBNPT BOUF VOB ĕHVSB RVF MB $PSUF IB UFOJEP RVF EFTBSSPMMBS
TJOP RVF TVSHF EFM EÏĕDJU RVF FT QPTJCMF DPOTUBUBS FO MPT NÞMUJQMFT
DBTPT RVF MMFHBO BM TJTUFNB EF QSPUFDDJØO EF EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT¤ &TUP FT FTQFDJBMNFOUF FWJEFOUF FO MPT DBTPT RVF
OP BQMJDBO MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT DPOUSBÓEBT QPS FM &TUBEP F JODPSQPSBEBT B MB MFHJTMBDJØO OBDJPOBM¤ &T EFDJS
FTUBNPT BO
UF VOB ĕHVSB RVF WJFOF B DMBSJĕDBS VOB PCMJHBDJØO ZB FYJTUFOUF Z MB EPUB EF DPOUFOJEP Z FTQFDJĕDJEBE¤
2. Aproximación contextual
%VSBOUF FTUPT ÞMUJNPT B×PT FO MB SFHJØO IFNPT TJEP UFTUJHPT EFM EFTBSSPMMP EF VOB DSF
DJFOUF JOUFSBDDJØO FOUSF FM EFSFDIP JOUFSOBDJPOBM EF MPT EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT %*%) Z FM EFSFDIP JOUFSOP EF
QPS VO MBEP
FO MB JODPS
QPSBDJØO GPSNBM EF USBUBEPT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT Z TVTUBOUJWB EF FTUÈOEBSFT EFM EFSFDIP JOUFSOBDJPOBM BM EFSFDIP
JOUFSOP
Z B TV WF[ FYJTUF VOB JOUFHSBDJØO EF FTUÈOEBSFT EFTEF MPT TJTUFNBT OBDJPOBMFT IBDJB FM TJTUFNB JOUFSOBDJPOBM
FO MB JOĘVFO
DJB RVF UJFOF FM EFSFDIP JOUFSOP FO EBS DPOUFOJEP Z BMDBODF B MPT EFSFDIPT DPOTBHSBEPT JOUFSOBDJPOBMNFOUF¤ %F
FTUB GPSNB
EF EFSFDIPT GVOEBNFOUBMFT
FTUÈO WJODVMBEPT EF GPSNB UBM RVF DPOTUJUVZFO VO TPMP DVFSQP KVSÓEJDP EF HBSBOUÓB Z RVF FM QSJODJQJP
GVOEBNFOUBM QBSB FYQMJDBS EJDIB VOJEBE FT FM QSJODJQJP EF JOUFSBDDJØO RVF FT VO WÓODVMP EF SFUSPBMJNFO
UBDJØO FOUSF BNCPT TJTUFNBT OPSNBUJWPT ¤
FT FM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE
RVF TF DPOTUJUVZF DPNP VO QVOUP EF DPOWFSHFODJB RVF QFSNJUF FM EJÈMPHP KVSJTQSVEFODJBM B MB MV[ EF MBT
FYQFSJFODJBT OBDJPOBMFT F JOĘVZF FO HFOFSBS VOB BSUJDVMBDJØO Z FTUÈOEBSFT FO NBUFSJB EF QSPUFDDJØO EF MPT
EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT¤
3. Delimitación conceptual
&M DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE QVFEF TFS EFTBSSPMMBEP FO EPT ÈNCJUPT FO FM ÈNCJUP OBDJPOBM Z FO FM
FTUP FT
VO DPOUSPM RVF QFSNJUF MB FYQVMTJØO EF MBT OPSNBT DPOUSBSJBT B MB $"%) B QBSUJS EF MPT DBTPT DPODSFUPT RVF TF
QPS FKFNQMP
B USBWÏT EF MB
492 CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD. PRECISIONES CONCEPTUALESY DESAFÍOS A LA LUZ… / CLAUDIO NASH ROJAS
DPNP IB PDVSSJEP DPO MB EFDMBSBDJØO EF JODPNQBUJCJMJEBE EF MFZFT EF BNOJTUÓB DPO MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT RVF
JNQPOF MB $"%)¤3
FM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE FT FM SFBMJ[BEP QPS MPT BHFOUFT EFM &TUBEP Z QSJODJQBMNFOUF QPS MPT
ĕTDBMFT Z EFGFOTPSFT BM BOBMJ[BS MB DPNQBUJCJMJEBE EF MBT OPSNBT JOUFSOBT DPO MB $"%)¤ 4JO FNCBSHP
MBT DPO
TFDVFODJBT EF FTUF BOÈMJTJT EFQFOEFO EF MBT GVODJPOFT EF DBEB BHFOUF FTUBUBM Z
QPS UBOUP
FTUP OP JNQMJDB OFDFTBSJBNFOUF MB GBDVMUBE EF FYQVMTBS OPSNBT EFM TJTUFNB JOUFSOP¤ 6O NPEFMP EFUFSNJOBEP EF
DPOUSPM EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBE P DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE OP QPESÓB TFS JNQVFTUP QPS MB $PSUF *%)¤4 5FOJFOEP DMBSP FTUP
PCMJHBEPT B IBDFS MPT KVFDFT Z UPEPT MPT GVODJPOBSJPT EFM &TUBEP FT B JOUFSQSFUBS MBT OPS
NBT JOUFSOBT EF GPSNB UBM RVF TFBO DPNQBUJCMFT DPO MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT EFM &TUBEP
NFEJBOUF VO FKFSDJDJP IFSNFOÏVUJDP P QPS PUSBT WÓBT RVF QVEJFSB FTUBCMFDFS FM EFSFDIP JOUFSOP¤
QPEFNPT TPTUFOFS RVF FTUB FT VOB ĕHVSB RVF WJFOF B DPODSFUBS MB PCMJHBDJØO EF HBSBOUÓB
NFEJBOUF VO FKFSDJDJP IFSNFOÏVUJDP RVF DPOTJTUF FO MB WFSJĕDBDJØO RVF SFBMJ[B MB $PSUF *%) Z UPEPT MPT
BHFOUFT FTUBUBMFT
EF EJDIP USJCVOBM
BQMJDBOEP FO DBEB DBTP DPODSFUP BRVFMMB JOUFSQSFUBDJØO RVF TF BKVTUF B MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT EFM
3
7FS $PSUF *%) Casos Barrios Altos vs. Perú, ŝŠ EF NBS[P EF ŞŜŜŝ
QÈSSBGPT Šŝ
ŠŠ Almonacid Arellano y otros vs. Chile, ŞŢ EF TFQUJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜŢ
QÈSSBGP ŝŜš
ŝŝŠ La Cantuta vs. Perú, Şť EF OP
WJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜŢ
QÈSSBGPT ŝŢţ Z TT¤ De la Masacre de las Dos Erres vs. Guatemala, ŞŠ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜť
QÈSSBGPT ŝŞť
ŝşŝ Gelman vs. Uruguay, ŞŠ EF GFCSFSP EF ŞŜŝŝ
QÈSSBGPT ŞşŤ
Şşť¤
4
&TUP TF SFBĕSNB DVBOEP 4FSHJP 3BNÓSF[ FO TV WPUP SB[POBEP FO FM DBTP Trabajadores cesa-dos del Congreso vs. Perú TVKFUB MB PCMJHBDJØO EF
SFBMJ[BS FM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE BM TJTUFNB OPSNBUJWP EF MPT &TUBEPT i4J FYJTUF FTB DPOFYJØO DMBSB Z SPUVOEB oP BM NFOPT
TVĕDJFOUF
JOUFMJHJCMF
MPT USJCVOBMFT OBDJPOBMFT QVFEFO Z EFCFO MMFWBS B DBCP TV QSPQJP ADPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE¤ "TÓ MP IBO IFDIP EJWFSTPT
ØSHBOPT EF
MB KVTUJDJB JOUFSOB
JOBVHVSBOEP VOB OVFWB FUBQB EF NFKPS QSPUFDDJØO EF MPT TFSFT IVNBOPT Z BDSFEJUBOEP MB JEFB oRVF IF SFJUFSBEPo EF RVF MB HSBO
QFSP OP TVTUJUVUP
FM JOUFSOBDJPOBMw QÈSS¤ ŝŝ ¤
5
&TUBSÓBNPT
FO DPOTFDVFODJB
QPS UBOUP
TV HBSBOUÓB OFHBUJWB QSJNBSJBw OP QSPEVDJS OPSNBT MFHBMFT RVF WJPMFO P EFSPHVFO OPSNBT DPOTUJUVDJPOBMFT ¤ 7FS -VJHJ
ŞŜŜŤ
Q¤ ťŤ¤
ANUARIO DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL LATINOAMERICANO 493
TF SFRVJFSF QSF
DJTBS DVÈM FT FM PSJHFO EF TV PCMJHBUPSJFEBE
FT EFDJS
FMFNFOUPT FT GVOEBNFOUBM QBSB FOUFOEFS MB JNQPSUBODJB EF SFBMJ[BS EJDIP DPOUSPM Z QBSB TF×BMBS RVF TV BVTFODJB
"TÓ
WFNPT RVF FM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE FODVFOUSB TV GVOEBNFOUP FO MBT GVFOUFT OPSNBUJWBT EF MBT
DPMPS
TFYP
JEJPNB
SFMJHJØO
QPTJDJØO FDPOØNJDB
MBT NFEJEBT MFHJTMBUJWBT P EF PUSP DBSÈDUFS RVF GVFSFO OFDFTBSJBT QBSB IBDFS FGFDUJWPT UBMFT EFSFDIPT Z MJCFSUBEFT¤
HSVQP P QFSTPOB
TVQSJNJS
FM HPDF Z FKFSDJDJP EF MPT EFSFDIPT Z MJCFSUBEFT SFDPOPDJEPT FO MB $POWFODJØO P MJNJUBSMPT FO NBZPS NFEJEB RVF MB QSFWJTUB
DVBMRVJFS EFSFDIP P MJCFSUBE RVF QVFEB FTUBS SFDPOPDJEP EF BDVFSEP DPO MBT MFZFT EF DVBMRVJFSB EF MPT
&TUBEPT 1BSUFT P EF BDVFSEP DPO PUSB DPOWFODJØO FO RVF TFB QBSUF VOP EF EJDIPT &TUBEPT D FYDMVJS
BTFHVSBS FM SFTQFUP
FOUFOEJEP DPNP MB PCMJHBDJØO RVF UJFOFO MPT KVFDFT EF DBEB VOP EF MPT &TUBEPT 1BSUFT EF FGFDUVBS OP TØMP VO
TJOP EF JOUFHSBS FO FM TJTUFNB EF TVT EFDJTJPOFT MBT OPSNBT DPOUFOJEBT FO MB $"%) Z MPT FTUÈOEBSFT EFTBSSPMMBEPT
QPS MB KVSJTQSVEFODJB¤
&TUF DPOUSPM FT
QPS UBOUP
MB $"%) "SUT¤ ŝ¤ŝ Z Ş ¤ &TUB PCMJHBDJØO EF HBSBOUÓB TF USBEVDF FO MB PCMJHBDJØO RVF BTVNF FM &TUBEP EF PSHBOJ[BS
UPEP FM BQBSBUP
EF QPEFS QÞCMJDP QBSB QFSNJUJS FM QMFOP Z FGFDUJWP HPDF Z FKFSDJDJP EF MPT EFSFDIPT Z MBT MJCFSUBEFT RVF TF MFT
DSFBS DPOEJDJPOFT FGFDUJWBT RVF QFSNJUBO FM HPDF Z FKFSDJDJP EF MPT EFSFDIPT DPOTBHSBEPT FO MB $POWFODJØO¤6
'JOBMNFOUF
MB OFDFTJEBE EF SFBMJ[BS VO DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE EF MBT OPSNBT FNBOB EF MPT QSJODJQJPT EFM EFSFDIP
FM QSJODJQJP EF ius cogens ipacta sunt servanda”, DPOTBHSBEP FO MB $POWFODJØO EF 7JFOB TPCSF EFSFDIP EF MPT USBUBEPT
DPNP MB PCMJHBDJØO RVF UJFOFO MPT &TUBEPT EF EBS DVNQMJNJFOUP B MPT USB
UBEPT EF MPT RVF TPO QBSUF
7
EB DVFOUB EFM DPNQSPNJTP RVF EFCFO UFOFS MPT &TUBEPT RVF IBO TVTDSJUP MB $"%)
DVNQMJS DPO FM NBOEBUP EF QSPUFDDJØO EF MPT EFSFDIPT GVOEBNFOUBMFT¤ &TUF JNQFSBUJWP EF EFSFDIP
JOUFSOBDJPOBM QÞCMJDP EFCF TFS DVNQMJEP EF CVFOB GF QPS QBSUF EF MPT &TUBEPT¤8 &NBOB UBNCJÏO EF MPT
FM IFDIP EF RVF MPT &TUBEPT OP QVFEFO JOWPDBS EJTQPTJDJPOFT EF EFSFDIP JOUFSOP DPNP GVOEBNFOUP
6
&O DPODSFUP
FO HFOFSBM
UPEBT MBT FTUSVDUVSBT B USBWÏT EF MBT DVBMFT TF NBOJĕFTUB FM FKFSDJDJP EFM QPEFS QÞCMJDP
EF NBOFSB UBM RVF TFBO DBQBDFT EF BTFHVSBS KVSÓEJDBNFOUF FM MJCSF Z QMFOP FKFSDJDJP EF MPT EFSFDIPT IVNBOPTw $PSUF *%)
DPNP TF×BMB 4FSHJP (BSDÓB 3BNÓSF[ FO TV WPUP SB[POBEP FO FM DBTP Trabajadores cesados del Congreso vs. Perú i&O MB FTQFDJF
BM SFGFSJSTF B VO
JOUFHSBOUFT EFM corpus juris DPOWFODJPOBM EF MPT EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT EF MPT RVF FT QBSUF FM &TUBEP 1SPUPDPMP EF 4BO 4BMWBEPS
DPOGPSNJEBE FOUSF MPT BDUPT JOUFSOPT Z MPT DPNQSPNJTPT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT DPOUSBÓEPT QPS FM &TUBEP
RVF HFOFSBO QBSB ÏTUF EFUFSNJOBEPT EFCFSFT Z SFDPOPDFO B MPT JOEJWJEVPT DJFSUPT EFSFDIPTw QÈSS¤ Ş ¤
7
7FS $POWFODJØO EF 7JFOB EF %FSFDIP EF MPT 5SBUBEPT ŝťŢť
BSUÓDVMP ŞŢ¤
8
&TUB NJTNB BSHVNFOUBDJØO FO UPSOP BM GVOEBNFOUP EFM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE FO MBT OPSNBT EFM EFSFDIP
JOUFSOBDJPOBM QÞCMJDP
IB TJEP SFDPHJEB QPS MB $PSUF *%) FO FM DBTP Almonacid Arellano vs. Chile, ŞŢ EF TFQUJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜŢ
QÈSSBGP ŝŞš¤
ANUARIO DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL LATINOAMERICANO 495
SFBĕSNBEP RVF MB PCMJHBDJØO EF UPNBS UPEBT MBT NFEJEBT OFDFTBSJBT QBSB EBS VO HPDF
QMFOP Z FGFDUJWP B MPT EFSFDIPT Z MJCFSUBEFT DPOTBHSBEPT FO MB $POWFODJØO
JODMVZF MB EF
PUPSHB VO QPEFSPTP SFTQBMEP KVSÓEJDP RVF QFSNJUF TBMWBS MBT PCKFDJPOFT RVF TF QVFEFO QMBOUFBS FO UPSOP B
MB QPTJCMF SFTUSJDDJØO B MB TPCFSBOÓB EF MPT &TUBEPT RVF TVQPOESÓB MB PCMJHBDJØO EF SFBMJ[BS VO DPOUSPM EF
DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE¤
-B KVSJTQSVEFODJB EF MB $PSUF *%) IB QBTBEP QPS WBSJBT FUBQBT FO FM EFTBSSPMMP EFM DPO
DFQUP EF iDPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBEw¤ "OBMJ[BS FTUB FWPMVDJØO FT GVOEBNFOUBM QBSB FOUFOEFS FM
FO TV WPUP SB[POBEP
EFM DBTP Myrna Mack Chang vs. Guatemala IBDF QPS QSJNFSB WF[ BMVTJØO BM DPOUSPM EF
DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE
TF QPOF EF
SFMJFWF MB JNQPSUBODJB RVF UJFOF QBSB FM DVNQMJNJFOUP EF MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT EF MPT &TUBEPT
$PSUF *OUFSBNFSJDBOB
MB SFTQPOTBCJMJEBE FT HMPCBM
BUB×F BM &TUBEP FO TV DPOKVOUP Z OP QVFEF RVFEBS TVKFUB B MB EJWJTJØO EF BUSJCVDJPOFT RVF TF×BMF
FM
FOUSFHBS B ÏTUPT MB SFQSFTFOUBDJØO EFM &TUBEP FO FM KVJDJP oTJO RVF FTB SFQSFTFOUBDJØO SFQFSDVUB TPCSF FM
EFKBOEP TVT BDUVBDJPOFT GVFSB EFM iDPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBEw RVF USBF DPOTJHP MB KVSJTEJDDJØO EF MB $PSUF
JOUFSOBDJPOBM¤11
9
$POWFODJØO EF 7JFOB EF %FSFDIP EF MPT 5SBUBEPT ŝťŢť
BSUÓDVMP Şţ¤
10
$PSUF *%) 3FTQPOTBCJMJEBE JOUFSOBDJPOBM QPS FYQFEJDJØO Z BQMJDBDJØO EF MFZFT WJPMBUPSJBT EF MB $POWFODJØO
ť EF EJDJFNCSF EF ŝťťŠ¤
11
$PSUF *%) Caso Myrna Mack Chang vs. Guatemala, Şš EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜş
WPUP SB[POBEP EFM KVF[ 4FSHJP (BSDÓB 3BNÓSF[
QÈSSBGP Şţ¤
496 CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD. PRECISIONES CONCEPTUALESY DESAFÍOS A LA LUZ… / CLAUDIO NASH ROJAS
&T DMBSP RVF FYJTUF VOB QSJNFSB FUBQB FO MB KVSJTQSVEFODJB EF MB $PSUF *%)
FO MB DVBM TF EFMJOFBSPO MPT BTQFDUPT HFOFSBMFT EF MB ĕHVSB EFM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE¤ &O ÏTUB TF TF×BMB
MP RVF QBSFDF VOB QPTJDJØO QSVEFOUF Z DMBSJĕDBEPSB EF MB OBUVSBMF[B EJWFSTB RVF UJFOF FTUB ĕHVSB EF BRVFM
TF BWBO[B FO JOEJDBS RVF FTUF DPOUSPM JODMVZF MB JOUFSQSFUBDJØO RVF IB IFDIP MB $PSUF *%) EF MBT
MP RVF FT VO EBUP SFMFWBOUF ZB RVF FO NVDIPT TJTUFNBT JOUFSOPT ÏTUB FT VOB DVFTUJØO EFCBUJEB
-B $PSUF FT DPOTDJFOUF RVF MPT KVFDFT Z USJCVOBMFT JOUFSOPT FTUÈO TVKFUPT BM JNQFSJP EF MB MFZ Z
QPS FMMP
TVT KVFDFT
MBT OPSNBT KVSÓEJDBT JOUFSOBT RVF BQMJDBO FO MPT DBTPT DPODSFUPT Z MB $POWFODJØO "NFSJDBOB TPCSF
&O TÓOUFTJT
B &YJTUF VOB PCMJHBDJØO EFM QPEFS KVEJDJBM EF DVNQMJS DPO MB OPSNBUJWB JOUFSOBDJPOBM RVF FM &TUBEP IB
JOUFSOBDJPOBM¤
D -BT OPSNBT DPOUSBSJBT B MB $POWFODJØO OP QVFEFO UFOFS FGFDUPT FO FM ÈNCJUP JOUFS
OP
UPEB WF[ RVF EJDIBT OPSNBT JODPNQBUJCMFT DPO MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT DPOTUJUVZFO VO JMÓDJUP
E 1BSB SFBMJ[BS EJDIP FKFSDJDJP JOUFSQSFUBUJWP FM KVF[ EFCF UFOFS FO DPOTJEFSBDJØO MB KVSJTQSVEFODJB EF MB
$PSUF *%)¤
12
$PSUF *%) Caso Almonacid Arellano y otros vs. Chile, ŞŢ EF TFQUJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜŢ
QÈSSBGP ŝŞŠ¤
ANUARIO DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL LATINOAMERICANO 497
MB $PSUF *%) FTUBCMFDJØ RVF FM DPOUSPM EFCF FKFSDFSTF JODMVTP EF PĕDJP QPS MB NBHJTUSBUVSB MPDBM
EFOUSP EFM ÈNCJUP EF DPNQFUFODJBT Z GVODJPOFT EF MB NBHJTUSBUVSB¤ &TUB BQSPYJNBDJØO EF MB $PSUF *%) FT SFMFWBOUF
ZB RVF
UPNB FO DPOTJEFSBDJØO MB PSHBOJ[BDJØO JOUFSOB EFM &TUBEP Z QFSNJUF VO GVODJPOBNJFOUP DPIFSFOUF EF MBT
QFSP TÓ FTUBCMFDF
MP RVF MFT PCMJHB B WFMBS QPSRVF FM FGFDUP ÞUJM EF MB $POWFODJØO OP TF WFB NFSNBEP P BOVMBEP
QPS MB BQMJ
DBDJØO EF MFZFT DPOUSBSJBT B TVT EJTQPTJDJPOFT
MPT
TJOP UBNCJÏO iEF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBEw FY PďDJP FOUSF MBT OPSNBT JOUFSOBT Z MB $PO
WFODJØO "NFSJDBOB
DPSSFTQPOEJFOUFT¤ &TUB GVODJØO OP EFCF RVFEBS MJNJUBEB FYDMVTJWBNFOUF QPS MBT NBOJGFTUBDJPOFT P
TJO DPOTJEFSBS PUSPT QSFTVQVFTUPT GPSNBMFT Z NBUFSJBMFT EF BENJTJCJMJEBE Z QSPDFEFODJB EF FTF UJQP
EF BDDJPOFT¤13
MB $PSUF *%) WB NÈT BMMÈ Z TF×BMB RVF FTUF DPOUSPM DPNQFUF B DVBMRVJFS KVF[ P USJCVOBM RVF NBUFSJBMNFOUF SFBMJDF
GVODJPOFT KVSJTEJDDJPOBMFT
JODPSQPSBOEP MP RVF TF IBCÓB TF×BMBEP BOUFSJPSNFOUF BDFSDB EF MB JNQPSUBODJB EF RVF FTUF DPOUSPM TF SFBMJDF FO
FM ÈNCJUP EF DPNQFUFODJBT EF DBEB NBHJTUSBUVSB¤ &TUB BQFSUVSB IBDJB MPT ØSHBOPT DPNQFUFOUFT QBSB SFBMJ[BS FM
DPOUSPM QFSNJUF MB JODMVTJØO EF MPT USJCVOBMFT DPOTUJUVDJPOBMFT Z SFBĕSNB MB JEFB EF RVF UPEP
DPO JOEFQFOEFODJB EF MBT DBSBDUFSÓTUJDBT QBSUJDVMBSFT EF MB PSHBOJ[BDJØO EF TVT GVODJPOFT¤14 &T SFMFWBOUF
13
$PSUF *%) Caso Trabajadores cesados del Congreso (Aguado Alfaro y otros) vs. Perú,
ŞŠ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜŢ
QÈSSBGP ŝŞŤ¤
14
6OB JOUFSQSFUBDJØO NÈT BNQMJB EF MB QBSUJDJQBDJØO EF MPT USJCVOBMFT DPOTUJUVDJPOBMFT FO MB SFBMJ[BDJØO EFM DPOUSPM EF
DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE EJDF SFMBDJØO DPO BTFHVSBS FM FGFDUP ÞUJM EFM 1BDUP EF 4BO +PTϤ &TUB JOUFSQSFUBDJØO MB QPEFNPT FODPOUSBS FO
B×P Ť
O¤¡ ŝ
QQ¤ ŝŝţ
ŝşŢ
ŞŜŝŜ
Q¤ ŝŞŝ¤
498 CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD. PRECISIONES CONCEPTUALESY DESAFÍOS A LA LUZ… / CLAUDIO NASH ROJAS
&TUF 5SJCVOBM IB FTUBCMFDJEP FO TV KVSJTQSVEFODJB RVF FT DPOTDJFOUF RVF MBT BVUPSJEBEFT JOUFSOBT FTUÈO TVKFUBT BM
JNQFSJP EF MB MFZ Z
QPS FMMP
FTUÈO PCMJHBEBT B BQMJDBS MBT EJTQPTJDJPOFT WJHFOUFT FO FM PSEFOBNJFOUP KVSÓEJDP¤ 1FSP DVBOEP VO &TUBEP FT 1BSUF EF
UP
EPT TVT ØSHBOPT
MP DVBM MFT PCMJHB B WFMBS QPS RVF MPT FGFDUPT EF MBT EJTQPTJDJPOFT EF MB $POWFODJØO OP TF WFBO NFSNBEPT QPS MB
ØSHBOPT WJODVMBEPT B MB BENJOJTUSBDJØO EF KVTUJDJB FO UPEPT MPT OJWFMFT FTUÈO FO MB PCMJHBDJØO EF FKFSDFS FY PďDJP VO
MPT KVFDFT Z ØSHBOPT KVEJDJBMFT WJODVMBEPT B MB BENJOJTUSBDJØO EF KVTUJDJB EFCFO UFOFS FO DVFOUB
OP TPMBNFOUF FM USBUBEP
"TJNJTNP
FO FTUB TFOUFODJB TF DMBSJĕDB DVBMRVJFS EVEB RVF QVEJFSB TVSHJS TPCSF MB OBUVSBMF[B EF FTUB JOTUJUVDJØO Z MPT
%F UBM NBOFSB
TF BEFDVFO B MPT QSJODJQJPT FTUBCMFDJEPT FO MB KVSJTQSVEFODJB EF FTUF 5SJCVOBM RVF IBO TJEP SFJUFSBEPT FO FM QSFTFOUF DBTP Z
WJPMBDJØO EF EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT RVF TF BMFHVF IBZBO DPNFUJEP NJFNCSPT EF MBT GVFS[BT BSNBEBT¤
MB $PSUF *%) JODPSQPSB DPNP ØSHBOP DPNQFUFOUF QBSB SFBMJ[BS FM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE B UPEB BVUPSJEBE
QÞCMJDB
FT EFDJS
15
$PSUF *%) Caso Cabrera García y Montiel Flores vs. México, ŞŢ EF OPWJFNCSF
EF ŞŜŝŜ
QÈSSBGP ŞŞš¤
16
$PSUF *%) Caso Cabrera García y Montiel Flores vs. México, ŞŢ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŝŜ
QÈSSBGP Şşş ÏOGBTJT B×BEJEP ¤
ANUARIO DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL LATINOAMERICANO 499
y -B MFHJUJNBDJØO EFNPDSÈUJDB EF EFUFSNJOBEPT IFDIPT P BDUPT FO VOB TPDJFEBE FTUÈ MJNJUBEB QPS MBT
EF NPEP RVF MB FYJTUFODJB EF VO WFSEBEFSP SÏHJNFO EFNPDSÈUJDP FTUÈ EFUFSNJOBEB QPS TVT
QPS MP RVF
QBSUJDVMBSNFOUF FO DBTPT EF HSBWFT WJPMBDJPOFT B MBT OPSNBT EFM %FSFDIP *OUFSOBDJPOBM EF MPT
%F
SFDIPT
FT EFDJS
RVF FT GVODJØO Z UBSFB EF DVBMRVJFS BVUPSJEBE QÞCMJDB Z OP TØMP EFM 1PEFS +VEJDJBMy17
6OB WF[ BOBMJ[BEB MB FWPMVDJØO EF MB KVSJTQSVEFODJB EF MB $PSUF *%) FO UPSOP BM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE
VOB JOUFSQSFUBDJØO EF MPT FTUÈOEBSFT JOUFSBNFSJDBOPT TPCSF EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT EFTEF VOB NJSBEB OPSNBUJWB
UPEP BHFOUF EFM &TUBEP QBSB FM DVNQMJNJFOUP EF TVT MBCPSFT EFCFSÈ UPNBS FO DPOTJEFSBDJØO MBT OPSNBT Z
MB $PSUF
*%) PCTFSWØ RVF MB KVSJTEJDDJØO JOUFSOB IBCÓB IFDIP VO BOÈMJTJT TPMBNFOUF DPOT
UJUVDJPOBM
EPOEF OP TF DPOTJEFSBSPO MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT EFM &TUBEP DPO SFMBDJØO B MB $"%)¤ 4F TF×BMØ RVF MB
&M BOÈMJTJT EFM $+$1 OP EFCFSÓB IBCFSTF MJNJUBEP B FWBMVBS TJ MB -%$1 FSB JODPOT
UJUVDJPOBM¤ .ÈT CJFO
MB DVFTUJØO EFCFSÓB IBCFS HJSBEP FO UPSOP B TJ MB MFZ UBNCJÏO FSB iDPOWFODJPOBMw¤ &T EFDJS
17
$PSUF *%) Caso Gelman vs. Uruguay, ŞŠ EF GFCSFSP EF ŞŜŝŝ
QÈSSBGP Şşť¤
500 CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD. PRECISIONES CONCEPTUALESY DESAFÍOS A LA LUZ… / CLAUDIO NASH ROJAS
EFCFO UBNCJÏO EFDJEJS TJ MB MFZ EF #BSCBEPT SFTUSJOHF P WJPMB MPT EFSFDIPT SFDPOPDJEPT FO MB
$POWFODJØOy18
EPOEF MB $PSUF *%) TF×BMØ RVF FM &TUBEP BM JOUFSQSFUBS VOB OPSNB DPOGPSNF B MPT FTUÈOEBSFT DPO
WFODJPOBMFT
%F UBM NBOFSB
FTUF 5SJCVOBM DPOTJEFSB RVF OP FT OFDFTBSJP PSEFOBS MB NPEJĕDBDJØO EFM DPOUFOJEP OPSNBUJWP RVF
&O SFTVNFO
MP RVF QJEF MB $PSUF FT RVF BM NPNFOUP EF SFTPMWFS VO DBTP P UPNBS DVBMRVJFS EFDJTJØO FTUBUBM MP RVF
EFCF IBDFSTF FT EFUFSNJOBS MPT IFDIPT SFMFWBOUFT TPCSF MPT DVBMFT EFCF UPNBSTF VOB DJFSUB EFDJTJØO MVFHP
DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE
ZB RVF TF BNQMÓB P SPCVTUFDF FM TJTUFNB OPSNBUJWP BQMJDBCMF QVFT OP TØMP RVFEB MJNJUBEP B MBT OPSNBT EF
MFHBMFT Z SFHMBNFOUBSJBT
TJOP UBNCJÏO B BRVFMMBT EF PSJHFO JOUFSOBDJPOBM RVF IBO TJEP SFDFQDJPOBEBT JOUFSOBNFOUF FO FTUF DBTP MB
$"%) ¤
'JOBMNFOUF
MP RVF QSPDFEF FT IBDFS VO FKFSDJDJP JOUFSQSFUBUJWP QBSB BQMJDBS EJDIBT OPSNBT B MB TJUVBDJØO DPODSFUB Z FO
UBOUP PCMJHBDJPOFT HFOFSBMFT DPNP EFSFDIPT FTQFDÓĕDPT ¤ C &M DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE JODPSQPSB FO FM
UBNCJÏO MB JOUFSQSFUBDJØO RVF IB SFBMJ[BEP MB $PSUF *%) EF MBT OPSNBT EF MB $POWFODJØO¤ 1BSB FM DVNQMJNJFOUP
EF CVFOB GF
TPO MB HVÓB RVF QPESÈO VUJMJ[BS MPT BHFOUFT EFM &TUBEP QBSB
18
$PSUF *%) Caso Boyce y otros vs. Barbados, ŞŜ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜţ
QÈSSBGPT ţţ
ţŤ¤
19
$PSUF *%) Caso Radilla Pacheco vs. México, Şş EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜť
QÈSSBGPT ŝŝŠ
ŝŝš¤
ANUARIO DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL LATINOAMERICANO 501
&O FGFDUP
TFSÓBO BRVFMMPT DBTPT FO RVF FM TJTUFNB JOUFSOP OP DPOUFNQMB VO DJFSUP EFSFDIP RVF TÓ TF DPOUFNQMB FO
&TUBEP¤
BCTPMVUBT
JODPSQPSBOEP BM PSEFOBNJFOUP OPSNBT RVF FTUÈO SFHVMBEBT FO MB $"%)¤ 5BNCJÏO TF TVQFSBO MBHVOBT
SFMBUJWBT
"TJNJTNP
TJTUFNB OPSNBUJWP JOUFSOP QFSNJUFO UFOFS VOB CBTF OPSNBUJWB QBSB BQMJDBS EJDIBT OPSNBT Z OP MBT
TJO BQBSUBSTF EF MB PCMJHBDJØO RVF UJFOFO MBT BVUPSJEBEFT OBDJPOBMFT EF BQMJDBS MBT OPSNBT KVSÓEJDBT
WJHFOUFT FO FM &TUBEP¤
%F FTUB GPSNB
MB ĕHVSB EFM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE BDMBSB RVF FO DBTP EF
MBHVOBT P BOUJOPNJBT
MBT BVUPSJEBEFT EFCFO IBDFS VO FKFSDJDJP IFSNFOÏVUJDP FO
MPT KVFDFT EFCFO SFBMJ[BS FM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE QPS JOJDJBUJWB QSPQJB¤ &TUP FT EF TVNB
FTUB PĕDJBMJEBE TJFNQSF EFCF DPODPSEBSTF DPO MBT DBQBDJEBEFT QSPDFTBMFT RVF UFOHB DBEB KVF[ FO FM
FKFSDJDJP EF DPNQBUJCJMJEBE¤
D &M DPOUSPM TF SFBMJ[B EFOUSP EFM ÈNCJUP EF DPNQFUFODJBT Z SFHVMBDJPOFT QSPDFTBMFT EF MB BVUPSJEBE
QÞCMJDB¤ &O FTUP MB $PSUF *%) IB TJEP QSVEFOUF Z IB TF×BMBEP RVF OP FT QPTJCMF JNQPOFS EFTEF FM DPOUSPM
TJOP RVF FM EJTF×P JOTUJUVDJPOBM QPS FM RVF PQUF EFCF QFSNJUJS DVNQMJS DPO MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT
JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT EFM &TUBEP Z EBS FGFDUJWJEBE B MPT EFSFDIPT FO FM ÈNCJUP JOUFSOP¤ -B DPOUSBDBSB EF FTUB
OPSNBUJWB JOUFSOB¤
502 CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD. PRECISIONES CONCEPTUALESY DESAFÍOS A LA LUZ… / CLAUDIO NASH ROJAS
7. Experiencias nacionales
BOBMJ
[BSFNPT BMHVOPT DBTPT JOUFSFTBOUFT FO MB KVSJTQSVEFODJB SFHJPOBM QBSB JMVTUSBS DØNP TF EFTBSSPMMB VOB DBEB WF[
NBZPS JOUFSBDDJØO FOUSF BNCPT TJTUFNBT Z RVF OPT QFSNJUF WFS DØNP FO FM ÈNCJUP JOUFSOP EF MPT &TUBEPT TF IB
.ÏYJDP
20
IB EFTBSSPMMBEP VO JOUFSFTBOUF BOÈMJTJT EFM DPOUSPM EJGVTP EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE
B QSPQØTJUP EF MB TFOUFODJB FNJUJEB QPS MB $PSUF *%) FO FM DBTP Radilla Pacheco vs. México. 21
MPT EFNÈT KVFDFT MPT RVF OP QFSUFOFDFO BM 1PEFS +VEJDJBM EF MB 'FEFSBDJØO FO MPT BTVOUPT EF TV
DPNQFUFODJB QPESÈO EFTBQMJDBS MBT OPSNBT RVF JOGSJOKBO MB $POTUJUVDJØO 'FEFSBM ZP MPT USBUBEPT
TØMP QBSB FGFDUPT EFM DBTP DPODSFUP Z TJO IBDFS VOB EFDMBSBDJØO EF JOWB
MJEF[ EF MBT EJTQPTJDJPOFT <y>
UPEPT MPT KVFDFT EFM &TUBEP .FYJDBOP B QBSUJS EF FTUF NPNFOUP Z EF DPOGPSNJEBE DPO FM BSUÓDVMP ŝ¡ DPOTUJUVDJPOBM
-BT BĕSNBDJPOFT EF MB $PSUF 4VQSFNB NFYJDBOB EBO DVFOUB ÓOUFHSBNFOUF EF DØNP TF IB EFTBSSPMMBEP VOB WJWB
BM GBDVMUBS B MPT KVFDFT OBDJPOBMFT B JOBQMJDBS OPSNBT RVF JOGSJOKBO USBUBEPT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT¤ %F FTUB
GPSNB
$POTUJUVDJPOBM IB TF×BMBEP
FO WBSJBT PQPSUVOJEBEFT
QBVUB SFMFWBO
20
$PSUF 4VQSFNB EF +VTUJDJB EF MB /BDJØO
ŝŠ EF KVMJP EF ŞŜŝŝ¤
21
$PSUF *%) Caso Radilla Pacheco vs. México, Şş EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜť¤
22
1PS FKFNQMP
WFS $PSUF $POTUJUVDJPOBM EF $PMPNCJB TFOUFODJB $
ŞŞŤ
ŞŜŜޤ
ANUARIO DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL LATINOAMERICANO 503
UF QBSB JOUFSQSFUBS FM BMDBODF EF FTPT USBUBEPT Z QPS FOEF EF MPT QSPQJPT EFSFDIPT
DPOTUJUVDJPOBMFT¤23
$PTUB 3JDB FT PUSP FKFNQMP SFMFWBOUF EF MB JOUFSBDDJØO QFSNBOFOUF RVF FYJTUF FOUSF MPT TJTUFNBT OBDJPOBMFT
FT QPTJCMF RVF MPT EFSFDIPT GVOEBNFOUBMFT UFOHBO TV GVFOUF OP TØMP FO FM DBUÈMPHP DPOT
UJUVDJPOBM
TJOP UBNCJÏO FO MPT QSJODJQJPT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT TPCSF EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT¤ "M SFTQFDUP MB 4BMB
$POTUJUVDJPOBM IB TF×BMBEP
y EFCF BEWFSUJSTF RVF TJ MB $PSUF *OUFSBNFSJDBOB EF %FSFDIPT )VNBOPT FT FM ØSHBOP OBUVSBM QBSB
FTUB OPSNBUJWB
UFOESÈ oEF QSJODJQJPo FM NJTNP WBMPS EF MB OPSNB JOUFSQSFUBEB¤ /P TPMBNFOUF WBMPS ÏUJDP P
DJFOUÓĕDP
QPS MP EFNÈT
&O EFĕOJUJWB
EFCF EFTUBDBSTF FM BMDBODF RVF UJFOF FTUB BQMJDBDJØO TVTUBOUJWB EFM %*%) FO FM ÈNCJUP JOUFSOP Z FO
FT FM DVNQMJNJFOUP EF MBT EJGFSFOUFT GVODJPOFT EF MPT EFSFDIPT GVOEBNFOUBMFT DPO CBTF FO MB DPOTUSVDDJØO
JOUFSOB
DJPOBM
FTUP FT
TFSWJS EF QSJODJQJPT RVF PSJFOUBO MB BDUJWJEBE EFM &TUBEP F JSSBEJBO B UPEPT TVT QPEFSFT GVODJØO PCKFUJWB Z
23
&O DPODSFUP B MB MV[ EFM DBTP RVF FTUBCB DPOPDJFOEP MB $PSUF $POTUJUVDJPOBM
JOUFSQSFUBDJPOFT RVF EF UBMFT UFYUPT IBO QSFTFOUBEP MB $PNJTJØO *OUFSBNFSJDBOB EF %FSFDIPT )VNB
OPT
MB $PSUF *OUFSBNFSJDBOB EF %FSFDIPT )VNBOPT Z $PNJUÏ EF %FSFDIPT )VNBOPT EF /BDJPOFT 6OJEBT¤ 5BNCJÏO IB EF PUPSHBSTF VO QFTP EJTUJOUP
B MBT PQJOJPOFT
DPOTJEFSBOEP ŝş ¤
24
$PSUF 4VQSFNB EF $PTUB 3JDB TFOUFODJB Şşŝşŝťťš
DPOTJEFSBOEP ţ¤
504 CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD. PRECISIONES CONCEPTUALESY DESAFÍOS A LA LUZ… / CLAUDIO NASH ROJAS
FT JOUFSFTBOUF MB MFHJUJNJEBE RVF BERVJFSF FM EFSFDIP JOUFSOBDJPOBM EF MPT EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT QPS WÓB EF TV
TJOP RVF IBDFO VO VTP QSÈDUJDP EF ÏTUBT Z BEPQUBO FM SB[POBNJFOUP FYQSFTBEP FO MB KVSJTQSVEFODJB JOUFSOBDJPOBM
MP RVF TF FTUÈ IBDJFOEP FT MFHJUJNBS QPS WÓB EF MB QSBYJT DPOTUJUVDJPOBM FM TJTUFNB JOUFSOBDJPOBM EF EFSFDIPT
IVNBOPT
FKFNQMP
EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBE Z QBÓTFT RVF UJFOFO VO DPOUSPM DPODFOUSBEP¤ 1BSB FTUPT ÞMUJNPT BQBSFDF MB EJĕDVMUBE Z MB
JOUFSSPHBOUF EF TJ VO ØSHBOP EF MB KVSJTEJDDJØO PSEJOBSJB QVFEF iJOBQMJDBSw VOB MFZ JOUFSOB FO WJSUVE EFM
DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE
TJ ÏTUB OP IB TJEP
EFDMBSBEB JODPOTUJUVDJPOBM¤ 1BSB SFTPMWFS FO QBSUF FTUBT JOUFSSPHBOUFT IBZ RVF SFDBMDBS BMHVOBT
RVF OP TVQPOF TJFNQSF Z FO UPEP DBTP RVF MB BVUPSJEBE iFYQVMTFw VOB OPSNB EFM TJTUFNB OPSNBUJWP
EFM &TUBEP RVF SFBMJ[B FM FKFSDJDJP EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE OFDFTJUB VOB CBTF OPSNBUJWB FTQFDJBM QBSB
DPTB FT FM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE UBM DPNP MP IFNPT EFTDSJUP Z PUSB EJTUJOUB FT MB PCMJHBDJØO EF
&TUBEP¤ &O FTUF DBTP FTUBNPT BOUF VOB PCMJHBDJØO FTQFDJBM GVOEBEB FO FM BSUÓDVMP ŢŤ¤ŝ EF MB $"%)¤ 1VFEF
TFS
26
RVF FM DPOUSPM EF
DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE TFB VOB HBSBOUÓB EF OP SFQFUJDJØO
QFSP FTP UJFOF RVF WFS DPO MB
25
$PSUF *%) Caso Trabajadores cesados del Congreso vs. Perú, ŞŠ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜŢ
QÈSSBGP ŝŞŤ Ibsen Cárdenas e Ibsen Peña vs. Bolivia, ŝ EF TFQUJFNCSF EF ŞŜŝŜ
QÈSSBGP ŞŜŞ Cabrera García y Montiel Flores vs. México, ŞŢ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŝŜ
QÈSSBGP ŞŞš Vélez Loor vs. Panamá, Şş OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŝŜ
QÈSSBGP ŞŤţ Gomes Lund y otros vs. Brasil, ŞŠ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŝŜ
QÈSSBGP ŝţޤ
26
$PSUF *%) Caso Gelman vs. Uruguay, ŞŠ EF GFCSFSP EF ŞŜŝŝ Radilla Pacheco vs. México,
Şş EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜť¤
ANUARIO DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL LATINOAMERICANO 505
Z MB PCMJHBDJØO EFM QPEFS MFHJTMBUJWP EF TVQFSBS BOUJOPNJBT HSBWFT FOUSF MB MFHJTMBDJØO JOUFSOB Z MPT
DPNQSPNJTPT JOUFS
OBDJPOBMFT EFM &TUBEP¤ &M QSPCMFNB FT VOB DVFTUJØO EF MÓNJUFT Z FOUSB×B VO QFMJ
HSP¤ 4J CJFO FM FKFSDJDJP EFM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE FT JOUFSFTBOUF QPSRVF EB VO TFOUJEP DPODSFUP
FO PSEFO B RVF VOB EF MBT NFEJEBT FGFDUJWBT EFOUSP EF MBT iPUSBT NFEJEBTw RVF FTUBCMFDF MB OPSNB RVF
TF×BMBS RVF VOB OPSNB FT WÈMJEB FO MB NFEJEB RVF TFB JOUFSQSFUBEB EF BDVFSEP B DJFSUPT FTUÈOEBSFT
BRVFMMBT OPSNBT RVF EFCFO TFS FYQVMTBEBT EFM TJTUFNB B USBWÏT EF VOB SFGPSNB MF
HJTMBUJWB Z BRVFMMBT RVF QVFEFO TPCSFWJWJS NFEJBOUF VOB JOUFSQSFUBDJØO BEFDVBEB¤ -B QPTJDJØO
FM KVF[ TJFNQSF EFCJFSB JOUFSQSFUBS FM TJTUFNB OPSNBUJWP OBDJPOBM DPOGPSNF B MBT PCMJHBDJPOFT
JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT Z
QPS UBOUP
TJFNQSF QPS WÓB JOUFSQSFUBUJWB TF QPESÓB TBMWBS MB SFTQPOTBCJMJEBE EFM &TUBEP¤ &M QVOUP FT RVF FTUF
MBT DVBMFT EFCFO TFS NPEJĕDBEBT¤ 1BSFDF TFS QSVEFOUF TPTUFOFS RVF EBEB VOB OPSNB RVF GPNFOUB
EFCJFSB QSFGFSJSTF TV FY
QVMTJØO EFM TJTUFNB B USBWÏT EF TV BEFDVBDJØO MFHJTMBUJWB
FM KVF[ IBHB DPNP QBSUF EFM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE FO FM DBTP DPODSFUP RVF EFCB SFTPMWFS¤ 1BSB RVF
TF EFCFSÓBO QSJWJMFHJBS EJTF×PT OPSNBUJWPT RVF BCSBO FTQBDJP QBSB RVF FM QPEFS KVSJTEJDDJPOBM QVFEB OP
TJOP RVF UBNCJÏO QFSNJUBO MB BDUJWBDJØO EFM TJTUFNB MFHJTMBUJWP WÓB KVSJTEJDDJPOBM¤
EFCF QSFGFSJSTF BRVFM RVF EF NFKPS NBOFSB QSPUFKB MPT EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT FO FM DBTP DPODSFUP¤ 4J FM
JOUÏSQSFUF MMFHB B MB DPODMVTJØO EF RVF VOB OPSNB JOUFSOB P VOB JOUFSQSFUBDJØO EJTUJOUB B MB EBEB QPS
FT
F &YJTUF FM SJFTHP EF RVF MB ĕHVSB EFM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE BCSB VO FTQBDJP B MB EPDUSJOB EFM
iNBSHFO EF BQSFDJBDJØOw OBDJPOBM QBSB TBMWBS MBT EJĕDVMUBEFT PQFSBUJWBT RVF USBF DPOTJHP MB BQMJDBDJØO
BEFNÈT
EFTEF FM QVOUP EF WJTUB EF MB TFHVSJEBE KVSÓEJDB QBSFDF QPDP QMBVTJCMF BQMJDBS FTUB EPDUSJOB DVBOEP FM
EFSFDIP JOUFSOP TF EFCF JS BWBO[BOEP IBDJB MB BQMJDBDJØO EJSFDUB EF MBT OPSNBT EFM %*%) Z TV
DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJ[BEP MBT OPSNBT JOUFSOBDJPOBMFT TV BQMJDBDJØO QVFEF TFS NÈT GÈDJM EFTEF FM QVOUP EF
DPIFSFODJB JOUFSOB Z VOJEBE EFM TJTUFNB KVSÓEJDP DPEJĕDBEP¤ &O BRVFMMPT FO RVF MB DVFTUJØO KFSÈSRVJDB IB
9. Conclusión
NF HVTUBSÓB QPOFS EF SFMJFWF BMHVOBT DVFTUJPOFT RVF NF QBSFDFO GVOEBNFOUBMFT QBSB FOUFOEFS MB SFMFWBODJB
IBZ RVF SFBĕSNBS MB JNQPSUBODJB EF RVF UPEP FM BOÈMJTJT EFM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE FT VOB QJF[B DMBWF
QSJODJQBMNFOUF
)BZ RVF QPOFS EF SFMJFWF MB JNQPSUBODJB EF MB PCMJHBDJØO EF HBSBOUÓB DPNP QJMBS GVO
EBNFOUBM FO FM BDUVBS EFM &TUBEP
Z BRVÓ FT EPOEF FM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE FT DMBWF QBSB BTFHVSBS RVF TF EÏ QMFOP HPDF Z FKFSDJDJP EF
TJOP NÈT CJFO MB DPODSFDJØO KVSJTEJDDJPOBM EF MB PCMJHBDJØO EF HBSBOUÓB EF MPT EFSFDIPT IVNBOPT FO FM ÈNCJUP
JOUFSOP
ANUARIO DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL LATINOAMERICANO 507
TJO RVF MB $PSUF *%) JNQPOHB VO EFUFSNJOBEP TJTUFNB EF DPOUSPM EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBE¤ -B FYQFSJFODJB DPNQBSBEB
&O EFĕOJUJWB
DVBOEP FM DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE TF QFSĕMB DPNP VO JOTUSVNFOUP SFMFWBOUF QBSB MB QSPUFDDJØO EF MPT
Bibliografía
"ĻŁļĻĶĮŇŇĶ
.BSJFMB i{-B EFNPDSBDJB DPNP QSJODJQJP EFM JVT DPOTUJUVUJPOBMF DPNNVOF
.PSBMFT "OUPOJB[[J DPPSET¤ La justicia constitucional y su internacionalización. ¿Hacia un ‘Ius Constitutionale Commune’ en
América Latina? U **
.BY
1MBODL
*OTUJUVU GàS BVTMÊO
EJTDIFT ÚČFOUMJDIFT 3FDIU VOE 7ÚMLFSSFDIU F *OTUJUVUP *CFSPBNFSJDBOP EF %FSFDIP
$POTUJUVDJPOBM
ŞŜŝŜ¤
$ĮŀŁĶĹĹĮ
,BSMPT i&M DPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBE VO OVFWP EFCBUF FO .ÏYJDP B QBSUJS EF MB TFOUFODJB 3BEJMMB
1BDIFDPw
WPM¤ 9*
ŞŜŝŝ
QQ¤ šťş
ŢťŠ¤
'IJĿĿĮķļĹĶ
-VJHJ La teoría del derecho en el paradigma constitucional, .BESJE
.ÏYJDP &EJUPSJBM 'POUBNBSB
ŞŜŜŤ¤
'IJĿĿIJĿ .Įİ
(ĿIJĴļĿ
O¡ ŝşŝ
ŞŜŝŝ
QQ¤ ťŝţ
ťŢţ¤
(̋ĻĴļĿĮ .IJĿĮ
.BOVFM &¤ i%JÈMPHPT KVSJTQSVEFODJBMFT FOUSF MB $PSUF *OUFSBNFSJDBOB EF %FSFDIPT )VNBOPT Z MB $PSUF
.BY
1MBODL
*OTUJUVU GàS BVTMÊOEJTDIFT ÚČFOUMJDIFT 3FDIU VOE 7ÚMLFSSFDIU F *OTUJUVUP *CFSPBNFSJDBOP EF %FSFDIP $POTUJUVDJPOBM
ŞŜŝŜ¤
)ĶŁŁIJĿŀ
B×P ţ
O¤¡ Ş
ŞŜŜť
QQ¤ ŝŜť
ŝŞŤ¤
508 CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD. PRECISIONES CONCEPTUALESY DESAFÍOS A LA LUZ… / CLAUDIO NASH ROJAS
-ļĻıļ̉ļ -˕ŇĮĿļ
O¤¡ ŝŞŤ
ŞŜŝŜ
QQ¤ţŢŝ
ŤŝŠ¤
.ĮĿĶ̉ ļ
'FSOBOEP Derecho internacional público, parte general, .BESJE 5SPUUB
ŞŜŜš¤ /Įŀĵ 3ļķĮŀ
$MBVEJP La concepción sobre derechos fundamentales en Latinoamérica:
tendencias jurisprudenciales, .ÏYJDP &EJUPSJBM 'POUBNBSB
ŞŜŝŜ¤
4ĮĴ̡˦ŀ
/ÏTUPS 1FESP i&M iDPOUSPM EF DPOWFODJPOBMJEBEw DPNP JOTUSVNFOUP QBSB MB FMBCPSBDJØO EF VO JVT
DPNNVOF JOUFSBNFSJDBOPw
.BY
1MBODL
*OTUJUVU GàS BVTMÊOEJTDIFT ÚČFOUMJDIFT 3FDIU VOE 7ÚMLFSSFDIU F *OTUJUVUP *CFSPBNFSJDBOP EF
%FSFDIP $POTUJUVDJPOBM
ŞŜŝŜ
QQ¤ ŠŠť
ŠŢŤ¤
B×P Ť
O¤¡ŝ
ŞŜŝŜ
QQ¤ ŝŝţ
ŝşŢ¤
Jurisprudencia
EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜţ¤
_____ Caso Cabrera García y Montiel Flores vs. México, FYDFQDJØO QSFMJNJOBS
GPOEP
SFQBSBDJPOFT Z DPTUBT
ŞŢ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŝŜ¤
_____ Caso De la masacre de Las Dos Erres vs. Guatemala ŞŜŜť
FYDFQDJØO QSFMJNJOBS
GPOEP
SFQBSBDJPOFT Z DPTUBT
ŞŠ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜť¤
_____ Caso Gelman vs. Uruguay, GPOEP Z SFQBSBDJPOFT
ŞŠ EF GFCSFSP EF ŞŜŝŝ¤
_____ Caso Gomes Lund y otros (Guerrilha do Araguaia) vs. Brasil
FYDFQDJPOFT QSFMJNJ
OBSFT
GPOEP
SFQBSBDJPOFT Z DPTUBT
ŞŠ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŝŜ¤
_____ Caso Ibsen Cárdenas e Ibsen Peña vs. Bolivia, GPOEP
SFQBSBDJPOFT Z DPTUBT
ŝ EF
TFQUJFNCSF EF ŞŜŝŜ¤
_____ Caso La Cantuta vs. Perú, GPOEP
SFQBSBDJPOFT Z DPTUBT
Şť EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜޤ
Z DPTUBT
Şş EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜť¤
_____ Responsabilidad internacional por expedición y aplicación de leyes violatorias de
la convención arts. 1 y 2 Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos
PQJOJØO DPOTVMUJWB 0$
ŝŠťŠ EFM ť EF EJDJFNCSF EF ŝťťŠ¤
_____ Caso Trabajadores cesados del Congreso (Aguado Alfaro y otros) vs. Perú
FYDFQ
DJPOFT QSFMJNJOBSFT
GPOEP
SFQBSBDJPOFT Z DPTUBT
ŞŠ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŜޤ
DPTUBT
Şş EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŞŜŝŜ¤
$ļĿŁIJ 4łĽĿIJĺĮ ıIJ $ļŀŁĮ 3ĶİĮ
4ĮĹĮ $ļĻŀŁĶŁłİĶļĻĮĹ Acción de inconstitucionali-
dad
TFOUFODJB Oo Şşŝş
ť EF NBZP EF ŝťťš¤
$ļĿŁIJ 4łĽĿIJĺĮ ıIJ +łŀŁĶİĶĮ ıIJ ĹĮ /ĮİĶ̋Ļ .IJŅĶİĮĻĮ 4FTJØO QÞCMJDB PSEJOBSJB EFM
1MFOP EF MB 4VQSFNB $PSUF EF +VTUJDJB EF MB /BDJØO
ŝŠ EF KVMJP EF ŞŜŝŝ¤
Fuentes
TVTDSJUB FO 4BO +PTÏ EF $PTUB 3JDB FO MB $POGFSFODJB &TQFDJBMJ[BEB *OUFSBNFSJDBOB TPCSF %FSFDIPT )VNBOPT
FM ŞŞ EF OPWJFNCSF EF ŝťŢť¤