Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Project Report
on
ASEAN
1
ABSTRACT
ASEAN,Association of SouthEast Asian Nations, is a unique example of regional
co-operation and development. Having come into existence in 1967 with 5 regional
member countries, ASEAN has grown tremendously in the coverage and impact by
including 5 more countries.. The region has population of 560 million. Its combined
gross domestic product exceeded US$1100 billion and a total trade of US$ 1400 billion.
With certain fundamental principles, ASEAN has grown to a greater stature and helped
its member countries immensely in economic growth and development. As a result,
ASEAN vision 2020 was spelt out at Kuala Lapmer in the yaer 1997. On the other,
declaration of ASEAN concord II was spelt out at Bali in 2003.Both these documents
spell out wider vision of co-operation and development for the ASEAN through the
strategy of dialogues and interaction with many countries and economic unions/regional
parts.
2
INDEX
1. Overview 4
2. History 11
3. Organizational Structure 15
4. ASEAN Trade 17
Bibliography 26
3
ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS (ASEAN)
Overview
ESTABLISHMENT
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations or ASEAN was established on 8
August 1967 in Bangkok by the five original Member Countries, namely, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. Brunei Darussalam joined on 8
January 1984, Vietnam on 28 July 1995, Lao PDR and Myanmar on 23 July 1997, and
Cambodia on 30 April 1999.
As of 2006, the ASEAN region has a population of about 560 million, a total area
of 4.5 million square kilometers, a combined gross domestic product of almost US$
1,100 billion, and a total trade of about US$ 1,400 billion.
OBJECTIVE
The ASEAN Declaration states that the aims and purposes of the Association
are: (1) to accelerate economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the
region and (2) to promote regional peace and stability through abiding respect for justice
and the rule of law in the relationship among countries in the region and adherence to
the principles of the United Nations Charter.
The ASEAN Vision 2020, adopted by the ASEAN Leaders on the 30th
Anniversary of ASEAN, agreed on a shared vision of ASEAN as a concert of Southeast
Asian nations, outward looking, living in peace, stability and prosperity, bonded together
in partnership in dynamic development and in a community of caring societies. In 2003,
the ASEAN Leaders resolved that an ASEAN Community shall be established
comprising three pillars, namely, ASEAN Security Community, ASEAN Economic
Community and ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community.
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
ASEAN Member Countries have adopted the following fundamental principles in
their relations with one another, as contained in the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in
Southeast Asia (TAC):
4
• Mutual respect for the independence, sovereignty, equality, territorial integrity,
and national identity of all nations;
• The right of every State to lead its national existence free from external
interference, subversion or coercion;
• Non-interference in the internal affairs of one another;
• Settlement of differences or disputes by peaceful manner;
• Renunciation of the threat or use of force; and
• Effective cooperation among themselves.
5
proliferation, counter-terrorism, transnational crime, South China Sea and the Korean
Peninsula, among others.
Launched in 1992, the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) is now in place. It aims to
promote the region’s competitive advantage as a single production unit. The elimination
of tariff and non-tariff barriers among Member Countries is expected to promote greater
economic efficiency, productivity, and competitiveness.
As of 1 January 2005, tariffs on almost 99 percent of the products in the Inclusion
List of the ASEAN-6 (Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines,
Singapore, and Thailand) have been reduced to no more than 5 percent. More than 60
percent of these products have zero tariffs. The average tariff for ASEAN-6 has been
brought down from more than 12 percent when AFTA started to 2 percent today. For
the newer Member Countries, namely, Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Viet Nam
(CLMV), tariffs on about 81 percent of their Inclusion List have been brought down to
within the 0-5 percent range.
6
Other major integration-related economic activities of ASEAN include the following:
• Roadmap for Financial and Monetary Integration of ASEAN in four areas,
namely, capital market development, capital account liberalisation, liberalisation
of financial services and currency cooperation;
• Trans-ASEAN transportation network consisting of major inter-state highway and
railway networks, including the Singapore to Kunming Rail-Link, principal ports,
and sea lanes for maritime traffic, inland waterway transport, and major civil
aviation links;
• Roadmap for Integration of Air Travel Sector;
• Interoperability and interconnectivity of national telecommunications equipment
and services, including the ASEAN Telecommunications Regulators Council
Sectoral Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ATRC-MRA) on Conformity
Assessment for Telecommunications Equipment;
• Trans-ASEAN energy networks, which consist of the ASEAN Power Grid and the
Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline Projects;
• Initiative for ASEAN Integration (IAI) focusing on infrastructure, human resource
development, information and communications technology, and regional
economic integration primarily in the CLMV countries;
• Visit ASEAN Campaign and the private sector-led ASEAN Hip-Hop Pass to
promote intra-ASEAN tourism; and
• Agreement on the ASEAN Food Security Reserve.
7
• ASEAN Work Programme on Preparing ASEAN Youth for Sustainable
Employment and Other Challenges of Globalisation;
• ASEAN University Network (AUN) promoting collaboration among seventeen
member universities ASEAN;
• ASEAN Students Exchange Programme, Youth Cultural Forum, and the ASEAN
Young Speakers Forum;
• The Annual ASEAN Culture Week, ASEAN Youth Camp and ASEAN Quiz;
• ASEAN Media Exchange Programme; and
• Framework for Environmentally Sustainable Cities (ESC) and ASEAN Agreement
on Transboundary Haze Pollution.
EXTERNAL RELATIONS
8
STRUCTURE AND MECHANICS
Basic Philosophy
9
to as carrying out “development intervention”. Outcomes of a development intervention
are typically measured by the impacts that it produces in providing solutions to the
problem being addressed. In ASEAN development cooperation, the same basic
philosophy is used. Regional development activities carried out under ASEAN
cooperation are always aimed at addressing regional problems and issues through
development interventions which are best carried out at the regional level. As ASEAN
represents the interest of its Member Countries as a group, development intervention
carried out at the regional level would naturally have to suit the needs of the group
without duplicating efforts that can be better implemented at the national or local levels.
In this context a regionality criteria has become very useful in checking if an idea for a
regional development intervention is truly region.
There are two primary criteria that can be used to examine if a given problem is truly
regional:
a. The problem or need is regional, and not national by definition: which means that the
problem exists above the national level.
An example of a regional problem according to these criteria would be a question of:
“How should import tariffs in all Member Countries be adjusted and coordinated as to
allow more flow of goods among them taking advantage of the larger market size of all
the Countries combined?” More flow of goods in a larger market would make
production more efficient and make the region more competitive. But, to achieve it each
country cannot act alone or even in pairs, but would have to work together as a group.
The solution to the problem would be for all Member Countries to jointly develop
regional trade scheme and coordinate the implementation of consistent import tariff
structures for the scheme. The development intervention would be to carry out
exercises to initiate the chain or sub-chain of processes from the development of the
tariff scheme, development of harmonized tariff nomenclature, translation of the scheme
into binding agreements, and implementation of the agreement in the field.
b. The problem or need requires regional cooperation in order to bring about a solution.
An example of a regional problem which requires regional cooperation to solve would
be a question of: “How to improve the efficiency and use values of the natural resource
products from ASEAN countries by eliminating trade of illegally harvested low-priced
commodities?” More efficient use of ASEAN’s natural resources would ensure longer-
lasting comparative and competitive advantages of the region. The solution to the
problem would be for all Member Countries to apply consistent trade regime to prevent
the sale of illegally harvested products, and to share the benefit together. The
development intervention would be to carry out exercises to initiate the chain or sub-
chain of processes from the mutual recognition of the legally harvested products,
applying consistent and sharing the cost of enforcements against illegal products,
spreading the production and market incentives for trading legal products only.
In the actual project development stage, some regional problems would often
come to a surface as a result of the lack of options to solve the problems at national or
10
local levels. Problems such as trans-boundary haze from land fires, or pressures
against regional currencies, for example, cannot be effectively dealt but through
regional cooperation.
HISTORY
The Founding of ASEAN:
On 8 August 1967, five leaders - the Foreign Ministers of Indonesia, Malaysia,
the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand - sat down together in the main hall of the
Department of Foreign Affairs building in Bangkok, Thailand and signed a document. By
virtue of that document, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was born.
The five Foreign Ministers who signed it - Adam Malik of Indonesia, Narciso R. Ramos
of the Philippines, Tun Abdul Razak of Malaysia, S. Rajaratnam of Singapore, and
Thanat Khoman of Thailand - would subsequently be hailed as the Founding Fathers of
probably the most successful inter-governmental organization in the developing world
today. And the document that they signed would be known as the ASEAN Declaration.
It was a short, simply-worded document containing just five articles. It declared
the establishment of an Association for Regional Cooperation among the Countries of
Southeast Asia to be known as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
and spelled out the aims and purposes of that Association. These aims and purposes
were about cooperation in the economic, social, cultural, technical, educational and
other fields, and in the promotion of regional peace and stability through abiding respect
for justice and the rule of law and adherence to the principles of the United Nations
Charter. It stipulated that the Association would be open for participation by all States in
the Southeast Asian region subscribing to its aims, principles and purposes. It
proclaimed ASEAN as representing "the collective will of the nations of Southeast Asia
to bind themselves together in friendship and cooperation and, through joint efforts and
sacrifices, secure for their peoples and for posterity the blessings of peace, freedom
and prosperity."
Yet it was by no means an easy process: each man brought into the
deliberations a historical and political perspective that had no resemblance to that of
any of the others. But with goodwill and good humor, as often as they huddled at the
negotiating table, they finessed their way through their differences as they lined up their
shots on the golf course and traded wisecracks on one another's game, a style of
deliberation which would eventually become the ASEAN ministerial tradition.
The fragmented economies of Southeast Asia,(with) each country pursuing its
own limited objectives and dissipating its meager resources in the overlapping or even
conflicting endeavors of sister states carry the seeds of weakness in their incapacity for
growth and their self-perpetuating dependence on the advanced, industrial nations.
ASEAN, therefore, will marshal the still untapped potentials of this rich region through
more substantial united action. The countries of Southeast Asia should also be willing
to take responsibility for whatever happens to them, vision of an ASEAN was to include
11
all the countries of Southeast Asia. The countries of the region should recognize that
unless they assumed their common responsibility to shape their own destiny and to
prevent external intervention and interference, According to the members Southeast
Asia would remain fraught with danger and tension. And unless they took decisive and
collective action to prevent the eruption of intra-regional conflicts, the nations of
Southeast Asia would remain susceptible to manipulation, one against another.
The goal of ASEAN, then, was to create, not to destroy. The countries of
Southeast Asia had no choice but to adjust to the exigencies of the time, to move
toward closer cooperation and even integration. Elaborating ASEAN objectives,
"Building a new society that will be responsive to the needs of our time and efficiently
equipped to bring about, for the enjoyment and the material as well as spiritual
advancement of our peoples, conditions of stability and progress. Particularly what
millions of men and women in our part of the world want is to erase the old and obsolete
concept of domination and subjection of the past and replace it with the new spirit of
give and take, of equality and partnership. More than anything else, they want to be
master of their own house and to enjoy the inherent right to decide their own destiny.
While the nations of Southeast Asia prevent attempts to deprive them of their freedom
and sovereignty, they must first free themselves from the material impediments of
ignorance, disease and hunger. Each of these nations cannot accomplish that alone,
but by joining together and cooperating with those who have the same aspirations,
these objectives become easier to attain.
And that was how ASEAN was conceived, given a name, and born. Barely 14
months since Thanat Khoman brought up the ASEAN idea in his conversations with his
Malaysian and Indonesian colleagues. In about three more weeks, Indonesia had fully
restored diplomatic relations with Malaysia, and soon after that with Singapore. That
was by no means the end to intra-ASEAN disputes, for soon the Philippines and
Malaysia would have a falling out on the issue of sovereignty over Sabah. Many
disputes between ASEAN countries persist to this day. But all Member Countries are
deeply committed to resolving their differences through peaceful means and in the spirit
of mutual accommodation. Every dispute would have its proper season but it would not
be allowed to get in the way of the task at hand. And at that time, the essential task was
to lay the framework of regional dialogue and cooperation.
The two-page Bangkok Declaration not only contains the rationale for the
establishment of ASEAN and its specific objectives. It represents the organization’s
modus operandi of building on small steps, voluntary, and informal arrangements
towards more binding and institutionalized agreements. All the founding member states
and the newer members have stood fast to the spirit of the Bangkok Declaration. Over
the years, ASEAN has progressively entered into several formal and legally-binding
instruments, such as the 1976 Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia and
the 1995 Treaty on the Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone.
Against the backdrop of conflict in the then Indochina, the Founding Fathers had
the foresight of building a community of and for all Southeast Asian states. Thus the
Bangkok Declaration promulgated that “the Association is open for participation to all
States in the Southeast Asian region subscribing to the aforementioned aims, principles
12
and purposes.” ASEAN’s inclusive outlook has paved the way for community-building
not only in Southeast Asia, but also in the broader Asia Pacific region where several
other inter-governmental organizations now co-exist.
The original ASEAN logo presented five brown sheaves of rice stalks, one for
each founding member. Beneath the sheaves is the legend "ASEAN" in blue. These are
set on a field of yellow encircled by a blue border. Brown stands for strength and
stability, yellow for prosperity and blue for the spirit of cordiality in which ASEAN affairs
are conducted. When ASEAN celebrated its 30th Anniversary in 1997, the sheaves on
the logo had increased to ten - representing all ten countries of Southeast Asia and
reflecting the colors of the flags of all of them. In a very real sense, ASEAN and
Southeast Asia would then be one and the same, just as the Founding Fathers had
envisioned.
13
mandate to initiate, advise, coordinate and implement ASEAN activities and (d)
the professionalization of the ASEAN Secretariat staff on the principle of open
recruitment.
6. The Manila Protocol of 22 July 1992 implemented the Singapore Summit
decision. The tenure of office of the Secretary-General was increased to five
years. Changes in the basic functions of the ASEAN Secretariat have been
reflected in the functions and powers of the Secretary-General, which appears as
Annex B.
7. In 1997, an additional post of Deputy Secretary-General was created.
8. The Sixth ASEAN Summit mandated the review of the overall organizational
structure of ASEAN in order to further improve efficiency and effectiveness,
taking into account the expansion of ASEAN activities, the enlargement of
ASEAN membership, and the current regional situation. As part of this review,
the Summit also decided to “review the role, functions and capacity of the
ASEAN Secretariat to meet the increasing demands of ASEAN and to support
the implementation of the Hanoi Plan of Action”.
9. In pursuance of this mandate, the ASEAN Standing Committee established in
September 1998 a Special Directors-General Working Group on the Review of
the Role and Functions of the ASEAN Secretariat. To assist in the review
process, the ASC commissioned PriceWaterHouse Coopers in November
1998. The ASEAN Directors-General considered the consultant’s Final Report in
April 1999.
10. While upholding the basic mandate of the Secretary-General of ASEAN as set
out in the 1992 Protocol Amending the Agreement on the Establishment of the
ASEAN Secretariat, the ASEAN Standing Committee agreed that the ASEAN
Secretariat should function as coordinating Secretariat to help facilitate effective
decision-making within and amongst ASEAN bodies. The Secretariat would
emphasize more on substantive matter, while its tasks on servicing the various
meetings would be precisely defined.
11. The ASEAN Secretariat has now put in place a functional structure. One of the
two Deputy Secretaries-General has assumed the role of chief-of-staff who shall
be responsible for corporate affairs to ensure efficiency in the internal
management of the ASEAN Secretariat. The other Deputy Secretary-General
shall serve as chief operations who will support the Secretary-General in
operations and policy matters.
12. Corporate affairs shall include the following areas: administration; finance and
funding; human resources; public information; information technology; and
special projects. The operational bureaus will include the Task Force for
Financial Cooperation and Macroeconomic Surveillance; Economic and
Functional Cooperation; Trade, Investment and Services; and Programme
Coordination and External Relations.
13. The measures aimed at improving internal management of the ASEAN
Secretariat include (a) the formulation of annual operating plans to provide a
framework for determining the Secretariat’s priorities and resource allocation
decisions; (b) strengthening of corporate services, particularly in financial
management, it services, and human resources development; (c) considerable
14
increase in professional Locally-Recruited Staff to free senior officers’ time from
administrative and secretarial tasks, enabling grater focus on strategic and
substantive matters.
15
16
TRADE
The ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) has now been virtually established. ASEAN
Member Countries have made significant progress in the lowering of intra-regional
tariffs through the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) Scheme for AFTA. More
than 99 percent of the products in the CEPT Inclusion List (IL) of ASEAN-6, comprising
Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand, have
been brought down to the 0-5 percent tariff range.
ASEAN’s newer members, namely Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Viet Nam, are not
far behind in the implementation of their CEPT commitments with almost 80 percent of
their products having been moved into their respective CEPT ILS. Of these items, about
66 percent already have tariffs within the 0-5 percent tariff band. Viet Nam has until
2006 to bring down tariff of products in the Inclusion List to no more than 5 percent
duties, Laos and Myanmar in 2008 and Cambodia in 2010.
Following the signing of the Protocol to Amend the CEPT-AFTA Agreement for the
Elimination of Import Duties on 30 January 2003, ASEAN-6 has committed to eliminate
tariffs on 60 percent of their products in the IL by the year 2003. As of this date, tariffs
on 64.12 percent of the products in the IL of ASEAN-6 have been eliminated. The
average tariff for ASEAN-6 under the CEPT Scheme is now down to 1.51 percent from
12.76 percent when the tariff cutting exercise started in 1993.
Products that remain out of the CEPT-AFTA Scheme are those in the Highly Sensitive
List (i.e. rice) and the General Exception List. The Coordinating Committee on the
Implementation of the CEPT Scheme for AFTA (CCCA) is currently undertaking a
review of all the General Exception Lists to ensure that only those consistent with Article
9(b)1 of the CEPT Agreement are included in the lists.
ASEAN Member Countries have also resolved to work on the elimination of non-tariff
barriers. A work programme on the elimination of non-tariff barriers, which includes,
among others, the process of verification and cross-notification; updating the working
definition of Non-Tariff Measures (NTMs)/Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) in ASEAN; the
setting-up of a database on all NTMs maintained by Member Countries; and the
eventual elimination of unnecessary and unjustifiable non-tariff measures, is currently
being finalized.
17
In an effort to improve and strengthen the rules governing the implementation of the
CEPT Scheme, to make the Scheme more attractive to regional businessmen and
prospective investors, the CEPT Rules of Origin and its Operational Certification
Procedures have been revised and implemented since 1 January 2004. Among the
features of the revised CEPT Rules of Origin and Operational Certification Procedures
include: (a) a standardized method of calculating local/ASEAN content; (b) a set of
principles for determining the cost of ASEAN origin and the guidelines for costing
methodologies; (c) treatment of locally-procured materials; and (d) improved verification
process, including on-site verification.
Direction of Trade
ASEAN's exports had regained its upward trend in the two years following the financial
crisis of 1997-1998 reaching its peak in 2000 when total exports was valued US$ 408
billion. After declining to US$ 366.8 billion in 2001, as a result of the economic slowdon
in the United States and Europe and the recession in Japan, ASEAN expots recovered
in 2002 when it was valued at US$ 380.2 billion. The upward trend for ASEAN-6
continued up to first two quarters of 2003. Intra-ASEAN trade for the first two quarters of
2003 registered an increase of 4.2 and 1.6 percent for exports and imports respectively.
The United States, the European Union and Japan continued to be ASEAN’s largest
export markets. Japan, followed by the U.S. and EU, were the largest sources of
ASEAN imports. During the first half of 2002-2003, ASEAN-6 trade with major markets
as a whole increased by 11.71 percent for exports and 6.91 percent for imports.
However, ASEAN exports to the U.S. and India and imports from Canada and India
declined during the same period
18
THE DIALOGUE SYSTEM
At the Second Summit in Kuala Lumpur the ASEAN heads of government agreed
that the association’s economic relations with other countries or groups of countries
needed to be expanded and intensified.
On that occasion, the ASEAN heads of government met with the Prime Ministers of
Australia, Japan and New Zealand, the first time that they had held consultations as a
group with the leaders of non-ASEAN countries.
The next year, the first Post ministerial Conference took place immediately after the
ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. This was a gathering among ASEAN and its dialogue
partners, which were then Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, New Zealand
and the United States.
Every year since then, the foreign ministers of dialogue countries have met at these
post ministerial conferences with their ASEAN counterparts. Between these
conferences, dialogues are held at various levels and wide-ranging projects are
undertaken. These relationships have become models for mutually beneficial relations
between North and South as well as for South-South cooperation.
Four more countries have since joined the ASEAN dialogue system: China (1996), India
(1996), the Republic of Korea (1991) and Russia (1996). The United Nations
Development Program (1977) is the only dialogue partner that is not a sovereign state.
These issues include territorial and jurisdictional disputes in the South China Sea; self-
determination for East Timor; nuclear proliferation in Northeast Asia and South Asia;
weapons of mass destruction; and the impact of globalization.
South China Sea. Like many other parts of the world, Southeast Asia faces territorial
disputes among its members and nearby states. In these disputes ASEAN has
consistently pursued a policy of cooperation in seeking the peaceful settlement of
differences.
In 1992, recognizing that any conflict in the South China Sea could directly affect peace
and stability in the region, ASEAN issued a declaration “urging all parties concerned to
19
exercise restraint in order to create a positive climate for the eventual resolution of all
disputes.” ASEAN further “emphasized the necessity to resolve all sovereignty and
jurisdictional issues about the South China Sea by peaceful means, without resort to
force.”
The Manila Declaration of 1992, which proposed a modus vivendi in the South China
Sea, represents one of the most remarkable demonstrations of political solidarity among
ASEAN members on strategic issues of common concern.
On the suggestion of ASEAN, ASEAN and China have been working on a Code of
Conduct to govern state behavior in the South China Sea.
East Timor. ASEAN supported the implementation of the agreement between Indonesia
and Portugal on the question of East Timor and the 5 May 1999 agreements between
the United Nations and the Indonesian and Portuguese governments about the
modalities for the popular consultations of the East Timorese. The consultations were
held on 30 August 1999.
As violence rocked the territory following the referendum, the ASEAN leaders who were
in Auckland for the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meet-ing gathered to address the
problem. Some of them agreed to contribute, at great expense, to the International
Force for East Timor, which was formed upon Indonesia’s invitation. The UN
Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET) was subsequently set up, with a
Filipino general taking over the command of the peacekeeping force. A Thai general
has since succeeded him.
Other ASEAN members have been extending humanitarian and other forms of
assistance to East Timor.
ASEAN has called on the international community to help East Timor achieve peace,
stability and prosperity during its transition to full independence, which would contribute
to the stability of Southeast Asia.
Following the separation of East Timor from Indonesia, ASEAN has declared its position
that a united, democratic and economically prosperous Indonesia is basic to the
maintenance of regional security. In this context, the association emphasised its support
for Indonesia’s territorial integrity.
Northeast Asia. At the Seventh ASEAN Regional Forum in July 2000, the participation
for the first time of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in the ARF process was
welcomed-a significant step in the rapid evolution of the situation on the Korean
20
Peninsula and thus in the security environment of the Asia-Pacific region. North Korea’s
ARF membership provides additional opportunities for dialogue and exchanges
between North Korea and those ARF countries with key roles in the Korean situation.
ASEAN expressed support for the historic summit between the North and South Korean
leaders, held in Pyongyang on 13-15 June 2000. It also commended the 15 June North-
South Joint Declaration, the first agreement signed at the highest level since the division
of the Korean Peninsula in 1945.
The Seventh ARF also considered the economic, social and human components of
security and the need to promote regional cooperation in dealing with regional security
issues. It discussed both the positive effects and the repercussions of globalization,
including greater economic interdependence among nations and the multiplication of
security threats like transnational crime. In responding to globalisation, ARF felt it
necessary for nations to strengthen their individual and collective capacities to meet the
challenges affecting their common security.
ARF has reaffirmed the need for Southeast Asian countries to continue efforts, through
dialogue and cooperation at national and international levels, in dealing with the
economic, social and political impacts of globalisation so as to ensure sustained
economic and social development.
CURRENT FOCUS
21
Current Development Cooperation Programmes
c. Programme stream and flagship projects are currently implemented in the two
programmes, namely:
IMPLEMENTING SECTORS
22
present, there are 13 clusters of sectors through which ASEAN cooperation activities
are channeled. These sectors include:
A. Economic Cooperation
1. Trade (AFTA),
2. Investment,
3. Transport,
4. Telecommunication,
5. Energy,
6. Tourism,
7. Finance,
B. Functional Cooperation
8. Social Development,
9. Environment,
10. Science and Technology,
11. Food, Agriculture and Forestry,
12. Culture and Information,
13. Special Projects
In each of the sector, there are hierarchies of committees from the ministerial, senior
officials, to a working/expert group levels. In most cases, the committee
structures reflect the sectors and sub-sectors of cooperation in ASEAN.
Road ahead
The ASEAN countries with large populations and consumption patterns are important
drivers of growth. With a combined Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of US$ 2.3 trillion as
of now, they together will create a new free trade area of 1.7 billion people and cover 11
countries.
The future has been summed up well by Indonesian Trade Minister Marie Pangestu.
She said the FTA in goods paved the way for more economic cooperation between
ASEAN countries and "This will lead to a greater integration between ASEAN and its
dialogue partners."
23
ASEAN VISION 2020
We envision the ASEAN region to be, in 2020, in full reality, a Zone of Peace,
Freedom and Neutrality, as envisaged in the Kuala Lumpur Declaration of 1971.
ASEAN shall have, by the year 2020, established a peaceful and stable Southeast Asia
where each nation is at peace with itself and where the causes for conflict have been
eliminated, through abiding respect for justice and the rule of law and through the
strengthening of national and regional resilience.
We envision a Southeast Asia where territorial and other disputes are resolved
by peaceful means.
We envision the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia functioning
fully as a binding code of conduct for our governments and peoples, to which other
states with interests in the region adhere.
We envision a Southeast Asia free from nuclear weapons, with all the Nuclear
Weapon States committed to the purposes of the Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapons
Free Zone Treaty through their adherence to its Protocol. We also envision our region
free from all other weapons of mass destruction.
We envision our rich human and natural resources contributing to our
development and shared prosperity.
We envision the ASEAN Regional Forum as an established means for
confidence-building and preventive diplomacy and for promoting conflict-resolution.
We envision a Southeast Asia where our mountains, rivers and seas no longer
divide us but link us together in friendship, cooperation and commerce.
We see ASEAN as an effective force for peace, justice and moderation in the
Asia-Pacific and in the world.
24
manpower, and strong networks of scientific and technological institutions and centers
of excellence.
We envision a clean and green ASEAN with fully established mechanisms for
sustainable development to ensure the protection of the region's environment, the
sustainability of its natural resources, and the high quality of life of its peoples.
We envision the evolution in Southeast Asia of agreed rules of behaviour and
cooperative measures to deal with problems that can be met only on a regional scale,
including environmental pollution and degradation, drug trafficking, trafficking in women
and children, and other transnational crimes.
We envision our nations being governed with the consent and greater
participation of the people with its focus on the welfare and dignity of the human person
and the good of the community.
We resolve to develop and strengthen ASEAN's institutions and mechanisms to
enable ASEAN to realize the vision and respond to the challenges of the coming
century. We also see the need for a strengthened ASEAN Secretariat with an enhanced
role to support the realization of our vision.
An Outward-Looking ASEAN
Conclusion
25