0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
20 Ansichten24 Seiten
1. The document contains examples of quantitative models for inventory management, including EOQ, PROQ, newsvendor and quantity discount models.
2. Key outputs include optimal order quantities, cycle times, total costs and reorder levels that minimize costs subject to demand uncertainties and discount structures.
3. The examples provide solutions to inventory problems for various companies across different industries.
1. The document contains examples of quantitative models for inventory management, including EOQ, PROQ, newsvendor and quantity discount models.
2. Key outputs include optimal order quantities, cycle times, total costs and reorder levels that minimize costs subject to demand uncertainties and discount structures.
3. The examples provide solutions to inventory problems for various companies across different industries.
1. The document contains examples of quantitative models for inventory management, including EOQ, PROQ, newsvendor and quantity discount models.
2. Key outputs include optimal order quantities, cycle times, total costs and reorder levels that minimize costs subject to demand uncertainties and discount structures.
3. The examples provide solutions to inventory problems for various companies across different industries.
2 3 Input 4 Annual Demand 1,200 5 Ordering Cost £9.00 6 Unit Cost 7 Unit holding cost per year (two options) 8 (i) in £s per year £0.10 9 (ii) as % of unit cost 10 User input cells are shaded purple 11 12 Output 13 Unit holding cost per year £0.10 14 15 EOQ 464.76 16 No. of Orders/Year 2.6 17 Total cost £46 F G 1 2 3 4 A quantity discount model for the ABC Company 5 DISCOUNT TABLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (i) Answer = 465 15 (ii) Answer = 500 at a cost of £586.60 16 17 H I J K 1 2 3 4 5 Unit Cost = £0.50 £0.45 6 Minmum discount quantity, Mini = 0 500 7 Annual unit holding cost = £0.10 £0.10 8 9 Qi =464.8 464.8 10 Adjusted order quantities = 464.8 500.0 11 Total costs = £646.48 £586.60 12 13 14 15 16 17 A B C D E F G H 1 Exercise 9.2 - The PROQ Model and solution to the Acme Company's problem. 2 3 Input User input cells are shaded purple 4 Annual Demand 6,500 Convert all units to annu 5 Setup Cost £180.00 Since an annual demand o 6 Unit Cost £5.50 equates to a daily demand 7 Annual production rate 15,600 deduced that the number 8 Unit holding cost per year (two options) per year is 6500/25 = 260. 9 (i) in £s per year production rate is 60 x 260 10 (ii) as % of unit cost 18.0% 11 Annual unit holding cost = £0.99 12 13 Output 14 PROQ 2012.95 (i) Answer = 201 15 Production run time,Ro (in weeks) 6.71 (ii) Answer = 11 16 Optimal cycle time, To (in weeks) 16.10 (iii) Answer = 6. 17 Maximum inventory level 1174.2 18 Annual holding cost £581 19 Annual setup cost £581 20 Total cost £36,912 I J K 1 2 3 Convert all units 4 to annual amounts. Since an annual 5 demand of 6500 units equates to a daily 6 demand of 25, it can be deduced that 7the number of working days per year is 6500/25 8 = 260. Thus the annual production rate 9 is 60 x 260 = 15,600 units 10 11 12 13 (i) Answer 14 = 2013 units (ii) 15 Answer = 1174.2 (iii)16 Answer = 6.71 weeks 17 18 19 20 A B C D E F G H I 1 Exercise 9.3 - Maximising profits of the Gardening Today magazine 2 3 Input Unit Cost, C = £0.90 4 Selling Price, S = £1.20 User input cells are shaded purple 5 Scrap value, V = £0.50 6 7 8 Output <- Probabilities -> <-- Expected --> 9 Indiv. Cumul. profit, EPi 10 Demand, Di Pi CUMi Sales Profit 11 1 500 0.1 1 500 £150 12 2 600 0.15 0.9 590 £173 13 3 700 0.2 0.75 665 £186 14 4 800 0.25 0.55 720 £184 15 5 900 0.2 0.3 750 £165 16 6 1000 0.1 0.1 760 £132 3 17 18 Optimal demand, Qo = 700 Maximum profit = £186 ANSWER J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ANSWER A B C D E F G H I 1 Exercise 9.4 - A quantity discount model for the New Products Company 2 3 Input Annual Demand 4,000 4 Ordering Cost £500.00 User input cells 5 Unit holding cost per year (two options) are shaded purple 6 (i) in £s per year 7 (ii) as % of unit cost 10.0% 8 9 DISCOUNT TABLE Unit Cost = £10.00 £9.70 £9.30 10 Minimum discount quantity, Mini = 0 1000 2500 11 Annual unit holding cost = £1.00 £0.97 £0.93 12 13 Output Qi = 2000.0 2030.7 2073.9 14 Adjusted order quantities = 2000.0 2030.7 2500.0 15 Total costs = £42,000 £40,770 £39,163 16 17 Minimum total cost is £39,163 2 18 Optimal order quantity is 2500.0 19 Cycle time is 32.5 weeks A B C D E F G H I J 1 Exercise 9.5 , part (i) - A deterministic EOQ Model with shortages - Bloggs Engineering 2 3 Input Annual Demand 14,560 4 Setup/Ordering Cost £8.00 User input cells 5 Unit Cost £30.00 are shaded purple 6 Holding cost (two options) 7 (i) in £s per year £52.00 8 (ii) as % of unit cost 9 Shortage cost per unit per year £104.00 10 Unit holding cost per year = £52.00 11 (i) Answer: 12 Output Optimal order size, Qo 82.0 Optimal order quantity = 82 13 Maximum stock level 54.7 Back-order size = 27.3 (=28) 14 Back-order size 27.3 (Answer to part (ii) is given below) 15 No. of orders/year 177.6 16 Cycle time 0.3 weeks 17 Annual Costs……..…… 18 Setup/ordering cost £1,420.91 19 Holding cost £947.27 20 Shortage cost £473.64 21 Purchase cost £436,800 22 Total cost £439,642 23 24 Exercise 9.5, part (ii) - A service-level model for Bloggs Engineering 25 26 Input - in consistent time units User input cells are shaded purple 27 Time (day, week, month, year) week Demand is normally-distributed 28 Ordering/Setup Cost £8.00 Mean = 280 29 Unit Cost £30.00 Standard deviation = 60 30 Holding cost (two options) Service Level %, SL = 95% 31 (i) in £s per week £1.00 Lead Time, Lt = 2 week 32 (ii) as % of unit cost 33 Unit holding cost per week = £1.00 52 34 35 Output 36 Reorder level/point, R 700.0 Holding cost of safety stock £140 37 Order quantity, Q 66.9 Holding cost of normal stock £33 38 Safety stock 140.0 Ordering/setup costs £33 39 Total costs per week £207 40 (ii) Answer: Optimal order quantity, Q = 67 41 Reorder level, R = 700 K L M N O P Q 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 size = 27.3 (=28) 13 part (ii) is given 14below) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 . 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 A B C D E F G H I 1 Exercise 9.6 - A two-product inventory model for the Ajax Company 2 3 Widget Gadget 4 Input Annual demand 5000 4000 5 Ordering cost £120.0 £200.0 User input cells 6 Holding cost £15.0 £10.0 are shaded purple 7 Storage reqmnts. (m3) 1.50 1.00 8 Profit £25.0 £20.0 9 10 Widget Gadget Totals 11 EOQ 283 400 12 Average space requirements (m3) 212.1 200.0 412.1 13 Profit contribution £7,071 £8,000 £15,071 14 15 16 ********** Scaling Factor = 0.85 (Set initially to 1.0) ********** 17 18 Widget Gadget Total Storage 19 EOQ 240 340 Storage Constraint 20 Average space requirements (m3) 180.2 169.8 350.0 350.0 21 Profit contribution £6,005 £6,794 22 23 Objective: Maximize profits = £12,799 24 Increase in profit = £2,272 25 ANSWER 26 [1] Each order consists of 240 widgets and 340 gadets (cells E19:F19) to give a maximum 27 profit of £12,799 (cell H23). 28 [2] In order to FULLY meet annual demand, the Ajax Company would need storage space 29 of 412 m3 (see cell H12), which would increase its profit by £2,272 (see cell H24). 30 31 32 Solver Parameters 33 Set Target Cell: H23 34 Equal to: Max 35 By Changing Cells: E16 36 Subject to Constraints: H20 <= I20 = Storage space constraint J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ls E19:F19) to give a 26 maximum 27 pany would need storage28 space 29 by £2,272 (see cell H24). 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 A B C D E F G H I J 1 Exercise 9.7 - A periodic review model 2 3 User input cells are shaded purple 4 Input - in consistent time units Demand is normally-distributed 5 Time (day, week, month, year) week Mean = 200 6 Ordering/Setup Cost Standard deviation = 30 7 Unit Cost £300.00 Service Level %, SL = 98% 8 Holding cost (two options) Lead Time, Lt = 1 9 (i) in £s per week £2.00 Review Period = 0 10 (ii) as % of unit cost Stock On-hand = 0 11 Unit holding cost per week £2.00 52 12 Output 13 Reorder level/point, R 262.0 Holding cost of safety stock £124.00 14 Order quantity, Q 262.0 Holding cost of normal stock £262.00 15 Safety stock 62.0 Ordering/setup costs £0.00 16 Total costs pe week £386.00 17 18 ANSWER 19 (i) Optimal order quantity = 262 at a weekly total cost of £386 20 (ii) When the ordering cost is £100, weekly total cost is £462.34 21 (iii) For a lead-time of 2 weeks, the order quantity is 488 K L M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 week 9 week 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 A B C D E F G H 1 Exercise 9.8 - MeadowSweet Creameries: A probabilistic model with shortages 2 3 Input User input cells are shaded purple 4 Holding cost, H = £2.00 5 Shortage cost, B = £2.40 6 B/(B + H) = 0.55 7 8 Output <- Probabilities -> 9 Indiv. Sum 10 Demand, Di Pi SUMi 11 1 500 0.1 0.1 12 2 600 0.2 0.3 13 3 700 0.3 0.6 = Optimal amount 14 4 800 0.3 0.9 15 5 900 0.05 0.95 16 6 1000 0.05 1 17 18 Answer: 700 units I J probabilistic model with 1 shortages 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 A B C D E F G H 1 Exercise 9.9 - The Bedrock Company: A stockout model with shortages allowed 2 3 Input Annual Demand 7,500 4 Setup/Ordering Cost £50.00 5 Unit Cost £20.00 User input cells 6 Holding cost (two options) are shaded purple 7 (i) in £s per year £10.00 8 (ii) as % of unit cost 9 Shortage cost per unit per year £15.00 10 Unit holding cost per year = £10.00 11 12 Output Optimal order size, Qo 353.6 13 Maximum stock level 212.1 14 Back-order size 141.4 15 No. of orders/year 21.2 16 Cycle time 2.5 weeks 17 Annual Costs……..…… 18 Setup/ordering cost £1,060.66 19 Holding cost £636.40 20 Shortage cost £424.26 21 Purchase cost £150,000 22 Total cost £152,121 23 24 Answer: (i) 354 (ii) 2.5 weeks (iii) 212 I J K L M N O P Q 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 . 24 A B C D E F G H I J K 1 Exercise 9.10 - An MRP model for Micros Unlimited 2 3 The BOM Table User input cells are shaded purple 4 Part Number: Description BOM Id. No. of Lead On Planned 5 Level Code Units Time Hand Order 6 Microprocessor 0 1 1 1 60 Rel. Row 7 Monitor 1 1001 1 2 50 25 8 Keyboard 1 1002 1 1 100 25 9 CPU Assembly 1 1003 1 2 60 25 10 Motherboard 2 2001 1 1 100 55 11 Disk drive 2 2002 1 1 90 55 12 CD-ROM drive 2 2003 1 1 90 55 13 14 15 16 The MRP Output Table 17 1 18 Microprocessor Lead Time = 1 19 Week Number Overdue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 20 Master Production Schedule 0 40 80 90 80 0 0 0 21 Scheduled Receipts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 On Hand 60 60 20 0 0 0 0 0 23 Net Requirements 0 0 60 90 80 0 0 0 24 Planned Order Receipts 0 0 60 90 80 0 0 0 25 Planned Order Releases 0 0 60 90 80 0 0 0 0 26 27 2 28 Monitor Lead Time = 2 29 Week Number Overdue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 30 Gross Requirements 0 60 90 80 0 0 0 0 31 Scheduled Receipts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 On Hand 10 50 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Net Requirements 0 10 90 80 0 0 0 0 34 Planned Order Receipts 0 10 90 80 0 0 0 0 35 Planned Order Releases 10 90 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 37 3 38 Keyboard Lead Time = 1 39 Week Number Overdue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 40 Gross Requirements 0 60 90 80 0 0 0 0 41 Scheduled Receipts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 On Hand 100 100 40 0 0 0 0 0 43 Net Requirements 0 0 50 80 0 0 0 0 44 Planned Order Receipts 0 0 50 80 0 0 0 0 45 Planned Order Releases 0 0 50 80 0 0 0 0 0 46 A B C D E F G H I J K 47 4 48 CPU Assembly Lead Time = 2 49 Week Number Overdue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 50 Gross Requirements 0 60 90 80 0 0 0 0 51 Scheduled Receipts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 On Hand 60 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 Net Requirements 0 0 90 80 0 0 0 0 54 Planned Order Receipts 0 0 90 80 0 0 0 0 55 Planned Order Releases 0 90 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 57 5 58 Motherboard Lead Time = 1 59 Week Number Overdue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 60 Gross Requirements 90 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 Scheduled Receipts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 On Hand 100 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 Net Requirements 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 Planned Order Receipts 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 Planned Order Releases 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 67 6 68 Disk drive Lead Time = 1 69 Week Number Overdue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 70 Gross Requirements 90 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 Scheduled Receipts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 On Hand 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 Net Requirements 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 Planned Order Receipts 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 Planned Order Releases 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 77 7 78 CD-ROM drive Lead Time = 1 79 Week Number Overdue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80 Gross Requirements 90 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 Scheduled Receipts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 On Hand 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 Net Requirements 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 Planned Order Receipts 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 Planned Order Releases 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 Example 9.11 - A model for the part period balancing (PPB) method 2 3 Input Ordering (or Setup) Cost = £50 User input cells 4 Unit holding cost = £0.70 are shaded purple 5 Economic part period (EPP) = 71 6 7 <--------- Net requirements, REQP, for each period P -------------> 8 REQP 40 30 20 30 25 30 20 25 9 Period, P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 Weighted REQi 0 30 40 90 100 150 120 175 12 CUMi 0 30 70 160 260 410 530 705 13 (CUMi - EPP)/EPP -1.0 -0.6 0.0 1.3 2.7 4.8 6.5 8.9 14 0.0 1.0 0.6 0.0 1.3 2.7 4.8 6.5 8.9 15 Order Data = 40 30 20 16 0 Answer: Place an order for 90 units in period 1 17 New Factor, NFi 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 18 19 Weighted REQi -40 -30 -20 0 25 60 60 100 20 CUMi 0 0 0 0 25 85 145 245 21 (CUMi - EPP)/EPP -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -0.6 0.2 1.0 2.5 22 0.2 1.0 1.0 1.01.0 0.6 0.2 1.0 2.5 23 Order Data = 30 25 30 24 3 Answer: Place an order for 85 units in period 4 25 New Factor, NFi 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 26 27 Weighted REQi -40 -30 -20 -30 -25 -30 0 25 28 CUMi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 29 (CUMi - EPP)/EPP -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -0.6 30 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.6 31 Order Data = 20 25 32 6 Answer: Place an order for 45 units in period 7 33 New Factor, NFi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 35 36 Copy cell range B11:L17 repeatedly down the spreadsheet, placing the cursor in cells B19, 37 B27…. until the 'New Factor, NFi' row contains nothing but zeros (e.g. see row 33 above). 38 M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 the cursor in cells36 B19, g. see row 33 above). 37 38 A B C D E F G H I J K L M 1 Exercise 9.12 - A simulation model for the GreenFingers Garden Centre 2 3 Demand table Lead-time table 4 <-- Limits --> Dem- <-- Limits --> 5 Lower Upper and Pi Lower Upper weeks Pi 6 0 0.20 0 0.20 0 0.20 1 0.20 User input cells 7 0.20 0.35 1 0.15 0.20 0.80 2 0.60 are shaded purple 8 0.35 0.50 2 0.15 0.80 1.00 3 0.20 9 0.50 0.75 3 0.25 1.00 10 0.75 0.95 4 0.20 11 0.95 1.00 5 0.05 Reorder level = 5 12 1.00 Order quantity = 10 13 14 Output table 15 Units Begin. RAND Dem- Ending New Lost Lead Recpt. 16 Week Recvd. Invntry. No. and Invntry. Level sales Order? time week 17 1 10 0.34 1 9 9 0 No 18 2 0 9 0.23 1 8 8 0 No 19 3 0 8 0.34 1 7 7 0 No 20 4 0 7 0.98 5 2 2 0 Yes 1 6 21 5 0 2 0.68 3 0 9 1 No 22 6 10 9 0.91 4 5 5 0 Yes 1 8 23 7 0 5 0.61 3 2 12 0 No 24 8 10 12 0.46 2 10 10 0 No 25 9 0 10 0.20 0 10 10 0 No 26 10 0 10 0.01 0 10 10 0 No 27 11 0 10 0.03 0 10 10 0 No 28 12 0 10 0.79 4 6 6 0 No 29 13 0 6 0.05 0 6 6 0 No 30 14 0 6 0.65 3 3 3 0 Yes 2 17 31 15 0 3 0.82 4 0 9 1 No 32 16 0 -1 0.58 3 0 6 4 No 33 17 10 6 0.69 3 3 3 0 Yes 2 20 34 18 0 3 0.98 5 0 8 2 No 35 19 0 -2 0.87 4 0 4 6 Yes 2 22 36 20 10 4 0.68 3 1 11 0 No 37 49 92 14 5 38 Service Level = 71.4% 39 40 ANSWERS: 41 (i) Average weekly ending-inventory = 4.6 units/week 42 (ii) Lost sales over 20-week period = 14 43 (iii) Number of orders placed = 5 44 (iv) Service Level = 71.4% N O 1 Because of the 2 volatility of the 3 RAND function, 4 the values in 5 this model may 6 not be the same 7 as those in 8 the textbook 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44