Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
01T
ABSTRACT: Concretes containing both portland cement and fly ash Luftporengehaltverhrst beim weiterem Mischen. Obgleich der Luft-
were evaluated to determine the effect of ‘fly ash on air-void stability. porengehalt reduziert ist, werden der ~bstandsfaktor, die spezifische
Tests indicate that air contents of concrete containing Class C fly ash Oberflache und die Anz.ahl Luftporen wenig beeinflusst. Das “Schaum-
appear tobemore stablethan those of concrete containing Class F fly Anzeiger’’-Test wurde durchgefiihrt und als eine zufriedenstellende
ash. The higher the organic matter content of a fly ash, the higher will Methode befunden urn die Erfordernisse fiir Luftporenbildner zu
be the air-entraining admixture requirement for concrete in which the priifen.
admixture is used. The higher the air-entraining admixture requirement,
the greater is the air loss on extended mixing. Even though the air vol-
ume is reduced the spacing factor, specific surface, and number of voids
are little affected. The “Foam Index” test was conducted and found to R6UM~: Des b6tons contenant du ciment Portland et de la cendre
be a satisfactory method for checking air-entraining admixture require- volante ont &t&&valu6s afirr de d~terminer I’effet de la cendre volante sur
ments. ia stabilitt des brzlles d’air clans Ie Wton. Les tests indiquent que le
volume d’air des b6tons contenant de la cendre volante de Classe C
semble plus stable que celui clans Ies bixons contenant de la cendre
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG: Beton, die sowohl Portlandzement und volante de Classe F. Plus la teneur en mati~re organique de la cendre est
Flugasche enthalten, wurden untersucht, urn die Beeinflussung der importance, plus Ies besoins d’adjuvant entraineur d’air seront impor-
Fhrgasche auf die Luftporengehaltstabilitat zu bestimmerr. Versuche tant pour les b~tons clans Iesquels de tels adjuvants sent utilis+s. Plus
zeigen an, class der Luftporengehalt von Beton, der Flugasche der Ies besoins en adjuvant entraineur d’air sent tlev~s, plus la perte en air
Klasse C enthalt, stabiler zu sein scheint als derjenige von Beton mit est importance pour un m61ange rallongL Blen que le volume d’air soit
Flugasche der Klasse F. Je hoher der organische Stoffgehalt der Flug- r&duit, Ie facteur d’espacement. la surface sp~cifique et le nombre de
asche, desto mehr wird die Zugabe vom Luftporenbildner verlangt. Je bulles sent peu affectts. Le test d’Indite de Mousse a&t&realis~ et trouvt$
hoher der Bedorf zum Luftporenbildner gehah ist, desto grosser ist der satisfaisant pour v6rifier les besoins en adjuvant entraineur d“air.
Steven Gebler is a Senior Research Engineer at the Construction
Technology Laboratories, WA. He joined the Association in 1979
and his activities have been in various phases of concrete mate-
rials research. He k an ASME/ACI 359 Level III Concrete Inspec-
tor and a member of ACI Committees 212, 214, 308, 309, and 517.
INTRODUCTION
3
requirement of portland-cement concrete mixtures containing fly
ash. Data are presented comparing “Foam Index” test results and
air-entraining admixtun requirements for companion concretes.
MATERIALS
Cement
Coarse Aggregate
Air-Entraining Admixture
Fly Ashes
The fly ash concretes used in this study contain 388 PCY
(230 kg/m3) cement and 129 pcy (77 kg/m3) of fly ash. Relative
to the two control mixesl this fly ash concrete can be considered
as a 25% cement replacement concrete to be compared with the
517 pcy (307 kg\m3) control and as a partial replacement plus
admixture for comparison with the 474 pcy (281 kg/m3) control. In
the latter case, 86 pcy (51 kg/m3) of cement (17%) is replaced by
fly ash and 43 pcy (26 kg/m3) of fly ash (8%) is used as an
admixturei
Mixing Procedure
Air-Void Stability
Foam Index
7
The apparatus for the “Foam Index” test is shown in Fig. 1.
In this test, 50 ml of water are placed in a 16-02. wide mouth jar
having a height-to-diameter ratio of approximately 1.0. Then,
20 g of blended cementitious pwder, 16 g of cement and 4 g of fly
ash mixed by hand, are added to the water. The jar is capped and
vigorously shaken for 15 sec. A quantity of air-entraining admix-
ture is added and the jar is vigorously shaken for an additional
15 sec. Next, the jar is placed on its base for 45 sec. and the
lid is then removed. A visual determination of the stability of
the foam or bubbles is then made.
10
retained air content. The average correlation coefficient of
these regressions was 0.87. Total carbon content and loss on
ignition of the fly ash generally exhibited a lesser correlation
with plastic air content retention than did organic matter
content.
11
Generally, spacing factors (~) of concretes containing Class
F fly ash are greater than those concretes with Class C fly ash.
As the spacing factor (~) increases, the potential for freeze-thaw
resistance decreases. For concrete with Class F fly ash, most
linear traverse measurements showed voids per inch (n), specific
surface (a), and spacing factor (17) within the guidelines set by
ACI 345(19), Recommended Practice for Highway Bridge Deck Con-
struction and ACI 201(20), Guide to Durable Concrete.
12
carbon is considerably lighter than other constituents of fly ash.
Carbon has a specific gravity of approximately 2.0(21) whereas the
alumino-silica glassy phase of the fly ash has a specific gravity
of approximately 2.5(22). Therefore, it is not surprising that
fly ashes higher in carbon have lower specific gravities.
13
Regression analyses were conducted to relate several chemical
properties of the fly ashes to the “Foam Index” to determine
whether correlations existed. Organic matter content was the most
significant chemical property of the fly ash that affects the
“Foam Index.” The data presented in Tables 3 and 11 and Fig. 24
indicate that as organic matter content of the fly ash increase,
the “Foam Index” increases. These data indicate a significant
correlation at the 99% confidence level between organic matter
content of fly ash and “Foam Index.”
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
15
REFERENCES
16
13. Pavlovich, R., Fly Ash as a Partial Replacement for Portland
Cement for-Concrete and Soil Cement - Mixture Physical Prop-
erties, Wyoming Highway Department, 1979.
17
TABLE 1. Composition of Cements
Chemical Properties
CaO, % 63.76 62.66
Si02, % 21.24 20.29
Fine Aggregate
Coarse Aggregate
Grading, % retained
8ulk
on sieve size indicated 24-hour
specific
Source absorption,
gravity
% by weight
s.s.d.
Eau
Claire, Wis. o 50 100 2.66 1.40
I I
!
TABLE3. Chemical Composition of Fly Ash(a)
Total Total
ivai1able MOis- ;lassifi-
Fly ash Si02+ ilkalies
‘ree Loss Total (e !lkalies ture :ation of
identi- Si02 Mgo CaO rganic(d) la20(e) Zo
“2°3 ‘e203 ‘3 on con- of fly
fication “ 2°3+ Iimt(b) :arbon(c) matter Na$(e) ,sNa20(f
[gnition tent
Fe203 ash(g)
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
A 35.70 20.30 5.76 61.76 3.05 4.26 7.32 0.63 0.36 0.14 0.09 ;.5J 0.84 7.05 4.10 0.0: c
B !6.70 25.00 8.40 80.10 0.94 2.81 7.00 0.71 2.92 2.75 0.29 1.63 2.11 0.95 0.0: F
c 56.00 22.00 11.02 89.02 0.64 1.71 8.70 1.23 2.01 1.80 1.04 1:75 0.91 2.34 0.01 F
D 52.60 24.00 9.80 86.40 0.30 1.30 1.20 0.20 4.30 4.02 0.54 0.37 3.19 2.47 I:E 0.1[ F
E i7.70 23.40 86.54 :.:; 1.62 6.30 1.13 0.93 0.75 0.24 1.79 1.19 2.57 1.05 0.0( F
23.13 13.29 W 48.07 7.54 4.86 2.02 0.74 0.29 0.15 7.28 0.58 7.66 2.41 0.11
: 48.93 21.30 3.74 73.94 0:33 2.68 0.66 0.60 0.49 0.15 6.40 0.94 7.02 2.73 0.0[ :
H 51.40 24.50 13.86 89.76 0.87 0.95 R 0.86 1.83 1.20 0.21 0.49 2.24 1.96 0.31 0.0( F
31.10 17.00 5.60 53.70 4.77 3.79 9.00 ;.OJ 0.28 0.16 0.09 3.17 0.37 3.41 2.34 O.a c
: $6.10 20.10 16.96 83.16 1.36 1.33 5.10 . 4.86 4.19 0.62 0.53 2.23 2.00 0.65 O.1: F
Al1 numerical values in percentages and tests conducted in accordance with ASTMC 311-77 unless otherwise
Franke free 1ime test method.
Calculated f ran the determination of C02 by Leco Furnace Method.
organics by University of Maryland method for evaluating soils using sodium bichromate and sulfuric acid.
Percent total alkalies calculated as follows - Na20 + 0.658 K20, tested in accordance with ASTM C114.
Tested in accordance with ASTM C311-77 Section 18.
Class of fly ash established based on total lime content, i.e., fly ashes containing at least 10% CaO are considered Class C f1y ashes ● those
containing less than 10% are considered Class F fly ashes.
TABLE 4. Physical Properties of Fly Ash
Pozzolanic
etained
Fineness activity
on later require- ~crease of Classi-
ir perme-
Fly ash 0. 325 index(c) ~ent (d,f ) fication
::::J9) Reduction of of
identification 45 pm) ability
Mortar
(a) Lsfnent(’) .ime (%) mortar fly ash
;ieve (m2/kg) expansion
(%) ,psi) expansion
(%) at 14 days
at 14 days
I
to
TABLE5. Concrete
MixCharacteristics
ontrol Mixtures
(a) Test mixtures contained 75% cement and 25% fly ash hy weiqht of
cementitious material, based on 517 pcy cemen~itious- cent&t
mixture, or 82% cement and 18% fly ash by weight of cementitious
material based on 474 pcy cementitious content mixture.
(b) Fine aggregate to coarse aggregate ratio of test mixtures was
42.5:57.5 based on 517 FCy cementiti,ous content mixture or
43.3:56.7 based on 474 pcy cementitious content mixture.
(c) Based on 517 pcy cementitious content mixture; also based on
initial water-cement + fly ash ratio tkfore retempering.
(d) To convert from millilitres per pound to millilitres per kilogram,
multiplyby 2.205.
(e) To convert from inches to millimetres, multiply by 25.4.
(f) Fine aggregate to coarse aggregate ratio was 42.5:57.5.
(9) Fine aggregate to coarse aggregate ratio was 43.3:56.7.
22
TABLE 6. Concrete Air-Entraining Admixture Requirement
4 * (
Percent air-entraining
admixture relative to
Fly ash control plastic concrete
Based on Based on
Identification Class of 517 pcy cement 474 pcy cement
fly ash content control content control
A c 126 145
B F 209 239
c F 553 633
D F 239 273
E F 190 217
F c 173 198
G c 158 182
H F 170 195
I c 149 171
F 434 498
L-___L_
Identifi- :lass of
o(c)
cation ly ash 30 60 90
Control Mixtures
517 pcy 4.0 6.6 6.0 5.6 5.3
474 pcy 3.4 5.2 4.6 4.4 4.2
23
TABLE 8. RetainedPlasticAir Content
A c 83 83 80
B F 77 64 58
c F 67 54 41
D F 82 64 62
E F 82 77 68
F c 96 93 94
G c 87 82 76
H F 91 86 87
I c 98 98 103
J F 76 69 61
I Control Mixtures
517 pcy 91 85 80
474 pcy 88 85 81
24
TASLE 9. Characteristics of Air Content in Concretes(a)
25
TASLE 9. Characteristics of Air Content in Concretes(a)
(continued)
k
60 6.5 5.80 11.98 826 0.005
90 6.6 6.70 13.78 823 0.004
(continued)
Control Mixtures
27
TABLE 10. Air Contents Retained in Hardened Concrete
A c 122 81 73
B F 100 100 75
c F 78 26 41
D F 79 48 43
E F 71 58
F c 95 109 1;;
G c 73 65 71
I-1 F 98 78 91
I c 108 96 93
J F 84 72 88
Control Mixtures
517 pcy 101 116 116
474 pcy 94 111 108
28
TABLE 11. Foam Index
Foam Index
A 0.09 100
B 0.12 133
c 0.33 367
D 0.19 211
E 0.19 211
F 0.10 111
G 0.15 167
H 0.13 144
I 0.11 122
J 0.24 267
ControlMixture
Control(b) 0.09 100
29
30
600 -
500 –
400 -
300 -,
Legend
A
&
I00 I
o 0.2 0.4 1.2
31
100 I
90
H
D
J
B
‘“\ ‘\ .
\ c
40
~
o 30 60 90
-I
/“
/-
-— -—-— -
--~-- —--—--— F
I I J
30 60 90
32
110
I 00
90
80
70
60
50
Correlation
COeltlclent.O.79
40
1
L
1 I 1 I 1
o 600
100 200 300 400 500
100
tA
L?!?@
0 Class F Fly Ash
90 -
A Class C Fly Ash
80 -
70 -
00
60 -
50
110-
A
lea
90 -
.!4!2!
O Class
F Fly Ash
A CIOU C Fly Ash
80 -A
A
m -
0
0
60 -
0
m -
0
40 C0rr910t 10. Coefficient .0.83
~
1 I 1 I !
0 EOo 6CQ
100 200 300 400
33
100 ~ Cmrelot,.n Crmfflcient.
0,63
t A
90 -
A
A
0
80 -
0
70 -
60 -
Legmd
50 - 0 Cl,lss
F FlyAsh
A ClassC FlyAsh
40
1 I ! 1 I J
0 02 04 0,6 0.8 I,0 1,2
‘O,q.nlc
Content1“Fly Ash, Percent
Fig. 9 - Relati.nehipbetween .rg?,nics in fly a.h and retention
of air content in pla.ti. concreteat 30 minute..
100
rAA
90 -
Legend
A
0 ClossF FlyAsh
80 - A CIOSSC FlyAsh
0
70 -
0 0
60 -
30 -
Correl.tio.
C.elflclenf
S0,07
T
~L.————J 1 I 1 1
0 0.2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1.2
110
A
103
90
Leqe.d
80 A
A 0 ClassF FlyAsh
A Cl.,,C FlyAsh
70
0
60
0
50
40 CorrdolionCOatficlent
.0,08
1 1 1 [ 1 I
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0.6 I ,0 I ,2
——517PCY
Control
,<..,.,..
110
‘“’ . . . . . 474pcy
... Control
..’
I 00 ——.. — .
.“
\
90 ‘h\
‘\/ :
BO \, ‘\ /
v
B
‘b \,\
%
,1
70
\
‘;~
60
+---.— E
\
,, \
50 \
$ L
‘-%
-+ o
40 \ ,.. c
‘!
,/
3@ ‘\,”/”
20
~.
o
F
I 20
517 pcy
Cent rol
I 10 474 PCy
Control
IOQ
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
;
I I I
o 30 60 90
A
100
0“
Lw!!!
40 O Class F Fly Ash
A Claua C Fly Ash
20
0 1 I 1 1 I
2, 2.20 2.40 2,60 2.00 3,00
140
I 20
Iw o
80 0
A
60
o
40
.Q@
O Cba,s F Fly Ash
o A Clots C Fly A$h
20
0
2.( 2.20 2,40 2.60 2,20 3SQ
SP#dflC Grovity of Fly Ash
140-
COrdOllOn
COWlclenl. 0.82
120 - A
100
0
0
80 -
60 -
Legend
40 - 0 Class F Fly Ash
A CIOSS C Fly Ash
20
t
I I 1 I 1 I
:.00 2.20 2,40 2.60 2,80 3.00
SP4CIIIC
G<a”lty
ofFly Ash
Fiy. 16 - Relationshipbetween Ep3.ific gravity Of fly .eh and retained
air CO”tent i“ hardened co”.rete east ., 90 minute,,
Legend
;
&
o~2
Organic Co”tM InFly Ash, Percent
I40
1?,0 LOgend
0 class F fly Ash
A A Class C Fly Ash
!00 0
A
80 A
> \ 0
i
60
‘o\
40
:
20 Coffelofion COefllciant. O.82
1 1 1 I I I
0 0.2 0.4 0,6 0.6 I,0 1.2
O,qanic
Cont..*
1.Fly ASII, Pe,cent
140
I 20
A Legend
0 Clm% F Fly Ash
A Clou C fly Ash
100
A
0
80
‘A
60
0
0
40
20 Cor,elollo” coefficle”t=O.65
I 1 1 ! I I
o 0,2 0.4 0,6 0.8 I ,0 1.2
rig. 19 - R.lati.n.
hip betwe.” Organic. i. fly ..h and r.tainti
air content in hard.nti concrete.a.t at 90 mi”ut.a.
37
140
A
I 20
100
8
b
I
0
eo 00
0
60 f
Mw!J!2
0 Class
F Fly A,h
40 - b Class C Fly Ash
20 - C.arrdl.d!m
C.WlciOnl,
0,76
I 1 I k I
o 2,0 4.0 6,0 8.0 loo
S03 In Fly &sh, F’wc.”1
140
100 0
80
0
A
60
Legend
0
20
1 1 1 I I
0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Fig. 21 - R.lati.n.
hip I,t,
kw.en S03 i. fly ash and retazne’1
air content in hardened concrete cast at 60 min.L$s.
120 A
100-
0
0
eo -
0
A
L8q0”d
20 Correlotlo”
CO*lflclenl .0,79
1
, 1 1 t 1
0 4,0 6,0 6,0 10.0
SO,i“Fly Ash, P@rca”t
0 /
Correlation Coefficient = 0.93
0 Legend
1 I I
) 200 300 400
39
400
Correlation Caefficient=O.94 o
300
0 Legend
200
O Class F Fly Ash
A Class C Fly Ash
A
A
100 I
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 I .0 I .2
,------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- I
i I
I KEYWORDS: admixtures, air content, airentrahinga dmixtures,a irentrain- I
I I
I ment, concrete, fly ash, Foam Index, fresh concretes, hardened concretes, mineral I
I admixtures, pozzolans. I
I I
ABSTRACT Concretes containing bothportland cement and flyashwereevalu- ~
atedtodetermine theeffect of flyashon air-void stability. Tests indicate that air I
contents of concrete containing Class C fly ash appear to be more stable than those I
I
ofconcrete containing ClzNs Ffly ash. Thehigher theorganic matter content ofa I
flyash, thehigher will betheair*ntraining admixture requirement forconcretein j
which the admixture is used. The higher the air-entraining admixture requirement, I
I
thegreater istheair loss unextended mixing. Even though theairvolumeisre-
ducedthe spacing factor, specific surface, andnumber ofvoids arelittle affected. :,
The “Foam Index” test was conducted and found to be a satisfactory method for ~
checking air-entraining admixture requirements. I
I
REFERENCE: Gebler, S. H., and Klieger, P., Effect of Fly Ash on the Air- Void 1
Stability of Concrete (RD085.OIT), Portland Cement Association, 1983. Preprint I
of Proceedings, presented at the First International Conference on The Use of Fly ~
Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Other Mineral By-Products in Concrete, Montebello, :
Quebec, Canada, July-August 1983 (American Concrete Institute publication ,
i SP-79). I
I I
I
------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- --------
40
This publicati n ;S based on the facts, tests, and authorities stated herein. It is
intended for th$! use of professional personnel competent to evaluate the signifi-
cance and limitations of the reported findings and who will accept responsibility
for the application of the material it contains. The Portland Cement Association
disclaims any and all responsibility for application of the stated principles or for
the accuracy of any of the sources other than work performed or information
developed by the Association.
Printed in U.S.A.
5420 old orchard Road, Skokie, Illinois 60077 RD085.OIT