Sie sind auf Seite 1von 76

Measuring Digital and DOCSIS

Performance
Randy Francis
JDSU
Today’s Agenda

 Definitions / Background
− Digital Signals / QAM
− DOCSIS 1, 1.1, 2.0. 3.0 (Data Over Cable Service Interface Spec.)
− VoIP

 Digital Testing/Troubleshooting
– MER, BER, QAM Ingress, Equalizer Stress,
– C/N vs. BER vs. MER
– Constellations / Symbols and Digital Bits, Phase Noise

 DOCSIS & IP Testing


– Packet Loss, Throughput

 VoIP Testing
– Voice Quality Measurements, E-Model, Delay, Packet Loss, Jitter
– VoIPCheck Testing, PacketCable Testing

 Return Path
– Why monitor it?
– RF Trending Results
– Ingress & Leakage

 Q and A

 Quiz Time

2 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Acronyms & Terms

 QAM - Quadrature Amplitude Modulation


 Symbols - Collection of Bits
 Symbol Rate - Transmission Speed
 I&Q - Components of QAM data
 Constellation - Graph of QAM Data
 MER - Modulation Error Ratio
 BER - Bit Error Rate
 FEC - Forward Error Correction

3 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
A Typical Home Installation

a typical home installation

TAP
House
TV

Drop Cable
GROUND
High Pass Filter TV
BLOCK
3-Way
2-Way Splitter
Splitter

TV

CABLE
MODEM

4 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Why Go Digital?

 Efficiency
– Source signals are digital
• Standard and High Definition TV (SDTV, HDTV)
– High Speed Data and Digital Video is more efficient than analog
• Transmit equivalent of 6 to 10 analog channels (VCR quality) over
one 6 MHz bandwidth

 Quality
– Better Picture and Sound Quality
– Less Susceptible to noise
• Error detection and correction is possible

 Flexibility
– Data easily multiplexed into digital signal
– Higher Data Security

5 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
What is Digital?

 Source and Destination is digital data


– Assign unique patterns of 1’s and 0’s
 Transmission path is via an analog carrier
– Choice of modulation is the one that optimizes
bandwidth (data versus frequency ‘space’) and resiliency
to noise

00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11

Generate Digital Receive Digital

Transmit Analog

6 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
The Carrier, by the way, is ANALOG Modulation

Analog Content –
Analog Carrier

Digital Content –
Analog Carrier

7 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Some good news…and some bad news

 Good  Bad
– Digital TV, DOCSIS, Digital – Each service has different
Voice all use SAME type of threshold of impairments
RF Modulation – QAM – What is noticeable in Digital
– Same measurements apply voice may not be perceptible
– Signal level, Modulation Error in DOCSIS, what is
Ratio, Bit Error Rate, in-band bothersome in DOCSIS is
frequency response, are all different than digital video.
similar, if not identical.

8 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
QAM and CATV

 16 QAM is part of the DOCSIS® 1.0/1.1 upstream


specifications
 64 QAM and 256 QAM is used for both digital video and
DOCSIS downstream, allowing more digital data
transmission using the same 6 MHz bandwidth
– Transmit equivalent of 6 to 10 analog channels (VCR quality) over
one 6 MHz bandwidth
 DOCSIS is the Standard for data over Cable
– Cable systems provide higher signal to noise ratios than over-the-
air transmission. A well designed and maintained cable plant meets
these QAM signal to noise requirements.

9 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
QAM Data Capacity (Annex B)

16 QAM 64 QAM 256 QAM


(Upstream) (Downstream) (Downstream) QAM 256 allows
~ 2 more channels
vs. QAM 64

Symbol 2.560 5.0569 5.3605


Rate (Msps) (@ 3.20 MHz)
(@ 6 MHz) (@ 6 MHz)

No Real Cost
Bits per 4 6 8 Advantages

symbol

Channel 10.24 30.3417 42.8843


Data Rate
Why not go all QAM
(Mbps) 256?

Actual 9.0 26.9704 38.8107


Information
bit rate
(Mbps)
Overhead 12.11% 11.11% 9.5%

10 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
DOCSIS®
What is it?
What differs among versions?
DOCSIS Defined?

 DOCSIS Definition
– CableLabs® Certified Cable Modem Project
• Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification
– Not required but highly adhered to standard – allows interoperability

 Data over a digital QAM signal


– Digital signal
• Downstream usually 64 or 256 QAM
• Upstream usually QPSK or 16 QAM
– Uses Data Packets
• Information broken into chunks
– Asymmetrical communication
• More Info Downstream
• Less Info Upstream
Digital “haystack”

12 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
DOCSIS® Versions at a Glance
DOCSIS 1.0 (High Speed Internet Access)
–23 million products shipped worldwide as of YE2002
–228 CM Certified, 29 CMTS Qualified
DOCSIS 1.1 (Voice, Gaming, Streaming)
–Interoperable and backwards-compatible with DOCSIS 1.0
–“Quality of Service” and dynamic services, a MUST for PacketCable™
–In the field NOW - 64 CM Certified, 22 CMTS Qualified
DOCSIS 2.0 (Capacity for Symmetric Services)
–Interoperable and backwards compatible with DOCSIS 1.x
–More upstream capacity than DOCSIS 1.0 (x6) & DOCSIS 1.1 (x3)
–Improved robustness against interference (A-TDMA and S-CDMA)
–Available NOW – Number of CM & CMTS Qualified growing
DOCSIS 3.0 (Channel Bonding)
–Interoperable and backwards compatible with DOCSIS 1.x & 2.0
–Specification released earlier this month – Devices not yet available
Good Resource Site: www.cablelabs.org

13 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
DOCSIS 1.1 Overview
 Interoperable with DOCSIS 1.0, plus more…
 Enhanced “Quality of Service” (QoS)
– Guarantees and/or limits for data rates
• (ex. Gold, Silver service levels)
– Guarantees for latency
 Improved security - designed to reduce possibility of “theft of
service, provide secure software downloading.” – BPI+
(Baseline Privacy Plus)
 Interoperability - DOCSIS 1.0 and DOCSIS 1.1 cable
modems and CMTSs on the same plant. Better operation and
OSS features
 Transmit Equalization - more robust transmission
 Max Modulation
– 256 QAM Downstream (~40Mbps)
– 16 QAM Upstream @ 3.2MHz (~10Mbps)

14 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
DOCSIS 2.0 Overview – Key Upstream Advances
 Symmetrical services are enabled by DOCSIS 2.0
– 1.5x greater efficiency
• operates at 64 QAM
– 2x wider channels
• new 6.4 MHz wide channel
 3x better upstream performance than V1.1
 6x better upstream performance than V1.0
 DOCSIS 2.0 widens the pipe for IP traffic, allowing cable providers to
create more and better services for voice, video, and data
– It does this by using enhanced modulation and improved error correction
 Superior ingress and impulse noise performance
 100% backward compatible with DOCSIS 1.0/1.1

15 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
DOCSIS 3.0 Overview
 Specification late last year
– DOCSIS 3.0 Interface Specifications (Released December 2006)
– CPE equipment in development stages
 Downstream data rates of 160 Mbps or higher
– Channel Bonding 256QAM => ~40Mbps
– 4 or more channels
4 x 256QAM => ~160 Mbps
 Upstream data rates of 120 Mbps or higher
– Channel Bonding 64QAM => ~30Mbps
– 4 or more channels
4 x 64QAM => ~120 Mbps
 Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)
– Current System (IPv4) is limited to 4.3B numbers
– IPv6 greatly expands the number of IP addresses
• Expands IP address size from 32 bits to 128 bits
• IPv6 supports 3.4×1038 addresses; 4923:2A1C:0DB8:04F3:AEB5:96F0:E08C:FFEC
• Colon-Hexadecimal Format
 100% backward compatible with DOCSIS 1.0/1.1/2.0
16 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
DOCSIS 3.0 – Channel Bonding

Individual QAM 256 DOCSIS channel


Versions 1.0/1.1/2.0 used only one channel for
upstream and one channel for downstream
communications

256QAM => ~40Mbps

4 Bonded QAM 256 DOCSIS channels


DOCSIS v3.0 Spec requires devices to be able to bond a
minimum of 4 upstream channels into one and 4 downstream
channels into one for 4 times increased throughput in both
directions
The MSO does not have to use all 4 channels, but the devices
which are 3.0 compliant must have the ability to bond 4 or
more channels in both directions

4 x 256QAM:
4 x 40Mbps = 160 Mbps

17 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Digital Testing and
Troubleshooting
How?
What does it mean?
QAM Digital Measurements

 Spectrum & Digital Average Power Level


 MER QAM
 Pre/Post FEC BER
 Constellation Display

 Advanced Tests
– QAM Ingress Under The Carrier
– Group Delay
– In-Channel Frequency Response
– Equalizer Stress (Adaptive Equalization)

19 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
QAM Digital Measurements

 Measuring the quality of QAM digital carriers


is significantly different than measuring
analog carriers.
 Measurement of digital carriers is important
to determine how close the carrier is to failing
(how much margin) since there may be no
quality degradation.

20 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Digital Average Power Level Measurements

Digital Average Power Measurements


and Measurement Bandwidth
 The spectrum analyzer view is an
excellent tool to see discreet RF-
carriers.
– Caution is needed when viewing digital
modulated signals (haystack). The
signal’s level measurement is derived
from the selected measurement
bandwidth (resolution bandwidth). At an
RBW of 300 kHz, a 64QAM - 6 MHz
wide digital signal reads in the spectrum
analyzer trace 3 dB too low.
 The Average Power principle takes
small slices from the integrated RF- Analog and digital (broadcast) QAM signal.
energy, summing them together to one The recommended delta in level should be
total power reading in the LEVEL-mode. 6 to 10 dB.

21 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Measuring the Digital “Haystack”
Non measured area
Digital carrier under based on 280 kHz step
test (6 MHz BW) size within 6 MHz total
Bandwidth

IF Measurement
Bandwidth =
280 kHz

Summing slices of the total integrated energy

0
-2.5 MHz Frequency +2.5 MHz
+/- 140 kHz

22 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Measuring the Digital “Haystack”

Measuring the Peak Measuring the Average


Level of the Digital Level of the Digital
Haystack Haystack

280 kHz 6 MHz


Bandwidth power Bandwidth power
23 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Digital – more than just dB’s

MER and Pre and Post BER measurements are


key to insuring Digital Quality

24 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Modulation Error Ratio (MER)

 Analogous to S/N
 A measure of how symbols (I vs. Q) are
actually placed, compared to ideal placement

 MER(dB) = 20 x log RMS error magnitude


average symbol magnitude
 Good MER
– 64 QAM: 28 dB MER
Average
– 256 QAM: 32 dB MER symbol
magnitude
RMS error
magnitude

25 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
More MER

 Modulation Error Ratio (MER) in digital systems is


similar to S/N or C/N used in analog systems
 MER determines how much margin the system has
before failure
– Analog systems that have a poor C/N show up as a
“snowy” picture
– A poor MER is not noticeable on the picture right up to
the point of system failure - “Cliff Effect”
 Can’t use the TV as a piece of test equipment
anymore

26 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Digital TV Waterfall Graph

Picture Quality Vs. Impairments

Good
Until it
Much Better Still Great
Crashes
Picture Quality ==>

Good
Digital
Analog
Beginning to get
Customer
Complaints

Customer
Rebellion

Increasing Impairments ==>

27 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
C/N vs. BER vs. MER

No FEC

28 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Lets have some MER review…

 “MER” is to Digital, what signal


to noise is for analog Some Guidelines for MER
 MER is affected by high noise,
low signal –64 QAM - 28dB or better
 Also ANY other continuous –256 QAM - 32dB or better
impairments
 MER readings are relatively Try to add at least 3db to above
immune to “brief bursty” figures to allow headroom.
interference
 MER is a predictor of BER

29 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Bit Error Rate (BER)

 Bit errors result when the receiver interprets


the wrong symbol and hence the wrong bits
 The number of bit errors versus the number
of bits transmitted is Bit Error Rate (BER)
 The more bits that are incorrect, the more
the signal will be affected
 Good signal: BER 10-10 (1.0 E-9)
 Threshold for visible degradation: BER 1E-6
– One error in every 1,000,000 bits

30 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
More on BER

 “BER” is HOW many  Some amount of errors


errors per HOW many bits can be corrected by
of data digital receivers. (PRE
 BER is affected by bursty errors)
interference  POST errors are
 Also, any other uncorrected errors –
impairments will always unacceptable!!!
adversely affect BER  Measurement reads in
scientific notation
 1.0 E-9 is the best on a
handheld test meter

31 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Pre and Post FEC BER

 Number of bad bits for every good bit.


 Forward Error Correction when working
will output >10-11
– 1 error in 100 billion bits
– 1 error every 42 minutes
– MPEG-2 likes good BER
 FEC will work to about 10-4
– 1 error in 10,000 bits
– 1 error every 276 uses
QAM256  42Mb/s
 FEC can correct BER from 1-E-4 to 1E-9
 FEC causes Cliff Effect

32 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
BER Example

 A 256QAM channel transmits at a symbol rate of 5M


symbols per second
 Bit rate = 8 bits per symbol X 5M symbol per second
=40M bits per second
 Error Incident = Bit rate X BER = Errors Per Second

BER Error Frequency Error Incident


10-12 1 in 1 Trillion bits 25000 secs between errs (6.94 hrs)
10-11 1 in 100 Billion bits 2500 secs between errs (41.67 mins)
10-10 1 in 10 Billion bits 250 secs between errs (4.167 mins)
10-9 1 in 1 Billion bits 25 seconds between errors
10-8 1 in 100 Million bits 2.5 seconds between errors
10-7 1 in 10 Million bits 4 errors per second
10-6 1 in 1 Million bits 40 errors per second
10-5 1 in 100 Thousand bits 400 errors per second
10-4 1 in 10 Thousand Bits 4000 errors per second
10-3 1 in 1 Thousand bits 40000 errors per second

33 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
What Causes MER and BER to degrade? “ Noise”

 The most common problem with digital-TV


and cable modem services is interference
under the digital carriers and Noise(stated by
most larger operators with experience in digital
transmission services).
 Most common sources are:
– Ingress due to off-air UHF TV channels
– Intermittent ingress due to pager transmitters
or two-way radio base stations.
– Cracked or broken cables
– CSO/CTB-intermodulation –
• due to unterminated TAPs or impedance mismatch
– Laser Clipping
34 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
QAM Constellations

35 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Constellations, Symbols and Digital Bits

 Each “dot” on constellation represents a unique symbol


 Each unique symbol represents unique digital bits
 Digital data is parsed into data lengths that encode the symbol
waveform

Q
1011 1001 0010 0011

1010 1000 0000 0001


I
1101 1100 0100 0110

1111 1110 0101 0111

16 QAM
36 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Constellation: headend or field problem ?
 Constellation is an ideal tool to find QAM modulator
problems.
 Modulator issues in the headend or noise and
interference (ingress, CTB, CSO, etc.) in the field?
 It’s possible to see interference in the constellation
diagram if interference is very severe, however, one can’t
Constellation diagram
distinguish noise from micro-reflection problems. showing severe ingress

 Much better alternatives to find ingress, noise and micro-


reflection problems is an in-service spectrum analyzer
view and equalization stress characteristic.

37 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Constellation Display
 This is a visual representation of the I and Q constellation
plots on a 16 QAM carrier

38 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
64 QAM and 256 QAM

 64 QAM has 8 levels of I and 8 levels of Q making 64


possible locations for the carrier.
 256 QAM has 16 levels of I and 16 levels of Q making
256 possible locations for the carrier.
 QAM 256 is somewhat less robust vs. QAM 64
8 Levels of I 16 Levels of I
Channel Channel

16 Levels of Q
8 Levels of Q
Channel

Channel
39 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Effects of Noise and Interference

 Noise and Interference moves the carrier


away from its ideal location causing a
spreading of the cluster of dots.

Ideal
Locations

40 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Decision Boundaries

 Data that falls outside the decision boundaries will be


assumed to be the adjacent data.
Data Received
Correctly
Q

Decision Error
Boundary
41 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Constellation

 Typical errors which originate from the headend:


– Phase Noise
• The constellation appears to be rotating at the extremes
while the middle ones remain centered in the decision boundaries.
Phase Noise is caused by headend converters.

– Gain Compression
• The outer dots on the constellation are pulled into the center
while the middle ones remain centered in the decision
boundaries. Gain Compression is caused by filters,
IF equalizers, converters, and amplifiers.

– I Q Imbalance
• The constellation is taller than it is wide. This is a difference
between the gain of the I and Q channels. I Q Imbalance is
caused by baseband amplifiers, filters, or the digital modulator.

– Carrier Leakage

42 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
System Noise and/or Leakage Issues
 A constellation displaying significant noise
 Dots are spread out indicating high noise and most likely
significant errors
– An error occurs when a dot is plotted across a boundary and is
placed in the wrong location
 Meter will not lock if too much noise present

Dots are
spread out
showing error

43 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Phase Noise
 Display appears to rotate at the extremes
 HE down/up converters can cause phase noise
 Random phase errors cause decreased
transmission margin
 Caused by transmitter symbol clock jitter

Rotation Rotation

Constellation with Phase Noise Zoomed Constellation with Phase Noise

Key Cause: Converter within the HE (garbage in produces garbage out)

44 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Gain Compression

 If the outer dots are pulled into the center while


the middle ones are not affected, the signal has
gain compression
 Gain compression can be caused by IF and RF
amplifiers and filters, up/down converters and IF
equalizers
– May be caused by line amps or laser clipping
– Not a customer issue – maintenance techs issue

Outer edges
pulled in

45 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Coherent Interference

 If the accumulation looks like a “donut”, the


problem is coherent interference
– CTB, CSO, Off-Air Carriers (ingress)
 Sometimes only a couple dots will be misplaced
– This is usually laser clipping or sweep interference

Circular
“donuts”

46 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
DOCSIS & IP Testing
What is important?
What can be done?
DOCSIS® Testing - Levels

Verify proper receive level at cable modem Pass/Fail


Should be seeing: 0dBmV Indicator:

Downstream
MER shows that Information
downstream is Frequency,
clean and clear Modulation type,
with margin Channel

Upstream
BER shows Frequency,
that Modulation type,
downstream Channel BW,
is clean and DOCSIS version
clear of
impulse
noise Shows that upstream is properly
aligned and CMTS has “ideal”
receive level with margin to spare.
Recommend: (35dBmV – 45dBmV)
48 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
DOCSIS – Packet Loss Testing

Check Packet
Loss and Overall loop
determine if information,
upstream is Up+Downstreams
good

View Downstream performance Upstream Signal


to Noise Ratio

49 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
DOCSIS – Throughput Testing

Check Throughput for proper speeds

Config.
File

Ensure customer can get what they pay for

50 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Correlate Data & Voice with RF

Compare Node Outages with your Return Path performance history to


QUICKLY identify the cause of the problem – RF or Data layer!

HSD Node Outage Report Courtesy of Auspice Corporation

51 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
VoIP Testing
Why is it important?
What can be done?
VoIP – Bullet Train Analogy

 Ideal World:
– Packets like train Cars through a station – 1 at a time,
evenly spaced, and Fast
• Bullet Train…
• Cold & Refreshing…

53 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
VoIP – Train Analogy

 Real World
– VoIP Packets don’t always do what you want…
• Multiple railcars taking different directions, uneven spacing
• Missing railcars… all = TRAIN WRECK!

54 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Voice Quality - Measures

 Models to Answer: “Does it ‘Sound Good’?”


– International Telecommunications Union (ITU) has
multiple models
• Subjective (Opinion of users)
– Mean Opinion Score (MOS)
» Defacto standard ‘score’
» “Judged” summary of call quality
» In-service test, can be used on live network
» Algorithms have replaced but mimic opinionated scores

• Objective (Not an opinion)


– Perceptual Analysis/Measurement System (PAMS) and
Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ)
» Not based on network issues: Packet loss, Jitter and Delay
» Do not factor in end-to-end delay
» Require HW probes
» (Not used for in-service testing)
– E-Model, R-Value
» Addresses all issues with PAMS and PESQ particularly as it places
focus on Packet loss, Jitter, and Delay

55 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Voice Quality - E-Model

 E-Model  R-Value
– Most complete, objective test

R = Ro + A – Ls – Ld – Le
• Ro: Basic SNR or circuits – handsets, environment
• A: Advantage Factor – GSM poor service, example.
• Ls: Simultaneous impairment factor – loudness/volume,
hissing, sidetone, quantization distortion
• Ld: Talker/listener echo, Overall Delay
• Le: Equipment impairment factor – Packet loss, Jitter

Things you will take action on!

56 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Delay, Packet Loss and Jitter- What is it?
 Delay
X-Time
X-Time

D C B A Network

Point A Point B
– Time it takes a packet to ‘transverse’ the network
• Point A to Point B
– Time it takes is shown here as ‘X’
– Too much delay affects the quality of a call
• See this on PSTN with international calls (Over-talk)
• Echo (More delay = more potential echo)
– Usually an architecture (traffic/capacity) issue
• Longer distances and more routers add delay
• Too many calls/downloads add delay (slows routers)
• Generally not a HFC issue with equipment such as amplifiers
57 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Delay, Packet Loss and Jitter- What is it?

 Packet Loss ∞ -Time


X-Time

D C B A Network

Point A Point B
– Packet did not arrive (Point B) or out of sequence
• VoIP telephony is different than data
– If it was out of order, computer reorders for data
– If lost, just retransmit data

– Shown here as infinite time – did not show up


– Worse if it is ‘bursty’, many lost in a row – “lossy”
– Can be architecture or physical layer
• Ingress (especially upstream)
• Routers over capacity (too full to hold any more)
58 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Delay, Packet Loss and Jitter- What is it?

 Jitter
X-Time

D C B A D
A
B
C
Network

Point A Point B
Slower than X Slower than X
Faster than X

– Packets not arriving at the same time (different from X-


Time) – time between packets is different
• Different than data
– You never notice with Data, doesn’t matter how the information arrives, just care
that it shows up
– VoIP is Real-Time

• Key Causes
– IP based equipment having packet routing issues

59 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Packet Knowledge

D C B A

Point A Point B
FULL

60 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jitter – A problem?

 Creates two problems


– Direct speech quality
• Part is FF, part is normal, part is ‘Slow’
– Could result in Packet Loss
• Walk on top of packets if some are slow and consecutive ones are fast.

D CB A
X-Time
Faster than X
Slower than X Slower than X

– Could be capacity, physical or core architecture


• Routers spitting out packets at varying intervals
• Packets take different routes to destination

61 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jitter – Solution?

 Jitter Buffer
– Add a place to store the data, and ‘spit’ it out at a constant
rate
• If packets come in fast – slow them down
• Packets are slow – OK, we have added time to allow for this

Jitter Buffer

D CB A D C B A
Point B X-Time Y-Delay
Slower than X Slower than X
Faster than X

• Very similar to Windows


Media Player
Buffer bar

62 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jitter Buffer – Problem Solved?

 Yes and No
– We have taken care of jitter (that isn’t extreme), but have
added delay: Y (buffer size)
• If packets come in fast – slow them down
• Packets are slow – OK, we have added time to allow for this

X-Time

X-Time Y-Delay
D C B A D C B A

Just Right
 Dynamic Jitter Buffer D C B A
 Self adjusting buffer, based on
system conditions which optimizes the
jitter buffer

63 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jitter Buffer – Tradeoffs

 Too large
– Too much delay

 Too small
– Have jitter
– Have packet loss

 Just Right
– Dynamic Jitter Buffer
• Can set this option so the system will monitor and optimize the jitter
buffer

64 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
VoIPCheck™ over DOCSIS®

 HFC Performance
– Packet Statistics
• Packet loss
• Delay
• Jitter
– VoIP Quality
• MOS
• R-Value
– Test Result Totals
• Current
• Min
• Max
• Average

65 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
VoIPCheck™ over DOCSIS®

 Segment HFC and IP


impairments

 Quick quality (MOS)


verification of VoIP over
DOCSIS® channel

 Good to check VoIP


packet statistics

66 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
VoIP Testing Based on CableLabs™
PacketCable™ Standard

Place and test the Quality


of a PacketCable®
Based VoIP Call to
validate In-Service
performance

Measure Performance
Statistics
– Packet Loss
– Total “End to End” Delay (ms)
– Jitter
– MOS & R-Value

67 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Segmented Error Budgets

Test Critaria Measurement Goal Start Seeing


Degradation on Call
Quality
Delay (1-way) < 100 ms > 150 ms
Jitter < 10 ms > 15 ms
Service Level Test Packet Loss < 1% > 2%
R-Value > 70 < 58
MOS > 3.6 <3
MER 30dB(64), 33dB (256) 25dB(64), 28dB(256)
RF PRE-FEC BER 1.00E-09 1.00E-07
At Home Rx - Level -5~+5 dBmV <-10dBmV or >+10dBmV
Tx - Level 35 ~45 dBmV < 30dBmV or >50dBmV
MER 32dB(64), 35dB (256) 28 dB(64), 31dB(256)
RF PRE-FEC BER 1.00E-09 1.00E-07
At Node Freq Response < 4dB > 5dB
Upstream SNR >35dB <25dB
CMTS CMTS Loading <50% >80%

68 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Wrap-Up
Troubleshooting is “Back to the Basics”

 Majority of problems are basic physical layer issues


 Most of the tests remain the same
 Check power
 Check forward levels, analog and digital
 Check forward / reverse ingress
 Do a visual check of connectors / passives
 Replace questionable connectors / passives
 Tighten F-connectors per your company’s installation
policy
– Be very careful not to over tighten connectors on CPE (TVs,
VCRs, converters etc.) and crack or damage input RFI
integrity

70 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Common problems typically identified in
outside plant

 Damaged or missing end-of-line terminators.


 Damaged or missing chassis terminators on
directional coupler, splitter or multiple-output amplifier
unused ports.
 Loose center conductor seizure screws.
 Unused tap ports not terminated. This is especially
critical on lower value taps.
 Unused drop passive ports not terminated.
 Use of so-called self-terminating taps (4 dB two port;
8 dB four port and 10/11 dB eight port) at feeder
ends-of-line. Such taps are splitters, and do not
terminate the line unless all F ports are properly
terminated.

71 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Common problems typically identified in
outside plant

 Kinked or damaged cable (including cracked cable,


which causes a reflection and ingress).
 Defective or damaged actives or passives (water-
damaged, water-filled, cold solder joint, corrosion, loose
circuit-board screws, etc.).
 Cable-ready TVs and VCRs connected directly to the
drop. (Return loss on most cable-ready devices is
poor.)
 Some traps and filters have been found to have poor
return loss in the upstream, especially those used for
data-only service.

72 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Quiz Time
Quiz Time

1. Define DOCSIS and QAM


2. What is the visual difference in an analog channel
vs. digital channel on a spectrum analyzer. How
many channels can you get in a digital 6MHz b/w?
3. When would someone use QAM256 modulation vs.
QAM64? Why not use all QAM256 modulation?
4. What’s the data rate expected for DOCSIS 3.0?
Distinguish between Downstream and Upstream.
What new technology enables this larger data rate?
Please explain.
5. How many IP addresses will IPv6 provide?

74 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Quiz Time con’t.

6. Why doesn’t Peak Level Power = Ave Digital Power?


7. Define MER and BER. Why do we use Constellation
Diagrams?
8. What are 2 good DOCSIS Tests?
9. What are 3 things to check when testing VoIP? What are
2 accepted “scorings” used in the industry?
10. What type testing should be done on the Reverse Path?
11. Why is Leakage testing important? Name 2 ways that it
can it be performed?

75 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Questions

 Thank you for your time…

 Any Questions???

76 © 2006 JDSU. All rights reserved. JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen